{"id":2334235,"date":"2024-08-30T11:14:02","date_gmt":"2024-08-30T15:14:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/az-court-oks-language-for-ranked-choice-voting-ballot-initiative\/"},"modified":"2024-08-30T11:18:28","modified_gmt":"2024-08-30T15:18:28","slug":"az-court-oks-language-for-ranked-choice-voting-ballot-initiative","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/az-court-oks-language-for-ranked-choice-voting-ballot-initiative\/","title":{"rendered":"AZ Court OK&#8217;s Language For Ranked-Choice Voting Ballot Initiative"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Faz-court-oks-language-for-ranked-choice-voting-ballot-initiative%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2334235&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>On August 30, 2024, the Arizona Supreme Court ruled against a\u200c proposed rewrite of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/san-francisco-safeway-cuts-hours-due-to-rampant-shoplifting\/\" title=\"San Francisco Safeway Cuts Hours Due to Rampant Shoplifting\">ballot initiative aimed<\/a> at ending partisan primaries ahead of the November election. The initiative, if approved, could lead to the implementation \u200cof <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/andrew-yang-has-commanding-lead-in-nyc-mayoral-race-poll-shows\/\" title=\"Andrew Yang Has Commanding Lead In NYC Mayoral Race, Poll Shows\">ranked-choice voting<\/a> (RCV) in Arizona. \u2063The court found that the legislative panel&#8217;s description of the initiative complied with state law and accurately described its intentions, overturning a previous ruling that deemed the language misleading. <\/p>\n<p>The proposed Proposition 140 aims to amend the Arizona Constitution to allow all candidates to run in the same primary, \u2062with RCV determining winners in general elections\u200c with three or more candidates. RCV allows voters to rank candidates by preference, and if no candidate achieves a\u2063 majority in the first round, the lowest candidate is eliminated, and their votes are redistributed until a candidate wins with a majority.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling also follows a \u2063signature challenge against Proposition 140, raising concerns about the validity of the petition signatures\u200d required for it to appear on the ballot. If enough signatures are invalidated,\u2062 it could prevent the initiative from being voted on in November.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-body body-md bdr-top-black pt-30\">\n<div class=\"row justify-content-center\">\n<div class=\"col-12\">\n<figure class=\"article-thumbnail mb-30 mb-sm-60\">\n<div class=\"article-thumbnail-caption d-flex align-items-center justify-content-md-end label-xs mt-15\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-camera me-10\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Image Credit<\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/\/2024\/08\/localimages\/File-3AArizona_Supreme_Court-2C_Phoenix-2C_Arizona_-_panoramio_-2814-29.jpg\">davidpinter\/Wikimedia Commons\/<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/licenses\/by\/3.0\/deed.en\">CC BY 3.0<\/a>       <\/div>\n<\/figure><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-share text-center article-share-simple\">\n<h5 class=\"label-sm mb-10\">Share<\/h5>\n<ul class=\"article-share-list list-unstyled m-0 p-0\">\n<li class=\"article-share-facebook m-0\">       <a href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer\/sharer.php?u=https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/30\/az-supreme-court-approves-ballot-measure-language-informing-voters-it-could-lead-to-ranked-choice-voting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-facebook\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article on Facebook<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-twitter m-0\">       <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=AZ%20Supreme%20Court%20Approves%20Ballot%20Measure%20Language%20Informing%20Voters%20It%20Could%20Lead%20To%20Ranked-Choice%20Voting&amp;url=https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/30\/az-supreme-court-approves-ballot-measure-language-informing-voters-it-could-lead-to-ranked-choice-voting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-twitter\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article on Twitter<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-truth-social m-0\">       <a href=\"https:\/\/truthsocial.com\/share?title=AZ%20Supreme%20Court%20Approves%20Ballot%20Measure%20Language%20Informing%20Voters%20It%20Could%20Lead%20To%20Ranked-Choice%20Voting&amp;url=https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/30\/az-supreme-court-approves-ballot-measure-language-informing-voters-it-could-lead-to-ranked-choice-voting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">         <svg xmlns=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" fill=\"currentColor\" style=\"width:36px;height:auto;\" viewbox=\"0 0 92 93\"><path d=\"M69.444 55.716H56.772v10.37h12.672zM64.487 37.795V27.32H38.666v38.664h13.18v-28.19zM21.05 27.321h12.653v10.471H21.051z\" https:><\/path><\/svg>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article on Truth Social<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-link m-0\">       <button data-clipboard-text=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/30\/az-supreme-court-approves-ballot-measure-language-informing-voters-it-could-lead-to-ranked-choice-voting\/\" data-tooltip-content=\"Copied!