{"id":2340034,"date":"2024-09-12T02:06:02","date_gmt":"2024-09-12T06:06:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/sds-pro-life-politicians-silent-on-extremist-abortion-amendment\/"},"modified":"2024-09-12T02:11:54","modified_gmt":"2024-09-12T06:11:54","slug":"sds-pro-life-politicians-silent-on-extremist-abortion-amendment","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/sds-pro-life-politicians-silent-on-extremist-abortion-amendment\/","title":{"rendered":"SD\u2019s \u2018Pro-Life\u2019 Politicians Silent On Extremist Abortion Amendment"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">16<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fsds-pro-life-politicians-silent-on-extremist-abortion-amendment%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2340034&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>South Dakota, known for its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/in-depth-pro-life-gop-a-winning-2024-strategy-survey-data-challenges-democrat-and-media-assumptions\/\" title=\"IN-DEPTH: Pro-Life GOP a Winning 2024 Strategy? Survey Data Challenges Democrat and Media Assumptions\">strong pro-life stance<\/a>, \u200dis facing a\u2062 significant challenge with Amendment \u200cG, which could radically change the state&#8217;s abortion\u200c laws.\u200b Although\u200c Republican\u200d officials, including Governor Kristi Noem and Senators John Thune and\u2063 Mike Rounds, have established pro-life records, they have remained largely silent on Amendment G, which would allow abortions up to birth under vague health-related provisions. As voters prepare to decide on this and\u2063 several\u200d other ballot initiatives, \u200cconcerns are rising that the amendment\u2064 could weaken existing protections \u200dfor women and unborn children, influenced by outside activist groups.<\/p>\n<p>The lack of vocal opposition from key political figures\u2062 is striking, especially\u200b given \u2064that polls indicate a majority of Americans reject extreme abortion measures. Critics argue that the vague wording of the amendment could mislead voters, and its pairing with a\u2064 marijuana \u200blegalization proposal might attract a broader electorate to the polls. While some local \u2064legislators express frustration over the silence of their leaders, Amendment G has slipped \u200cpast scrutiny to make \u200bit onto the ballot for the upcoming election. As the situation develops, \u200bthe response of South Dakota&#8217;s Republican leadership will be critical in shaping the debate and\u2063 influencing voter decisions regarding this contentious issue.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<p>On paper, South Dakota is one of the reddest, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/idaho-governor-signs-bill-banning-abortions-after-fetal-heartbeat-can-be-detected\/\" title=\"Idaho Governor Signs Bill Banning Abortions After Fetal Heartbeat Can Be Detected\">pro-life states<\/a> in the United States. The Republican politicians who reside in and are sworn to represent the Mount Rushmore State such as Gov. Kristi Noem, Senate Minority Whip John Thune, Sen. Mike Rounds, Rep. Dusty Johnson, and others, however, have been curiously quiet about the biggest threat to their constituents&rsquo; values: Amendment G.<\/p>\n<p>Starting <a href=\"https:\/\/states.aarp.org\/south-dakota\/election-voting-guide\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">this month<\/a>, voters in South Dakota can weigh in on <a href=\"https:\/\/sdsos.gov\/elections-voting\/upcoming-elections\/general-information\/2024\/2024-ballot-questions.aspx\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">seven different ballot initiatives<\/a>. Several seek to reinvent the state&rsquo;s ability to regulate elections, marijuana, and unlimited abortion. If passed, <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/South_Dakota_Right_to_Abortion_Amendment_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Amendment G<\/a> would undermine South Dakota&rsquo;s current prohibition on abortion and allow the fatal practice through birth as long as a physician deems it necessary for the women&rsquo;s health, a term that is both vague and left undefined.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed amendment doesn&rsquo;t simply strip the state&rsquo;s ability to protect women and babies from harm. As in other states, it could be easily <a href=\"https:\/\/sbaprolife.org\/newsroom\/press-releases\/aclu-sues-to-remove-informed-consent-in-ohio\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">litigated<\/a> by outside activists like Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union to eliminate <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/LilaGraceRose\/status\/1829272783148195918\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">parental rights and conscience protections<\/a> for doctors who have moral or religious objections to abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Despite <a href=\"https:\/\/atg.sd.gov\/docs\/Letters%20from%20AG%20Jackley%20to%20Sponsor%20R.%20Weiland%20to%20Dakotans%20for%20Health.