{"id":2207737,"date":"2024-03-27T18:16:02","date_gmt":"2024-03-27T22:16:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-plans-to-destroy-whats-left-of-the-economy-with-ban-on-gas-powered-vehicles\/"},"modified":"2024-03-27T18:23:23","modified_gmt":"2024-03-27T22:23:23","slug":"biden-plans-to-destroy-whats-left-of-the-economy-with-ban-on-gas-powered-vehicles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-plans-to-destroy-whats-left-of-the-economy-with-ban-on-gas-powered-vehicles\/","title":{"rendered":"Biden&#8217;s Proposal to Ban Gas-Powered Vehicles Sparks Economic Concerns"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">18<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fbiden-plans-to-destroy-whats-left-of-the-economy-with-ban-on-gas-powered-vehicles%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2207737&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>As interesting as the text is, it exceeds the character limit for a single response. How would you like to proceed? Shall I summarize the \u200dtext or\u200d focus on a specific section of it? Let&#8217;s focus on a specific section\u2063 of the\u200b text. Which part would you \u200dlike me to summarize or discuss further? Let&#8217;s focus on the\u2062 section discussing California&#8217;s plan to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-lefts-climate-whataboutism-is-on-full-display-in-california\/\" title=\"The Left\u2019s Climate \u2018Whataboutism\u2019 Is On Full Display In California\">ban <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/two-ca-dem-senators-tell-biden-to-set-hard-date-to-eliminate-sale-of-gas-powered-vehicles\/\" title=\"Two CA Dem Senators Tell Biden To Set Hard Date To Eliminate Sale Of Gas-Powered Vehicles\">gas-powered vehicles<\/a><\/a> and \u2063the implications of such a decision.  <\/p>\n<p class=\"readmore\">\n    <button onclick=\"showReadMore()\" id=\"readmorebtn\">Read more&#8230;<\/button>\n<\/p>\n<hr id=\"line\">\n<span id=\"more\"><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When future historians decide to write the definitive treatise on the downfall of the state of California, we can be sure that the final days of August 2022 will feature very prominently.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was on August 25 that the state announced a bold plan to ban the sale of gas-powered vehicles by the year 2035. Everything had to be electric from that point forward. What would that do to the economy of the state of California, given how expensive electric vehicles are? Where were we going to get the materials to manufacture all of these new EV batteries? No one seemed to care.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Local news anchors, however, were elated. Watch:<\/span><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">When the news broke, a lot of commentators on the Right made the point that the euphoria would probably be short-lived. But no one quite had any idea just how short-lived it would be. Just six days after California\u2019s big announcement mandating electric vehicles, the state\u2019s power grid failed. And it failed in spectacular fashion. The state <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2022-08-31\/california-declares-grid-emergency-raising-specter-of-blackout\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">declared<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> a level-one <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.ca.gov\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/08\/8.31.22-Heat-Proclamation.pdf?emrc=78e3fc\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">power emergency<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">For seven days, residents were <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.bloomberg.com\/news\/articles\/2022-08-31\/california-declares-grid-emergency-raising-specter-of-blackout?embedded-checkout=true\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">ordered<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> to conserve power whenever possible, including by shutting off appliances between 5:00 and 10:00 p.m. (They call that a \u201cFlex Alert\u201d in California, because it happens so often that they need a catchy brand name for it).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Watching this debacle from the safety of their air-conditioned living rooms, many Americans thought: \u201cWell, that\u2019s probably it for California\u2019s lofty EV mandate. Surely they\u2019re going to rethink things after this.\u201d After all, if the state doesn\u2019t have a reliable power grid, to the point that people have to disable their toasters in the evening, then there\u2019s no way the grid can possibly tolerate millions of new electric vehicles that start charging all at once. You can\u2019t tell people to turn off their cars at sundown. No one will go for that, especially when they have reliable <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/3-recent-failures-of-green-energy-policies\/\" title=\"3 Recent Failures of Green Energy Policies\">gas-powered cars<\/a> already. That\u2019s not a knock against EVs; it\u2019s just true. Without infrastructure, there\u2019s no reason to buy one of these cars.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/episode\/ep-1334-biden-plans-to-destroy-what-s-left-of-the-economy-with-ban-on-gas-powered-vehicles-member-exclusive\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">WATCH: The Matt Walsh Show<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But that\u2019s not how California\u2019s local media responded to these power outages. It\u2019s not how Gavin Newsom responded, either. They didn\u2019t pause and rethink anything. Instead, they all doubled down on California\u2019s commitment to so-called \u201crenewable energy,\u201d even as they acknowledged that this renewable energy was responsible for the brownouts. Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As of 2022, when that footage aired, more than one-third of California\u2019s energy came from renewable sources, including solar and wind power. Gavin Newsom has said he wants that number to be 100% by 2045. And, as you saw, Gavin Newsom acknowledges that these \u201crenewables\u201d are one of the reasons that California\u2019s grid had just collapsed.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But despite all of that, he doesn\u2019t roll back the EV mandate. He doesn\u2019t change his plan for renewables in any way. In fact, just a couple of weeks after he declared a statewide emergency due to a lack of power caused by renewable energy, Newsom again <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=JbV-tBnQ5Bw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">reiterated<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> his commitment to the EV mandate and to a \u201crenewable\u201d energy grid.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">We know why that is. It\u2019s because Gavin Newsom lacks any capacity for shame or self-doubt. What you may not know \u2014 and what\u2019s truly hard to believe \u2014 is that California\u2019s bad ideas are no longer confined to California. Somehow, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailymail.co.uk\/yourmoney\/cars\/article-13237051\/ban-gas-cars-biden-evs-states.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">seven other states<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, as well as the District of Columbia, have signed onto California\u2019s plan to rid the world of gas-powered vehicles, which is known as the \u201cAdvanced Clean Cars II rule.\u201d The states that have signed on include Rhode Island, Maryland, Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington. And to be clear, when I say they\u2019ve adopted California\u2019s plan, I mean they\u2019re explicitly adopting it by name. The Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, for example, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.wpri.com\/news\/local-news\/providence\/ri-leaders-want-to-eliminate-sale-of-gas-powered-vehicles-by-2035\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">says<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> it\u2019s eager to adopt the quote, \u201cCalifornia standard.\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Each of these seven states, like California, now plans to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/money.com\/states-banning-gas-powered-cars\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">ban<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> all sales of new gas-powered cars starting in 2035.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Specifically, the rules say that only cars with zero emissions, including EVs and a small number of plug-in hybrids, can be sold. And by the way, there\u2019s a gradual ramp-up to the total ban. California\u2019s rule requires a third of new car sales to be \u201czero-emission vehicles\u201d by 2026, and roughly 70% of new car sales to be \u201czero-emission\u201d by 2030. Existing gas-powered vehicles aren\u2019t affected.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">There are other states that have adopted rules to limit the number of gas-powered vehicles on the road, including New Mexico, Delaware, and Colorado. So they won\u2019t ban them all outright, although it\u2019s clear they\u2019re getting there. But the state-by-state discussion is becoming moot, because the Biden administration has just quietly issued its own rule that will essentially have the same effect as California\u2019s ban. The federal government is trying to phase out all gas-powered vehicles \u2014 and they\u2019re going to do it in the same undemocratic, ham-fisted way as all of these states. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">They\u2019re not going to pass a law, or let voters decide the issue. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Instead, the feds have issued new \u201cemissions standards,\u201d which function as a de facto ban on many gas cars. Watch:<\/span><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It\u2019s a very sing-songy segment. The reporter assures us that this EPA rule isn\u2019t anything like an EV mandate, because it doesn\u2019t strictly require that automakers only manufacture EVs. Technically they can make hybrids and \u201chydrogen\u201d cars too, although those don\u2019t really exist right now \u2014 a small problem you\u2019re not supposed to concern yourself with. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Incidentally, that happens to be the same line that the EPA administrator trotted out when he announced these new rules. He claimed that the agency is simply expanding \u201cconsumer choice.\u201d But of course they\u2019re doing the opposite. That talking point completely obscures what\u2019s really happening here. The Biden administration is using the EPA to effectively pass a law banning the sale of most gas cars, without ever consulting the voters.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Specifically, the EPA\u2019s new rule demands that car manufacturers slash emissions on all new passenger cars, SUVs, crossovers, minivans, light trucks, and pickups by roughly 50%, by the year 2032. And by the EPA\u2019s <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/money.com\/states-banning-gas-powered-cars\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">own estimates<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">, that means that up to <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/epa-electric-vehicles-emissions-limits-climate-biden-e6d581324af51294048df24269b5d20a#:~:text=Washington%20News-,EPA%20issues%20new%20auto%20rules%20aimed%20at%20cutting%20carbon,boosting%20electric%20vehicles%20and%20hybrids&#038;text=WASHINGTON%20(AP)%20%E2%80%94%20The%20Biden,warming%20emissions%20from%20passenger%20vehicles.