{"id":2328171,"date":"2024-08-21T07:39:02","date_gmt":"2024-08-21T11:39:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/dems-want-to-wield-the-doj-against-election-laws-they-hate\/"},"modified":"2024-08-21T07:47:01","modified_gmt":"2024-08-21T11:47:01","slug":"dems-want-to-wield-the-doj-against-election-laws-they-hate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/dems-want-to-wield-the-doj-against-election-laws-they-hate\/","title":{"rendered":"Dems Want To Wield The DOJ Against Election Laws They Hate"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">22<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fdems-want-to-wield-the-doj-against-election-laws-they-hate%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2328171&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The Democratic Party&#8217;s platform advocates for increased federal intervention in state elections through the Department of Justice (DOJ) to promote voting rights. This push comes as the party prepares for a controversial Democratic National Convention in \u2062Chicago. They claim to have significantly expanded DOJ staff dedicated to enforcing voting\u2062 rights laws and are advocating for the passage of the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, which would allow the federal \u200dgovernment to\u2064 override local election laws if deemed discriminatory against minorities.<\/p>\n<p>Historically, the Voting Rights Act of 1965 mandated certain jurisdictions to obtain federal\u200b approval before changing voting laws to combat racial\u2063 discrimination, a measure that was extended until 2006. However, the Supreme \u2063Court&#8217;s 2013\u200d ruling in Shelby\u200d County v. Holder deemed the preclearance formula\u2062 outdated, limiting federal control over state \u2064voting laws.<\/p>\n<p>The proposed John R.\u2063 Lewis Voting Rights Act could reinstate and potentially amplify federal oversight of state election laws by \u2062imposing stricter \u200crequirements for approvals, allowing the DOJ to\u200d challenge laws based on allegations of discrimination. The\u200d platform highlights ongoing issues, including criticisms of Georgia\u2019s voter ID laws, which have drawn comparisons to Jim Crow-era restrictions \u2064from prominent Democrats like\u2064 President Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland.\u2063 Garland \u200bhas committed to using the DOJ to oppose what they term\u200c discriminatory voting laws\u2062 enacted by several states.<\/p>\n<p>This reflects a broader Democratic strategy to control the narrative around voting\u2062 rights, framing certain <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/appeals-court-smacks-down-democrats-ludicrous-challenge-to-floridas-congressional-map\/\" title=\"Court rejects Democrats&#039; baseless challenge to Florida&#039;s congressional map\">election integrity \u2063measures<\/a> as regressive while\u2062 emphasizing the need for federal intervention in state-regulated elections, amid claims of partisan exploitation of\u200b the DOJ.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\n<p>The Democrat Party platform calls for the Department of Justice to intervene in elections across the country, supposedly in the interest of  &ldquo;voting rights.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The party released its <a href=\"https:\/\/democrats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/FINAL-MASTER-PLATFORM.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">platform<\/a> Sunday, ahead of the <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/TheKevinDalton\/status\/1825335158486319523\/video\/1\">already-contentious<\/a> Democratic National Convention in Chicago. It boasts the Department of Justice has &ldquo;more than doubled&rdquo; staff to enforce so-called &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-administration-democrats-push-reformed-voting-rights-laws\/\" title=\"Biden administration, Democrats push reformed voting rights laws\">voting rights laws<\/a>.&rdquo; The document also calls for passage of the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, which, as Jonatahan Tobin previously <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2022\/01\/07\/democrats-top-priority-before-fall-elections-is-rigging-u-s-voting-rules\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">explained<\/a> in The Federalist, would &ldquo;allow the federal government to intervene anywhere in the country to overrule local or state authorities&rdquo; when the left claims election discrimination against minorities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>This proposed change, along with recent Democrat efforts, reveals the party&rsquo;s intent to exert federal control over state elections.<\/p>\n<h2>Federalizing State Elections<\/h2>\n<p>When Congress <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/03\/07\/democrats-bill-would-give-the-doj-veto-power-over-state-and-local-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">passed<\/a> the Voting Rights Act of 1965, it enacted a <a href=\"https:\/\/ballotpedia.org\/Voting_Rights_Act\">formula<\/a> requiring some jurisdictions to seek federal approval before changing voting laws, apparently to reduce racial voting restrictions of the Jim Crow era in compliance with the law. Congress continued authorizing the formula through 2006, letting the federal government continue to dictate local voting laws.