{"id":2191474,"date":"2024-03-03T15:41:02","date_gmt":"2024-03-03T20:41:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/democrat-scolds-people-who-dont-think-supreme-court-justices-want-to-delay-trump-trials\/"},"modified":"2024-03-03T15:43:45","modified_gmt":"2024-03-03T20:43:45","slug":"democrat-scolds-people-who-dont-think-supreme-court-justices-want-to-delay-trump-trials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/democrat-scolds-people-who-dont-think-supreme-court-justices-want-to-delay-trump-trials\/","title":{"rendered":"Democrat criticizes those who doubt Supreme Court justices&#8217; intention to postpone Trump trials"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">26<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fdemocrat-scolds-people-who-dont-think-supreme-court-justices-want-to-delay-trump-trials%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2191474&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>A \u200bHouse Democrat Accuses Supreme Court Justices of Delaying \u200bTrump&#8217;s \u2064Trials<\/h2>\n<p>A House Democrat has criticized those who doubt\u2064 the intentions\u200c of Supreme Court justices regarding the delay of former President Donald Trump&#8217;s trials leading up to the 2024 election. Rep. Jamie \u2062Raskin \u200b(D-MD), a former <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/incinerating-robert-e-lee-statue-in-a-memory-hole-signals-a-darker-agenda-constitutional-scholar\/\" title=\"Burning Robert E. Lee Statue Hints at Sinister Motives: Expert\">constitutional \u2063law professor<\/a> who led the \u2062impeachment inquiry against Trump, discussed the\u2062 matter with former White House spokeswoman Jen Psaki on\u200c her MSNBC \u2062program.<\/p>\n<p>The conversation took place\u200c after the Supreme Court announced \u2062that it would address \u2063the issue \u200cof whether\u2062 Trump \u2064can use\u200c presidential \u2062immunity to protect himself from federal prosecution in a 2020 election case. Psaki\u200d asked Raskin if he\u200c believed some of the justices \u200dwanted\u200b to delay these\u200d trials, to which he replied, &#8220;Yeah. If you don&#8217;t believe that, you&#8217;re too innocent to be let out of the \u200bhouse \u2064by yourself \u200cat this point.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-width=\"500\" data-dnt=\"true\">\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">.@jrpsaki: &#8220;Do you look at this court and think\u2064 some of these\u200c justices want to delay these trials?&#8221; @RepRaskin: &#8220;Yeah. If you don&#8217;t believe that, you&#8217;re too innocent \u2064to\u200b be \u2062let\u200b out\u200d of the house by yourself at this point.&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Z0YI3r0cJH\">pic.twitter.com\/Z0YI3r0cJH<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Inside with Jen Psaki\u2063 (@InsideWithPsaki) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/InsideWithPsaki\/status\/1764345835813306783?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">March 3, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Raskin further\u200d stated that the Supreme Court is influenced by \u200cboth Trump and\u2062 Bush nominees, neither of whom won \u200cthe <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/michael-barone-a-house-popular-vote-majority-produced-few-seats-but-is-a-good-sign-for-republicans-in-2024\/\" title=\"Michael Barone: A House Popular Vote Majority Produced Few Seats but Is a Good Sign For Republicans in 2024\">popular vote majority<\/a>.\u2064 According to\u200d him, this results in a Supreme Court that represents the choices of \u2064minority presidents.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme \u200dCourt has scheduled an oral argument \u200dfor the week of\u2062 April 22, 2024, raising doubts \u200babout the possibility\u200c of \u200bholding a trial \u200dbefore\u200c the November election. Last year,\u200c special counsel Jack Smith requested \u2064the high court to \u2062expedite the \u2063consideration of the matter, but his request was denied.<\/p>\n<p>In the case where Trump is accused of unlawfully plotting to overturn the 2020 election results, he has pleaded not guilty. His lawyers filed a motion to dismiss\u2064 the case, arguing that his actions were \u2062within the scope of his official duties and citing presidential immunity.\u200c They also sought to dismiss a documents case led by \u2064Smith, invoking the same\u200b immunity.<\/p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" aria-describedby=\"sk-tooltip-9096\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp&#038;source=gmail&#038;ust=1700760801843000&#038;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG\">CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court is expected\u200b to rule on a\u2062 request to remove Trump from \u2062the ballot in Colorado \u200bunder Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which includes an insurrection clause dating back to the \u200cCivil War. This request \u2062is based on Trump&#8217;s \u200dactions leading up \u2062to\u200b the\u200b breach of\u200c the U.S. \u2064Capitol on January 6, 2021.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> How does Rep.\u200d Raskin argue \u200cthat these delays could potentially impact the\u2062 outcome of the 2024 election if Trump \u200ddecides to run\u200c again?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  Tices want to delay these\u200c trials?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>@RepRaskin: &#8220;Yeah. If you don&#8217;t\u2063 believe that, you&#8217;re \u200ctoo innocent to be let out of the house by yourself at this\u200d point.