{"id":2423413,"date":"2025-04-14T16:08:01","date_gmt":"2025-04-14T20:08:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/people-living-unhealthy-lives-on-government-health-care-just-got-put-on-notice-by-rfk-jr\/"},"modified":"2025-04-14T16:11:18","modified_gmt":"2025-04-14T20:11:18","slug":"people-living-unhealthy-lives-on-government-health-care-just-got-put-on-notice-by-rfk-jr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/people-living-unhealthy-lives-on-government-health-care-just-got-put-on-notice-by-rfk-jr\/","title":{"rendered":"People Living Unhealthy Lives on Government Health Care Just Got Put on Notice by RFK Jr"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">32<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fpeople-living-unhealthy-lives-on-government-health-care-just-got-put-on-notice-by-rfk-jr%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2423413&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>U.S. Secretary of Health adn Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has ignited controversy with his comments regarding <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/lindsey-graham-latest-cbo-scoring-of-build-back-better-reveals-a-spending-orgy\/\" title=\"Lindsey Graham: Latest CBO Scoring of Build Back Better Reveals a &#039;Spending Orgy&#039;\">health insurance subsidies<\/a>, questioning whether society should <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/senators-introduce-bill-to-bar-states-from-using-federal-dollars-to-subsidize-health-care-for-illegal-immigrants\/\" title=\"Senators propose bill to prevent states from using federal funds for ...... of un...ed immigrants\">fund health care<\/a> for individuals who knowingly engage in unhealthy behaviors, such as overeating or smoking. As part of his Make America Healthy again (MAHA) initiative, Kennedy argues for greater personal responsibility within health care policy, suggesting that taxpayer dollars should not subsidize chronic health issues resulting from individual choices.<\/p>\n<p>His remarks resonate particularly with conservative audiences who advocate for fiscal responsibility and express frustration over financing teh medical expenses of those who disregard their health. Kennedy emphasizes that while Americans have the right to unhealthy lifestyles, it raises the question of whether the government should cover the financial consequences of these choices. <\/p>\n<p>While his views promote personal accountability as a means to <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\">alleviate public health system pressures<\/a>, they have stirred meaningful debates and criticism. Opponents argue against government involvement in personal lifestyle choices and warn of potential inequities, especially towards vulnerable populations. Some critics even deem Kennedy\u2019s stance hypocritical, as it appears to blame individuals for health conditions exacerbated by systemic issues.<\/p>\n<p>Still, proponents of Kennedy&#8217;s viewpoint believe that encouraging personal responsibility could lead to healthier decisions and eventually lower health care costs. his comments have drawn parallels to a past policy in West Virginia, which sought to limit Medicaid benefits based on health behaviors. In contrast, the notion of limiting health care based on personal choices raises concerns about fairness and access to care.<\/p>\n<p>The discourse surrounding Kennedy\u2019s opinions highlights a profound struggle between individual freedom and collective responsibility, making it a polarizing topic within American society. As Kennedy continues to advocate for health improvements, the debate remains unresolved, suggesting an ongoing clash between personal liberties and the implications of those choices on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/its-a-mess-team-biden-loses-track-of-20-million-covid-19-doses-report\/\" title=\"\u2018It\u2019s A Mess\u2019: Team Biden Loses Track Of 20 Million COVID-19 Doses: Report\">public health systems<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., leading the Make America Healthy Again movement, has sparked a heated debate with comments made Wednesday on health insurance subsidies. He questioned whether society should pay for the health care of Americans who knowingly engage in unhealthy behaviors like eating doughnuts or smoking, despite understanding the risks.<\/p>\n<p>Kennedy&rsquo;s remarks, part of his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/rfk-jr-confirms-new-food-pyramid-works-maha-standards-school-nutrition-programs\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MAHA initiative<\/a>, have put those living recklessly unhealthy lives on notice. He has argued that personal responsibility should play a larger role in health care policy when taxpayer dollars are involved.<\/p>\n<p>The core of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/rfk-jr-gives-faucis-wife-ax-nih\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Kennedy&rsquo;s<\/a> argument is undeniably compelling: Why should taxpayers subsidize health care for individuals who willingly make choices that lead to chronic illnesses? Smoking and excessive consumption of unhealthy foods like doughnuts contribute to conditions such as diabetes and heart disease.<\/p>\n<p>In his statements, RFK Jr. highlighted that these behaviors are often choices, not necessities. He noted that it&rsquo;s an American&rsquo;s right to &ldquo;eat donuts all day&rdquo; or smoke, but questioned whether the government should bear the financial burden of such decisions.<\/p>\n<p>This perspective resonates with swathes of conservatives who believe in fiscal responsibility. Taxpayers, many of whom strive to maintain healthy lifestyles, may feel frustrated covering the medical costs of others who disregard their health.<\/p>\n<p> <script type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\tif ( getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"stnvideo\").remove() \t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\tdocument.