{"id":2343242,"date":"2024-09-19T07:45:01","date_gmt":"2024-09-19T11:45:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/yes-democrats-and-propaganda-media-support-infanticide\/"},"modified":"2024-09-19T07:48:08","modified_gmt":"2024-09-19T11:48:08","slug":"yes-democrats-and-propaganda-media-support-infanticide","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/yes-democrats-and-propaganda-media-support-infanticide\/","title":{"rendered":"Yes, Democrats And Propaganda Media Support Infanticide"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">14<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fyes-democrats-and-propaganda-media-support-infanticide%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2343242&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The recent debate between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump has sparked significant media coverage,\u200c particularly focused on the topic\u200b of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/hunter-bidens-ex-biz-partner-admits-joe-was-on-more-than-20-business-calls-with-son-using-influence\/\" title=\"Hunter Biden&#039;s former business partner confesses that Joe Biden participated in over 20 business calls with his son, leveraging his influence.\">late-term\u2064 abortion<\/a>. In the debate, Trump claimed to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/michigan-voters-consider-next-step-in-pro-abortion-extremism-sterilization-without-parental-consent\/\" title=\"Michigan Voters Consider Next Step In Pro-Abortion Extremism: Sterilization Without Parental Consent\">oppose late-term abortion<\/a>, while the moderator, Linsey\u200b Davis, defended Harris by stating that \u200dit is illegal to &#8220;kill a baby after it&#8217;s born.&#8221; This assertion has been a focal point for various media outlets, with many fact-checking Trump&#8217;s \u2062claims and denying that infanticide\u2064 is a legal issue in the United States.<\/p>\n<p>However, the article\u200d argues that this portrayal\u2062 is misleading. It notes that several U.S. states allow abortion up until birth with no restrictions, and it highlights \u200cinstances, like those in\u2062 Minnesota, where infants have been left to die after failed \u200dabortions without adequate reporting or protection. The author contends \u2062that radical Democrats are \u200cincreasingly supportive \u2064of policies \u2063that\u200d blur the lines between abortion\u2062 and infanticide, as evidenced by their\u200b votes against bills aimed at protecting infants who survive abortion attempts.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the piece accuses Harris \u200dof supporting a \u2062culture that permits selling body parts \u200dfrom\u200c aborted babies, referencing \u2062her actions as\u200d California&#8217;s attorney general in 2015 against a journalist exposing Planned Parenthood&#8217;s\u200b practices. It calls attention to the changing mindset in society regarding abortion and infanticide, questioning \u2063why such practices have gained traction among voters, especially suburban women.<\/p>\n<p>The discussion broadens to the acceptance of extreme abortion policies and calls into question the moral implications of\u200c this shift. The text concludes by\u200c highlighting concerns over cultural acceptance of \u200cwhat it terms\u200b \u201cbarbarism\u201d in the face of growing support for unrestricted abortion\u200b and infanticide, urging readers to critically \u200cevaluate these changes in societal norms.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Media outlets have continued to litigate one of the more outrageous portions of the recent &ldquo;debate&rdquo; between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. It occurred when ABC&rsquo;s so-called moderator Linsey Davis shamelessly framed the abortion issue to protect Harris from any suggestion that she approves of legalized infanticide. When Trump said he is against late-term abortion, Davis proceeded to &ldquo;fact-check&rdquo; him by claiming &ldquo;there&rsquo;s no state in this country where it&rsquo;s legal to kill a baby after it&rsquo;s born.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Ever since, media outlets from The Guardian to MSNBC have continued to issue &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.mprnews.org\/episode\/2024\/09\/11\/minnesota-mentions-trump-harris-presidential-debate\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">fact checks<\/a>&rdquo; and outraged opinion articles backing up Davis&rsquo; claim and denying Trump&rsquo;s, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.msnbc.com\/top-stories\/latest\/donald-trump-fact-check-late-term-abortion-rcna171352\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">calling <\/a>it the &ldquo;post-birth abortion lie&rdquo; and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2024\/sep\/14\/baby-homicide-illegal-trump\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">claiming <\/a>&ldquo;there is no state in the US where it is &lsquo;OK&rsquo; to kill a baby after it is born.