{"id":2405102,"date":"2025-02-21T10:45:01","date_gmt":"2025-02-21T15:45:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/ag-pushes-in-supreme-court-to-stop-strangling-pro-life-speech\/"},"modified":"2025-02-21T10:47:20","modified_gmt":"2025-02-21T15:47:20","slug":"ag-pushes-in-supreme-court-to-stop-strangling-pro-life-speech","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/ag-pushes-in-supreme-court-to-stop-strangling-pro-life-speech\/","title":{"rendered":"AG Pushes IN Supreme Court To Stop Strangling Pro-Life Speech"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fag-pushes-in-supreme-court-to-stop-strangling-pro-life-speech%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2405102&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>Indiana Attorney\u2062 General Todd Rokita has petitioned the state Supreme Court to \u2064halt disciplinary actions against his law license\u200c stemming from his <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/tim-tebow-strengthens-bond-with-israel-with-charity-event\/\" title=\"Tim Tebow Strengthens Bond With Israel With Charity Event\">pro-life advocacy<\/a>. This follows a lengthy\u200c legal and media saga that began \u200din \u200d2022, \u200dwhen abortionist\u2063 Caitlin Bernard revealed she performed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim. Rokita&#8217;s investigation into Bernard led to lawsuits and ethical challenges from pro-abortion advocates. \u2063He claims the Indiana Attorney Discipline Commission is retaliating\u2064 against him for exercising his \u2063<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/states-push-to-rein-in-big-tech-as-federal-gears-grind-slow\/\" title=\"...s Push to Rein in Big Tech as Federal Gears Grind Slow\">free speech rights<\/a> concerning public\u200d issues, thereby\u2063 infringing on constitutional protections.<\/p>\n<p>Despite previously \u200csettling an ethics complaint regarding comments he \u2064made about Bernard,the\u2064 Commission\u200d has launched further scrutiny into his \u2063actions,alleging he did not\u200b express sufficient remorse. Rokita argues that this investigation is politically motivated and\u200b intends to stifle his speech\u200c as an elected official.\u200d His motion for Supreme Court intervention emphasizes \u200cthat the commission&#8217;s actions are \u200cunconstitutional and that he plans to seek finding to \u2063investigate the motivations behind the ethics \u200dcomplaints.<\/p>\n<p>rokita&#8217;s case is not an isolated incident; it reflects\u200b a \u200dbroader trend \u200bof\u2064 Republican attorneys general facing politically motivated challenges to their licenses, particularly around contentious issues like abortion.His ongoing\u200b legal battles\u2062 come amid a politically charged surroundings, further intricate by the affiliations\u200c of the Commission members wiht Democratic\u200d causes.\u2064 rokita maintains that such investigations represent a misuse of ethics complaints \u2064for political\u2063 ends, undermining both his rights and \u200dthe larger legal\u2062 system.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Republican Indiana Attorney General Todd Rokita petitioned the state Supreme Court Thursday to stop threats to his law license over his pro-life legal efforts. It&rsquo;s the latest development in years of abortion litigation and advocacy involving Congress, the White House, and ongoing media coverage that began in 2022, when Indiana abortionist Caitlin Bernard disclosed she&rsquo;d committed an abortion on a 10-year-old rape victim from Ohio.<\/p>\n<p>Ever since he announced an investigation into Bernard after her story swiftly gained <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/us-news\/2023\/may\/26\/indiana-abortion-ruling-caitlin-bernard-medical-license\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">international attention<\/a>, Rokita has fought abortion industry lawsuits and ethics challenges from pro-abortion lawyers. Rokita&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.scribd.com\/document\/830989879\/Motion-to-Dismiss-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Thursday motion<\/a> argues Indiana&rsquo;s attorney Discipline Commission is retaliating against Rokita for speaking to voters about public issues, infringing on his state and national constitutional free speech rights, interfering in elections, violating the constitutional separation of powers, and violating state law banning Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (anti-SLAPP).<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;The Commission&rsquo;s latest attempt to discipline Respondent based on the exercise of his freedom of expression is blatantly unconstitutional. The First Amendment does not permit the Commission, as an agent of the state government, to punish Respondent, an elected public official, for his protected speech,&rdquo; the complaint says.