\" class=\"clip tooltip\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-link-variant\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Copy Article Link<\/span>       <\/button>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-email m-0\">       <a href=\"mailto:?subject=AZ%20Supreme%20Court%20Approves%20Ballot%20Measure%20Language%20Informing%20Voters%20It%20Could%20Lead%20To%20Ranked-Choice%20Voting&amp;body=The%20Arizona%20Supreme%20Court%20disagreed%20with%20the%20lower%20court's%20claim%20that%20the%20Legislative%20Council's%20description%20of%20the%20initiative%20was%20misleading.%20https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/30\/az-supreme-court-approves-ballot-measure-language-informing-voters-it-could-lead-to-ranked-choice-voting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">         <i class=\"mdi mdi-email\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>         <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Share Article via Email<\/span>       <\/a>     <\/li>\n<li class=\"article-share-email m-0\"><span class=\"printfriendly pf-button  pf-alignleft\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/thefederalist.com\/#\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" onclick=\"window.print(); return false;\" title=\"Printer Friendly, PDF &amp; Email\"><span id=\"printfriendly-text2\" class=\"pf-button-text\"><i class=\"mdi mdi-printer\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i><\/span><\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<p>On Wednesday, the Arizona Supreme Court struck down an attempt by supporters of a ballot initiative that would end partisan primaries to rewrite the measure ahead of the 2024 election. Approval of the proposal this November could lead to the adoption of ranked-choice voting (RCV) in Arizona.<\/p>\n<p>Siding with state lawmakers, Arizona&rsquo;s highest court <a href=\"https:\/\/stateaffairs.com\/arizona\/courts\/legislative-council\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ruled<\/a> that the description used by the legislative panel responsible for writing ballot initiative summaries &ldquo;accurately describes the Initiative&rdquo; and &ldquo;substantially complies&rdquo; with state law. The ruling overturns a prior decision from a Maricopa County Superior Court judge, who according to the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.influencewatch.org\/non-profit\/the-newsroom\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">States Newsroom<\/a>-affiliated Arizona Mirror, claimed the language used by the Legislative Council &ldquo;was intentionally misleading.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-cbd5bc33835c8eb7861a469936acaee9 fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-2\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-cbd5bc33835c8eb7861a469936acaee9\"><\/div>\n<p>If passed by voters, <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Arizona_Proposition_140,_Single_Primary_for_All_Candidates_and_Possible_RCV_General_Election_Initiative_(2024)\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Proposition 140<\/a> would amend the Arizona Constitution by instituting an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-biden-administration-is-a-loser-in-the-2022-midterms-democratic-strategist-offers-warning-to-his-party\/\" title=\"\u2018The Biden Administration Is A Loser\u2019 In The 2022 Midterms: Democratic Strategist Offers Warning To His Party\">open primary system<\/a> in which candidates of all parties run in the same primary. The state legislature would be tasked with determining how many candidates advance to the general election, which would use ranked-choice voting to determine the winner in races with three or more candidates. Should the legislature fail to decide how many candidates run in general elections by Nov. 1, 2025, the decision would fall upon the secretary of state. <\/p>\n<p>Under an <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/ranked-choice-voting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">RCV system<\/a>, voters are asked to rank candidates of all parties in order of preference. If no candidate receives more than 50 percent of first-choice votes in the first round of voting, the last-place finisher is eliminated, and his votes are reallocated to the voter&rsquo;s second-choice candidate. This process continues until one candidate receives a majority of votes.<\/p>\n<p>RCV is predominantly favored by Democrats as a way of flipping traditionally Republican-held seats and has <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/10\/31\/ranked-choice-voting-is-the-monster-under-the-bed-of-american-elections\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">produced<\/a> inaccurate election results and high rates of discarded ballots.<\/p>\n<p>The Legislative Council reportedly noted in its summary that a &ldquo;yes&rdquo; vote on Prop 140 could result in RCV being used in general elections. This prompted Make Elections Fair Arizona, the group behind Prop 140, to file a lawsuit challenging the language, in which its members claimed the Council&rsquo;s summary, as the Arizona Mirror <a href=\"https:\/\/azmirror.com\/2024\/08\/28\/prop-140-supreme-court-lets-legislatures-description-of-open-primaries-measure-stand\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">described<\/a>, &ldquo;unfairly focuses on the possibility for ranked-choice voting, which is not mandated by the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/pas-democrat-secstate-resigns-after-botching-process-over-amendment-for-child-sex-abuse-victims\/\" title=\"PA\u2019s Democrat SecState Resigns After Botching Process Over Amendment For Child Sex Abuse Victims\">proposed constitutional amendment<\/a>.