{"id":2191773,"date":"2024-03-04T07:26:02","date_gmt":"2024-03-04T12:26:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/republicans-getting-tripped-up-by-ivf-should-focus-the-abortion-debate-on-infants-born-alive\/"},"modified":"2024-03-04T07:27:15","modified_gmt":"2024-03-04T12:27:15","slug":"republicans-getting-tripped-up-by-ivf-should-focus-the-abortion-debate-on-infants-born-alive","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/republicans-getting-tripped-up-by-ivf-should-focus-the-abortion-debate-on-infants-born-alive\/","title":{"rendered":"Republicans should shift their focus on the abortion debate to infants born alive, rather than getting caught up in IVF issues"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">42<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Frepublicans-getting-tripped-up-by-ivf-should-focus-the-abortion-debate-on-infants-born-alive%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2191773&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>In Leon Trotsky\u2019s famous quote, war may not\u2063 interest you, but it certainly has an\u200d interest in\u2064 you. The 2024 election is shaping up to be a battle over abortion, with Mr.\u2064 and \u2062Mrs. \u2064Obama making it clear \u200bthat \u200bit will\u200d be a central point of their campaign. The Obamas \u2064see abortion as a key issue, second \u2063only to former\u200b President Donald Trump. The \u200dRepublicans, on the other hand, seem reluctant to discuss\u2064 abortion, which only strengthens the Democrats&#8217;\u200d resolve to bring it to the forefront.<\/p>\n<p>While Republicans have become the pro-life party,\u200c those in the House \u2064are more confident in addressing\u2062 the issue due\u200c to their proximity \u200cto pro-life constituencies.\u2064 However, presidential contenders have struggled to find the right words to express their stance on abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Recent events in Alabama have\u200b further confirmed the significance of the abortion debate. The \u200bissue of frozen embryos and their inadvertent \u200bdestruction has caused panic among Republicans. The Supreme Court\u200d in \u200dAlabama upheld the claim of a couple who lost their embryos during in vitro fertilization (IVF). These embryos were not mere property \u200cbut were already \u2063unique, small human beings with the potential to become the couple&#8217;s desired baby.<\/p>\n<p>The controversy surrounding the embryos raises questions about the \u2062status of \u2064these\u2063 small human beings and\u200d whether they can be destroyed at will. Democrats \u2062have seized on this issue \u200bto highlight the potential\u2062 dangers if Republicans continue to view embryos \u2063as anything less than human. However, \u200bRepublicans have struggled to effectively communicate this fundamental truth to the public.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, defenders of abortion have spread false information in states like Ohio, Kansas, Kentucky, and Virginia, claiming that pro-life states would deny abortion even if the \u2062life of the pregnant \u200cwoman\u200d was in danger. Despite\u2062 the persistent falsehoods, pro-life doctors in Texas have made \u2063it clear\u2062 that pro-life laws \u2064protect women even in cases of\u2062 premature cervical dilation or rupture of membranes.<\/p>\n<p>To refocus the public&#8217;s attention on the core issue, Republicans should step away from distractions such as\u2062 debating\u200d abortion at\u200c specific weeks of\u200b pregnancy. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito has argued\u2062 that if the law can protect a child at viability\u2063 (around 24 weeks), it should also protect that same child before\u200c viability. The Republicans should avoid negotiating over specific weeks and instead emphasize the continuity of a small human being&#8217;s existence throughout different stages of growth.<\/p>\n<p>While some suggest leaving \u200dthe abortion \u200bissue to the states,\u200d the \u2064federal \u2062government has historically dealt with matters \u200dsuch as public funding of abortion and abortion practices in various locations. President \u200dJoe \u2064Biden has \u200bmade it clear that enacting Roe v.\u2063 Wade into a national statute would\u2064 be a priority for a Democratic Congress.<\/p>\n<p>Rather than\u200b getting caught up in debates\u2063 over specific time limits, Republicans \u200bcould focus on the\u200c Born-Alive Infants&#8217; Protection Act. This act, passed by Congress in 2002, aimed to protect children who survive abortion. However, serious penalties were stripped from the act to avoid a veto from President Bill Clinton. Efforts\u2062 to restore \u2064these penalties have faced opposition from Democrats, revealing their radical stance on abortion \u2062even after birth.<\/p>\n<p>Despite media blackout on\u200b this issue, Republicans have been unable to bring the \u2063Born-Alive bill \u200dto a vote in the Senate. The bill has already been enacted at the national level with Democratic support, \u2062leaving the question \u2063of whether serious penalties should\u200d be attached to doctors who kill babies born\u200d alive during abortion.<\/p>\n<p>This modest\u2064 bill\u2063 serves as a \u200dstarting point for a conversation. The extension of \u2064time limits for abortion will depend on persuading people step\u2064 by step. \u2064It is crucial for Republicans \u200bto contest the Democrats on this issue, as it\u2062 exposes \u200cthe radical and embarrassing position of the Democratic party. It&#8217;s \u2063time for Republicans\u200d to aim where it truly matters.<\/p>\n<p>Source: [1] [2] [3]  <\/p>\n<h2>What did Trotsky do in the October Revolution?