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>For example, South Carolina was required to &ldquo;<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/03\/07\/democrats-bill-would-give-the-doj-veto-power-over-state-and-local-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">preclear<\/a>&rdquo; a law requiring photo ID to vote in 2012, and the DOJ denied it. Leftist groups like the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclusc.org\/en\/press-releases\/court-blocks-south-carolina%E2%80%99s-discriminatory-voter-id-law-for-2012-election\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">American Civil Liberties Union<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/court-cases\/south-carolina-v-holder\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Brennan Center for Justice<\/a> intervened in <em>South Carolina v. Holder<\/em>, and a three-judge panel&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/court-cases\/south-carolina-v-holder\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">allowed<\/a>&nbsp;the law to take effect, but &ldquo;clarified&rdquo; that the law &ldquo;does not require a photo ID to vote.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court ruled in&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/570\/529\/#tab-opinion-1970752\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><em>Shelby County v. Holder<\/em><\/a>&nbsp;in 2013, however, that the &ldquo;preclearance&rdquo; formula established in the 1965 Voting Rights Act was outdated and the federal government could no longer use it to exert control over state voting laws.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;[L]argely because of the Voting Rights Act, voting tests were abolished, disparities in voter registration and turnout due to race were erased, and African-Americans attained political office in record numbers,&rdquo; the ruling reads.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The court <a href=\"https:\/\/supreme.justia.com\/cases\/federal\/us\/570\/529\/#tab-opinion-1970752\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">ruled<\/a> the 15th Amendment, which allows all citizens the right to vote, was &ldquo;not designed to punish for the past,&rdquo; but to &ldquo;ensure a better future.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>But the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, would <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/03\/07\/democrats-bill-would-give-the-doj-veto-power-over-state-and-local-election-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">override<\/a> this ruling. It would impose even stricter requirements for federal approval of changes in election law, as The Federalist previously reported, allowing the DOJ to attack laws for mere allegations that they disadvantage minority voters.<\/p>\n<p>The Constitution&rsquo;s Article 1, Section 4 contains an <a href=\"https:\/\/constitution.congress.gov\/browse\/article-1\/section-4\/clause-1\/#:~:text=Clause%201%20Elections%20Clause,the%20Places%20of%20chusing%20Senators.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Elections Clause<\/a> that gives states the power to determine &ldquo;times, places and manner&rdquo; of elections. It allows Congress &mdash; not federal agencies &mdash; to &ldquo;make or alter such regulations.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<h2>Weaponizing The DOJ<\/h2>\n<p>The Democrat platform&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/democrats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/FINAL-MASTER-PLATFORM.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">targets<\/a>&nbsp;what leftists frequently&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/analysis-opinion\/georgias-voter-suppression-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">call<\/a>&nbsp;Georgia&rsquo;s &ldquo;voter suppression law&rdquo; &mdash; which&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.democracydocket.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/03\/GA-SB-202.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">requires<\/a>&nbsp;voter ID to obtain an absentee ballot, places drop boxes inside more secure early voting sites, bans the use of &ldquo;buses and other readily movable facilities&rdquo; as regular polling locations,&nbsp;and bans offering potential&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.politifact.com\/factchecks\/2021\/mar\/29\/josh-holmes\/facts-about-georgias-ban-food-water-giveaways-vote\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">incentives<\/a>&nbsp;like water or snacks to voters in line at the polls.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Thirty-six states currently have voter ID <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncsl.org\/elections-and-campaigns\/voter-id\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">laws<\/a> of some sort. Eighty-one percent of Americans <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pewresearch.org\/politics\/2024\/02\/07\/bipartisan-support-for-early-in-person-voting-voter-id-election-day-national-holiday\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">support<\/a> voter ID requirements, according to a Pew Research study earlier this year.<\/p>\n<p>But President Joe Biden called the Georgia law &ldquo;Jim Crow 2.0&rdquo; in a 2022 Atlanta speech.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;It&rsquo;s not hyperbole; this is a fact,&rdquo; Biden <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing-room\/speeches-remarks\/2022\/01\/11\/remarks-by-president-biden-on-protecting-the-right-to-vote\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">said<\/a>. &ldquo;They&rsquo;ll just decide what they want and then do it. That&rsquo;s the kind of power you see in totalitarian states, not in democracies.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Never mind the Democrat platform&rsquo;s <a href=\"https:\/\/democrats.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/08\/FINAL-MASTER-PLATFORM.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">call<\/a> to exert federal control over state election laws.