{"id":2202263,"date":"2024-03-19T20:45:02","date_gmt":"2024-03-20T00:45:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-files-scotus-brief-claiming-former-presidents-immune-to-prosecution-for-acts-while-in-office\/"},"modified":"2024-03-19T20:51:36","modified_gmt":"2024-03-20T00:51:36","slug":"trump-files-scotus-brief-claiming-former-presidents-immune-to-prosecution-for-acts-while-in-office","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-files-scotus-brief-claiming-former-presidents-immune-to-prosecution-for-acts-while-in-office\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Submits Brief to Supreme Court Arguing Immunity for Ex-Presidents from Prosecution for Actions Taken in Office"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">34<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Ftrump-files-scotus-brief-claiming-former-presidents-immune-to-prosecution-for-acts-while-in-office%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2202263&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>&#8220;`html<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">In an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-hears-arguments-over-public-charge-rule\/\" title=\"Supreme Court Hears Arguments Over \u2018Public Charge\u2019 Rule\">unprecedented legal maneuver<\/a> on Tuesday, former President Donald\u200c Trump championed a\u200c constitutional safeguard, submitting a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/DocketPDF\/23\/23-939\/303418\/20240319150454815_23-939%20-%20Brief%20for%20Petitioner.pdf\">brief<\/a> to the Supreme Court. He stands firm on the principle\u200b that ex-presidents retain immunity for \u2063actions connected to their official duties\u2064 while in office.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump&#8217;s legal\u2064 battle escalated when he was indicted on August 1, 2023, in Washington, D.C. The basis of the indictment \u200ccentered on allegations\u200c of undermining the constitutional process of presidential power transition. The D.C. \u2063Circuit Court <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cadc.uscourts.gov\/internet\/opinions.nsf\/1AC5A0E7090A350785258ABB0052D942\/%24file\/23-3228-2039001.pdf\">upheld<\/a> the decision to proceed with the charges, effectively stripping Trump of any executive immunity he might have previously held.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump&#8217;s Supreme Court filing \u200cunderscores a historical precedent, emphasizing that no president has\u2062 ever been criminally\u200d charged \u2062for fulfilling their official role, from \u200c1789 through 2023.\u2064 Asserting that such vulnerability to prosecution could compromise presidential decision-making, the \u2062brief suggests this would weaken the office&#8217;s independence and authority.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The argument extends \u200cbeyond Trump&#8217;s personal case, suggesting a broader \u200bthreat to presidential sovereignty. \u201c<strong>Denying criminal immunity \u200ccould subject every future president to potential political coercion<\/strong>, undermining their office during and after their \u200bterm,\u201d the brief warns.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Drawing on the landmark <em>Marbury v. \u200dMadison<\/em> case, the brief reinforces the notion that a president&#8217;s official actions are not subject to\u2063 judicial scrutiny. \u201cThis tradition has long protected \u200dformer presidents,\u201d the document asserts,\u2062 urging the Supreme Court to uphold this principle.<\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">The brief also reflects on numerous past presidents who \u2064<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/bidens-commerce-secy-pick-takes-soft-stance-on-china\/\" title=\"Biden\u2019s commerce secy. pick takes soft stance on China\">faced accusations<\/a> of criminality in their <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-giuliani-ask-judge-to-toss-democrats-capitol-riot-suit\/\" title=\"Trump, Giuliani Ask Judge to Toss Democrats' Capitol Riot Suit\">official acts<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>From allegations\u2063 of a &#8220;corrupt bargain&#8221; against John Quincy Adams to \u200bPresident Obama&#8217;s controversial \u200duse of\u200c drone \u200dstrikes, history shows that political opponents \u2064often label presidential decisions as criminal. Yet, none has faced prosecution post-tenure\u2014until now.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Continuing,\u200d the brief elaborates:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>The Founders\u2063 recognized the danger of politically charged prosecutions to the executive office, prioritizing its independence over\u200b the risk of potentially unpunished presidential misconduct. This perspective has been upheld \u200duntil the present predicament.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\"><em>The current stance of the D.C. Circuit is not only at odds with established precedent, but it also holds implications beyond \u200dPresident Trump, affecting the\u200d very essence of future presidential immunity.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h2>The Heart of the Matter<\/h2>\n<h3>Presidential Precedent<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>No criminal charges for presidents&#8217; official acts, maintaining their\u200c decision-making sanctity.<\/li>\n<li>Trump points to historical patterns to bolster his argument for continued immunity.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>The Core\u2064 Argument<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Affirms the pivotal role of immunity in ensuring presidential independence and deterrence from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/jim-jordan-rejects-january-6-committees-unprecedented-and-inappropriate-request-for-interview\/\" title=\"Jim Jordan Rejects January 6 Committee\u2019s \u2018Unprecedented And Inappropriate\u2019 Request For Interview\">partisan witch hunts<\/a>.<\/li>\n<li>Warns against setting a disruptive precedent that could diminish the\u2064 presidency&#8217;s stature.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trump&#8217;s brief posits a future where\u2063 the lack of precedent could irreparably change the presidency. It&#8217;s more than just Trump&#8217;s defense\u2014it&#8217;s a rallying cry to preserve the executive branch&#8217;s cornerstone as envisioned by the nation\u2019s founders.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;`<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Former President Trump filed a brief on Tuesday asserting that ex-presidents are immune from criminal charges for official acts while in office. This follows an indictment against him in Washington, D.C., on August 1, 2023<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":2202264,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-1702064588-scaled-e1696697640750.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[541],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2202263","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-daily-wire"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2023\/10\/GettyImages-1702064588-scaled-e1696697640750.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2202263","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2202263"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2202263\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2202264"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2202263"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2202263"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2202263"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}