10<\/div>SHARES<\/span><\/div>

<\/span>Facebook<\/span><\/a><\/span>Twitter<\/span><\/a>

Thirty years ago, the incendiary \u200dcolumnist Sam Francis\u2064 coined the term \u201c anarcho-tyranny<\/a>\u201d to\u2063 describe a state \u2062of\u200c affairs \u200bin which the government cannot \u200dor will not enforce laws against serious criminals and instead \u200cexerts excessive and often\u2064 arbitrary force on ordinary citizens.<\/p>\n

Francis\u2019s coinage, conceived against the backdrop\u2063 of \u200dthe crack epidemic\u2063 and\u2062 attendant crime wave of\u200b the late\u2064 \u201980s\u200c and early \u201990s, was\u2062 provoked by a series of feckless gun\u2062 laws ostensibly designed to curb armed crime. But in practice, they were used to\u2064 harass ordinary gun\u2064 owners. The \u2064original column<\/a> appeared in December 1992, a \u2064few \u200cmonths\u2062 after an off-the-grid Vietnam vet was entrapped by\u2064 an undercover ATF agent for the illegal sale of a shotgun, leading \u2062to a raid on his cabin in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, and the murder\u2064 of his dog, son, and\u2063 wife by federal agents.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n

Anarcho-tyranny is not an intentional conspiracy to subvert \u200cthe rule of\u2064 law. There are no\u200b smoke-filled \u200crooms \u200dwhere the anarcho-tyranny white paper is passed around among policymakers. It is simply the\u2062 natural devolution of a government undergoing a\u2064 crisis of authority: As power \u200bslackens\u200c in one direction, it must tighten in\u200b another.<\/p>\n

After a two-decade respite, the days\u200d of \u2063anarcho-tyranny have returned, perhaps more explicitly than ever. Since at least 2016, leftist DAs around the \u2063country have \u2064made it their explicit \u200caim\u2062 to decriminalize every offense short\u2063 of murder (and sometimes \u200cthat, too) and empty the prisons of even \u200cthe\u2063 most dangerous felons. Violent\u2062 crime<\/a> is once again a mainstay of big-city\u2064 life. Drug addicts\u200d and psychopaths haunt the subways. Flagrant theft is \u2062forcing businesses to shutter and lock away their goods behind walls of plexiglass. \u2063In San Francisco alone, roughly 2,000 car break-ins<\/a> are committed per month \u2014 with a less\u2064 than 1 percent arrest\u2064 rate. \u200dThe George Floyd riots of 2020 amassed \u2062upward of \u200c $2 billion<\/a> in damage,\u200b while its \u200cperpetrators were rewarded with tens of millions<\/a> in exculpatory payouts.<\/p>\n

The state, which \u200bis currently controlled by \u2064a \u2064party whose political \u2063clients \u2062are \u2064the \u200dagents of \u200dthis disorder, has responded by cracking down on\u200c anyone who tries to intervene (murder \u200dcharges brought against Kyle Rittenhouse, Jacob Gardner<\/a>, and Daniel Penny \u2063demonstrate the point) and has \u2064mercilessly prosecuted \u2063red Americans who have responded in kind \u2063(compare\u200b the millions in payouts for Black Lives Matter rioters \u2064to the\u200c excessive sentencing<\/a> of Jan.\u200b 6 defendants for example). \u2063Even more insidiously, the state, in the absence \u2063of neutral enforcement of the\u200d laws as \u2064they exist, is \u200cemploying\u200d an expansive reading of \u200bcivil \u200brights\u2064 law to punish their political enemies \u2064and flex their tyrannical authority.<\/p>\n

Currently, the Department\u200c of \u2062Education\u2019s Office of Civil\u2062 Rights is investigating<\/a> conservative activist Christ Rufo for\u200d refusing \u200dto play the pronoun\u200b game\u200d with his colleagues\u200c at the New College in Florida. \u2064Elon Musk, whose purchase of Twitter \u200dand subsequent release of a trove of\u200d internal \u200cdocuments\u2063 exposed the hand-in-glove relationship \u2064between the federal \u2062government and (former) Twitter executives to suppress conservative speech, now faces a \u2062civil rights lawsuit<\/a> for the crime of not hiring refugees to work at SpaceX. <\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

These targeted prosecutions are scandals in their own right, \u2063but\u2062 they pale in comparison to the \u200ctreatment of Douglass Mackey, \u2062whose \u2064recent\u2062 conviction is\u2063 the canary in the coal\u2063 mine for what\u2019s \u2064coming down\u200b the pike.<\/p>\n