<\/p>\n<p>In January, Discipline Commission staff chose to pursue a fresh ethics complaint against Rokita based on a 2024 press release he issued about another ethics complaint the two parties had just settled. It alleges he didn&rsquo;t express enough remorse after settling the first complaint against factually accurate public prolife comments. The lawyers both <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/16\/democrat-friendly-licensing-boards-target-republican-attorneys-general-in-election-year\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">filing charges<\/a> against Rokita and <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/05\/effective-republican-attorneys-general-get-slapped-with-politicized-ethics-charges\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">evaluating those charges<\/a> for the Indiana Supreme Court&rsquo;s disciplinary commission have a long history of supporting far-left causes such as race and sex discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>Indiana&rsquo;s Supreme Court controls state lawyer licensing and ethics, and its Disciplinary Commission can choose not to pursue ethics complaints, as they are often filed to retaliate against a lawyer rather than expose wrongdoing. The commission&rsquo;s investigation of this complaint included an eight-hour deposition with Rokita, &ldquo;hours&rdquo; of depositions of his communications and campaign staff, paging through internal emails about the disputed press release, and reviewing records from Rokita and staff&rsquo;s work and personal phones, including private communications with their friends and family, the complaint says.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s designed to put a chill on the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/mi-lawmakers-just-made-it-easier-to-commit-election-fraud\/\" title=\"MI ...makers Simplify Process for Election Fraud\">attorney general&#038;rsquo<\/a>;s speech,&rdquo; said Jim Ammeen, Rokita&rsquo;s lawyer, in a phone call with The Federalist Thursday. &ldquo;&hellip; We&rsquo;re not talking about dishonest conduct.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h2>Ethics Complaints Weaponized For Politics<\/h2>\n<p>Rokita&rsquo;s motion says if the Supreme Court does not stop the commission&rsquo;s &ldquo;unconstitutional harassment&rdquo; before the complaint proceeds further, he is legally entitled to seek discovery from the commission: &ldquo;Respondent plans to seek relevant discovery from the Commission. Respondent is entitled to discover, among other things, whether the Disciplinary Complaint was &lsquo;filed for an ulterior political end[.]&#8217;&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>A footnote in the complaint says, &ldquo;The Commission, its members, and staff are hereby put on notice of their duty to preserve all documents and communications in their possession, custody, or control (including on any personal email accounts) referring or relating to the press release, the Rules Proposal, or the pending disciplinary action against Respondent.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Rokita is one of <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/05\/democrats-work-to-strip-all-opponents-of-representation-in-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">more than a dozen<\/a> Republican state attorneys general and hundreds of Republican lawyers to face license challenges since 2020. Democrats created several organizations for the express purpose of harassing Republican lawyers with ethics charges motivated by politics rather than misconduct, <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/05\/democrats-work-to-strip-all-opponents-of-representation-in-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">including<\/a> The 65 Project and Lawyers Defending Democracy. Ammeen and other Indiana lawyers faced ethics complaints for giving Rokita legal counsel, he said.<\/p>\n<p>The right to an attorney, not to mention the constitutional right to freedom of speech, is fundamental to American rule of law and basic judicial fairness. Resolving an ethics complaint can cost attorneys at least $10,000 to $30,000 for simpler cases and many times that for more drawn-out cases such as Rokita&rsquo;s, lawyers skilled in disciplinary cases <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/05\/democrats-work-to-strip-all-opponents-of-representation-in-court\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">have told The Federalist<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Is an ACLU Plaintiff Suing Prolifers an &lsquo;Activist&rsquo;?<\/h2>\n<p>The previous charges against Rokita arose after he said on TV that Bernard was &ldquo;an abortion activist with a history of failing to report.&rdquo; According <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/2022\/10\/the-fight-for-abortion-rights\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">to Vanity Fair<\/a>, Bernard has a tattoo of a coat hanger &mdash; a symbol of abortions that kill two humans instead of one &mdash; and was a plaintiff in an unsuccessful 2019 American Civil Liberties Union lawsuit that attempted to force Indiana to allow abortions of babies old enough to survive outside the womb.<\/p>\n<p>The commission alleged Rokita&rsquo;s statement could influence legal proceedings against Bernard. Rokita settled that complaint, accepting a Supreme Court rebuke and paying $250 in court fees in exchange for ending the dispute. The commission then decided to pursue a second investigation extending the first instead of upholding its end of the dispute resolution and foregoing further litigation. <\/p>\n<p>Bernard has starred in a massive pro-abortion media campaign defending her decision to commit an abortion on a 10-year-old girl from Ohio who <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/11\/03\/reprimand-of-indiana-ag-shows-state-bars-have-it-in-for-conservatives\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">was raped by<\/a> her mother&rsquo;s boyfriend. Her disclosure of that case to an Indianapolis Star reporter gained international attention, including notice from then-President Joe Biden and profiles in publications including Vanity Fair, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/news\/persons-of-interest\/one-of-the-last-abortion-doctors-in-indiana\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The New Yorker<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2022\/07\/28\/us\/politics\/abortion-doctor-caitlin-bernard-ohio.