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\", function() { \t\t\t\t\tfunction loadScript(src) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst script=document.createElement(\"script\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.src=src; \t\t\t\t\t\tscript.async=true; \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.body.appendChild(script); \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\tfunction findPreviousParagraph(selector, x) { \t\t\t\t\t\tconst targetElement=document.querySelector(selector); \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!targetElement) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Target element not found.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Get all <\/p>\n<p> elements in order as they appear in the document \t\t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphs=Array.from(document.querySelectorAll(\"p\"));  \t\t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the index of the last <\/p>\n<p> before the target element \t\t\t\t\t\tlet targetIndex=paragraphs.findIndex(p=> p.compareDocumentPosition(targetElement) & Node.DOCUMENT_POSITION_PRECEDING);  \t\t\t\t\t\tif (targetIndex===-1 || targetIndex <x) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.warn(\"Not enough paragraphs before the target element.\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\treturn null; \t\t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\treturn paragraphs[targetIndex - x]; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Set up IntersectionObserver \t\t\t\t\tfunction observeElement(element) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif (!element) return;  \t\t\t\t\t\tconst observer=new IntersectionObserver( \t\t\t\t\t\t\t(entries)=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tentries.forEach(entry=> { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tif (entry.isIntersecting) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log(\"Paragraph is now visible:\", entry.target.textContent.trim()); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tloadScript(\"https:\/\/embed.sendtonews.com\/player3\/embedcode.js?fk=s28Az7AY\"); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.disconnect(); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t\t\t\t}, \t\t\t\t\t\t\t{ threshold: 0.5 } \/\/ Adjust threshold as needed \t\t\t\t\t\t);  \t\t\t\t\t\tobserver.observe(element); \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\t\/\/ Find the 1st paragraph before #stnvideo and observe it \t\t\t\t\tlet paragraphToObserve=findPreviousParagraph(\"#stnvideo\", 2); \t\t\t\t\tobserveElement(paragraphToObserve); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> <\/p>\n<p>Kennedy&rsquo;s comments align with his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/rfk-jr-tells-trump-will-know-caused-massive-autism-outbreak-september\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">MAHA mission<\/a> to tackle chronic disease by addressing root causes, like poor diet and environmental factors. He&rsquo;s pushing for a cultural shift toward wellness, which could reduce the strain on public health care systems.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters of RFK Jr.&rsquo;s stance argue that incentivizing personal responsibility could lead to a healthier population. If individuals know their unhealthy habits might impact their health care coverage, they might make better choices.<\/p>\n<p>The idea isn&rsquo;t entirely new. In 2007, West Virginia limited Medicaid benefits for patients who didn&rsquo;t follow healthy behaviors, a policy RFK Jr.&rsquo;s comments echo, though that program was later withdrawn under the Obama administration.<\/p>\n<p>However, Kennedy&rsquo;s remarks have ignited a firestorm of debate, drawing sharp criticism from opponents. Critics argue that the government has no business dictating personal choices, such as what people eat or whether they smoke.<\/p>\n<p>The left-leaning <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/health\/2025\/04\/10\/rfk-jr-personal-responsibility-health-care-donuts-smoking\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Washington Post<\/a>, for example, cited Robert Weissman of Public Citizen, who called RFK Jr.&rsquo;s views hypocritical, pointing out the contradiction in blaming big food for obesity while denying health care to those struggling with it.<\/p>\n<p>The Post &mdash; again, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/washington-post-goes-far-bid-discredit-pete-hegseth-insults-thousands-veterans-process\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">no fan<\/a> of the current administration &mdash; also noted that Kennedy&rsquo;s comments could be interpreted as a push to limit Medicaid benefits for those deemed unhealthy, raising concerns about fairness and access to care. As leftists are wont to do, they argue that such policies could disproportionately affect vulnerable populations.<\/p>\n<p>The Post further warned that limiting benefits based on behavior could exclude those who need care the most, citing the West Virginia experiment as an example of a failed policy.<\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, Michael Cannon from the Cato Institute has voiced support for RFK Jr.&rsquo;s push for personal responsibility. He said he believes it could encourage healthier habits, potentially reducing health care costs in the long run.<\/p>\n<p>Critics also worry about the slippery slope of government overreach. If eating doughnuts disqualifies someone from health care subsidies, where does the line get drawn? This is a valid concern in a free society.<\/p>\n<p>Of note, Kennedy has made it clear he won&rsquo;t ban doughnuts or soda, emphasizing personal freedom.<\/p>\n<p>The debate RFK Jr. has sparked is far from settled. Supporters see his stance as a necessary wake-up call for a nation grappling with chronic disease, while critics fear it undermines the principle of health care.