{"id":2235896,"date":"2024-05-02T18:22:02","date_gmt":"2024-05-02T22:22:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-announces-plan-to-combat-anti-whiteism-anti-white-leftists-panic\/"},"modified":"2024-05-02T18:28:31","modified_gmt":"2024-05-02T22:28:31","slug":"trump-announces-plan-to-combat-anti-whiteism-anti-white-leftists-panic","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-announces-plan-to-combat-anti-whiteism-anti-white-leftists-panic\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump unveils strategy to address anti-white bias, sparking concern among left-wing critics"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">24<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Ftrump-announces-plan-to-combat-anti-whiteism-anti-white-leftists-panic%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2235896&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The discussion revolves around\u2064 the potential differences in a second \u200bTrump presidency compared to the first, notably focusing on the issue of \u2062anti-whiteism. Trump&#8217;s acknowledgment and intention to combat anti-white discrimination have stirred controversy and critique, highlighting contrasting views on racial equality and civil\u200c rights enforcement. The conversation centers on the\u2064 potential variances between Trump&#8217;s first and potential second presidency,\u2063 particularly addressing anti-whiteism. Trump&#8217;s commitment to combatting anti-white bias has generated debate, showcasing conflicting perspectives on racial equality and the enforcement of civil rights.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the biggest questions surrounding a potential second Trump presidency is how exactly it would differ from the first one.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Normally presidents don\u2019t have to address this question when they\u2019re running for a second term, they can just promise more of the same. But for Trump, he\u2019s obviously been out of office for a few years. He\u2019s one of a handful of presidents in American history seeking a nonconsecutive term, and a lot\u2019s changed since 2021. And, as even Trump\u2019s most devoted supporters would admit, he wasn\u2019t able to achieve all of his promises in his first four years in office. It stands to reason that accomplishing those goals the second time around might require something of a new approach.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">On Tuesday, we got one of the clearest signs yet that Donald Trump will indeed be taking a new approach concerning one of the biggest problems this country faces, which directly impacts more than 200 million Americans at every stage of their life \u2014 from schooling to the workplace to government assistance and healthcare. I\u2019m talking about anti-whiteism. This is a word that\u2019s more or less verboten even in conservative circles. Unlike, say, anti-Semitism, no one wants to talk about it. But in an interview with Time magazine this week, Trump confirmed that combating anti-white racism, by name, will be one of the key goals of his administration if he wins re-election.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump was responding to a question about polls showing that most of his supporters believe, correctly, that anti-white racism is a much bigger problem in this country than anti-black racism:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cOh, I think that there is a lot to be said about that,\u201d <\/span><\/em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump said.<\/span><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">  \u201cIf you look at the Biden administration, they\u2019re sort of against anybody depending on certain views. They\u2019re against Catholics. They\u2019re against a lot of different people. They actually don\u2019t even know what they\u2019re against, but they\u2019re against a lot. But no, I think there is a definite anti-white feeling in this country and that can\u2019t be allowed either. .. If you look right now, there\u2019s absolutely a bias against white and that\u2019s a problem.\u201d<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This shouldn\u2019t have been a significant moment in the presidential race. It should\u2019ve had all the significance of a candidate affirming that the sky is blue. Trump doesn\u2019t even say that anti-white racism is more prevalent than any other type of racism \u2014 though it is, obviously. Instead, he just says that there is some amount of anti-white sentiment in the country and that is also a bad thing. There shouldn\u2019t be anything even notable about that. But it was a surprising moment, even for Trump supporters. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In his first term, Trump rarely if ever mentioned the concept of anti-whiteism so explicitly. I couldn\u2019t find any evidence of it. But a couple of years ago, Trump <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/arizona-rally-trump-claims-covid-19-treatment-is-anti-white-people-2022-1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">pointed<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">  out that the Biden administration was giving preferential medical treatment to non-white Americans, and in the past several months, former Trump adviser Stephen Miller has been targeting anti-white institutions in this country with lawsuits. And now Trump himself is recognizing the broader problem with anti-whiteism in our culture.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/episode\/ep-1360-trump-announces-plan-to-combat-anti-whiteism-anti-white-leftists-panic-member-exclusive\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show<\/a><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">You can tell this moment caught the Left by surprise because the mere acknowledgment that anti-whiteism exists was enough to reduce some commentators practically to tears. Here for example was the reaction from Whoopi Goldberg:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">The View is the most antiwhite show on TV. Here, Whoopi Goldberg feigns outrage at Trump&#8217;s remarks about the antiwhite feeling in America, but she knows it&#8217;s true \u2013 she makes her money from it. She also knows that lynchings were done to criminals, including white people. <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/TThYXTc1F9\">pic.twitter.com\/TThYXTc1F9<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Way of the World (@wayotworld) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/wayotworld\/status\/1785580712042578301?