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>First off, <a href=\"https:\/\/worldpopulationreview.com\/state-rankings\/late-term-abortion-laws-by-state\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">that&rsquo;s disingenuous and false<\/a>. Seven U.S. states allow abortion until birth, with no restrictions, and 14 allow it for the sake of the mother&rsquo;s &ldquo;health,&rdquo; which can include mental health. In Minnesota, eight babies are recorded as being left to die outside the womb after failed abortions in just 2021 alone, until Gov. Tim Walz <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailysignal.com\/2024\/08\/06\/under-gov-tim-walz-babies-born-alive-in-botched-abortions-were-left-to-die-then-he-removed-reporting-requirements\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">removed<\/a> that reporting requirement. Minnesota is not the only state that fails to record or protect children left to die after birth in such circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Second, radical Democrats used to see a difference between abortion and infanticide. Third, and maybe even most importantly, this sheltering of Harris obscures the fact that Harris&rsquo; policy positions are clearly in line with Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s hard push towards legalizing all forms of infanticide. It&rsquo;s happening because of the support of the propaganda media.<\/p>\n<p>As cheerleader for the Harris campaign, Davis seemed to understand that most Americans simply are not ready (yet?) for something so evil as making sure a helpless, breathing newborn is deliberately left to die after an attempted abortion. Hence Davis&rsquo; shielding of Harris.<\/p>\n<h2>Democrats Vote For Infanticide<\/h2>\n<p>The bigger issue is that infanticide is fast becoming an essential policy position for Democrats. We can see this in their repeated and overwhelming votes against legislation that would allow infants to live if they survive an attempted abortion. One such roll call took place as recently as January 2023, when a whopping 210 Democrats in the House of Representatives <a href=\"https:\/\/clerk.house.gov\/Votes\/202329\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">voted against<\/a> the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act.<\/p>\n<p>On top of that we now have <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/how-the-ballot-amendment-process-became-democrats-new-strategy-to-entrench-their-agenda-into-law\/\" title=\"Democrats have adopted the ballot amendment process to solidify their agenda in law.\">pro-abortion initiatives<\/a>, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/initiativepetitions.elections.myflorida.com\/InitiativeForms\/Fulltext\/Fulltext_2307_EN.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Amendment 4 on this year&rsquo;s Florida ballot<\/a>, that serve as Orwellian word salads that officially open the door to unrestricted infanticide. For more on the Florida measure, read Margot <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/09\/03\/if-you-think-trump-is-the-abortion-extremist-youve-bought-democrat-propaganda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Cleveland&rsquo;s legal analysis<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/2024_abortion-related_ballot_measures_and_state_context\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Several other states<\/a> with ballot measures do not even include words about &ldquo;viability&rdquo; of the preborn child. There may not yet be reports of babies actively put to death legally, a common <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thelancet.com\/journals\/lancet\/article\/PIIS0140-6736(12)61881-9\/fulltext\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">practice under China&rsquo;s forced abortion one-child policy<\/a>, but we can&rsquo;t deny we&rsquo;re veering onto that same road.<\/p>\n<h2>Kamala Backed Baby Body Harvesting In 2015<\/h2>\n<p>When Kamala Harris was California&rsquo;s attorney general in 2015, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.latimes.com\/local\/lanow\/la-me-attorney-general-seizes-planned-parenthood-videos-20160405-story.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">she ordered a raid<\/a> on the home of investigative journalist <a href=\"https:\/\/www.daviddaleiden.com\/bio.php\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">David Daleiden<\/a> because he exposed Planned Parenthood&rsquo;s ghoulish practice of harvesting and selling the body parts of aborted babies.