{"id":2379532,"date":"2024-12-12T20:01:02","date_gmt":"2024-12-13T01:01:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/congress-passes-bill-that-will-give-trump-additional-judicial-appointments-biden-threatens-veto\/"},"modified":"2024-12-12T20:02:25","modified_gmt":"2024-12-13T01:02:25","slug":"congress-passes-bill-that-will-give-trump-additional-judicial-appointments-biden-threatens-veto","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/congress-passes-bill-that-will-give-trump-additional-judicial-appointments-biden-threatens-veto\/","title":{"rendered":"Congress Passes Bill That Will Give Trump Additional Judicial Appointments &#8211; Biden Threatens Veto"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">28<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fcongress-passes-bill-that-will-give-trump-additional-judicial-appointments-biden-threatens-veto%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2379532&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>President Joe \u2064Biden has threatened to veto a bipartisan bill that would increase the number \u200cof federal judges by 66 over the next decade.the bill was approved by the House with a vote\u200c of 236 to 173 and had previously passed the Senate via unanimous consent in August. The White House\u200d expressed concern that the bill could create new\u200b judgeships in states where current vacancies have not been filled, suggesting that the motivations behind the legislation are politically rather than judicially\u200c driven. <\/p>\n<p>supporters of the bill, including the Federal Judges Association and the Federal Bar Association, argue that\u200d the federal judiciary has seen a 30% increase in\u2063 caseloads over the\u2062 past three decades, leading to importent delays in\u2062 case resolution.\u200b They \u200demphasize the necessity of additional judges to improve access to justice. <\/p>\n<p>The legislation\u2064 is set to enhance the \u2062judiciary&#8217;s capacity in various states, including California, \u200cFlorida, \u2063and texas, but raises political questions, especially regarding motivations behind its passage after the recent elections.\u200b Lawmakers,including Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin and Rep. Jerry Nadler, voiced skepticism about the timing of the bill&#8217;s advancement and its implications for \u2064presidential power, given former President Trump\u2019s\u200d previous judicial appointments. <\/p>\n<p>Despite <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/majority-passing-partisan-covid-19-bill-says-senate-minority-leader-mcconnell\/\" title=\"\u2018Majority passing \u2018partisan\u2019 COVID-19 bill,\u2019 says Senate Minority Leader McConnell\">broad bipartisan support<\/a>, House Speaker Mike Johnson criticized the Biden administration\u2019s change in stance, attributing it to partisan politics rather than a genuine concern for judicial efficiency or \u200bcase backlogs.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<section> \t\t\t\t<script>console.log(\"ad slot (AC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC1)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC2)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC3)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (IC4)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_0)\")<\/script><script>console.log(\"ad slot (REP_1)\")<\/script><\/p>\n<p>President Joe Biden threatened to veto a bill that would increase the number of federal judges nationwide by 66 over the next decade.<\/p>\n<p>The bill passed both chambers of Congress with bipartisan support.<\/p>\n<p>The White House revealed the president&rsquo;s position earlier this week before the House voted on the Judges Act Thursday. It easily passed, <a href=\"https:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/Votes\/2024501\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">236 to 173<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Twenty-nine Democrats joined with Republicans in supporting the legislation.<\/p>\n<p>The Senate passed the bill by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.congress.gov\/bill\/118th-congress\/senate-bill\/4199\/all-actions\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">unanimous consent<\/a> in August, meaning no <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/republicans-stonewall-paycheck-fairness-act-over-employer-burdens-redundancy\/\" title=\"Republicans Stonewall \u2018Paycheck Fairness Act\u2019 Over Employer Burdens, Redundancy\">roll call vote<\/a> was taken.<\/p>\n<p> <script type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\tif ( getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"stnvideo\").remove() \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> <\/p>\n<p>If enacted, the legislation would provide for the largest expansion of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/trump-shape-judiciary-second-term\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">federal judiciary<\/a> since 1990, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/government\/biden-vows-veto-bill-expanding-us-judiciary-after-trumps-win-2024-12-10\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Reuters<\/a> reported.<\/p>\n<p>However, the White House said in a <a href=\"https:\/\/fingfx.thomsonreuters.com\/gfx\/legaldocs\/gdvzkjrdapw\/judgesact.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">statement<\/a>, &ldquo;The bill would create new judgeships in states where Senators have sought to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-plans-veto-of-bill-adding-new-judges-after-trump-victory-washington-examiner\/\" title=\"Biden plans veto of bill adding new judges after Trump victory - Washington Examiner\">hold open existing judicial vacancies<\/a>. Those efforts to hold open vacancies suggest that concerns about judicial economy and caseload are not the true motivating force behind passage of this bill now.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Further, the Senate passed this bill in August, but the House refused to take it up until after the election,&rdquo; the statement read.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">US House voted 236-173 to clear bill that would <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\">authorize additional federal district judges<\/a> to address growing caseloads. R 207-2, D 29-171<\/p>\n<p>Senate passed bill in August by unanimous consent. Biden White House threatened veto. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/8NzEewFIQJ\">pic.twitter.com\/8NzEewFIQJ<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Greg Giroux (@greggiroux) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/greggiroux\/status\/1867231396193862058?