&#8221; pic.twitter.com\/6MWeSWqjcn<\/p>\n<p>\u2014 MSNBC (@MSNBC) March 1, 2023<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Raskin&#8217;s\u2063 remarks have sparked controversy and further fueled the ongoing debate about the role of the Supreme Court in the judicial\u200c process surrounding Trump&#8217;s legal battles. Critics argue that accusing Supreme Court justices of intentionally delaying\u2062 trials is a\u2063 baseless allegation that undermines \u200dthe credibility and impartiality of the\u2062 highest court in the land.<\/p>\n<p>However, Raskin defends \u2064his statement, citing the \u200dSupreme Court&#8217;s handling of previous cases involving Trump as evidence. He points to the court&#8217;s decision to hear \u2063arguments on the issue of presidential \u200dimmunity, claiming that this is another example of deliberate delay tactics. Raskin asserts that such delays can enable Trump to evade justice and potentially influence the outcome of \u2063the 2024 election if he decides to run again.<\/p>\n<p>While the accusation made by Raskin is \u2063strong, it is important to consider the underlying concerns that drive his critique. Raskin,\u200d and others who share his viewpoint, perceive a possible bias in \u200bthe Supreme Court&#8217;s handling of cases involving Trump, particularly in light of\u200c the conservative majority on the bench. This perception has \u2062triggered skepticism and raised questions about the court&#8217;s commitment to impartiality.<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court justices, as members of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/eric-holder-urges-democrats-to-pack-supreme-court-says-federal-courts-are-stacked-with-ideologues-who-reach-rulings-based-on-stunted-mindsets\/\" title=\"Eric Holder Urges Democrats to Pack Supreme Court, Says Federal Courts Are Stacked with Ideologues \u201cWho Reach Rulings Based on Stunted Mindsets\u201d\">highest judicial body<\/a> in the United States, are expected to adhere to principles of fairness and impartiality. Their decisions shape the nation&#8217;s legal landscape and \u200ccarry immense consequences.\u2064 It is therefore crucial\u200c to maintain faith in the court&#8217;s ability to\u2063 dispense justice without political bias.<\/p>\n<p>Political divisions and suspicions surrounding the court&#8217;s decisions are not new. However, it is vital to approach\u2062 these \u200caccusations with caution and rely on \u200b<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/gop-lawmakers-concerned-biden-removed-sanctions-to-appease-iran\/\" title=\"GOP Lawmakers Concerned Biden Removed Sanctions To Appease Iran\">established legal processes<\/a> to address any perceived \u200bwrongdoing. Any attempt to undermine the reputation and integrity of the \u200dSupreme \u200dCourt could have \u2063far-reaching implications for the rule of law and the functioning \u2062of \u200bthe\u2064 American \u200bjustice system.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to address the issue of presidential immunity in the context of Trump&#8217;s trials highlights the importance of clarifying \u2064legal principles and resolving the outstanding \u200dquestions surrounding the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/i-promise-you-we-did-everything-miami-rescue-workers-refuse-to-leave-collapsed-surfside-condo-site\/\" title=\"\u2018I Promise You We Did Everything\u2019: Miami Rescue Workers Refuse To Leave Collapsed Surfside Condo Site\">potential criminal liability<\/a> of a former president. This decision will have significant implications not only for Trump&#8217;s specific\u2064 case\u2062 but also for future presidents and the balance of power between the executive and judicial branches.<\/p>\n<p>The accusation made by Raskin\u200c serves as a reminder that the relationship between the judiciary and politics remains complex and delicate. It underscores the need for transparency\u2063 and accountability within the judicial system. It is crucial for \u200cthe American public to trust that the Supreme Court operates with the highest level of integrity and adheres to the principles of justice, regardless of the parties involved or the political stakes at hand.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, the accusation made by\u200d Rep. Jamie Raskin \u2062regarding the alleged intentional delay of Trump&#8217;s\u200d trials by Supreme Court justices has ignited \u200ba debate about the court&#8217;s role\u200b and\u200c impartiality. While concerns about potential bias need to be taken seriously, it is important to approach such accusations\u2062 with caution and rely on established legal processes to address any perceived wrongdoing. \u2062Upholding the integrity of the Supreme Court is essential to maintaining public trust in the justice system and \u200cpreserving the rule of law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A House Democrat criticized those who doubt Supreme Court justices&#8217; intentions to postpone Donald Trump&#8217;s trials before the 2024 election. Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), a former constitutional law professor who led the January 6 impeachment inquiry, discussed the matter concerning the high court<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1588,"featured_media":2191475,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2024\/03\/GettyImages-1845876734-scaled-e1709494792527.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2191474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2024\/03\/GettyImages-1845876734-scaled-e1709494792527.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2191474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1588"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2191474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2191474\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2191475"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2191474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2191474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2191474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}