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">complaints and allegations of misconduct<\/a> surrounding the signature-gathering and petition process, Amendment G <a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/abortion-south-dakota-voter-ballot-amendment-ed7f558d0cfeabd944cef6ba4aa33cdc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">slid through<\/a> the state&rsquo;s months-long certification process to make it on the Nov. 5 ballot. &nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>A majority of U.S. adults&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/06\/16\/poll-majority-of-americans-still-reject-democrats-unlimited-abortion-agenda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">reject the abortion extremism<\/a> found in the proposed amendment. Ballot measures like Amendment G, however, are carefully crafted with vague language and undefined terms to trick unsuspecting voters into supporting it. Its presence alongside a proposal to legalize marijuana for recreational use, a tactic abortion activists use to attract <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/opinion\/election-day-2023-watch-races-get-preview-2024\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">hesitant voters<\/a> to the polls, is no coincidence.<\/p>\n<p>One of the <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/11\/07\/abortion-radicals-will-expand-their-schemes-from-ohio-to-your-state-heres-how-to-be-ready\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">easiest ways<\/a> to keep constituents from falling for <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/07\/14\/associated-press-poll-is-corporate-medias-latest-language-twisting-exercise-in-advancing-abortion-extremism\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">euphemistic calls for &ldquo;reproductive rights&rdquo;<\/a> that contradict their true feelings about late-term abortions is to offer clarifying commentary on the nature of radical ballot measures. Instead of using their political megaphones to fight for the lives of women and children in their state, however, South Dakota Republicans have kept their lips sealed and their social media accounts carefully curated to avoid discussing the dangers posed by Amendment G.<\/p>\n<h2>Under The Rug<\/h2>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/KristiNoem\/status\/1532872680097124352\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Noem<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kristinoem.com\/news\/governor-noems-pro-life-record\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">her team<\/a> assert she is the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.kristinoem.com\/news\/governor-noems-proven-record-of-pro-life-leadership\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&ldquo;most <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/texas-bill-banning-abortion-if-roe-is-overturned-heads-to-governors-desk\/\" title=\"Texas Bill Banning Abortion If Roe Is Overturned Heads To Governor\u2019s Desk\">pro-life governor<\/a> in the nation.&rdquo;<\/a> Her decision to <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/KristiNoem\/status\/1777388075976478958\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">jump<\/a> at the opportunity to support Trump&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/04\/08\/trumps-mixed-messaging-on-abortion-and-ivf-plays-right-into-democrats-electoral-strategy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">mixed messaging on abortion<\/a> proves that she&rsquo;s not against discussing abortion in the context of the 2024 election. Yet Noem hasn&rsquo;t officially weighed the proposed amendment that threatens to replace her state&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/americans-remember-the-48th-annual-march-for-life\/\" title=\"Americans remember the 48th annual March for Life\">pro-life protections<\/a> with unlimited, on-demand abortion.<\/p>\n<p>When The Federalist asked where she stands on Amendment G and if she&rsquo;s made that position known to her constituents, Noem did not answer. Instead, her chief of communications and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thedakotascout.com\/p\/noem-spokesman-assumes-role-of-unborn\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">official unborn child advocate<\/a> Ian Fury tried to justify Noem&rsquo;s silence on Amendment G by claiming that &ldquo;Governor Noem is pro-life&rdquo; and &ldquo;Every South Dakotan knows it.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The phenomenon of Republicans holding their tongues on an amendment that <a href=\"https:\/\/lozierinstitute.org\/abortion-reporting-south-dakota-2022\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">guarantees an increase in the murder of unborn babies<\/a> doesn&rsquo;t simply plague the governor&rsquo;s mansion and office. It reaches far beyond the state&rsquo;s boundaries and to both the lower and upper chambers of Congress. <\/p>\n<p>Thune, whose <a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/thune-mcconnell-republican-senate-leadership-8d17785f9140bd7c184d81b05bfd178a\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">aspirations<\/a> to replace Mitch McConnell as Senate Republicans&rsquo; top leader are no secret, boasts of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.thune.senate.gov\/public\/index.cfm\/protectinglife\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">&ldquo;100 percent pro-life voting record&rdquo; and claims to &ldquo;have consistently supported a ban on abortion&rdquo;<\/a> on the federal level. On the infiltration of unlimited abortion activists in his state, however, mum is the word.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter obtained by The Federalist, the senior senator told a constituent concerned about his silence on Amendment G that &ldquo;the issue you are addressing is primarily a state issue.&rdquo; &ldquo;Thus, your concerns would be better addressed by your state legislators and Governor Kristi Noem,&rdquo; Thune wrote.<\/p>\n<div>\n<figure><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Thune&rsquo;s two-decade history of representing South Dakota in the upper U.S. chamber indicates a vested interest in what happens back home. His office confirmed to The Federalist, however, that he believes Amendment G &ldquo;is an issue at the state level.