Democrat Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse allegedly spent the last 17 years in the Senate pushing legislation that directly benefits the environmentalist groups that pay his wife. <\/p>\n

A 21-page ethics complaint<\/a>, filed by Judicial Watch last month, alleges Whitehouse abused his congressional position to enrich himself and his wife, Sandra Thorton Whitehouse, president of the consulting firm Ocean Wonks. She also raked in millions consulting for Ocean Conservancy and sat on the advisory board at AltaSea from 2015 to 2018, says the complaint.<\/p>\n

Whitehouse is Democrats\u2019 lead man in their effort to destroy the credibility of the Supreme Court with sham ethics grievances and dark money allegations. He only became interested in scrutinizing the court\u2019s \u201cethics\u201d code when it became\u00a0 politically<\/a>\u00a0and\u00a0 personally<\/a>\u00a0profitable to target the conservative-controlled court.<\/p>\n

Not only has Whitehouse refused to probe Democrat-nominated justices\u2019 decades-long ethics violations<\/a>, he\u2019s also spent the last 15 years skirting criticism for his conflicts of interest<\/a> and dark money deals.<\/a> The Senate Ethics Code<\/a> prohibits members from using the \u201cprestige or influence of a position in the Senate for personal gain.\u201d <\/p>\n

Over his nearly two decades in office, however, Whitehouse allegedly orchestrated and sponsored several pieces of legislation that \u201ccontains authorization for, and appropriation of, numerous federal environmental programs that fund activities undertaken by his wife\u2019s clients, which constitute a \u2018limited class\u2019 of beneficiaries for such federal funds.\u201d<\/p>\n

Just two years after taking office, Whitehouse penned a letter for the U.S. Department of
Transportation to approve a $22 million grant for a company that planned to lease offshore land in Providence, Rhode Island to Deepwater Wind. Three weeks later, Deepwater Wind hired Whitehouse\u2019s wife as a consultant. <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Whitehouse repeatedly denied his wife consulted for Deepwater even after the company issued a press release boasting about her employment and local media outlets highlighted the suspect agreement. <\/p>\n

Whitehouse also supported nearly two dozen bills<\/a> that specifically benefitted either his wife\u2019s companies or her consulting clients. Legislation like the 2020 Save Our Seas Act 2.0 is responsible for funneling hundreds of thousands of dollars in federal grants to Ocean Conservancy, which endorsed the bill<\/a>. To this day, Ocean Conservancy pays Whitehouse\u2019s wife and features content written by Whitehouse on its website<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cThus, if a Senator\u2019s official activities pecuniarily benefit himself or his family (who are members of a \u2018limited class\u2019), the Senator is \u2018disqualifi[ ed] from involvement with the legislation\u2019 and his disqualification \u2018should be total.\u2019 The Senator should abstain from voting on such legislation (or taking other action), and \u2018the Senator would have to state that he was abstaining because of a conflict of interest,\u2019\u201d the complaint reads.<\/p>\n

Despite his long and public history of pushing bills that directly benefit companies his wife financially benefits from, Whitehouse has not made an effort to disqualify himself or abstain from legislation that enriches his family, says the complaint.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

The complaint\u2019s author, Judicial Watch\u2019s Tom Fitton, ended the document by asking Senate Ethics Committee Chairman Chris Coons and ranking member James Lankford to subpoena and investigate Whitehouse under Senate Resolution 338<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u201cGiven Senator Whitehouse\u2019s longstanding practice of sponsoring or cosponsoring legislation that directly benefits his wife and\/or her clients, we urge the Senate Ethics Committee to conduct a preliminary investigation to disinter the full extent of Mrs. Whitehouse\u2019s consulting activities, with both for-profit and nonprofit entities, that may create a reasonable appearance of a conflict of interest with Senator Whitehouse\u2019s official duties,\u201d the complaint concludes. <\/p>\n

Whitehouse did not respond to The Federalist\u2019s request for comment. A spokeswoman for Whitehouse previously accused the complaint of being \u201cthe latest in a long string of erroneous conspiracy theories\u201d from a \u201cdark-money\u201d organization.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe billionaires behind this group would like to try to stem Senator Whitehouse\u2019s efforts to shine a light on what they\u2019ve done to block progress on the issues Americans overwhelmingly support.\u00a0But far-right special interests will not slow down the Senator\u2019s push for accountability on behalf of the American people,\u201d she told the New York Post.<\/a> <\/p>\n

[READ MORE: Democrat Sen. Whitehouse Says His Exclusive Beach Club\u2019s All-White Membership Is Simply \u2018Tradition\u2019]<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n