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">56%<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> of new vehicles will have to be EV\u2019s, and at least <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/apnews.com\/article\/epa-electric-vehicles-emissions-limits-climate-biden-e6d581324af51294048df24269b5d20a#:~:text=Washington%20News-,EPA%20issues%20new%20auto%20rules%20aimed%20at%20cutting%20carbon,boosting%20electric%20vehicles%20and%20hybrids&#038;text=WASHINGTON%20(AP)%20%E2%80%94%20The%20Biden,warming%20emissions%20from%20passenger%20vehicles.\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">13%<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u00a0will need to be plug-in hybrids. That is a massive reduction on the number of gas-powered cars that will be allowed on the road. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Marlo Lewis, a Senior Fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI), <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/cei.org\/news_releases\/epa-tailpipe-rule-an-abuse-of-power-consumer-freedom\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">assessed<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> that under these rules, <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u2026even if \u2026 Toyota scrapped all its vehicles and just manufactured its best-in-class Prius, the company\u2019s fleet average tailpipe CO2 emissions rating would still be more than double the EPA\u2019s 2032 standard. \u2026 Clearly, automakers cannot comply with the EPA\u2019s \u2018performance-based\u2019 GHG program without rapidly phasing out <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/exclusive-u-s-epa-to-consider-tougher-emissions-rules-for-heavy-trucks\/\" title=\"Exclusive-U.S. EPA to consider tougher emissions rules for heavy trucks\">internal combustion engine vehicle sales<\/a> and rapidly ramping up electric vehicle sales.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As CEI states, this is one of the most extreme rules that\u2019s ever been proposed by a federal agency. Similar regulations are <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/environment\/report\/californias-ruinous-and-unlawful-assault-americas-trucking-industry\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">already in the works<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> for the trucking industry, which would of course destroy the nation\u2019s economy. California is, once again, the leader in those regulations, with some already in effect. But CBS News has no problem with any of this. They\u2019re happy to tell you that there will be less smog in the air, so just roll with it. The EPA has issued its commandment, and the EPA knows best.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">But even if that were true, which it\u2019s not, we still have something called the Constitution. And the Constitution empowers Congress, not a federal administrative agency, to pass laws. Agencies can\u2019t expand their mandate so far that they become a de facto Congress. This is a lesson the CDC learned a few years ago, when it tried to prevent landlords from evicting tenants who weren\u2019t paying rent. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It\u2019s also a lesson the EPA itself <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/opinions\/21pdf\/20-1530_n758.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">learned<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> just two years ago, in the case \u201cWest Virginia v. EPA.\u201d In that case, the Supreme Court made it very clear that the EPA\u2019s Obama-era Clean Power Plan far exceeded the EPA\u2019s legal mandate. Now the EPA is doing it again. They\u2019re trying to ban gas-powered vehicles, even though there\u2019s no authorizing law passed by Congress which permits the EPA to do that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">So even if this ban were somehow a good idea, it\u2019s unconstitutional. The Supreme Court needs to strike it down immediately. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this country, voters get to weigh the pros and cons of a law like this \u2014 not some faceless bureaucrats in an administrative agency. And there happen to be a lot of cons of this particular rule. That\u2019s not to say that some electric vehicles aren\u2019t great cars. But there are obviously downsides to mandating them for everyone. For one thing, a lot of people are going to be priced out of the new car market. The average EV <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.kbb.com\/car-advice\/how-much-electric-car-cost\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">costs<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> more than $5,000 more than the average gas-powered car. Typical repair costs are also much higher for EVs that are involved in accidents; that\u2019s one of the reasons Hertz just <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.businessinsider.com\/electric-car-service-maintenance-car-buyers-tips-dealers-cost-2023-2\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">scaled back<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> on its massive fleet of Tesla sedans. And from a national security perspective, it\u2019s also worth pointing out that China has enormous leverage in the production of batteries, which are obviously necessary for EV production.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The other issue is that, even if every vehicle on the planet suddenly becomes a \u201czero-emission\u201d vehicle overnight, they still have to get power from somewhere. And right now, that power <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/02\/climate\/electric-vehicles-environment.