<\/p>\n<p>In one of Daleiden&rsquo;s videos you can watch Planned Parenthood <a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/jjxwVuozMnU?t=29\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">official Deborah Nucatola talking<\/a> about the demand for body parts, including the calvarium &mdash; a freshly extracted baby&rsquo;s head. She enthusiastically explains how to maximize the chances of obtaining an intact and fresh specimen during an abortion. Since Harris ordered a subsequent raid on Daleiden&rsquo;s home, you can easily guess that Harris approves of baby-part harvesting and condemns the free speech that exposes it.<\/p>\n<p>But the central point here is that the abortion mindset has hurtled in a downward spiral over the past 50 years since <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> abolished state regulation of abortion. Few realize that even back in 1973 <em>Roe<\/em> came with a companion ruling called <a href=\"https:\/\/tile.loc.gov\/storage-services\/service\/ll\/usrep\/usrep410\/usrep410179\/usrep410179.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Doe v. Bolton<\/em><\/a>, which allowed for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-senators-have-no-clothes\/\" title=\"Senators are naked.\">full-term abortion<\/a> under a vague pretext of &ldquo;mother&rsquo;s health&rdquo; that was left up to any interpretation. Harris and her supporters in the corporate media seem to have a growing appetite to move that along.<\/p>\n<p>Today&rsquo;s arguments for abortion are a far cry from the mantra of Bill Clinton&rsquo;s era that claimed abortion should be <em>rare<\/em> as well as safe and legal. Furthermore, Planned Parenthood says it wants <a href=\"https:\/\/shoutyourabortion.com\/about\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">abortion to be celebrated<\/a>, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.plannedparenthood.org\/planned-parenthood-orange-san-bernardino\/about-us\/blog\/why-we-celebrate-abortion-providers\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">and certainly not regretted<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h2>Question the Growing Infanticide Mentality<\/h2>\n<p>Whatever debate on abortion remains to be had, we should be asking a lot more questions about the <em>mentality<\/em> behind Americans&rsquo; increasing support &mdash; or lack of outrage &mdash; for unrestricted abortion and infanticide. What&rsquo;s happening to us? What is causing this previously unthinkable shift in mindset in the West?<\/p>\n<p>We need to ask, because such a shift always leads to ever more killing. We see it happening in Canada, where a third of the population <a href=\"https:\/\/nationalpost.com\/news\/canada\/canada-maid-assisted-suicide-homeless\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">approves of prescribing assisted suicide<\/a> not only for the terminally ill, but also for the homeless. So it goes. Kill the homeless. Kill the &ldquo;unfit.&rdquo; Push eugenics and euthanasia until we&rsquo;re engaged in mass killing. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC5719686\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">historical record<\/a> bears that out.<\/p>\n<p>We should also ask why totally unrestricted abortion seems so important among so many voters. Why do increasing numbers seem intent on celebrating this gruesome procedure? This is <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wsj.com\/politics\/elections\/abortion-poll-trump-swing-state-voters-2024-election-3e12f57c\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">particularly the case with suburban women<\/a>, who can easily get an abortion despite the Supreme Court&rsquo;s <em>Dobbs v. Jackson<\/em> decision that reversed <em>Roe<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Why is totally <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/beinlibertarian\/status\/1827887326543987054\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">unrestricted abortion more important to these voters than illegal immigration<\/a>? More important than runaway inflation that is preventing people from buying a home and even groceries? Or more important than exponentially rising crime rates and drug addiction and suicide rates among youth?<\/p>\n<p>Why is the Senate currently ruled by radical partisans who increasingly <a href=\"https:\/\/eppc.org\/publication\/how-democrats-get-away-with-justifying-infanticide\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">support infanticide even if they won&rsquo;t (yet) call it infanticide?<\/a> Why was Virginia Gov. