{"id":2367546,"date":"2024-11-12T05:16:02","date_gmt":"2024-11-12T10:16:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-2024s-abortion-ballot-referendums\/"},"modified":"2024-11-12T05:18:25","modified_gmt":"2024-11-12T10:18:25","slug":"the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-2024s-abortion-ballot-referendums","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-good-bad-and-ugly-of-2024s-abortion-ballot-referendums\/","title":{"rendered":"The Good, Bad, And Ugly Of 2024&#8217;s Abortion Ballot Referendums"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fthe-good-bad-and-ugly-of-2024s-abortion-ballot-referendums%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2367546&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>In a recent election, \u2063various states across the U.S. voted on \u2064abortion-related constitutional amendments, with \u2064mixed results for the pro-life movement. Activists had pushed for pro-abortion initiatives in ten states, funded in part by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/key-democratic-vendors-still-doing-business-with-lincoln-project-after-sex-scandal\/\" title=\"Key Democratic Vendors Still Doing Business with Lincoln Project After Sex Scandal\">wealthy left-wing<\/a> groups, presenting these\u200c measures as protecting reproductive rights. <\/p>\n<p>**Victories for\u200b Pro-Life Advocates:**<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **South Dakota**: Voters rejected Amendment G, which would have allowed unrestricted abortion \u2064based \u2063on the vague criteria \u2063of a physician&#8217;s assessment of a woman&#8217;s health, with 58.6% opposed.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **Nebraska**: Initiative 434, limiting abortions after the first trimester, was\u2062 approved by 55% of\u200d voters, while Initiative 439, seeking to establish a\u200b constitutional right to abortion, was rejected by a slim\u200c majority.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **Florida**: Nearly 43% opposed Amendment \u20634, which lacked clear limits on abortion.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **West Virginia**: A constitutional\u2063 amendment prohibiting assisted \u200bsuicide passed by a narrow margin.<\/p>\n<p>**Losses for Pro-Life \u2062Advocates:**<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **Colorado**: Amendment 79, securing a right \u200bto abortion and \u200bpermitting \u200btaxpayer funding, passed with \u2062nearly 62% approval.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; \u200b**Maryland**: A constitutional \u2063amendment establishing a fundamental right to\u2062 abortion was approved by three-quarters of \u200cvoters.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **New York**: Proposal 1, further solidifying \u2064abortion rights, received\u2064 approximately 62% support.<\/p>\n<p>**Red\u2063 and Battleground States:**<\/p>\n<p>There were\u2062 also concerning results in traditionally red\u200d states:<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; \u200b**Arizona**: Proposition 139, establishing \u2062a constitutional \u200dright to abortion,\u2063 received 61.5% support.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; **Missouri**: Amendment 3, creating \u2064a constitutional right to abortion, passed with \u206351.6%.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; \u2063**Montana**: \u200cCI-128, which enshrined \u2063a right to \u200dabortion, was approved by \u200c57.6%.<\/p>\n<p>while <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/texas-abortion-ban-back-in-effect-after-suspension\/\" title=\"Texas Abortion Ban Back In Effect After Suspension\">pro-life advocates celebrated<\/a>\u2063 some\u200c wins, particularly in states like South Dakota and Nebraska, the results also \u200chighlighted significant victories for pro-abortion measures in both blue and red states.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Heading into last week&rsquo;s contest, Democrat activists managed to place radical pro-abortion initiatives on the ballot in <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/02\/unpopular-abortion-through-birth-could-become-legal-in-these-10-states-unless-voters-act-now\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">10 states<\/a> across the country. With some of them funded by <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/09\/05\/democrats-are-weaponizing-dark-money-and-ballot-initiatives-to-turn-red-states-blue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">wealthy left-wing and dark money groups<\/a>, these campaigns sought to deceive voters into enshrining baby-killing into their states&rsquo; respective constitutions.<\/p>\n<p>With most ballots tabulated in each state, the projected outcomes of these referendums produced some wins and losses for America&rsquo;s pro-life movement. Here&rsquo;s a breakdown of these proposed amendments and whether voters have approved or rejected them.<\/p>\n<h2>The Good<\/h2>\n<p>There were several significant wins for pro-lifers and unborn babies in several states throughout the country.<\/p>\n<p>In South Dakota, voters overwhelmingly rejected <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/South_Dakota_Constitutional_Amendment_G,_Right_to_Abortion_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Amendment G<\/a>. As The Federalist&rsquo;s Jordan Boyd previously <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/02\/unpopular-abortion-through-birth-could-become-legal-in-these-10-states-unless-voters-act-now\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reported<\/a>, that amendment contained &ldquo;vague and undefined language&nbsp;[that] would allow [abortion] through all nine months of pregnancy as long as a physician deems it necessary for women&rsquo;s &lsquo;health,&#8217;&rdquo; and &ldquo;open[ed] the door for outside activists like Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sbaprolife.org\/newsroom\/press-releases\/aclu-sues-to-remove-informed-consent-in-ohio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">to sue to<\/a>&nbsp;eliminate&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/LilaGraceRose\/status\/1829272783148195918\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">parental rights and conscience protections<\/a>&nbsp;for doctors who have moral or religious objections to abortion.