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">May 1, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u201cNobody in your family was hung,\u201d Whoopi Goldberg barks at Donald Trump. That\u2019s one of the few cases where the difference between the words \u201changed\u201d and \u201chung\u201d is actually pretty important, unless Whoopi Goldberg has some kind of intimate knowledge of Trump\u2019s family that I\u2019m not aware of. She also claims Donald Trump is \u201canti-humanist,\u201d which makes it clear she doesn\u2019t know what humanism is.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">From context, though, it seems like Whoopi is saying that because no one in Donald Trump\u2019s family was lynched, therefore anti-whiteism can\u2019t possibly exist today. Or maybe she\u2019s also implying that white people in general were never lynched, and then she\u2019s using that false premise to somehow conclude that anti-whiteism can\u2019t possibly exist today.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whatever interpretation you choose, it doesn\u2019t work. The <a href=\"https:\/\/lasc.libguides.com\/mass-lynching-italian-americans\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">largest mass lynching<\/a> in this country involved Italians, who Whoopi would presumably classify as white. Regardless, white people were not immune from lynchings. In fact, according to a document on the University of Missouri\u2013Kansas City School of Law\u2019s website, tracking lynchings by race from the years 1882 \u2013 1968, there were <a href=\"http:\/\/law2.umkc.edu\/faculty\/projects\/ftrials\/shipp\/lynchingsstate.html\">1297 lynchings<\/a> of white people. While that\u2019s fewer than the 3,445 black lynchings, the point is that you certainly can\u2019t assume that any white person alive today doesn\u2019t have a lynching victim in their ancestral history. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Even if you pretend that lynching has only ever involved black people, it still doesn\u2019t remotely address the fact that anti-whiteism is a much bigger problem right now than anti-black racism. Her entire argument is a non sequitur.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But it\u2019s notable that Whoopi Goldberg was so fired up about this. And indeed, many Democrats are. Earlier this month, Congressman Cedric Richmond, a co-chair of Biden\u2019s campaign, warned that Trump is, quote, \u201cmaking it clear that if he wins in November, he\u2019ll turn his racist record into <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-fall-of-a-country-the-untold-eyewitness-story-of-afghanistans-collapse\/\" title=\"The Fall of A Country: The Untold, Eyewitness Story Of Afghanistan\u2019s Collapse\">official government policy<\/a>, gutting programs that give communities of color economic opportunities and making the lives of Black and brown folks harder.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Richmond made those comments in response to an Axios report last month, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.axios.com\/2024\/04\/01\/trump-reverse-racism-civil-rights\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">entitled<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u201cTrump allies plot anti-racism protections \u2014 for white people.\u201d Specifically, a new Trump administration would shut down various programs designed to benefit only certain demographic groups. That includes programs like the $29 billion pandemic-era program that would have awarded money only to \u201cwomen and minority-owned restaurants.\u201d (Stephen Miller\u2019s group, America First Legal, successfully sued to stop that). But there are many more programs like that, which a Trump DOJ could also shut down. That includes the NFL\u2019s Rooney Rule, which mandates interviews with \u201cminority\u201d coaches, for example. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Presumably, a second Trump administration would also end the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/news\/biden-administration-declares-that-criminal-background-checks-are-racist-against-black-people\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">absurd lawsuit<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">  against Sheetz for daring to use criminal background checks, which alleges that any employer using background checks is automatically racist.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This potential return to a race-blind government that respects the Constitution greatly infuriated a woman named Jasmine Harris, who directs \u201cBlack media\u201d for the Biden-Harris campaign. (Yes, they apparently have a segregated media department at the Biden campaign that only deals with black people.) Here\u2019s what she said: <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">This [Axios] report, in addition to all of the recent examples of shameless racism by Donald Trump and MAGA Republicans, serves as a warning to Black America: Donald Trump is a selfish and vindictive man who doesn\u2019t give a damn about Black people. .. He will make our lives worse by using the very laws that the pioneers of the Civil Rights Movement fought for, against us.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">There\u2019s actually an interesting admission buried in that quote. The Biden black media director isn\u2019t alleging that Donald Trump is going to do anything illegal. Instead, she\u2019s complaining that he\u2019s going to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/why-vivek-ramaswamys-plan-to-ban-viewpoint-censorship-is-a-terrible-idea\/\" title=\"Why Vivek Ramaswamy\u2019s Plan To Ban \u2018Viewpoint Censorship\u2019 Is A Terrible Idea\">enforce existing civil rights laws<\/a>, which were supposedly intended to ensure racial equality. This is a totally foreign concept to the Biden campaign. They\u2019re essentially admitting that they\u2019re discriminating against whites in violation of civil rights laws \u2014 but they\u2019re saying those laws just shouldn\u2019t be enforced to protect white people, who they see as second-class citizens.