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;But Sen. Thune has a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sbaprolife.org\/senator\/john-thune\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">100 percent pro-life voting record<\/a>&nbsp;in Congress and has always worked to defend the lives of the unborn,&rdquo; a spokeswoman said. <\/p>\n<p>Rounds, whose website <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rounds.senate.gov\/issues\/list\/family-values\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">states<\/a> &ldquo;we have an inherent responsibility to promote policies encouraging individuals to choose life,&rdquo; similarly did not respond to The Federalist&rsquo;s inquiry about this silence on the extremist amendment. <\/p>\n<p>Kristen Kurtz, the communications director for Johnson, South Dakota&rsquo;s only representative in the U.S. House, told The Federalist the <a href=\"https:\/\/dustyjohnson.house.gov\/issues\/pro-life\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">self-proclaimed pro-life advocate<\/a> will be &ldquo;voting &lsquo;no,&rsquo;&rdquo; and &ldquo;spending substantial resources in the weeks to come informing South Dakotans about the serious flaws of amendment G,&rdquo; but did not specify exactly how.<\/p>\n<p>On the state level, South Dakota Republican elected officials have either <a href=\"https:\/\/southdakotasearchlight.com\/2024\/07\/09\/former-legislator-establishes-republican-group-to-support-abortion-rights-amendment\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">come out in support of Amendment G<\/a> or failed to speak up about it altogether. The state convention passed a resolution in June &ldquo;urging all South Dakotans to oppose Amendment G. Yet the state&rsquo;s Republican Party chairman John Wilk <a href=\"https:\/\/dakotawarcollege.com\/sdgop-notes-party-has-no-official-position-on-any-other-ballot-measure-besides-h\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">penned a letter <\/a>to Republican officials in August specifically noting that the party&rsquo;s central committee had not taken any positions on any of the 2024 ballot measures except Amendment H, <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/South_Dakota_Constitutional_Amendment_H,_Top-Two_Primary_Elections_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">which proposes open primaries.<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>A Losing Battle<\/h2>\n<p>The toothless statements and pointless grandstanding that usually plague the GOP get old. In the case of Amendment G, however, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/record-number-of-pro-life-bills-passed-in-2021\/\" title=\"Record Number of Pro-Life Bills Passed in 2021\">pro-life legislators<\/a> like State Reps. John Mills and Brandei Schaefbauer say every comment counts.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;I don&rsquo;t know anyone who thinks abortion should be legal through all 9 months, and yet that&rsquo;s what Amendment G would allow. Every leader across our state, including the governor, should be speaking out against this terrible proposed change to our Constitution. South Dakota women and children need our help to stop this,&rdquo; Mills said in a statement to The Federalist.<\/p>\n<p>Schaefbauer expressed frustration to The Federalist that the &ldquo;top politicians&rdquo; in &ldquo;one of the most pro-life states in the country are not saying much of anything.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;As a state legislator, I would like to see our Governor, who claims to be the most pro-life governor in the country, speaking out and encouraging South Dakotans to vote No on radical Amendment G,&rdquo; Schaefbauer said.&nbsp;&ldquo;Our federal and state leaders should be doing everything they can to help stop this measure that allows abortions up to the moment of birth.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Noem, Thune, Rounds, Johnson, and other South Dakota politicians might justify their silence on Amendment G as a way to protect their power. <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2022\/11\/09\/these-pro-life-republican-victories-show-abortion-radicalism-isnt-the-winner-democrats-want-it-to-be\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Time and time again<\/a>, however, history shows that Republicans who engage voters with popular pro-life protections win big. Those elected officials who claim to be pro-life on paper but only offer a noncommital approach to abortion often lose out.<\/p>\n<p>In the end, the biggest losers no matter who is in office are unborn babies, women, and voters, whose <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/06\/16\/poll-majority-of-americans-still-reject-democrats-unlimited-abortion-agenda\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">strong support<\/a> for <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2022\/07\/08\/look-how-even-democrat-opinion-shifts-on-abortion-laws-when-polls-stop-using-leftist-framing\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">limiting abortion to the first trimester<\/a> is repeatedly sidelined by Democrats and Republicans alike.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;As we enter into the largest pro-life battle we&rsquo;ve had in decades, our top leaders have been largely absent,&rdquo; Family Voice Director Norman Woods told The Federalist. &ldquo;We elected them to lead, and if they would plant the flag for life, thousands would rally behind them. Instead, we hear excuses.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>      Jordan Boyd is a staff writer at The Federalist and producer of The Federalist Radio Hour. Her work has also been featured in The Daily Wire, Fox News, and RealClearPolitics. Jordan graduated from Baylor University where she majored in political science and minored in journalism. Follow her on X @jordanboydtx.