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-985c885bd325b6304286d839ea56ee7d fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-6\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-985c885bd325b6304286d839ea56ee7d\"><\/div>\n<p>The Arizona Supreme Court disagreed with the lower court&rsquo;s claim that the Legislative Council&rsquo;s description of the initiative was misleading and ruled that the panel&rsquo;s description complies with state law.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;We unanimously conclude that the Council&rsquo;s analysis substantially complies [with the law],&rdquo;&nbsp;Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer reportedly <a href=\"https:\/\/azmirror.com\/2024\/08\/28\/prop-140-supreme-court-lets-legislatures-description-of-open-primaries-measure-stand\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">wrote<\/a>.&nbsp;&ldquo;The Council&rsquo;s analysis in the first numbered paragraph therefore accurately describes this provision by stating that the Initiative would amend the constitution to &lsquo;[a]llow for the use of voter ranking at all elections held in this state to determine which candidate received the highest number of votes.&rsquo;&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Wednesday&rsquo;s ruling came a week after the Grand Canyon State&rsquo;s highest court separately allowed a signature challenge to Prop 140 to move forward. According to <a href=\"https:\/\/azfreenews.com\/2024\/08\/arizona-supreme-court-rules-signature-challenge-against-prop-140-can-continue\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">AZ Free News<\/a>, the parties challenging the signatures submitted by Make Elections Fair Arizona to Secretary of State Adrian Fontes &ldquo;have argued that there are 40,000 duplicative signatures in the batch, which, if discarded, would bring the initiative under the minimum number required for placement on the ballot.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The Arizona Supreme Court said if it is ultimately determined there are enough invalid signatures to disqualify the initiative from appearing on the November ballot, it &ldquo;should issue an injunction precluding any votes for the measure from being counted,&rdquo; as the state began printing ballots on Aug. 23. <\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-bfec68c881d262b9b1c747c58fe20966 fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-10\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-bfec68c881d262b9b1c747c58fe20966\"><\/div>\n<p>Make Elections Fair has since <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.md\/0okDJ\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">requested<\/a> the high court reconsider its decision allowing for such a possibility, even if it&rsquo;s later determined the measure lacked the number of valid signatures. <\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-580aed80c790bcfad533254981accad0 fdrlst__b89e9-after-post-content\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-580aed80c790bcfad533254981accad0\"><\/div>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\">\n<div class=\"article-author-description fst-italic\">      Shawn Fleetwood is a staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the University of Mary Washington. He previously served as a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/exclusive-american-freedom-convoy-set-to-launch-on-march-1\/\" title=\"Exclusive: \u2018American Freedom Convoy\u2019 Set To Launch On March 1\">state content writer<\/a> for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on Twitter @ShawnFleetwood<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-author mt-30 mt-sm-60 pt-30 bdr-top-bold-black\">\n<div class=\"row g-0 align-items-center\">\n<div class=\"col-12 col-md-6\">\n<div class=\"article-author-profile d-flex align-items-center justify-content-center justify-content-md-start\">\n<div class=\"article-author-details\">\n<div class=\"label-md\">Shawn Fleetwood<\/div>\n<div class=\"article-author-twitter label-sm d-flex align-items-center mt-10\">             <i class=\"mdi mdi-twitter me-5\" aria-hidden=\"true\"><\/i>             <span class=\"visually-hidden\">Visit on Twitter<\/span>            <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/ShawnFleetwood\" target=\"_blank\" class=\"text-decoration-none\" rel=\"noopener\">@ShawnFleetwood<\/a>           <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"col-12 col-md-6 d-flex justify-content-center justify-content-md-end mt-15 mt-md-0\">        <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/author\/shawnfleetwood\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">More Articles<\/a>     <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article-tags bdr-top-black mt-30 mt-sm-60 pt-15 pt-md-45\">\n<ul class=\"list-unstyled d-flex flex-wrap align-items-center mb-0 mx-n10 p-0\">\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/2024-election\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">2024 election<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/arizona\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Arizona<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/arizona-supreme-court\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Arizona