The Bill Deciphered<\/strong><\/h2>\nAdvocates of the bill wave a banner claiming $60 billion in military aid<\/a> is headed Ukraine’s way. But has anyone really dug into the details?<\/p>\n
The supplemental bill<\/a> earmarks funds \u200dalong\u2062 three avenues: the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative (USAI), Foreign Military Financing (FMF), and the Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA).<\/p>\n
Allocations for the USAI stand at $13.8 \u2064billion until September 2025, covering both 2024 and 2025. FMF\u2064 sees \u200b$1.6 billion designated for Ukraine and others caught in the conflict’s ripples, again until September 2025. The\u200b PDA spans globally, \u200dnot just Ukraine, with a budget\u200d of\u2064 $7.8 billion until September 2024.<\/p>\n
But here’s where it gets interesting. Orders via USAI and \u200cFMF will likely roll out over \u200bthe next\u2062 decade\u2014a long wait \u2063for tangible aid to Ukraine. A report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) illustrates this staggered \u200boutlay, meaning the much-touted $60 billion won’t be \u200dbolstering Ukraine’s defense any time soon.<\/p>\n
Historical\u2063 data paints\u2063 a concerning picture of previous appropriations: a consistent lack of urgency. Of the $18.9 billion of\u2062 USAI funding for 2022 and\u2063 2023, the administration \u200conly utilized $12.3 billion for production orders, leaving over a\u2062 third untouched.\u200b What’s\u2062 more,\u2064 out of the $23.2 \u2063billion in USAI \u200band FMF\u2062 funds \u200bfor those years, a mere $1.6 billion\u2014just 7%\u2014actually\u200d reached Ukraine.<\/p>\n
Cutting\u2064 through the projections and promises reveals an unsettling truth: \u200cThe lion’s share \u200bof what’s been approved by Congress \u2064hasn\u2019t made the journey to the Ukrainian front lines. It’s unlikely the current “emergency” bill\u2064 will see a dramatic shift from this trend in the coming year.<\/p>\n
Unpacking the Presidential Drawdown Authority<\/strong><\/h2>\n
The PDA is a critical lever, allowing the president to dispatch arms from U.S. reserves. It’s flexible,\u200c swift,\u200d and historically has \u2062been a \u2062cornerstone of urgent aid. After the 2022 invasion \u2063of Ukraine by Russia, Congress bumped the PDA\u2063 limit up massively, reflecting the dire need for immediate support.\u2064 This bill, however, slashes \u200dthat limit for the remainder of FY2024\u2014and not just for Ukraine, but for all\u200d potential recipients. \u200dDeterioration \u200bin other global flashpoints could divert \u200dthese resources further\u200b from Ukraine’s cause.<\/p>\n
Assuming\u200c stability elsewhere\u200b and a persistent conflict in Ukraine, estimates suggest only $5-6 billion of\u200b the PDA might be directed to Ukraine, vastly under\u200b the previous\u200c years’ allocations. Coupled with historical patterns<\/a> of undersupplying military \u2062support, the true figure\u200c of aid likely to reach\u200b Ukraine’s hands in 2024 hovers \u2064between $4 billion and $5 billion\u2014far\u2063 from the headline-grabbing $60 billion.<\/p>\n
Even now, \u200bthe administration retains the capacity \u2062to \u2063ship out $4.2 billion in military aid \u2064from 2023’s \u200bapprovals without \u200bfresh Congressional action. A more proactive stance earlier in the year could have spared Ukrainian forces from significant setbacks.<\/p>\n
Resisting the supplemental\u2063 bill<\/a> isn’t the Russian boon Biden suggests, but rather, it’s the delay in deploying already -approved military aid<\/a> that plays into\u2062 adversary \u200chands.\u200c This \u2064is a puzzling contradiction at the \u2063heart of the administration’s strategy\u2014one still in need of a clear explanation.<\/p>\n
\n<\/div>\n
<\/body><\/html><\/p>\n
“`<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Biden’s State of the Union focused less on domestic issues and more on supporting a foreign nation, despite pressuring House Republicans to pass the “Emergency National Security Supplemental Appropriations Act<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2986,"featured_media":2202372,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/President-Biden-with-Ukrainian-President.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2202371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/03\/President-Biden-with-Ukrainian-President.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2202371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2986"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2202371"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2202371\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2202372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2202371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2202371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2202371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}