{"id":2266703,"date":"2024-06-13T08:51:02","date_gmt":"2024-06-13T12:51:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/unanimous-wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-racine-mobile-voting-van-keep-polling-places\/"},"modified":"2024-06-13T09:01:08","modified_gmt":"2024-06-13T13:01:08","slug":"unanimous-wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-racine-mobile-voting-van-keep-polling-places","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/unanimous-wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-racine-mobile-voting-van-keep-polling-places\/","title":{"rendered":"Wisconsin Supreme Court unanimously rules against Racine mobile voting van, upholds traditional polling sites"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">28<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Funanimous-wisconsin-supreme-court-rejects-racine-mobile-voting-van-keep-polling-places%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2266703&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>Conservatives on \u200dthe Wisconsin Supreme Court criticized a \u200dcourt decision banning Racine County&#8217;s mobile voting \u200dvan \u2062while allowing other polling locations in the Democrat-heavy\u2064 city to remain. Despite the conservative \u200ddissent, \u2063the liberal-majority court\u2063 unanimously supported the ruling. The scenario you&#8217;ve described regarding \u2062the Wisconsin Supreme Gourt&#8217;s decision involves an interesting case of the complex dynamics often \u200bpresent\u2063 in legal rulings that touch upon voting rights and the mechanisms of voting. \u200cHowever, based on the information you&#8217;ve provided, there seems to be some inconsistency. If the \u2062court has\u2064 a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/liberal-law-professor-jonathan-turley-explains-the-dangers-of-pursing-a-supreme-court-that-fits-the-age-of-rage\/\" title=\"Liberal Law Professor Jonathan Turley Explains The Dangers Of Pursing A Supreme Court That Fits The \u2018Age of Rage\u2019\">liberal majority<\/a> and the decision was \u200cunanimous,\u200b the support from conservative \u200bjustices despite their criticism highlights the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/corporate-dei-headed-for-legal-test-after-supreme-court-affirmative-action-ruling\/\" title=\"Supreme Court ruling puts Corporate DEI to legal test.\">complex legal considerations<\/a> that may have guided their\u2062 decision.<\/p>\n<p>In interpreting such decisions, it&#8217;s important to consider the \u200dlegal arguments and justifications provided by the court. Courts may consider factors like the legality and fairness of various methods of voting,\u2062 potential impacts on voter turnout, and adherence to state \u200band federal laws regarding elections. In this\u200b instance, banning a mobile voting van might\u2063 have been seen legally necessary by \u2064the court to ensure fairness and \u2062compliance with existing\u200c election laws, which might have \u2064driven even dissenting members to concur \u2064with the ruling.<\/p>\n<p>Without more specific details of the court&#8217;s arguments and broader\u200b context\u2064 about the\u2062 case (e.g., reasons for banning the mobile\u2062 van, arguments made by opposing \u200csides, \u200dapplicable legal statutes), it would be \u200dchallenging to fully\u2062 assess the \u2064dynamics at play. The essential takeaway here\u200d is \u2064that court \u200cdecisions on matters involving \u2062election procedures sometimes require balancing access to voting with adherence to regulated \u200cand uniformly\u2062 applied election practices.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<div data-td-block-uid=\"tdi_79\">\n<p>(The Center Square) \u2013\u00a0Conservatives on the Wisconsin Supreme Court say the order that bans Racine County\u2019s mobile voting van but keeps the city\u2019s Democrat-heavy other polling locations is nonsensical.<\/p>\n<p>The liberal-majority court unanimously ruled that Racine, and other cities in Wisconsin, cannot use vans to collect ballots.<\/p>\n<p>A Racine County judge said the same thing in January. The judge also ruled Racine County chose the stops for its mobile voting van in areas of the city that favored democrats.<\/p>\n<p>The liberal-majority court disagreed and issued a stay on that idea.<\/p>\n<p>The majority wrote in their opinion that they don\u2019t want the Racine judge\u2019s ruling to \u201cdramatically curtail[] the number of locations municipalities may designate as alternate absentee ballot sites.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe conclude that public interest weighs heavily in favor of staying the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/federal-court-rules-in-favor-of-abortion-waiting-period\/\" title=\"Federal court rules in favor of abortion waiting period\">circuit court\u2019<\/a>s ruling regarding designating alternate absentee ballot sites,\u201d the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/california-democrats-cut-proposed-penalties-for-child-prostitution-buyers\/\" title=\"California Democrats have reduced penalties for buyers of child prostitution\">majority added<\/a>. \u201cAt this stage, just months before the August primary and November general elections, there is a risk that the circuit court\u2019s ruling will disrupt ongoing preparations for those elections by creating uncertainty about which sites may be designated as alternate absentee balloting locations. Granting a stay will, as mentioned previously, simply ensure the status quo since 2016.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Conservative Justice Rebecca Bradley said the majority\u2019s reasoning is \u201cnonsensical.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cA first-year law student understands that courts stay orders, not reasoning,\u201d she wrote.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn its ongoing effort to resolve cases in a manner benefitting its preferred political party, the majority enters a bewildering order heretofore unheard of in the legal realm. While the majority (correctly) denies the motion to stay the circuit court\u2019s order, the majority \u2018stays\u2019 a portion of the circuit court\u2019s legal analysis. This is not a \u2018thing\u2019 under the law,\u201d Bradley added. \u201cThe majority doesn\u2019t explain, but it obviously wants everyone to know it does not like the circuit court\u2019s analysis, even if it cannot find fault with the circuit court\u2019s actual order. The majority wreaks havoc with the law governing motions to stay, and egregiously misrepresents the circuit court\u2019s decision.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Conservatives on the Wisconsin Supreme Court criticized the ban on Racine County&#8217;s mobile voting van while allowing other Democrat-favored polling sites. The liberal-majority court, along with a Racine County judge, unanimously prohibited the use of vans for ballot collection across Racine and other Wisconsin cities<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2266704,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/wisconsin-capitol-1024x596.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2266703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/wisconsin-capitol-1024x596.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2266703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2266703"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2266703\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2266704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2266703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2266703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2266703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}