Douglass\u2063 Mackey\u2019s Memes<\/h2>\n
Mackey,\u2063 the\u200c man behind the now-defunct Twitter persona Ricky\u200d Vaughn, was convicted on March 31 of this year of \u201cconspiracy \u200bagainst \u200brights\u201d in violation of 18 U.S.C.\u2063 \u00a7 241, a Reconstruction Era law designed to\u2063 counteract the violent voter suppression tactics of\u2064 the \u200cKu Klux Klan. In October, Mackey was sentenced\u2063 to seven\u200b months in federal\u2063 prison.<\/p>\n
Mackey\u2019s\u2064 alleged conspiracy? Posting a joke meme on Twitter.<\/p>\n
Really. See<\/a> \u2064 for yourself.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
The offending tweet features an image of a mock political flier, which, according to federal prosecutors, was aimed at deceiving Hillary Clinton voters with the text, \u200c\u201cAvoid \u200dthe line. Vote from home. Text \u2018Hillary\u2019 to \u200d59925.\u201d\u2063 Another tweet<\/a>, also named \u2064in the suit, instructs \u200creaders to \u200dcast their vote \u200dby posting the \u200cword \u201cHillary\u201d to Facebook and Twitter alongside \u2064the hashtag\u200b #PresidentialElection.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s\u2063 a mildly provocative troll, a\u2063 wry jab \u200bat the absurdity of get-out-the-vote efforts, which target the most civically\u200d illiterate members of the public. But never mind whether the joke\u200c is\u200c good or bad, it is obviously a \u2063joke<\/em>, \u200dobvious enough that posters far \u200bless clever than Mackey have made it\u200b before. Kristina Wong, a semi-prominent Twitter Democrat, posted a nearly identical tweet<\/a> \u2064during the same election cycle encouraging her\u200c fellow \u201cChinese Americans for\u2063 Trump and \u2063people of \u200ccolor for Trump\u201d to vote \u2063on \u201cSuper Wednesday,\u201d adding, \u201cTEXT in your vote! Text votes are legit.\u201d<\/p>\n
Fair play, in other words. Jokes, \u200dtrolls,\u2062 accusations, deceptions, outright lies \u200cof the most salacious, malicious, and \u2063truly deplorable\u2063 nature are all part of the \u2064daily maelstrom \u200cof political informational warfare. You may \u2064find this kind of partisan mud-slinging degrading, even regrettable, but the grand spectacle of American democracy has always<\/a> been this way.\u200d We take the \u200cgood with the bad, the funny with the cringe.\u2062 If you want something different, a system of laws and norms that promises a little more dignity, well\u2026\u200b that\u2019s another conversation for another time. For now, this is the\u200b game we\u2019re all\u2064 playing, and the rules, enshrined by the First Amendment, are the rules.<\/p>\n
Or so\u2063 we thought. If you are a Trump \u2062supporter like Mackey, rather than an obedient party\u200c apparatchik like Wong, the rules no longer apply. When,\u2062 as \u2064Mackey\u2019s case demonstrates, the\u200d state\u2063 can expand\u200b the\u2063 purview of a\u2063 law meant to thwart acts of Klan violence to include \u2062online \u201c disinformation<\/a>,\u201d\u200c it can render \u2064almost any action\u200d illegal. Every utterance, to the extent it has\u2062 a \u2063political valence, is a potential crime. Everything is against the \u2062law, but the law only applies \u2062to the state\u2019s \u200cpolitical\u200c enemies.<\/p>\n
If this is an exaggeration, \u200bit is so only barely.<\/p>\n
Here are some more\u2063 facts that provide a fuller picture of the circumstances of Mackey\u2019s \u2064alleged crime and their implications. Mackey\u2019s meme first appeared \u2062on Twitter on Nov.\u200b 1, 2016.\u200d It wasn\u2019t until \u200cJanuary 2021, two days after the \u200dinauguration of Joe Biden, that charges were filed. Despite Mackey living\u2063 in Florida, the DOJ used a dubious legal reading to have\u200c the case tried in the hostile Eastern District\u200c of New York, under the auspices\u2064 of newly appointed U.S. Attorney Breon \u200dPeace, in front of a Democrat activist judge who \u200cin 2017 issued an emergency \u200dstay<\/a> to\u200d block Trump\u2019s executive order on refugee resettlements,\u2064 and in front of a Brooklyn jury\u200d pool that voted 4 to\u200d 1 \u2063in favor of Joe Biden.\u2063 <\/p>\n
The\u200c most astonishing fact is that the case was brought in the\u2064 absence of any victim. According \u2062to the Justice Department, 4,900 people texted the fake number in the \u200btweet. Out of \u2064these, the \u2063Justice Department found not a single person who claimed to have been deceived by the meme or who thought that texting \u201cHillary\u201d to 59925 constituted a valid vote.<\/p>\n
Mackey\u2019s real crime, his real sin, was\u200d being\u200b an effective right-wing provocateur. According to an analysis<\/a> from MIT Media Labs, Mackey\u2019s Twitter account, @TheRickyVaughn, \u200bwith a little over 50,000 \u2063followers at the\u200b time of \u200cthe election, was one of\u2064 the most influential social media accounts in the \u200dcountry, ranking higher than NBC News and prominent Democrat mouthpieces like Stephen Colbert.<\/p>\n