Supreme Court<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/ballot-initiative\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">ballot initiative<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/constitutional-amendment\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">constitutional amendment<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/court-ruling\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">court ruling<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/elections\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">Elections<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/open-primaries\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">open primaries<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/ranked-choice-voting\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">ranked-choice voting<\/a><\/li>\n<li class=\"mt-10 mx-10\"><a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/tag\/rcv\/\" class=\"btn btn-black btn-small\">RCV<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Wednesday, the Arizona Supreme Court rejected an effort by advocates of a ballot initiative aimed at abolishing partisan primaries to modify the proposal before the 2024 election. If approved in November, this initiative could pave the way for ranked-choice voting (RCV) in Arizona. The court sided with state lawmakers, stating that the description provided by the legislative panel responsible for drafting summaries of ballot initiatives &#8220;accurately describes the Initiative&#8221; and &#8220;substantially complies&#8221; with state law. This decision overturned a previous ruling from a Maricopa County Superior Court judge who had claimed that the Legislative Council&#8217;s language was &#8220;intentionally misleading.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>If voters approve Proposition 140, it would amend Arizona&#8217;s Constitution to create an open primary system where candidates from all parties compete in a single primary election. The state legislature would decide how many candidates advance to the general election, which would utilize ranked-choice voting for races with three or more candidates. If lawmakers do not determine how many candidates will participate in general elections by November 1, 2025, this responsibility will fall to the secretary of state.<\/p>\n<p>In an RCV system, voters rank candidates based on their preferences. If no candidate secures over 50 percent of first-choice votes during initial voting rounds, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated and their votes are redistributed according to voters&#8217; second choices. This process continues until one candidate achieves a majority.<\/p>\n<p>Ranked-choice voting is mainly supported by Democrats as a strategy to win traditionally Republican districts but has also led to inaccurate election outcomes and high rates of discarded ballots. The Legislative Council indicated in its summary that supporting Prop 140 could lead to RCV being implemented in general elections. This prompted Make Elections Fair Arizona\u2014the group advocating for Prop 140\u2014to file a lawsuit against this language, arguing it unfairly emphasized RCV&#8217;s potential use when it wasn&#8217;t mandated by their proposed amendment.<\/p>\n<p>The Arizona Supreme Court disagreed with lower court claims regarding misleading descriptions and affirmed that they complied with legal standards. Chief Justice Ann Scott Timmer stated that they unanimously concluded that \u201cthe Council\u2019s analysis substantially complies [with law],\u201d accurately reflecting how voter ranking would be utilized under this initiative.<\/p>\n<p>This ruling came just one week after another decision allowed challenges against signatures submitted for Prop 140 to proceed; opponents claim there are around 40,000 duplicate signatures which could disqualify it from appearing on ballots if removed.<\/p>\n<p>The court noted that if it&#8217;s determined there are enough invalid signatures rendering Prop 140 unqualified for inclusion on November\u2019s ballot, they should issue an injunction preventing any votes on it from being counted since ballots began printing on August 23rd.<\/p>\n<p>Make Elections Fair has since requested reconsideration from the high court regarding its decision about potentially invalidating votes even if later assessments show insufficient valid signatures<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":539,"featured_media":2334236,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Arizona_Supreme_Court_Phoenix_Arizona_-_panoramio_14.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[36739,39753,36700,38334,36265],"class_list":["post-2334235","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist","tag-arizona-politics","tag-az-court","tag-ballot-initiative","tag-election-reform","tag-ranked-choice-voting"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/Arizona_Supreme_Court_Phoenix_Arizona_-_panoramio_14.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2334235","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/539"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2334235"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2334235\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2334236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2334235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2334235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2334235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}