{"id":2275481,"date":"2024-06-21T21:04:01","date_gmt":"2024-06-22T01:04:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-decision-raises-timing-question-on-bidens-illegal-immigration-order\/"},"modified":"2024-06-21T21:07:03","modified_gmt":"2024-06-22T01:07:03","slug":"scotus-decision-raises-timing-question-on-bidens-illegal-immigration-order","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scotus-decision-raises-timing-question-on-bidens-illegal-immigration-order\/","title":{"rendered":"SCOTUS Ruling Questions Timing of Biden&#8217;s Immigration Order"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">16<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fscotus-decision-raises-timing-question-on-bidens-illegal-immigration-order%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2275481&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>A Supreme\u200c Court\u2062 ruling \u2064on a Friday \u200bmorning has\u200c <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/major-payment-processor-works-with-left-wing-charity-tied-to-palestinian-terrorism\/\" title=\"Payment processor partners with Palestinian terrorism-linked left-wing charity.\">raised \u200bconcerns<\/a> regarding the timing of a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-backtracks-on-mask-guidance\/\" title=\"Biden backtracks on mask guidance\">recent <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/judge-rules-ca-gov-overstepped-his-authority-with-covid-order-issues-permanent-injunction-restraining-newsom-from-further-issuing-unconstitutional-orders\/\" title=\"Judge Rules CA Gov Overstepped His Authority with Covid Order, Issues Permanent Injunction Restraining Newsom From Further Issuing Unconstitutional Orders\">executive order<\/a><\/a> by President Joe Biden, leading Sean Davis from The Federalist to speculate about the possibility\u200c of a leak within the court. The executive order in question aimed to \u2063legalize <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/bidens-executive-actions-on-the-border-are-making-the-crisis-even-worse\/\" title=\"Biden's Border Executive Actions Intensify Crisis\">immigrant spouses<\/a> of American citizens, which was \u2064described \u200cas &#8220;oddly specific&#8221; \u2064by Davis, especially in light of the \u2062court&#8217;s decision in The State Dept. v. Munoz. This aspect fueled his suspicion about\u200d the unusual timing, suggesting that the executive order might\u200b have been influenced by prior knowledge of the court&#8217;s ruling. Davis\u200c questioned whether there might be a \u2064new\u2062 leaker at the Supreme Court, hinting at insider information potentially shaping the administration&#8217;s actions.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p>A Friday morning <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/topic\/supreme-court\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Supreme Court<\/a> ruling raised questions about the timing of a recent executive order from President Joe Biden, prompting The Federalist\u2019s Sean Davis to ask whether there was a \u201cnew leaker\u201d at the court.<\/p>\n<p>Davis pointed to Biden\u2019s recent order legalizing immigrant spouses of American citizens, calling it \u201coddly specific\u201d and noting that the Supreme Court\u2019s decision in <em>The State Dept. v. Munoz<\/em> made the timing of that order seem suspect.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIs there a new leaker at the Supreme Court? Just days ago, the Biden regime announced a radical new executive order to legalize the immigrant spouses of citizens, even if those immigrants were in the U.S. to commit crimes or were here legally,\u201d Davis began. \u201cIt was very strange timing for such an oddly specific EO.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Davis included a screenshot of the court\u2019s ruling, handed down on Friday morning along with several other rulings.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\">\n<p dir=\"ltr\" lang=\"en\">Is there a new leaker at the Supreme Court?<\/p>\n<p>Just days ago, the Biden regime announced a radical new executive order to legalize the immigrant spouses of citizens, even if those immigrants were in the U.S. to commit crimes or were here legally. It was very strange timing for such\u2026 <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/X9MRHkGdVY\">pic.twitter.com\/X9MRHkGdVY<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Sean Davis (@seanmdav) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/seanmdav\/status\/1804163183315140786?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">June 21, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cNow we know why: the Supreme Court ruled today in a 6-3 decision that the U.S. is not required to admit immigrant spouses of American citizens in a case involving an MS-13 member whose spouse was a U.S. citizen and who demanded legalization,\u201d Davis continued. \u201c\u2018From this Nation\u2019s beginnings, the admission of noncitizens into this country was characterized as \u2018of favor [and] not right,\u2019 the Court ruled.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" aria-describedby=\"sk-tooltip-9096\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp&#038;source=gmail&#038;ust=1712932862202000&#038;usg=AOvVaw0plT8RRdMy9XUpIhocnjQS\">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<p>Davis\u2019 conclusion was that someone at the White House may have known which way that decision was going to go prior to Friday\u2019s announcement: \u201cSomebody at the White House was clearly tipped off about the unannounced Supreme Court decision, which explains why the White House rushed out such a shoddily written and argued new executive order to open the border even more: the Biden regime knew how the Supreme Court was going to rule, and it sought to pre-empt the court with its absurd EO. So the question now is: who, exactly, is leaking information on rulings to the Biden White House?\u201d<\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A recent Supreme Court decision on Friday cast doubt on the timing of President Joe Biden&#8217;s executive order concerning immigrant spouses of American citizens. Sean Davis of The Federalist speculated about a possible new leaker at the court, describing the order as &#8220;oddly specific.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":93,"featured_media":2275482,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2024\/05\/GettyImages-2153139564-scaled.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2275481","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2024\/05\/GettyImages-2153139564-scaled.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2275481","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/93"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2275481"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2275481\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2275482"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2275481"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2275481"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2275481"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}