<\/h2>\n<p><span>On 10 October 1917 (O.S.; 23 October, N.S.), the Petrograd Soviet, led by\u2063 Trotsky, \u2064voted to back a military uprising.\u200b On 24 October \u200d(O.S.; 6 November,\u2064 N.S.) the government \u200cshut down numerous newspapers and \u2064closed the city of Petrograd in an attempt to forestall the revolution; minor \u2063armed skirmishes broke out. Central issue of abortion in the upcoming\u200b 2024 election, it \u200cis important to consider \u200bLeon Trotsky&#8217;s famous \u2062quote, &#8220;war may not interest you, but it\u2064 certainly has an\u2062 interest in you.&#8221; This quote \u200dcan\u2063 be applied to the\u2062 current political climate, where the battle over abortion has become a central point of \u200bthe campaign between \u2064the Obamas and the Republicans.<\/p>\n<p>The Obamas have made it \u200dclear that abortion is a \u200bkey issue for them, second only to former President Donald \u2062Trump. They see it as a fundamental \u2062right that should be protected and expanded. On\u2064 the \u2062other hand, the Republicans seem reluctant to discuss abortion, which \u200bonly strengthens the Democrats&#8217; resolve \u200dto bring \u2063it to the forefront.<\/p>\n<p>It is crucial to \u200cunderstand \u200cthe \u200ddifferent perspectives and motivations behind these stances. Republicans have positioned themselves as the\u200c pro-life party, appealing to \u200ctheir conservative base and \u200cconstituents who prioritize the protection\u2063 of unborn life. However, while those\u2062 in the House of Representatives \u2063are more confident in addressing the issue due\u2063 to their proximity to\u2062 pro-life\u2062 constituencies, \u200dpresidential contenders\u2062 have struggled to find the right words \u200dto express their stance on abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Recent events\u200c in Alabama have further \u2063confirmed the significance of\u2064 the abortion debate. The issue of frozen embryos and their\u200d inadvertent destruction has caused\u2064 panic among\u200b Republicans.\u2062 The Supreme Court \u2064in\u200c Alabama upheld \u2064the claim of a couple who lost\u200c their embryos \u2062during in vitro fertilization (IVF). This case highlighted that \u2062the embryos were \u2064not mere property but already unique, small human beings with the potential to become\u200d the couple&#8217;s desired\u2063 baby.<\/p>\n<p>This controversy surrounding \u2064the status of \u200dthe embryos raises important ethical and\u200b moral questions.\u2062 Democrats have seized on this issue to highlight the potential dangers\u200c if Republicans continue\u2063 to view embryos as anything less than human. They argue for\u200c the \u200dprotection of the rights of women and the autonomy to make decisions regarding their own bodies.<\/p>\n<p>However, Republicans have struggled \u2063to \u200beffectively communicate this \u2064fundamental truth to the public. They \u200dmust find a way \u2062to show\u200b that their stance on abortion is\u200b rooted in \u2064respect for the \u200csanctity \u200cof life\u2064 and the \u200bprinciples of protecting the vulnerable. \u2062This communication\u2063 challenge is further complicated \u200cby false information spread \u2063by defenders of abortion in states like Ohio, Kansas, Kentucky, and\u200c Virginia.\u2064 These false claims \u200csuggest that pro-life states would \u200ddeny abortion even if \u200cthe life of\u200d the pregnant \u200cwoman was in danger.<\/p>\n<p>Despite these persistent falsehoods, pro-life doctors in\u2064 Texas \u200bhave made it clear that pro-life laws also prioritize the health and safety of women, even in cases of premature cervical dilation \u2062or rupture of \u2064membranes. \u200dIt is \u200cimportant to dispel these misconceptions \u2064and present a nuanced understanding of pro-life positions.<\/p>\n<p>In \u200bconclusion, the 2024 election is \u2063indeed shaping \u200dup to be a \u200dbattle\u200c over abortion. \u200bThe Obamas see abortion as a key issue, second only to former\u200b President Donald Trump. The Republicans, although\u2064 becoming the pro-life party, \u2063are\u2063 struggling to effectively communicate their stance and address the complex ethical and moral questions\u2062 surrounding abortion. Recent events in Alabama have further highlighted the significance of this\u2064 debate. It is essential for both parties to engage in thoughtful \u200cand respectful\u2062 dialogue to\u2062 refocus the public&#8217;s attention on the\u2063 central issue of abortion and ensure the protection of women&#8217;s rights and the\u2063 sanctity\u200d of life.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Republicans may not prioritize the 2024 election battle on abortion, but the Obamas are determined to make it the campaign&#8217;s focal point. As Leon Trotsky said, war may not interest you, but it surely does<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1996,"featured_media":2191774,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/52223060936_da246d2170_k-e1708743207546.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2191773","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/52223060936_da246d2170_k-e1708743207546.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2191773","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1996"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2191773"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2191773\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2191774"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2191773"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2191773"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2191773"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}