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">mostly comes<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> from power plants that burn coal. As the New York Times <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2021\/03\/02\/climate\/electric-vehicles-environment.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">conceded<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> recently, <\/span><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p><em><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If [a Chevy] Bolt is charged up on a coal-heavy grid, such as those currently found in the Midwest, it can actually be a bit worse for the climate than a modern hybrid car like the Toyota Prius, which runs on gasoline but uses a battery to bolster its mileage.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In other words, there are common scenarios in which a purely electric vehicle is emitting <em>more<\/em> carbon dioxide than a car that you fill up at a gas station. And even outside the Midwest, the differences in emissions aren\u2019t as significant than you might think. It\u2019s closer to 50%, in the best cases, taking into account the emissions related to manufacturing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of this, of course, requires that you accept the false premise that the carbon emissions from motor vehicles have any meaningful negative impact on your life, which they don\u2019t. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">As Michael Schellenberger has pointed out, the number of national disasters linked to climate and weather have <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/shellenberger\/status\/1670195742697222147?s=20\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">declined<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> from 2000 to 2021. The cost of natural disasters \u2014 as measured by percent of GDP \u2014 is <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/environmentalprogress.org\/the-case-against-environmental-alarmism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">down<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> worldwide since 1990. The number of landfalling U.S. hurricanes has dropped in that same period. So has the global frequency of major hurricanes. Fewer people than ever are dying in heat waves. All of this is <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/environmentalprogress.org\/the-case-against-environmental-alarmism\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">well-documented<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\"> by the think tank Environmental Progress. Pretty much the only thing that\u2019s gone up is the cost of electricity in California, which rose more than seven times higher than it did in other states.<\/span><\/p>\n<h4><strong><a href=\"https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILY WIRE APP<\/a><\/strong><\/h4>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The reason states like California persist in pushing these mandates, even when they\u2019ve clearly accomplished nothing and serve no purpose whatsoever, is that the environmentalist agenda has nothing to do with the environment. It\u2019s determined, instead, to make life more difficult and expensive, not to mention uglier (as we can see from the climate alarmist attacks on famous art, for example). The point is also to make life less enjoyable, hence the push for disgusting bug-based foods. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Biden administration is endorsing all of this not because the science calls for it, and certainly not because they want to preserve human life, but rather because they fundamentally see human life as a parasitic infestation on the planet (excluding themselves of course). It\u2019s not the carbon your car emits that they\u2019re after, it\u2019s the carbon you emit, as a human being. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">If this EPA regulation survives, that will only embolden them to go further. They will continue to restrict your freedom of choice, even as they tell you they\u2019re expanding it. This is the greatest encroachment on civil liberties right now that no one is talking about. Unless you want the car you\u2019re probably driving right now to become illegal in the near future, it\u2019s time to change that.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the annals of California&#8217;s history, August 2022 will be remembered for a pivotal moment. The state&#8217;s announcement on August 25, 2022, to phase out gas-powered vehicle sales by 2035 will undoubtedly be a focal point in future historical accounts of California&#8217;s decline<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":305,"featured_media":2207738,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2022\/10\/63B7DBB2-05AA-4134-8C8C-18762ECCB1E4_1_201_a.jpeg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[541],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2207737","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-daily-wire"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2022\/10\/63B7DBB2-05AA-4134-8C8C-18762ECCB1E4_1_201_a.jpeg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2207737","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/305"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2207737"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2207737\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2207738"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2207737"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2207737"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2207737"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}