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the surface, South Dakota is recognized as one of the most conservative and pro-life states in the U.S. However, key Republican leaders from the state, including Governor Kristi Noem, Senate Minority Whip John Thune, Senator Mike Rounds, and Representative Dusty Johnson, have remained notably silent regarding a significant threat to their constituents&#8217; values: Amendment G. Starting this month, South Dakota voters will have the opportunity to vote on seven different ballot initiatives that aim to reshape regulations around elections, marijuana use, and unrestricted abortion access. If approved, Amendment G would dismantle existing restrictions on abortion in South Dakota and permit abortions up until birth if deemed necessary by a physician for the woman&#8217;s health\u2014a term that lacks clear definition.<\/p>\n<p>The amendment not only removes protections for women and unborn children but could also lead to legal challenges from organizations like Planned Parenthood and the ACLU aimed at eroding parental rights and conscience protections for healthcare providers with moral or religious objections to abortion. Despite concerns about misconduct during its signature-gathering process, Amendment G has successfully passed through certification to appear on the November 5 ballot.<\/p>\n<p>A majority of Americans oppose such extreme measures regarding abortion; however, initiatives like Amendment G are often crafted with ambiguous language designed to mislead voters into supporting them. Its placement alongside a proposal for recreational marijuana legalization appears strategic\u2014aimed at drawing more hesitant voters to participate in elections.<\/p>\n<p>To prevent constituents from being swayed by misleading rhetoric surrounding &#8220;reproductive rights,&#8221; it is crucial for political leaders to clarify these radical proposals&#8217; implications. Yet instead of advocating for women&#8217;s and children&#8217;s lives in their state using their platforms effectively, South Dakota Republicans have largely refrained from addressing the risks associated with Amendment G.<\/p>\n<p>Governor Noem claims she is &#8220;the most pro-life governor in the nation,&#8221; yet her support of Trump&#8217;s mixed messages about abortion suggests she is willing to engage on this topic when politically convenient\u2014though she has not publicly addressed how she feels about an amendment that threatens existing pro-life laws in her state.<\/p>\n<p>When asked by The Federalist about her stance on Amendment G or whether she&#8217;s communicated it with her constituents, Noem did not respond directly; instead her communications chief defended her silence by asserting that &#8220;every South Dakotan knows&#8221; she is pro-life.<\/p>\n<p>This reluctance among Republicans extends beyond just Noem&#8217;s office; it reaches into Congress as well. Thune has maintained a perfect pro-life voting record but remains silent regarding his position on Amendment G while suggesting it&#8217;s primarily a state issue better suited for local legislators\u2019 attention.<\/p>\n<p>Rounds similarly did not respond when questioned about his lack of commentary concerning this extreme amendment despite stating online that promoting life-affirming policies is essential. Johnson&#8217;s office indicated he plans to vote against it but provided no details on how he intends to inform constituents about its flaws.<\/p>\n<p>At both state and local levels within South Dakota\u2019s Republican Party ranks there seems either support or silence surrounding Amendment G despite resolutions urging opposition against it being passed at party conventions earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>Pro-life legislators like State Representatives John Mills and Brandei Schaefbauer express frustration over top politicians\u2019 reticence amid what they see as an urgent need for vocal opposition against such radical changes allowing late-term abortions without restrictions\u2014calling upon leadership figures including Governor Noem herself who professes strong pro-life beliefs\u2014to actively campaign against these measures threatening unborn lives rather than remaining passive out of fear over political repercussions or power retention strategies which history shows can backfire significantly leading ultimately towards losses across all fronts affecting vulnerable populations involved: unborn babies along with women seeking care options available under current law frameworks already established prior amendments proposed here today!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":490,"featured_media":2340035,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Untitled-design-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[4310,5235,5894,8347,40710],"class_list":["post-2340034","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-abortion","tag-extremism","tag-politics","tag-pro-life","tag-south-dakota"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Untitled-design-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2340034","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/490"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2340034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2340034\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2340035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2340034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2340034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2340034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}