\">December 12, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>The Federal Judges Association and the Federal Bar Association came out in favor of the bill, urging its passage.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Our federal courts observed over 30 percent growth in their caseloads since the last comprehensive judgeship legislation three decades ago and the lack of new judgeships has contributed to profound delays in the resolution of cases and serious access to justice concerns,&rdquo; the groups said in a Wednesday news release.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Inbox: The Federal Judges Association, headed by Biden-appointed U.S. Circuit Judge Michelle Childs, is urging Biden to sign a bill pending in the House to expand the judiciary and add 66 new judges. The statement came day after the White House said Biden planned to veto it. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/WAmTgP8iNl\">pic.twitter.com\/WAmTgP8iNl<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Nate Raymond (@nateraymond) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/nateraymond\/status\/1866898642264641748?\">December 11, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>Reuters reported, &ldquo;If enacted, the JUDGES Act would increase the number of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/bidens-judicial-nominees-highlight-conflict-between-progressives-civil-rights-groups\/\" title=\"Biden\u2019s Judicial Nominees Highlight Conflict Between Progressives, Civil Rights Groups\">trial court judges<\/a> in 25 federal courthouses in 13 states including California, Florida and Texas over the next decade through 2035, with new judges being added every two years.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Senate Majority Whip <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/democratic-senator-blocks-bill-require-detainment-illegal-immigrants-charged-violent-crimes\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Dick Durbin<\/a> of Illinois, who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee, and Rep. Jerry Nadler of New York, ranking member on the House Judiciary Committee, both questioned why Republicans waited until after the election to pass the Judges Act.<\/p>\n<p>Durbin&rsquo;s spokesperson said in a statement that the legislation was designed to be taken up before Nov. 5, when neither side knew who would win the presidency, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/national-security\/2024\/12\/12\/judges-act-biden-trump-judicial-nominees-veto\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Washington Post<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;Instead, House Republicans stonewalled bipartisan efforts to move the legislation, and it changed the political environment completely,&rdquo; Durbin&rsquo;s office said.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Nadler <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/legal\/government\/biden-vows-veto-bill-expanding-us-judiciary-after-trumps-win-2024-12-10\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">argued<\/a> during a House Judiciary Committee hearing on Monday, &ldquo;Donald Trump has made it clear that he intends to expand the power of the presidency, and giving him 25 new judges to appoint gives him one more tool at his disposal to do that.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">In a bipartisan vote, the House just passed my JUDGES Act to address the shortage of federal judges and the severe delays Americans are experiencing.<\/p>\n<p>I urge President Biden to do the right thing for our judicial system and sign it into law.<\/p>\n<p>The legislation is widely supported&hellip;<\/p>\n<p>&mdash; Senator Todd Young (@SenToddYoung) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SenToddYoung\/status\/1867241150366564394?\">December 12, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><\/p>\n<p>On Thursday, House Speaker Mike Johnson <a href=\"https:\/\/mikejohnson.house.gov\/news\/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=1496\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">said<\/a> following the passage of the Judges Act, &ldquo;This important legislation garnered broad, bipartisan support when it unanimously passed the Senate in August because it directly addresses the pressing need to reduce case backlogs in our federal courts and strengthen the efficiency of our judicial system.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;At that time, Democrats supported the bill &ndash; they thought Kamala Harris would win the Presidency,&rdquo; he continued. &ldquo;Now, however, the Biden-Harris Administration has chosen to issue a veto threat and Democrats have whipped against this bill, standing in the way of progress, simply because of partisan politics.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/mike-johnson-puts-foot-first-trans-rep-sarah-mcbride-reacts-forbidden-using-womens-bathroom\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Johnson<\/a> concluded, &ldquo;This should not be a political issue&mdash;it should be about prioritizing the needs of the American people and ensuring the courts are able to deliver fair, impartial, and timely justice.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The Post noted that the Senate &ldquo;advanced Biden&rsquo;s last two [judicial] nominees out of the Judiciary Committee on Thursday, teeing up floor votes that &hellip; could result in the confirmation of Biden&rsquo;s 234th and 235th judicial nominees.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Trump appointed a near-record <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/biden-stacking-deck-left-wing-federal-judges-set-impact-u-s-decades-milestone-move\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">234 judges<\/a> during his first term, so Biden no doubt would take pleasure in topping that number.<\/p>\n<div style=\"position: relative;\">\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-submit-correction inner-content\">\n<div class=\"correction-form\">\n<form style=\"display: none;\">\n<div class=\"sc-name-field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* Name<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"name\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"sc--field\"> \t\t\t\t\t\t<label>* <\/label> \t\t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"text\" name=\"\" required> \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<label>* Message<\/label> \t\t\t\t\t<br \/> \t\t\t\t\t<textarea name=\"message\" required><\/textarea> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"required-message\" style=\"display: none; padding-bottom: 15px;\">* All fields are required.