{"id":2248423,"date":"2024-05-20T08:03:02","date_gmt":"2024-05-20T12:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/i-researched-judicial-ethics-rules-for-years-heres-why-the-alito-recusal-calls-are-ridiculous\/"},"modified":"2024-05-20T08:14:24","modified_gmt":"2024-05-20T12:14:24","slug":"i-researched-judicial-ethics-rules-for-years-heres-why-the-alito-recusal-calls-are-ridiculous","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/i-researched-judicial-ethics-rules-for-years-heres-why-the-alito-recusal-calls-are-ridiculous\/","title":{"rendered":"After Extensive Research, Why Demanding Alito&#8217;s Recusal Seems Absurd"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fi-researched-judicial-ethics-rules-for-years-heres-why-the-alito-recusal-calls-are-ridiculous%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2248423&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The left\u200b and media shifted focus to \u2062Justice Alito, urging his \u200drecusal from Supreme\u2064 Court cases due to \u200da &#8220;Stop the Steal&#8221; symbol\u200b at his home. However, the ethical violation <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/women-accusing-jeffrey-epstein-of-abuse-sue-deutsche-bank-jpmorgan-chase\/\" title=\"Women Accusing Jeffrey Epstein of Abuse Sue Deutsche Bank, JPMorgan Chase\">claim lacks merit<\/a> as the Code of \u200dConduct doesn&#8217;t regulate spouses&#8217; actions. Justice Alito&#8217;s \u200cimpartiality remains intact despite \u2064biased calls\u200d for recusal in Trump-related cases. The left and\u200d media\u2063 called for Justice Alito&#8217;s recusal from Supreme Court cases over a &#8220;Stop\u200c the Steal&#8221; symbol at his\u200d home.\u2064 The claim lacks merit as the Code of Conduct doesn&#8217;t cover \u2064spouses&#8217;\u200b actions. Justice Alito&#8217;s impartiality\u200b remains unaffected by \u2063biased demands for recusal in Trump-related cases.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><\/p>\n<div class=\"article-content\">\n<p>Last week, the left and their paramours in the propaganda press paused momentarily from their near-continuous assault on Justice Clarence Thomas to set their sights on a new target: Justice Samuel Alito. <\/p>\n<p>Justice Alito, headlines barked, must recuse from the pending Supreme Court cases involving Jan. 6 defendants and Trump\u2019s appeal concerning presidential immunity because a \u201cStop the Steal\u201d symbol was displayed at his house in January 2021. Democrats quickly <a href=\"https:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/full-list-lawmakers-calli-1902153\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">joined<\/a> the choir screeching for Alito to recuse. But to borrow a line from Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, the idea that Alito violated any ethical rules, or that the Code of Conduct for the justices requires his recusal from those cases, is wrong six ways to Sunday.<\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-2-long d-flex justify-content-center\" style=\"margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; text-align: center; \" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-222279173\">\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-1379703300879-0\" class=\"mb-30\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-1e9189ec25f92832570cf4739a679139 fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-2\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-1e9189ec25f92832570cf4739a679139\"><\/div>\n<p>The false flag of an ethical scandal was clear from The New York Times\u2019 spin in breaking the story on Thursday under the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/05\/16\/us\/justice-alito-upside-down-flag.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">headline<\/a>: \u201cAt Justice Alito\u2019s House, a \u2018Stop the Steal\u2019 Symbol on Display.\u201d From the Old Gray Lady\u2019s header, one would think the Alitos had displayed a banner brandishing the phrase outside their home. <\/p>\n<p>But no, as the article soon acknowledged, it was an upside-down American flag seen flying outside the home where Justice Alito lives with his wife. And it was his wife who raised the flag \u2014 in protest of a neighbor displaying a profane yard sign, as we would soon learn.<\/p>\n<p>The Times, though, quoted supposed ethics experts, including Amanda Frost, a law professor at the University of Virginia, to frame the hanging of an upside-down flag as a public declaration of \u201cStop the Steal.\u201d This is \u201cthe equivalent of putting a \u2018Stop the Steal\u2019 sign in your yard,\u201d Frost reportedly told The New York Times.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s quite the leap of logic \u2014 and one even the Times\u2019 reporters refrained from making. (Frost did not respond to The Federalist\u2019s request for comment). The Times instead left its readers to infer the upside-down flag professed a \u201cStop the Steal\u201d sentiment by noting some of Trump\u2019s supporters had inverted Old Glory in contesting the 2020 election results. <\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-5c0e3d711d1f6930e4004c4321083be9 fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-6\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-5c0e3d711d1f6930e4004c4321083be9\"><\/div>\n<p>That inference, furthered by Frost\u2019s declaration, however, represents a rewriting of history. While there may have been a few upside-down flags seen displayed during protests at the capital, calling it a symbol of \u201cStop the Steal\u201d is a completely concocted narrative. Consider, for instance, that contemporaneous reporting by leftist outlets, such as CNN, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnn.com\/2021\/01\/09\/us\/capitol-hill-insurrection-extremist-flags-soh\/index.html\">professing<\/a> to \u201cdecod[e] the extremists symbols and groups at the Capitol Hill insurrection\u201d included no mention of protesters appropriating an upside-down flag as a universal symbol for \u201cStop the Steal\u201d adherents.  <\/p>\n<p>The case against Justice Alito crumbles without the upside-down flag holding the professed political meaning his critics claim. But even accepting the false narrative that flying an upside-down flag is the \u201cequivalent of putting a \u2018Stop the Steal\u2019 sign in your yard,\u201d the charges of unethical conduct and the clamoring for recusal fare no better.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Code of Conduct<\/h2>\n<p>There are two distinct issues: First, whether Mrs. Alito\u2019s raising of the flag represented an ethical violation for Justice Alito. Second, whether Mrs. Alito\u2019s display of an upside-down flag requires Justice Alito to recuse. The answer to both questions is no.<\/p>\n<p>On the first question, for simplicity\u2019s sake, let\u2019s assume Mrs. Alito placed a \u201cStop the Steal\u201d sign in the front yard of the home she shares with her husband. Such a sign would qualify as political activity within the meaning of the various ethical codes governing judicial conduct. <\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-46f699ee789c257d46e222d8c455653d fdrlst__b89e9-paragraph-10\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-46f699ee789c257d46e222d8c455653d\"><\/div>\n<p>The Code of Conduct governing Supreme Court justices, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/about\/Code-of-Conduct-for-Justices_November_13_2023.pdf\">adopted<\/a> Nov. 13, 2023, to formalize the court\u2019s long-standing ethical traditions, provides in Canon 5 that \u201ca justice should refrain from political activity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Canon 5 then specifies that \u201c[a] Justice should not: (1) act as a leader or hold any office in a political organization; (2) make speeches for a political organization or candidate, or publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for public office; or (3) solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution to a political organization or candidate, or attend or purchase a ticket for a dinner or other event sponsored by a political organization or candidate.\u201d The canon then ends with a catchall provision that \u201c[a] Justice should not engage in other political activity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The posting of a sign, such as \u201cStop the Steal,\u201d would clearly fit in the \u201cshould not engage in other political activity\u201d prohibition. But it wasn\u2019t Justice Alito who hung the upside-down flag we are hypothesizing was instead a \u201cStop the Steal\u201d placard \u2014 it was Mrs. Alito. And the Code of Conduct does not govern a spouse\u2019s actions.<\/p>\n<p>You wouldn\u2019t know that from The New York Times\u2019 reporting, though. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt might be his spouse or someone else living in his home, but he shouldn\u2019t have it in his yard as his message to the world,\u201d the Times quoted Frost as opining. Other unnamed \u201cjudicial experts,\u201d according to The New York Times, \u201csaid in interviews that the flag was a clear violation of ethics rules\u2026\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That is not at all what the ethical rules provide, however, as guidance surrounding the similarly restrictive codes of conduct for federal judges and federal law clerks confirm.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/file\/25752\/download\">Canon 5 <\/a>of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges is identical to that the Supreme Court recently adopted. There are some variations in the phrasing of Canon 5 in the ethical rules that govern judicial employees because some judicial employees are permitted to engage in limited nonpartisan political activities. Law clerks, however, remain bound by the same prohibitions on political conduct that apply to federal judges and Supreme Court justices: They are prohibited from engaging in \u201cpolitical activity.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the case of federal judges and law clerks, there is further guidance available beyond the relevant codes of conduct. A Committee on Codes of Conduct within the federal judicial branch is authorized to \u201crender advisory opinions\u201d about the code, which are published. <\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Take It from Me<\/h2>\n<p>During my time as a career law clerk for a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/bidens-ag-nominee-wont-commit-to-keeping-durham-as-special-counsel\/\" title=\"Biden\u2019s AG nominee won\u2019t commit to keeping Durham as special counsel\">federal appellate judge<\/a>, my boss served on the Codes of Conduct Committee, and for some six years, my duties included assisting with research related to various inquiries. So I am well-versed in the minutia of the ethical rules and the committee\u2019s guidance.<\/p>\n<p>As noted, the committee published some of its responses as advisory opinions, while other times it provided only an unpublished opinion in the form of a letter to the inquiring judge or judicial employee. A synopsis of that private guidance, however, is also included in a compendium that\u2019s accessible to all judges and their staff.<\/p>\n<p>The most on-point published advisory opinion from the Committee is No. 53, titled \u201cPolitical Involvement of a Judge\u2019s Spouse.\u201d That advisory opinion after reiterating Canon 5\u2019s prohibition on a judge engaging in political activity, states the obvious: \u201cThe Code does not govern the conduct of a judge\u2019s spouse, however.