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Leftist groups including the ACLU, NAACP, and Southern Poverty Law Center <a href=\"https:\/\/www.aclu.org\/press-releases\/civil-rights-groups-sue-georgia-over-new-sweeping-voter-suppression-law\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">sued<\/a> Georgia for its <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/report-supreme-court-seems-to-favor-upholding-key-election-integrity-laws\/\" title=\"Report: Supreme Court Seems To Favor Upholding Key Election Integrity Laws\">election integrity law<\/a> in 2021. The DOJ weighed in with a complaint that effectively <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2021\/06\/29\/9-most-insane-lies-about-georgias-voter-id-law-in-dojs-lawsuit\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">asserted<\/a>, as previously explained in The Federalist, that Georgia&rsquo;s elections are the same as in 1965, that Georgia Republican legislators are racist, and that racism within the state makes its laws racist, among other things.<\/p>\n<p>Biden compared Republican election integrity measures to &ldquo;Jim Crow&rdquo; in 2021, labeling them the &ldquo;most significant test of our democracy since the Civil War.&rdquo; He touted the 2020 election &mdash; rife with third-party election <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/07\/02\/how-red-states-can-hold-zuckbucks-group-legally-accountable-for-2020-election-meddling\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">meddling<\/a> &mdash; as the &ldquo;the most examined and the fullest expression of the will of the people in the history of this nation.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Democrat Attorney General Merrick Garland echoed Biden&rsquo;s comparison of election integrity measures to Jim Crow laws earlier this year, vowing to <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/03\/04\/biden-department-of-justice-declares-war-on-voter-id-and-other-election-security-laws\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">weaponize<\/a> the DOJ against states.<\/p>\n<p>&ldquo;[T]he Justice Department is fighting back,&rdquo; Garland said. &ldquo;We are challenging efforts by states and jurisdictions to implement discriminatory, burdensome, and unnecessary restrictions on access to the ballot, including those related to mail-in voting, the use of drop boxes, and voter ID requirements.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>The DOJ <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/20\/biden-doj-asks-scotus-to-squash-arizonas-proof-of-citizenship-voter-requirements-for-2024-election\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">asked<\/a> the Supreme Court on Friday to keep Arizona from requiring proof of citizenship in November&rsquo;s election, The Federalist reported. In Arizona, even if voters don&rsquo;t prove citizenship in state elections, they are still <a href=\"https:\/\/www.azcleanelections.gov\/federal-only-voters\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">allowed<\/a> to vote in federal elections &ldquo;in compliance with the National Voter Registration Act&rdquo; of 1993, according to the Citizens Clean Elections Commission.<\/p>\n<h2>Partisan Control<\/h2>\n<p>The DOJ is <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/06\/04\/garland-insists-doj-will-keep-ignoring-increasing-public-alarm-over-its-abuses-of-power\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">compromised<\/a> with partisan <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2022\/08\/17\/deranged-russia-hoaxer-peter-strzok-is-back-with-one-of-the-most-unhinged-trump-conspiracy-theories-yet\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">actors<\/a>. It has continued to engage in <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/08\/12\/the-feds-election-interference-didnt-stop-after-2020-it-just-got-more-sophisticated\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">election interference<\/a>, both working with Big Tech on elections and pushing <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2023\/10\/25\/doj-should-investigate-its-own-russia-collusion-hoax-leaks-not-the-hill-staff-who-caught-them\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">debunked<\/a> claims that former President Donald Trump committed election collusion with Russia.<\/p>\n<p>Biden also issued an &ldquo;Executive Order On Promoting Access To Voting&rdquo; in 2021, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.whitehouse.gov\/briefing-room\/presidential-actions\/2021\/03\/07\/executive-order-on-promoting-access-to-voting\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">directing<\/a> federal agencies to work with so-called &ldquo;nonpartisan third-party&rdquo; groups to register voters and push get-out-the-vote efforts to likely Democrat voters ahead of November&rsquo;s election.&nbsp;This order, dubbed &ldquo;Bidenbucks,&rdquo; effectively directs federal agencies including the DOJ to <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/author\/logan-washburn\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">interfere<\/a> in elections.<\/p>\n<p>Ironically, the party <a href=\"https:\/\/democrats.org\/where-we-stand\/party-platform\/restoring-and-strengthening-our-democracy\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">accuses<\/a> Republicans of &ldquo;disenfranchis[ing]&rdquo; voters and claims it wants to &ldquo;bring an end&rdquo; to &ldquo;dark money.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<p>Considering the Democrat platform&rsquo;s call to federalize state elections, and Democrat politicians&rsquo; push to transform elections while targeting Republican election integrity bills, it seems the leftist-legal complex hopes to cement its hold on American elections. <\/p>\n<hr>\n<p>      Logan Washburn is a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/lawsuit-clark-county-keeps-commercial-addresses-on-voter-rolls\/\" title=\"Lawsuit: Clark County Keeps Commercial Addresses On Voter Rolls\">staff writer covering election integrity<\/a>. He graduated from Hillsdale College, served as Christopher Rufo&#8217;s editorial assistant, and has bylines in The Wall Street Journal, The Tennessean, and The Daily Caller. Logan is originally from Central Oregon but now lives in rural Michigan.