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Unfinalized results from The New York Times <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-south-dakota-amendment-g-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">show<\/a> 58.6 percent of electors voting against Amendment G and 41.4 percent voting in support. The measure&rsquo;s failure came after it was reported that an out-of-state left-wing advocacy group founded by Illinois Democrat Gov. J.B. Pritzker <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/28\/report-group-founded-by-illinois-democrat-governor-drops-500k-in-south-dakota-to-enshrine-abortion-into-law\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">gave<\/a> $500,000 to a group behind the campaign seeking to pass the proposal weeks ahead of Election Day.<\/p>\n<p>Pro-lifers also chalked up wins in Nebraska, where <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/26\/abortion-and-pro-life-constitutional-amendments-duel-on-nebraska-ballots-this-fall\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">dueling<\/a> pro-life and pro-abortion measures appeared on the state&rsquo;s 2024 ballot. <\/p>\n<p>More than half of voters (55 percent) have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-nebraska-initiative-434-prohibit-abortion-past-first-trimester.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approved<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Nebraska_Initiative_434,_Prohibit_Abortions_After_the_First_Trimester_Amendment_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Initiative 434<\/a> &mdash; a constitutional amendment limiting abortion after the first trimester &mdash; current results show. So far, a majority of voters (51 percent) have simultaneously <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-nebraska-initiative-439-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">rejected<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Nebraska_Initiative_439,_Right_to_Abortion_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Initiative 439<\/a>, which sought to enshrine a constitutional &ldquo;right&rdquo; to abortion in Nebraska&rsquo;s founding document.<\/p>\n<p>In Florida, where <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/election-integrity-groups-urge-north-carolina-to-pass-citizens-only-voting-amendment\/\" title=\"Election Integrity Advocates Push for Citizens-Only Voting Amendment in North Carolina\">constitutional amendment proposals require<\/a> at least 60 percent of support from voters to pass, results show that nearly 43 percent of electors have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-florida-amendment-4-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">opposed<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Florida_Amendment_4,_Right_to_Abortion_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Amendment 4<\/a>. As previously <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/11\/05\/florida-voters-defeat-pro-abortion-marijuana-ballot-amendments\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">noted<\/a> by GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis, the &ldquo;very opaque&rdquo; measure ultimately included &ldquo;no limits on when an abortion can be performed,&rdquo; effectively allowing the murder of an unborn child &ldquo;for no reason at all.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>While not specifically related to abortion, the cause for life also experienced a victory in West Virginia, where a slight majority (50.4 percent) of voters have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-west-virginia.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approved<\/a> a <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/West_Virginia_Amendment_1,_Prohibit_%22Medically-Assisted_Suicide,_Euthanasia,_and_Mercy_Killing%22_Measure_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">constitutional amendment<\/a> prohibiting medically assisted suicide, current results show.<\/p>\n<h2>The Bad<\/h2>\n<p>Unfortunately, last week&rsquo;s abortion referendum results are not all good news for the unborn. Voters in several &ldquo;blue&rdquo; states successfully passed extreme proposals authorizing the murder of babies in the womb.<\/p>\n<p>In Colorado, nearly 62 percent of electors have voted to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-colorado-amendment-79-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">pass<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Colorado_Amendment_79,_Right_to_Abortion_and_Health_Insurance_Coverage_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Amendment 79<\/a>, results show. The proposal codifies a &ldquo;right&rdquo; to abortion in the Colorado Constitution and permits <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/02\/unpopular-abortion-through-birth-could-become-legal-in-these-10-states-unless-voters-act-now\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">taxpayer<\/a> money to be used for such horrific procedures.<\/p>\n<p>Similar tragic results were also seen in Maryland, where preliminary results show three-quarters of voters <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-maryland-constitutional-amendment-1-right-to-reproductive-freedom.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approved<\/a> a <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Maryland_Question_1,_Right_to_Reproductive_Freedom_Amendment_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">constitutional amendment<\/a> establishing a &ldquo;fundamental right&rdquo; to abortion. As The Federalist&rsquo;s Jordan Boyd previously <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/02\/unpopular-abortion-through-birth-could-become-legal-in-these-10-states-unless-voters-act-now\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">noted<\/a>, the measure makes the state&rsquo;s &ldquo;sweeping abortion provisions more permanent.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>In New York, while the state already permits <a href=\"https:\/\/ag.ny.gov\/publications\/abortion-legal-and-protected-new-york-state\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">unlimited abortion<\/a> if a medical provider deems it necessary for the physical or mental health of the mother, that didn&rsquo;t stop roughly 62 percent of voters from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-new-york-constitutional-amendment-1-equal-protection-of-law.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approving<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/New_York_Proposal_1,_Equal_Protection_of_Law_Amendment_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Proposal 1<\/a>. As <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/02\/unpopular-abortion-through-birth-could-become-legal-in-these-10-states-unless-voters-act-now\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">described<\/a> by Boyd, the deceptively named Equal Rights Amendment &ldquo;further hamstring[s] legislators who try to bring state law up to par with&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/06\/16\/poll-majority-of-americans-still-reject-democrats-unlimited-abortion-agenda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Americans&rsquo; desire to limit abortion<\/a>.