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">The New York Times<\/a>. She was <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/news\/nation\/2024\/03\/07\/dr-caitlin-bernard-state-of-the-union-guest\/72857165007\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">also the guest<\/a> of a California Democrat congresswoman for Biden&rsquo;s last State of the Union address.<\/p>\n<p>Disclosing the child&rsquo;s tragic personal details also earned Bernard a reprimand from the Indiana medical licensing board and a $3,000 fine for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/feds-investigate-eric-holders-doctor-wife-for-violating-patient-privacy\/\" title=\"Feds Investigate Eric Holder\u2019s Doctor Wife for ... Patient Privacy\">violating patient privacy<\/a>. She still has her medical license. <\/p>\n<p>In 2022, Bernard <a href=\"https:\/\/lawandcrime.com\/abortion\/doctor-who-provided-10-year-old-ohio-rape-victim-an-abortion-after-supreme-courts-dobbs-decision-sues-indiana-ag\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sued<\/a> Rokita for investigating her treatment of the Ohio child and recently <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theindianalawyer.com\/articles\/bernard-sues-indiana-state-health-commissioner-over-release-of-terminated-pregnancy-reports\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sued to stop<\/a> a policy Rokita&rsquo;s office has backed, of following state law in releasing abortion records. Indiana Gov. Mike Braun, at Rokita&rsquo;s urging, in January ordered the state health department to once again comply with state law and release those records. Rokita&rsquo;s office will defend that state policy in court.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier records of the kind Bernard is suing to conceal suggest Bernard may have failed to comply with state law when committing abortions. Two <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/drive\/folders\/1cYJLfLs7jDh54I3U77EVYR7P9LNI4R8I\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">2022 state records<\/a> compiled by pro-life organization Voices for Life <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/drive\/folders\/1BGMm9a1mSsfmVg9o8twpPzIVhIeIbwzC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">suggest<\/a> Bernard may not have obtained proper patient consent for abortions. Another 2022 <a href=\"https:\/\/drive.google.com\/drive\/folders\/1BGMm9a1mSsfmVg9o8twpPzIVhIeIbwzC\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">record<\/a> from Bernard may have been filed later than the legal reporting requirement. Bernard&rsquo;s lawsuit to prevent the continued disclosure of such records <a href=\"https:\/\/www.lifenews.com\/2025\/02\/12\/indiana-abortionists-want-to-hide-records-about-the-babies-they-kill\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">names<\/a> Voices for Life as a defendant.<\/p>\n<h2>Highly Politicized Disciplinary Personnel<\/h2>\n<p>In the 2024 elections, Rokita was the largest vote-getter of all statewide candidates, winning re-election by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-indiana-attorney-general.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">nearly 18 points<\/a> despite the charges against his law license. Rokita earned more votes than every other candidate on Indiana ballots, except for Donald Trump. Hoosier voters clearly weighed in strongly against procedural efforts to impede Rokita&rsquo;s work as attorney general.<\/p>\n<p>Some Indiana Republicans who oppose their party working on behalf of prolife voters used the license challenge to <a href=\"https:\/\/indianacitizen.org\/gop-challenger-madison-county-prosecutor-rodney-cummings-explores-run-for-ag-amid-todd-rokitas-troubles\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">threaten a primary<\/a> against Rokita in 2024. Abortion and the commission&rsquo;s disciplinary action were central campaign planks for Rokita&rsquo;s Democrat challenger, Destiny Wells.<\/p>\n<p>At the time it began pursuing charges against Rokita, <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/26\/indiana-republicans-move-to-let-democrats-kick-any-republican-ag-off-the-ballot\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">public records showed<\/a> every Disciplinary Commission member with a record of political donations had donated to Democrat Party candidates. At the time, the board was also chaired by a Democrat prosecutor who publicly supported Wells in 2024 and has made numerous donations to other pro-abortion candidates.<\/p>\n<p>Some new commission members have come aboard, but public records <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/16\/democrat-friendly-licensing-boards-target-republican-attorneys-general-in-election-year\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">still show<\/a> the majority has a history of political donations to Democrats. Several commission members also have <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/26\/indiana-republicans-move-to-let-democrats-kick-any-republican-ag-off-the-ballot\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">financial connections<\/a> to Bernard&rsquo;s employer, Indiana University Health.