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/virginia-governor-defends-letting-infants-die\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Ralph Northam<\/a> so comfortable indicating in 2019 that in the case of an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/babies-who-survived-abortions-left-to-die-state-health-department-report-suggests\/\" title=\"Babies Who Survived Abortions Left To Die, State Health Department Report Suggests\">infant born alive<\/a> after an attempted abortion, infanticide should be an option if the mother agreed? And why did a Virginia delegate so brazenly promote a bill that <a href=\"https:\/\/lawandcrime.com\/abortion\/dem-lawmaker-deletes-social-media-after-saying-her-bill-would-allow-abortion-during-labor\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">she testified would extend abortion to 40 weeks of gestation, including during the onset of natural labor?<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>Cultural Acceptance of Barbarism<\/h2>\n<p>All of this is even more chilling when we realize that abortion supporters no longer contest the fact that this is a human being. The long-time late-term abortionist <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/obituaries\/2023\/04\/29\/leroy-carhart-abortion-doctor-dies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">LeRoy Carhart<\/a> even offered women the chance to <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2019\/10\/03\/late-term-abortionist-offers-mothers-the-chance-to-cuddle-their-dead-babies\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">cuddle their freshly killed infants<\/a>. His staff put together goodbye packages with keepsakes such as their dead baby&rsquo;s footprints, photos, and newborn&rsquo;s hat. What brought us to this point?<\/p>\n<p>The answer clearly lies in a constant propaganda campaign that is nudging and shoving people into accepting this. Americans are being psychologically conditioned through corporate media and its allies in government, academia, and Hollywood to allow increasing levels of barbarity.<\/p>\n<p>Those who have bought the propaganda hook, line, and sinker &mdash; like Harris and Davis &mdash; either have no capacity to think this through and understand it, or, even worse, understand and accept it all: the slaughter, the organ harvesting, the foul culture of desolation and death.<\/p>\n<p>However, most Americans can and should re-evaluate the abortion-at-all-costs mindset and the propaganda campaign behind it. Let&rsquo;s analyze it. Understand what&rsquo;s happening. And reject the whole psychological operation. Because it truly is suicidal for us all.<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>      Stella Morabito is a senior contributor at The Federalist. She is author of &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.amazon.com\/Weaponization-Loneliness-Tyrants-Isolation-Silence\/dp\/1637582021\/ref=sr_1_1?crid=N5PGDDDUYGO4&amp;keywords=weaponization+of+loneliness&amp;qid=1666811187&amp;qu=eyJxc2MiOiIwLjAwIiwicXNhIjoiMC4wMCIsInFzcCI6IjAuMDAifQ%3D%3D&amp;sprefix=weaponization%2Caps%2C104&amp;sr=8-1\">The Weaponization of Loneliness: How Tyrants Stoke Our Fear of Isolation to Silence, Divide, and Conquer<\/a>.&#8221;    Her essays have appeared in various publications, including the Washington Examiner, American Greatness, Townhall, Public Discourse, and The Human Life Review. In her previous work as an intelligence analyst, Morabito focused on various aspects of Russian and Soviet politics, including communist media and propaganda.  <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/stella_morabito\">Follow Stella on Twitter.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Media outlets have persistently scrutinized a particularly controversial segment of the recent \u201cdebate\u201d between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump. This incident arose when ABC&#8217;s moderator, Linsey Davis, blatantly framed the abortion topic to shield Harris from any implication that she endorses legalized infanticide. When Trump expressed his opposition to late-term abortion, Davis attempted to \u201cfact-check\u201d him by asserting that \u201cthere\u2019s no state in this country where it\u2019s legal to kill a baby after it\u2019s born.\u201d Since then, various media organizations, including The Guardian and MSNBC, have issued \u201cfact checks\u201d and outraged opinion pieces supporting Davis\u2019 assertion while dismissing Trump\u2019s claim as the \u201cpost-birth abortion lie,\u201d insisting that no state in the U.S. permits killing a baby post-birth.<\/p>\n<p>Firstly, this assertion is misleading and incorrect. Seven states in the U.S. allow abortions up until birth without restrictions, while 14 permit them for reasons related to the mother\u2019s &#8220;health,&#8221; which can encompass mental health considerations. In Minnesota alone, eight infants were documented as being left to die outside the womb following failed abortions in 2021 before Governor Tim Walz eliminated that reporting requirement; Minnesota is not unique in its lack of recording or safeguarding children left to die under such circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly, radical Democrats previously distinguished between abortion and infanticide. Thirdly\u2014and perhaps most crucially\u2014this defense of Harris obscures her alignment with Planned Parenthood&#8217;s aggressive push towards legalizing all forms of infanticide. This shift is bolstered by supportive media narratives.