Mackey\u2019s prolific output and acerbic wit, his \u2062unique ability to proselytize the ideological foundations of \u200cTrumpism with native digital \u2062fluency, is what made him a target.\u200d It is also true that Mackey could be blatantly offensive, but the need to protect\u2062 offensive\u2063 speech only \u200cunderscores the\u200b principles of free expression at stake. Ultimately, he represented the breakup of\u2064 the \u2062informational monopoly held by\u2062 the state\u2019s preferred opinion makers, and that is why\u2064 he was prosecuted. The candidacy of Donald\u200b Trump, a sui generis <\/em>figure in a hundred\u200d different ways, and whose own subsequent legal entanglements operate from the same logic\u2062 of excessive prosecutorial\u200c zeal, \u200dwas \u200canimated, at \u200dleast in part,\u200d by the\u2062 unconstrained energy of \u2063online \u2063troublemakers \u200dlike Mackey.<\/p>\n
And like Trump, Mackey had to be held to account \u2062for exposing these\u2064 vulnerabilities in the \u200dsystem. Again, \u200bwhere power\u200d slackens \u200cin\u2063 one direction (losing control of the electorate), it must tighten in another (stringing up meme makers). \u2064The likeness here isn\u2019t \u2064merely \u2063symbolic. Remember \u200d18 \u2064U.S.C. \u00a7 241? This\u2064 same law, \u200cwhich according to legal \u200cscholar Eugene \u200dVolokh<\/a> \u2063 has never been used to prosecute a\u200b speech act, is precisely the law federal prosecutor Jack Smith is relying on to\u2064 indict<\/a> Trump. \u2063Douglass Mackey\u2019s case isn\u2019t a standalone act of prosecutorial \u200caggression; it is\u2062 the \u2064foundation for a\u2064 new legal regime that intends to cast\u200d a net \u200cover the entire ocean of online speech.<\/p>\n
Broadening the Law\u2019s Scope<\/h2>\n
The precedent\u2062 set in\u200d the Mackey case eschews any limiting principle\u2062 on \u2063how the\u200d law can be\u200b applied. Any \u201cdisinformation\u201d \u2014 \u200dthat is, any untrue statement, even crude jokes, like jesting \u2062that Michelle \u200bObama is a man,\u200c or that [insert politician] is really \u200ban \u2062alien \u2063lizard \u2064in a \u200dhuman skinsuit \u2014 so long as\u2062 it might deter someone from voting, is a\u2063 potential crime.\u2064 Even the mild suggestion that voting is irrational<\/a>, a belief long \u2064held by\u200b many mainstream \u200cpolitical scientists, \u200dcould\u200c count as \u200ca criminal act under this reading of Section 241. This broadening \u200cof scope\u2062 is \u200dprecisely the point.<\/p>\n
In his 1964 book \u200c The\u200c Morality\u200b of Law<\/a><\/em>, \u2063legal theorist Lon \u2064L. Fuller tells the parable of King \u200bRex,\u200b an ambitious though naive ruler who attempts to reform his kingdom\u2019s legal system from the ground up. First, his legal code is too narrow,\u200d then \u200ctoo broad, too abstruse, then too\u2062 plain. His subjects\u2019 dissatisfaction mounts, until the \u2063king realizes that by making his laws impossible \u2062to obey, he can \u2062bring his enemies to\u200b heel whenever he chooses. <\/p>\n
\u201cIt was made \u2062a\u2063 crime, punishable by 10 years\u2019 \u2062imprisonment, to cough, sneeze, hiccough,\u200c faint or fall down in the presence of\u2063 the king,\u201d Fuller writes. \u2064In other words, there \u2064was no law, only the king\u2019s discretion concerning who deserved punishment\u200b or mercy.<\/p>\n
The 17th-century polemicist \u2063Leveler \u201cFree Born\u201d\u2062 John Lilburne called such a\u200c state of affairs a \u201clawless unlimited power.\u201d \u200dIt eventually led\u2063 to a revolution. \u200dWe\u2019re not there yet, but\u200d when \u200bone of our fellow citizens faces federal prison time for a joke, we are forgiven for being\u2064 reminded of dear King Rex.<\/p>\n
In the coming year, we will be treated\u200b to\u2063 a warmed-over buffet of sermons by our \u200dintellectual betters on the sanctity\u2062 of\u2062 Our \u200cDemocracy\u2122. \u200cWe will be relentlessly hounded\u2063 to check under our \u200dbeds and in \u2062our closets \u200bfor purveyors of \u201cdisinformation.\u201d While the streets are overrun with another round of election year \u201cmostly peaceful protests,\u201d\u200b the\u2063 border \u200bis\u200b swamped by a deluge of illegal immigrants, and\u200d our major metros are ravaged by \u200cwanton criminality, \u2064we will do well \u2064to consider what\u200d we stand \u2063for, and where we will draw the \u200bline<\/a>\u00ad.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
rnrn <\/p>\n
How does the Mackey case set a dangerous precedent for \u200dpotential prosecution of individuals based on the dissemination of perceived disinformation and its potential impact\u2062 on voting<\/h2>\n