<\/p>\n<p>The commission is also now chaired by Peter Rusthoven. As The Federalist <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/16\/democrat-friendly-licensing-boards-target-republican-attorneys-general-in-election-year\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reported <\/a>in October, &ldquo;Rusthoven is a former Ronald Reagan speechwriter and Never Trumper who&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.opensecrets.org\/donor-lookup\/results?name=peter+rusthoven\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">financially supported<\/a>&nbsp;Joe Biden and Liz Cheney and&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.wishtv.com\/news\/election\/trump-manifestly-unfit-for-office-reagan-alum-explains-harris-endorsement\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">endorsed<\/a> Kamala Harris for president in 2024. In&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.realclearpolitics.com\/articles\/2024\/02\/06\/the_case_for_disqualifying_trump_150442.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Politico in February<\/a>, Rusthoven endorsed removing Trump from the ballot, a legal effort a&nbsp;<em>unanimous&nbsp;<\/em>Supreme Court voted against in March. Trump&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nwitimes.com\/news\/state-regional\/crime-courts\/trump-rokita-endorsement-attorney-general\/article_92ccfbb2-227f-11ef-b59a-979eeb9e1869.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">endorsed<\/a>&nbsp;Rokita in June.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>In 2021 and 2023 <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/02\/05\/effective-republican-attorneys-general-get-slapped-with-politicized-ethics-charges\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">articles<\/a>, the Disciplinary Commission&rsquo;s executive director, Adrienne Meiring, endorsed the <a href=\"https:\/\/replicationindex.com\/category\/implicit-association-test\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">empirically disreputable<\/a> concept of &ldquo;implicit bias,&rdquo; supported diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives, and suggested judges could attend Marxist-led racial grievance protests without calling their legal impartiality into question.<\/p>\n<p>Three of the Indiana Supreme Court justices hearing Rokita&rsquo;s complaint were subject to an unsuccessful effort to prevent their retention in office in 2024 because they upheld a <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\">strong pro-life law passed<\/a> by Indiana&rsquo;s legislature. Two Supreme Court justices dissented from Rokita&rsquo;s first complaint agreement, saying they thought his prolife speech deserved a greater punishment. The state Supreme Court justices up for retention votes in 2024 <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Indiana_Supreme_Court_elections,_2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">earned higher vote margins<\/a> but approximately one-third of Rokita&rsquo;s vote totals.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;There are real, live, legal, and constitutional issues here that only the Supreme Court can decide,&rdquo; Ammeen said.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>      Joy Pullmann is executive editor of The Federalist. Her latest book with Regnery is &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/bookshop.org\/p\/books\/false-colors-the-flag-of-our-occupation-joy-pullmann\/20707173?ean=9781684515875\">False Flag: Why Queer Politics Mean the End of America<\/a>.&#8221;  A happy wife and the mother of six children, her ebooks include &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/payhip.com\/b\/R1JL\">Classic Books For Young Children<\/a>,&#8221; and &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/payhip.com\/b\/a2Jzp\">101 Strategies For Living Well Amid Inflation<\/a>.&#8221;      An 18-year education and politics reporter, Joy has testified before nearly two dozen legislatures on education policy and appeared on major media including Tucker Carlson, CNN, Fox News, OANN, NewsMax, Ben Shapiro, and Dennis Prager. Joy is a grateful graduate of the Hillsdale College honors and journalism programs who identifies as native American and gender natural.  Joy is also the cofounder of a high-performing Christian classical school and the author and coauthor of classical curricula.    Her traditionally published books also include &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Education-Invasion-Parents-Control-American\/dp\/1594038813\/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;qid=1486730068&amp;sr=8-1&amp;keywords=education+invasion\">The Education Invasion: How Common Core Fights Parents for Control of American Kids<\/a>,&#8221; from Encounter Books.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Rokita seeks Supreme Court help against law license threats<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":519,"featured_media":2405103,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/8427839598_88e518df1e_k.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[50810,32311,8347,32275],"class_list":["post-2405102","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-ag-2","tag-free-speech","tag-pro-life","tag-supreme-court"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/8427839598_88e518df1e_k.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2405102","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/519"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2405102"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2405102\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2405106,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2405102\/revisions\/2405106"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2405103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2405102"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2405102"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2405102"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}