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>\u201cTherefore,\u201d the committee noted, a judge\u2019s responsibility is \u201cto the extent possible, disassociate himself or herself from the spouse\u2019s political involvement.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That responsibility, however, does not include dictating a spouse\u2019s behavior or unilaterally commandeering the marital home. Thus, for instance, the Codes of Conduct Committee advised a judge should not \u201c<strong>join <\/strong>in the use of the marital home for political meetings or fund-raising events, and should disassociate himself or herself from any such gathering,\u201d but did not suggest that the spouse could not use their home for political events.<\/p>\n<p>The Times\u2019 Thursday hit piece ignored that advisory opinion which made clear the Code of Conduct does not control Mrs. Alito\u2019s behavior \u2014 and neither does Justice Alito. And as Advisory Opinion 53 recommended, Justice Alito \u201cdisassociated himself\u201d from the inverted flag, explaining he had nothing to do with its flying.<\/p>\n<p>The Times instead sought to disparage Justice Alito by including several clips of guidance provided to judicial employees regarding engaging in partisan activities. \u201cDisplaying signs or bumper stickers is not permitted, according to the court\u2019s internal rule book and a 2022 memo reiterating the ban on political activity,\u201d the article explained above these graphics:<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large is-resized\"><\/figure>\n<p>Advisory Opinion 92, which discusses political activities for judicial employees, confirms these prohibitions, stating that covered employees should not \u201cpublicly display[] a campaign picture, sign, sticker, badge, or button for a partisan political candidate or organization.\u201d But again, that prohibition does not apply to spouses.<\/p>\n<p>A training <a href=\"https:\/\/cafc.uscourts.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/HR\/Forms\/Maintaining-the-Public-Trust_2019-Revised-Fourth-Edition.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">manual<\/a> for federal law clerks reiterates that point, stressing that a clerk\u2019s \u201cspouse and children may engage in political activities; however, if they do, you have an obligation to disassociate yourself from their involvement.\u201d The training manual then provides as an example a clerk whose \u201cdomestic partner runs the election campaign for a local city council person and plans to host a strategy meeting at their house.\u201d The training material recommends the clerk \u201cask his partner not to post a campaign sign in their front yard.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>But it is an \u201cask,\u201d not a \u201ctell\u201d or a \u201ccompel.\u201d As the compendium summary of unpublished opinions referenced in the training manual confirms, a law clerk (or a judge or justice) does not violate any ethical rules because his or her spouse opts to instead exercise his or her own political voice.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">An Attempt to Force Recusal<\/h2>\n<p>The Times\u2019 effort to smear Justice Alito as unethical based on the flag incident cannot withstand scrutiny. But that wasn\u2019t really the end goal. The coordinated hit piece sought to force his recusal on two Trump-related cases. <\/p>\n<p>The first case concerns charges brought against Jan. 6 defendants and not the former president. But the issue in that case concerns the breadth of the federal obstruction of an official proceeding statute, and both Jan. 6 defendants and Trump were charged under that section of the criminal code. Thus, if the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/german-high-court-rules-facebook-illegally-censored-content\/\" title=\"German High Court Rules Facebook Illegally Censored Content\">high court rules<\/a> in favor of the defendants, giving the statute a narrow reading \u2014 as it <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2024\/01\/02\/why-scotus-will-likely-smack-down-two-of-jack-smiths-get-trump-charges-as-non-crimes\/\">should<\/a> \u2014 such a holding could doom two of the special counsel\u2019s charges against Trump, since those counts charged violations of the same law. The second case from which the Times and its ilk suggest Alito must recuse concerns Trump\u2019s appeal to the Supreme Court over the question of presidential immunity.<\/p>\n<p>The calls for Alito to recuse from these cases have no basis in sanity. <\/p>\n<p>Canon 3 of the Supreme Court\u2019s Code of Conduct provides that \u201c[a] Justice should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the Justice\u2019s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, that is, where an unbiased and reasonable person who is aware of all relevant circumstances would doubt that the Justice could fairly discharge his or her duties.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Those screaming for Justice Alito to recuse are far from unbiased \u2014 and even farther from \u201creasonable.\u201d And an unbiased and reasonable person, knowing \u201call relevant circumstances\u201d would have no reason to doubt that Justice Alito could fairly discharge his duties.<\/p>\n<p>Knowledge of \u201call relevant circumstances\u201d is key because the legacy media\u2019s spin and Democrats\u2019 talking points focus <em>not<\/em> on reality, but on the false narrative they\u2019ve been peddling. <\/p>\n<p>The \u201crelevant circumstances\u201d are that Mrs. Alito \u2014 not Justice Alito \u2014 briefly flew an American flag upside down, not as a symbol of \u201cStop the Steal,\u201d but \u201cin response to a neighbor\u2019s use of objectionable and personally insulting language on yard signs.