Title: \u2063The Case of Douglass Mackey and the Erosion of\u2062 Free Speech<\/p>\n
Introduction:<\/p>\n
Thirty years ago, columnist Sam Francis introduced the term “anarcho-tyranny” to describe a phenomenon where \u200dthe government fails to enforce laws against serious criminals but exerts excessive force on ordinary citizens. Today, we are witnessing a \u200dresurgence of anarcho-tyranny, particularly in the realm\u200d of free speech. The case of Douglass Mackey, known for\u200c his provocative Twitter persona Ricky Vaughn, exemplifies how the government is expanding the scope of laws to suppress political adversaries and \u2062control online speech.<\/p>\n
The Return of Anarcho-Tyranny:<\/p>\n
In recent years, leftist district attorneys across the\u200c country have sought to decriminalize offenses and empty prisons, leading to a resurgence of violent crime and theft. While\u200c dangerous felons roam the streets, law-abiding citizens face prosecution for defending themselves. Law enforcement selectively cracks down on those who intervene while ignoring or downplaying the crimes committed by certain political movements, as seen in the differing treatment of the George\u200d Floyd rioters \u2064and January 6\u200c defendants.<\/p>\n
The Expansion of Civil Rights\u2064 Law:<\/p>\n
To further exert control, the state \u200bhas begun\u2064 employing an expansive interpretation of civil rights law \u2064to punish political enemies and curtail \u200cfree speech. \u2062Examples include \u200cinvestigations launched against conservative activist Christ Rufo for refusing to use preferred gender pronouns and the lawsuit\u200b against Elon Musk’s SpaceX for not hiring \u200crefugees.\u2062 These \u200dtargeted prosecutions demonstrate\u200b a trend \u2063of punishing individuals for expressing dissenting opinions or failing to \u2063adhere to\u2063 politically\u200b correct\u200d narratives.<\/p>\n
The\u200b Case of Douglass Mackey:<\/p>\n
Douglass Mackey’s recent conviction\u200b under the Reconstruction Era law “conspiracy against rights” highlights the \u2064erosion of free\u200c speech rights. Mackey’s conviction stems from posting a joke meme on Twitter during the 2016 election. Despite the meme being a clearly satirical comment, law enforcement applied a dubious interpretation of the law, rendering virtually any action illegal if it carries a political connotation. Mackey’s case \u200bwas brought without a victim, demonstrating the arbitrary\u200b nature of this expansion.<\/p>\n
Implications for Free Speech:<\/p>\n
The Mackey \u200ccase sets a\u200c dangerous \u200bprecedent, allowing\u2062 authorities to prosecute individuals for disseminating what they\u2063 perceive as disinformation. Under this broadened interpretation,\u200d any statement, no matter how absurd or satirical, that may potentially deter someone \u2064from voting could be deemed a criminal act. Such an expansive application stifles free expression and undermines the principles upon which the\u2062 First Amendment is built.<\/p>\n
Conclusion:<\/p>\n
The case of Douglass Mackey exemplifies the current erosion of \u200bfree speech rights \u2062in the United States. \u2062From targeting \u200bindividuals for expressing dissenting opinions to expanding the scope\u2062 of laws \u2062to suppress political adversaries, the government is exhibiting anarcho-tyrannical \u200btendencies. If left unchecked, this trend poses a significant threat to the \u200cdemocratic values and principles that underpin \u2063American society. It is imperative to defend free speech and protect the rights of individuals to express themselves without\u2064 fear of prosecution\u200b or retribution.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Thirty years ago, Sam Francis introduced “anarcho-tyranny” to depict a situation where the government fails to enforce laws against major criminals, while burdening regular citizens with excessive and arbitrary force. Coined during the crack epidemic and its related crime wave, Francis’s term remains relevant today<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2927,"featured_media":2188737,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Screenshot-2024-02-28-at-1.36.51%E2%80%AFPM.png","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2188736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Screenshot-2024-02-28-at-1.36.51%E2%80%AFPM.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2188736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2927"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2188736"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2188736\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2188737"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2188736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2188736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2188736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}