&rdquo; It also enshrines leftists&rsquo; radical gender ideology into the state&rsquo;s founding document.<\/p>\n<h2>The Ugly<\/h2>\n<p>It wasn&rsquo;t only &ldquo;blue&rdquo; states in which voters opted to alter their state constitutions to permit the unlimited killing of unborn babies, however. Electors in several historically &ldquo;red&rdquo; and battleground states approved such amendments as well.<\/p>\n<p>In Arizona, voters are projected to pass <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Arizona_Proposition_139,_Right_to_Abortion_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Proposition 139<\/a>, which establishes a state constitutional &ldquo;right&rdquo; to abortion. While ballots are still being tabulated as of this article&rsquo;s publication, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-arizona-proposition-139-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">preliminary results<\/a> show the initiative receiving support from 61.5 percent of voters. <\/p>\n<p>In Missouri, a slight majority (51.6 percent) of voters have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-missouri-amendment-3-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approved<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Missouri_Amendment_3,_Right_to_Reproductive_Freedom_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Amendment 3<\/a>. That initiative establishes a &ldquo;constitutional right&rdquo; to murder unborn babies and effectively overturns the state&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.frc.org\/prolifemaps\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">pro-life law<\/a> prohibiting abortion except in the case of a <a href=\"https:\/\/revisor.mo.gov\/main\/OneSection.aspx?section=188.017\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">medical emergency<\/a>. State Republican lawmakers&rsquo; efforts to make passage of the amendment more difficult were <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/05\/30\/how-senate-republicans-tanked-efforts-to-keep-abortion-out-of-missouris-constitution\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">thwarted<\/a> by Senate GOP leadership earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, in Montana, nearly 57.6 percent of voters have voted to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-montana-constitutional-amendment-128-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">pass<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Montana_CI-128,_Right_to_Abortion_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">CI-128<\/a>, which amends the state constitution by enshrining a &ldquo;right to abortion.&rdquo; As Boyd <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/10\/02\/unpopular-abortion-through-birth-could-become-legal-in-these-10-states-unless-voters-act-now\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">noted<\/a>, under the initiative&rsquo;s &ldquo;vague&rdquo; language, &ldquo;practically any abortion could be construed to meet&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/leg.mt.gov\/bills\/mca\/title_0530\/chapter_0060\/part_0010\/section_0970\/0530-0060-0010-0970.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">the &lsquo;medically necessary&rsquo; qualifier<\/a>&nbsp;required for taxpayer funding under Montana&rsquo;s Medicaid program.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>While <a href=\"https:\/\/dpbh.nv.gov\/Programs\/MIP\/AbortionInNevada\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">permitted<\/a> with few limits in the state already, results show nearly two-thirds (64.2 percent) of Nevada electors have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/interactive\/2024\/11\/05\/us\/elections\/results-nevada-question-6-right-to-abortion.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approved<\/a> a <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Nevada_Question_6,_Right_to_Abortion_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ballot initiative<\/a> creating a constitutional &ldquo;right&rdquo; to abortion.<\/p>\n<p>In the Silver State, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/can-this-groups-ballot-chasing-efforts-deliver-nv-for-the-gop\/\" title=\"Can This Group&#039;s Ballot-Chasing Efforts Deliver NV For The GOP?\">constitutional amendment proposals produced<\/a> by <a href=\"https:\/\/amzn.to\/3YuVZYV\">citizen-led signature collection campaigns&#038;nbsp<\/a>;<a href=\"https:\/\/thenevadaindependent.com\/fact-briefs\/do-amendments-to-the-nevada-constitution-have-to-be-approved-twice-before-enactment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">must<\/a>&nbsp;be passed by voters in two consecutive general elections to amend the state constitution. This means the state&rsquo;s pro-abortion initiative currently projected to pass will also need to be approved by voters during the state&rsquo;s next general election to amend the Nevada Constitution.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>      Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a state content writer for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Democrat activists placed radical pro-abortion measures on ballots in 10 states, funded by wealthy left-wing groups, aiming to mislead voters into constitutionalizing abortion<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":539,"featured_media":2367547,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sonogram.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[4506,4310,44829],"class_list":["post-2367546","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-4506","tag-abortion","tag-referendums"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Sonogram.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2367546","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/539"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2367546"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2367546\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2367550,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2367546\/revisions\/2367550"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2367547"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2367546"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2367546"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2367546"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}