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, RFK Jr.&rsquo;s MAHA movement has brought a polarizing issue to the forefront. While his call for accountability has merit, the government must tread carefully to avoid overreach.<\/p>\n<p>This firestorm shows no signs of dying down.<\/p>\n<p>As Kennedy continues to push his health agenda, Americans will need to grapple with the balance between personal freedom and collective responsibility.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey==typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts={ \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs=[ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i=0; i <inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]]=document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display='block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src=firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id']=firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting=jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display='block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who heads the Make America Healthy Again movement, has ignited a contentious discussion with his recent remarks on health insurance subsidies. He raised the issue of whether society should fund healthcare for Americans who consciously choose unhealthy habits, such as consuming doughnuts or smoking, despite being aware of the associated risks. Kennedy&#8217;s comments, part of his MAHA initiative, challenge those leading unhealthy lifestyles and advocate for greater personal responsibility in healthcare policy when taxpayer money is involved. His argument raises a significant question: why should taxpayers support healthcare for individuals who make choices that result in chronic illnesses? Smoking and excessive consumption of unhealthy foods contribute to diseases like diabetes and heart disease. In his statements, RFK Jr. emphasized that these behaviors are often choices rather than necessities, asserting that while Americans have the right to indulge in such habits, it is questionable whether the government should shoulder the financial burden resulting from them. This viewpoint resonates with many conservatives who prioritize fiscal responsibility; taxpayers striving for healthy lifestyles may feel frustrated covering medical expenses for those neglecting their health.<\/p>\n<p>Kennedy\u2019s comments align with his MAHA mission to address chronic diseases by tackling root causes like poor diet and environmental factors while advocating for a cultural shift towards wellness to alleviate pressure on public healthcare systems. Supporters argue that promoting personal accountability could lead to healthier populations since individuals might make better choices if they know their habits could affect their healthcare coverage.<\/p>\n<p>This concept isn&#8217;t entirely new; in 2007 West Virginia limited Medicaid benefits for patients not adhering to healthy behaviors\u2014a policy reminiscent of Kennedy&#8217;s remarks but later rescinded under Obama\u2019s administration. However, Kennedy&#8217;s statements have sparked intense debate and drawn criticism from opponents who argue against government interference in personal choices regarding diet or smoking.<\/p>\n<p>The left-leaning Washington Post highlighted Robert Weissman from Public Citizen criticizing RFK Jr.&#8217;s views as hypocritical\u2014pointing out contradictions between blaming large food corporations for obesity while denying care to those affected by it\u2014and raised concerns about fairness regarding access to care if Medicaid benefits were restricted based on health behavior.<\/p>\n<p>Conversely, Michael Cannon from the Cato Institute supports RFK Jr.&#8217;s emphasis on personal responsibility as potentially encouraging healthier habits and reducing long-term healthcare costs but acknowledges fears about potential government overreach\u2014questioning where lines would be drawn if certain behaviors disqualified individuals from receiving subsidies.<\/p>\n<p>Notably, Kennedy has stated he does not intend to ban doughnuts or soda but emphasizes individual freedom instead. The debate he has initiated remains unresolved; supporters view it as an essential wake-up call amid rising chronic diseases while critics worry it undermines fundamental principles of healthcare access.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, RFK Jr.\u2019s MAHA movement highlights a divisive issue requiring careful navigation by policymakers between individual freedoms and collective responsibilities\u2014a conversation likely far from conclusion as he continues advocating his health agenda<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2423414,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/RFK-Jr.-on-Unhealthy-Govt-Assistance.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[33651],"tags":[53440,51257,32068,50401,53441],"class_list":["post-2423413","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-western-journal","tag-government-health-care","tag-health-awareness","tag-public-health","tag-rfk-jr-2","tag-unhealthy-lives"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/04\/RFK-Jr.-on-Unhealthy-Govt-Assistance.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2423413","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2423413"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2423413\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2423417,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2423413\/revisions\/2423417"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2423414"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2423413"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2423413"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2423413"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}