<\/div>\n<p> \t\t\t\t\t<input type=\"submit\" value=\"Submit\" onclick=\"event.preventDefault(); firefly_sc();\"> \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"firefly-sc-confirm\" style=\"display: none;\">Success!<\/div>\n<\/p><\/form>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> \t\t<script> \t\t\tfunction firefly_sc() { \t\t\t\tif( typeof window.captchaPublicKey==typeof undefined ){ \t\t\t\t\tconsole.error('window.captchaPublicKey is not defined'); \t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\tgrecaptcha.execute( window.captchaPublicKey, { action: 'submit_correction' } ).then( function( token ) { \t\t\t\t\tvar opts={ \t\t\t\t\t\taction:    'firefly_sc_submit', \t\t\t\t\t\tname:      document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"name\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\t:     document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tmessage:   document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"message\"]' ).value, \t\t\t\t\t\tpost_id:   firefly_post_id, \t\t\t\t\t\tcap_token: token \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tvar inputs=[ 'name', '', 'message' ];  \t\t\t\t\tfor( var i=0; i <inputs.length; i++ ) if( ! ( opts[inputs[i]]=document.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction [name=\"' + inputs[i] + '\"]' ).value ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .required-message' ).style.display='block'; \t\t\t\t\t\treturn; \t\t\t\t\t}  \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction input[type=\"submit\"]' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).src=firefly_loading_gif_url; \t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='inline-block';  \t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( 'ma subbing' );  \t\t\t\t\tif( firefly_post_id ) opts['post_id']=firefly_post_id;  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Send the data using post with element id name and name2*\/ \t\t\t\t\tvar posting=jQuery.post( firefly_ajax_url, opts );  \t\t\t\t\t\/* Alerts the results *\/ \t\t\t\t\tposting.done( function( response ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tif( response.success ) { \t\t\t\t\t\t\tconsole.log( response.data ); \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-submitting-img' ).style.display='none'; \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.querySelector( '.entry-submit-correction .firefly-sc-confirm' ).style.display='block';  \t\t\t\t\t\t\tdataLayer.push( { 'event': 'submit-correction' } ); \t\t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t\t}); \t\t\t} \t\t<\/script> \t     \t\t\t\t\t\t     \t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p style=\"border: 1px solid #f5f5f5; padding: 16px;\">Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/advertise-us\/?wj_source=article\">Advertise Today<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><script>console.log(\"ad slot (BA1)\")<\/script> \t\t<\/p>\n<div class=\"ff-fancy-header-container\"> \t\t\t \t<\/div>\n<style> \t\t\t \t\t\t.insticator-unit.type-commenting{margin: 0 10px 25px 10px}@media screen and (max-width:1060px){#div-insticator-ad-cmt-1, #div-insticator-ad-cmt-2, #div-insticator-ad-cmt-3, #div-insticator-ad-cmt-4{margin: 0 auto 25px auto !important;}}#div-insticator-ad-cmt-1, #div-insticator-ad-cmt-2, #div-insticator-ad-cmt-3, #div-insticator-ad-cmt-4{height: 280px !important; width: 336px !important} \t\t<\/style>\n<div class=\"insticator-unit type-commenting\">\n<div class=\"insticator-ads\"> \t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t<script data-cfasync=\"false\" type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\t\t\tif ( ! getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tInsticator.ad.loadAd(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-1\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tInsticator.ad.loadAd(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-2\"); \t\t\t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-1\").remove() \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-2\").remove() \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t<\/script> \t\t\t<\/div>\n<div class=\"insticator-ads additional\"> \t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t<script data-cfasync=\"false\" type=\"text\/javascript\"> \t\t\t\t\tif ( ! getCookie( \"ff_subbed\" ) ) { \t\t\t\t\t\tInsticator.ad.loadAd(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-3\"); \t\t\t\t\t\tInsticator.ad.loadAd(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-4\"); \t\t\t\t\t} else { \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-3\").remove() \t\t\t\t\t\tdocument.getElementById(\"div-insticator-ad-cmt-4\").remove() \t\t\t\t\t} \t\t\t\t<\/script> \t\t\t<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>President Joe Biden has indicated he may veto a bill aimed at adding 66 federal judges over the next ten years, despite it receiving bipartisan approval in Congress. The White House disclosed his stance prior to the House&#8217;s vote on the Judges Act, which passed comfortably with a tally of 236 to 173. Twenty-nine Democrats supported the measure alongside Republicans. The Senate had previously approved the bill unanimously in August without a roll call vote. If enacted, this legislation would mark the most significant expansion of the federal judiciary since 1990, according to Reuters. However, the White House expressed concerns that new judgeships would be created in states where existing vacancies are being intentionally left open by Senators, suggesting that genuine issues regarding judicial workload are not driving this bill&#8217;s passage at this time<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2379533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Biden-vs-Trump-Judge-Act-Veto-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[3620,4402,46692,3634],"class_list":["post-2379532","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-biden","tag-congress","tag-judicial-appointments","tag-trump"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.westernjournal.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/12\/Biden-vs-Trump-Judge-Act-Veto-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2379532","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2379532"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2379532\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2379536,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2379532\/revisions\/2379536"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2379533"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2379532"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2379532"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2379532"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}