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yesterday afternoon, we saw yet another sign of this attitude. The Biden campaign\u2019s official rapid response page tweeted this clip of Donald Trump, apparently in an effort to make him look bad. But it was actually more of an advertisement for his campaign. Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">Trump: Look at Paris. Look at London. They&#8217;re no longer recognizable. I&#8217;m going to get myself into a lot of trouble, but you know what? That&#8217;s the fact, they are no longer recognizable. We can&#8217;t let that happen here <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/sRr6pdU2rb\">pic.twitter.com\/sRr6pdU2rb<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Biden-Harris HQ (@BidenHQ) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/BidenHQ\/status\/1785759162783224174?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">May 1, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Biden campaign didn\u2019t even comment on this video. They just posted it, quoting every word Trump said. That\u2019s because they know everything Trump said is true. Pretty much <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/uk\/uk-population-projected-reach-737-million-2036-ons-2024-01-30\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">all<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">  of the population growth in the U.K. going forward is going to be driven by migration. That\u2019s been the case for the last several years, too. The unstated result is that fewer white people will live in the U.K., which the Biden administration assumes you\u2019ll think is a good thing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">That\u2019s because, in their view, it\u2019s not racist to deliberately diminish white populations. It\u2019s also not racist to violate the civil rights of white people. In fact, they don\u2019t believe it\u2019s possible to be racist against whites in the first place. This is an idea that originated in the bowels of Left-wing academia and Critical Race Theory, and it\u2019s since metastasized to politics.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Here\u2019s how one professor in the U.K. named Pragya Agarwal puts it. See if you can spot the massive flaw in <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/DrPragyaAgarwal\/status\/1236943486710173696\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">this reasoning:<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">White people can indeed face stereotypical assumptions based on their skin color and hence encounter racial prejudice. But this cannot be called racism, because of the inherent systemic imbalance of power between those with lighter skin color and people of color. Racial prejudice can affect people on an individual level, but it would not have the same effect on a larger social and cultural level because it is only when stereotypes are bolstered by power \u2026 that it creates systemic and structural racism.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In other words, she\u2019s saying white people can\u2019t be victims of racism because racism involves \u201cpower\u201d and \u201csystemic imbalance,\u201d and white people have all the power. It takes about two seconds to realize that, even on its own terms, this argument makes precisely no sense whatsoever. The Fortune 500 companies that award preferential treatment to non-white applicants have far more \u201cpower\u201d than their white applicants do. So do the universities that award black applicants a 500-point boost on their SAT scores, and the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/white-house-instructs-fed-agencies-to-say-biden-harris-administration-report-says\/\" title=\"White House Instructs Fed Agencies To Say \u2018Biden-Harris\u2019 Administration, Report Says\">federal government agencies<\/a> that award financial assistance to various demographic groups on the basis of race. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In all of these cases, there is prejudice backed by \u201cpower\u201d \u2014 extraordinary power, actually.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But there\u2019s really no point in engaging with Critical Race Theory on the merits, though, because it\u2019s not actually meant to convince anyone of anything. It\u2019s intended to be a thin, allegedly scholarly veneer that justifies overt discrimination against millions of Americans. The appropriate response to this kind of thinking is not to treat it with any kind of legitimacy. It\u2019s to call it what it is: anti-white racism, or anti-whiteism. That\u2019s what Donald Trump has just done. It\u2019s what every Republican should be doing right now. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Talking about anti-whiteism infuriates Democrats because it\u2019s been an unstated core part of their policy agenda for several years. And now, for the first time since Biden took office, it looks like it could very soon come to an end.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The key query for a possible second Trump term is its contrast with the first. Typically, incumbents pledge continuity; however, Trump&#8217;s hiatus makes his approach uncertain<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":305,"featured_media":2235897,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2024\/05\/GettyImages-2150483796.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[541],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2235896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-daily-wire"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2024\/05\/GettyImages-2150483796.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2235896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/305"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2235896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2235896\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2235897"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2235896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2235896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2235896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}