<\/p>\n<p>As an advocate for Harris&#8217; campaign, Davis appeared aware that many Americans are not yet prepared for something as morally reprehensible as allowing a helpless newborn to die after an attempted abortion; hence her protective stance toward Harris.<\/p>\n<p>The broader concern is that infanticide is rapidly becoming a core policy position among Democrats. Evidence of this can be seen in their consistent votes against legislation aimed at ensuring infants who survive attempted abortions receive care; notably, 210 House Democrats opposed the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, pro-abortion measures like Amendment 4 on Florida&#8217;s ballot present convoluted language that effectively paves the way for unrestricted infanticide. Other states with similar ballot initiatives do not even mention &#8220;viability&#8221; concerning unborn children. While there may not yet be reports of legally sanctioned killings akin to practices seen under China\u2019s one-child policy involving forced abortions, we cannot ignore our trajectory toward such outcomes.<\/p>\n<p>In 2015 when Kamala Harris served as California&#8217;s attorney general, she ordered a raid on journalist David Daleiden&#8217;s home after he revealed Planned Parenthood&#8217;s disturbing practice of harvesting and selling aborted fetal body parts\u2014a practice highlighted by Planned Parenthood official Deborah Nucatola discussing how best to procure intact specimens during procedures.<\/p>\n<p>The crux here is how attitudes towards abortion have spiraled downward since Roe v. Wade dismantled state regulations on abortion nearly fifty years ago\u2014an evolution few recognize began even then with Doe v. Bolton allowing full-term abortions under vague health pretexts open to broad interpretation.<\/p>\n<p>Today\u2019s arguments surrounding abortion starkly contrast Bill Clinton-era claims advocating for safe but rare procedures; now organizations like Planned Parenthood promote celebrating rather than regretting abortions.<\/p>\n<p>We must question why there seems to be growing acceptance\u2014or indifference\u2014toward unrestricted abortion and infanticide among Americans today: What has led us down this path? Why does unrestricted access seem more critical than pressing issues like illegal immigration or rising inflation affecting basic living costs?<\/p>\n<p>Why do radical partisans increasingly support policies resembling infanticide without labeling them as such? Instances like Virginia Governor Ralph Northam suggesting post-abortion options should include letting infants die if agreed upon by mothers raise alarming questions about societal values regarding life itself.<\/p>\n<p>This cultural acceptance reflects an unsettling reality where supporters no longer contest whether these are human beings; some practitioners even offer parents keepsakes from their deceased infants\u2014a chilling normalization of barbarism driven by relentless propaganda conditioning society into accepting escalating levels of cruelty through media influence alongside government complicity.<\/p>\n<p>Most importantly though: We must critically reassess our collective mindset surrounding these issues because failing too could lead us further down a perilous road toward widespread moral decay\u2014a reality already unfolding elsewhere globally.<br \/>\nStella Morabito serves as a senior contributor at The Federalist and authored &#8220;The Weaponization of Loneliness.&#8221; Her writings appear across various platforms including Washington Examiner and American Greatness among others while her background includes intelligence analysis focused on Russian politics including propaganda strategies<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":568,"featured_media":2343243,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/23385695626_967af479c7_k.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[6733,3685,15066,4188,4488],"class_list":["post-2343242","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist","tag-controversy","tag-democrats","tag-infanticide","tag-media","tag-propaganda"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/23385695626_967af479c7_k.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2343242","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/568"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2343242"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2343242\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2343243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2343242"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2343242"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2343242"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}