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>As Justice Alito <a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/ShannonBream\/status\/1791483561675022624\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">explained<\/a> in an interview with Fox News\u2019 Shannon Bream, Mrs. Alito had complained to a neighbor about his posting of a \u201cF-ck Trump\u201d sign within 50 feet of where children waited for a school bus. In response, \u201cthe neighbor put up a sign personally addressing Mrs. Alito and blaming her for the Jan. 6th attacks.\u201d Later, a male at the home reportedly verbally attacked Mrs. Alito, with vulgar language, \u201cincluding the c-word.\u201d \u201cFollowing that exchange,\u201d Bream reported, \u201cMrs. Alito was distraught and hung the flag upside down \u2018for a short time.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Nothing in these circumstances creates even the remote appearance that Justice Alito might hold a bias for or against the parties in the pending cases. To argue the contrary, one would have to believe that a three-year-old dispute between a neighbor and Alito\u2019s wife, rendered the justice unable to \u201cfairly discharge his duties\u201d in litigation involving statutory interpretation in appeals involving unrelated parties.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s clear from the hundreds of opinions from the Judicial Codes of Conduct Committee over the years \u2014 some published as advisory opinions, some unpublished opinions summarized in the compendium \u2014 that there is no basis to suggest Justice Alito should recuse. A majority of those opinions addressed Canon 2\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/www.uscourts.gov\/file\/25752\/download\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">mandate<\/a> that judges \u201cavoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety\u201d and Canon 3C\u2019s requirement that a judge \u201cdisqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge\u2019s impartiality might reasonably be questioned\u2026\u201d And none would recommend a federal judge recuse in a similar circumstance to avoid the appearance of impropriety. <\/p>\n<p>On the contrary, if you studied the wealth of guidance provided over the years \u2014 as I have \u2014 you would instead conclude there is no <em>reasonable<\/em> appearance of impropriety and no need for recusal.<\/p>\n<p>The Codes of Conduct Committee\u2019s guidance is inapplicable to Supreme Court justices and, in fact, merely advisory to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/dem-senator-who-argued-against-investigating-leak-of-alitos-roe-draft-targets-alito\/\" title=\"Democrat Senator Opposing Probe of Alito's Roe Draft Leak Targets Alito\">lower-court judges<\/a> and judicial employees. Yet that that guidance confirms there is no reasonable<strong> <\/strong>appearance of impropriety and no need for recusal highlights the ridiculous nature of the attacks on Justice Alito: The Supreme Court\u2019s Code of Conduct adopts a more stringent view on the need for recusal because of \u201cthe effect on the Court\u2019s processes and the administration of justice in the event that one or more Members must withdraw from a case.\u201d <\/p>\n<p>In fact, it would be <em>unethical<\/em><strong><em> <\/em><\/strong>for Justice Alito to recuse because the Supreme Court\u2019s Code of Conduct <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/about\/Code-of-Conduct-for-Justices_November_13_2023.pdf\">expressly<\/a> provides that a justice \u201chas an obligation to sit unless disqualified.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Yet Democrat activists and their friends in the propaganda press continue to press for recusal by misrepresenting the facts and ethical rules. The Times again serves as the standard-bearer for pushing this fake controversy, as exemplified by its follow-up <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/05\/17\/us\/alito-stop-steal-flag-ethics.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">article<\/a> headlined, \u201cWhat Do Judicial Rules Say About Alito and a \u2018Stop the Steal\u2019 Symbol?\u201d The subhead is no better: \u201cJudicial experts say an upside-down flag at the justice\u2019s home raises thorny questions about potential ethics violations and what circumstances require recusal from cases.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But just as there is no \u201cStop the Steal\u201d symbol, there is no \u201cthorny\u201d question in play \u2014 at least if you are reasonable and unbiased.<\/p>\n<div class=\"fdrlst__b89e9-e5194c3d5ac6821f1b591d703502275e fdrlst__b89e9-after-post-content\" id=\"fdrlst__b89e9-e5194c3d5ac6821f1b591d703502275e\"><\/div>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\">    \t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, amidst the ongoing scrutiny of Justice Clarence Thomas, attention shifted to Justice Samuel Alito. Calls for Alito&#8217;s recusal in Supreme Court cases related to Jan. 6 defendants and Trump&#8217;s presidential immunity appeal emerged, diverting briefly from the left&#8217;s focus on Thomas<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":499,"featured_media":2248424,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Samuel-Alito-official-photo.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2248423","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/05\/Samuel-Alito-official-photo.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248423","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/499"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2248423"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2248423\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2248424"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2248423"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2248423"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2248423"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}