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Democratic Party&#8217;s platform advocates for the Department of Justice to take action in elections nationwide, claiming it is to protect &#8220;voting rights.&#8221; This platform was unveiled on Sunday, just before the highly debated Democratic National Convention in Chicago. It highlights that the Department of Justice has significantly increased its personnel dedicated to enforcing these &#8220;voting rights laws.&#8221; Additionally, the document calls for the passage of the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act, which, as Jonathan Tobin previously noted in The Federalist, would empower the federal government to intervene anywhere in the country and override local or state authorities when allegations of election discrimination against minorities arise. This proposed legislation and recent actions by Democrats indicate a desire to impose federal oversight on state elections.<\/p>\n<p>When Congress enacted the Voting Rights Act of 1965, it established a formula requiring certain jurisdictions to obtain federal approval before modifying voting laws\u2014an effort aimed at eliminating racial voting restrictions from the Jim Crow era. This formula was reauthorized through 2006, allowing continued federal influence over local voting regulations. For instance, South Carolina had to seek preclearance for a photo ID law in 2012; however, this request was denied by DOJ despite some legal challenges allowing parts of it to proceed with clarifications.<\/p>\n<p>In 2013&#8217;s Shelby County v. Holder ruling, however, the Supreme Court determined that this preclearance requirement was outdated and no longer applicable for controlling state voting laws. The court acknowledged that due largely to measures like those from the Voting Rights Act, significant progress had been made regarding voter registration and representation among African Americans.<\/p>\n<p>The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act aims to counter this ruling by imposing stricter requirements for federal approval on changes related to election law and enabling DOJ scrutiny based solely on claims that such laws may disadvantage minority voters.<\/p>\n<p>According to Article 1 Section 4 of the Constitution\u2014known as an Elections Clause\u2014states have authority over determining &#8220;times, places and manner&#8221; of elections while Congress holds power over making or altering these regulations.<\/p>\n<p>The Democratic platform specifically criticizes what leftists label Georgia\u2019s \u201cvoter suppression law,\u201d which mandates voter ID for absentee ballots and restricts certain polling practices deemed problematic by critics. Despite thirty-six states having some form of voter ID requirements\u2014with a Pew Research study indicating strong public support\u2014President Biden condemned Georgia\u2019s law as \u201cJim Crow 2.0\u201d during a speech in Atlanta last year.<\/p>\n<p>Biden has consistently equated Republican efforts aimed at ensuring election integrity with Jim Crow-era policies while asserting they pose significant threats against democracy itself since he characterized them as attempts at disenfranchisement reminiscent of historical injustices faced by African Americans.<\/p>\n<p>Democratic Attorney General Merrick Garland echoed Biden&#8217;s sentiments earlier this year about using DOJ resources against states implementing what he described as discriminatory restrictions affecting ballot access\u2014including mail-in voting procedures\u2014and has taken steps such as challenging Arizona\u2019s proof-of-citizenship requirement ahead of upcoming elections.<\/p>\n<p>Concerns have been raised about partisan influences within DOJ operations regarding electoral matters; accusations include collusion with tech companies during elections alongside unfounded claims surrounding former President Trump\u2019s alleged connections with Russia concerning electoral interference.<\/p>\n<p>In addition to these actions targeting Republican-led initiatives around election integrity measures under scrutiny from various left-leaning organizations like ACLU or NAACP\u2014the party also launched an executive order promoting access-to-voting efforts through collaboration between federal agencies and third-party groups perceived likely aligned politically towards Democrats ahead November polls\u2014a move dubbed \u201cBidenbucks.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Ironically accusing Republicans themselves regarding disenfranchisement tactics while simultaneously advocating reforms intended toward consolidating control over American electoral processes suggests broader ambitions within progressive circles aiming toward reshaping how democracy functions domestically moving forward<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":507,"featured_media":2328172,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/code-block0AJoe-Biden-Democratic-Nominee.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[3933,7076,38778,32504,36625],"class_list":["post-2328171","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-dems","tag-doj","tag-election-laws","tag-political-strategy","tag-social-justice"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/code-block0AJoe-Biden-Democratic-Nominee.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328171","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/507"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2328171"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2328171\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2328172"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2328171"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2328171"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2328171"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}