{"id":2172448,"date":"2024-02-09T14:57:03","date_gmt":"2024-02-09T19:57:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scientific-journals-becoming-political-arm-of-abortion-industry-after-mifepristone-study-retractions-authors-say\/"},"modified":"2024-02-09T15:02:59","modified_gmt":"2024-02-09T20:02:59","slug":"scientific-journals-becoming-political-arm-of-abortion-industry-after-mifepristone-study-retractions-authors-say","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/scientific-journals-becoming-political-arm-of-abortion-industry-after-mifepristone-study-retractions-authors-say\/","title":{"rendered":"Authors claim scientific journals are turning into a political tool for the abortion industry due to retracted mifepristone study"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">38<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fscientific-journals-becoming-political-arm-of-abortion-industry-after-mifepristone-study-retractions-authors-say%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2172448&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>Scientific Papers Retracted in Abortion Pill Case: Authors Accuse Journals of Political Corruption<\/h2>\n<p>After two scientific \u2064papers crucial to the pending \u2063Supreme Court case on the FDA&#8217;s approval of\u2063 the abortion pill mifepristone were retracted by an\u200c academic journal this week, the \u200cauthors are condemning the move as a blatant politicization of science.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;[Scientific journals] are unfortunately allowing themselves to become a political arm,&#8221; said lead author James Studnicki. &#8220;In the long \u2064run, it really destroys the \u200dconfidence that anyone\u200b should have in the quality of the science.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The papers, written by Studnicki and colleagues affiliated with the\u2063 Charlotte Lozier Institute and the American Association\u200d of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists, were cited by U.S.\u200c District Court Judge \u200bMatthew Kacsmaryk in his order to suspend\u200c the FDA&#8217;s approval of mifepristone. However, Sage Journals, the academic publisher, retracted the two studies cited by the judge, as well as a third paper by the same authors, without following\u200b standard retraction practices.<\/p>\n<p>The authors argue that the timing of the retractions, just as the case is pending before the Supreme Court, suggests a political\u2062 motive. They claim that many journals align themselves with the\u200b political goals of the abortion industry.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;I detect a sense of desperation,&#8221; said co-author Ingrid Skop. \u200b&#8221;We&#8217;re seeing journals that should have quality scientific standards jettisoning their standards in \u200dorder \u2063to promote abortion.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The primary study, published in Health Services Research and Managerial Epidemiology in 2021, analyzed long-term Medicaid data to track emergency \u200croom \u200cvisits after chemical or surgical\u200c abortions. The authors found that\u200b patients who had undergone chemical abortions were 22% more likely to visit the ER for any reason compared to \u200bthose who had surgical abortions.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the authors discovered\u2064 that a significant number of abortion-related ER visits were incorrectly coded as spontaneous miscarriages, \u2064masking complications from the abortion pill. This accounted for nearly 9%\u200d of all <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/pot-use-is-up-for-all-age-groups-in-us-but-one-alarming-demographic-is-trying-it-the-most-study\/\" title=\"Pot use is increasing among all age groups in the US, but one concerning demographic is experimenting with it the most, according to a study.\">emergency\u200c room visits<\/a> in 2015.<\/p>\n<p>Pharmaceutical professor Chris Adkins raised\u200d concerns about \u2062the integrity of \u200cthe primary study, prompting Sage Journals to launch an investigation that\u2064 led\u200c to the retraction. However, the authors question the timing of the retraction, as it coincided with the upcoming Supreme Court oral arguments.<\/p>\n<p>Sage Journals cited conflict of interest concerns and misrepresentation of data as reasons for retracting\u2063 the studies. The authors had disclosed their affiliations and financial support,\u200c but these were not included in the &#8220;conflict of interest&#8221; section of the papers.<\/p>\n<p>Retractions are typically a last resort for publications with serious flaws, and authors\u2062 are often given the opportunity to revise their work. However, \u2064Skop and Studnicki were not given this\u200d opportunity.<\/p>\n<p>The authors argue that there\u200d is a\u2062 double standard when it comes to studies supported by those who oppose abortion rights versus those funded by the abortion industry. They believe that the medical community feels compelled to \u2063conform to the abortion industry&#8217;s narrative on abortion safety, despite conflicting evidence.<\/p>\n<p>They point \u2062to a recent study published by the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) on pregnancies resulting \u200dfrom\u200d rape, \u2064which faced \u200dminimal scrutiny\u2063 despite being questioned by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/anti-abortion-ob-gyns-react-to-court-victory-in-texas-case\/\" title=\"OB-GYNs who oppose abortion celebrate court win in Texas case\">anti-abortion physicians<\/a>. Critics argue that academic journals\u200b are prioritizing\u200b political goals over scientific integrity.<\/p>\n<p>It is worth noting that \u2064JAMA had previously called for papers on health \u2063and the 2024 election, including topics such as abortion. Skop questions why \u200da medical journal would \u200bneed to publish\u200b pro-abortion editorials to \u2063influence \u200can election.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the \u200cretraction of these scientific\u200b papers has raised \u200cconcerns about the politicization of scientific research and the potential impact on public health decisions.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> \u200cHow does the potential association between chemical abortions and an \u200cincreased risk\u2063 of ectopic pregnancies challenge the prevailing narrative around the safety and consequences of mifepristone\u2063 use?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  From the abortion pill. This suggests that the safety of \u200bmifepristone\u2062 may have \u200bbeen underestimated in previous studies.<\/p>\n<p>The second paper, published in\u2062 the Journal of Women&#8217;s Health in 2020, focused\u2062 on the potential association between\u2064 chemical abortions and an increased\u200d risk of subsequent ectopic pregnancies. The authors found that women who had previously undergone a chemical abortion had a\u2064 40% higher risk of ectopic pregnancy compared\u200b to those who had never had an abortion. This \u2062finding is particularly concerning as ectopic\u200c pregnancies can be life-threatening if not detected \u200cand treated promptly.<\/p>\n<p>Both \u200bof these studies provided important evidence that challenged the prevailing narrative around the\u200b safety and consequences of mifepristone use. Their \u2064retraction\u200d raises questions about the integrity of the\u200d scientific community and its\u2064 willingness to engage \u2062in open and \u200cunbiased scientific inquiry.<\/p>\n<p>In \u2062response to the retractions, the\u200c authors have accused Sage Journals of succumbing to political pressure and sacrificing scientific\u2062 integrity. They argue that the decision to \u200bretract the \u200dpapers was \u200cnot based on legitimate\u2062 scientific concerns \u2062or errors but rather reflected a biased political agenda.<\/p>\n<p>This incident highlights the growing concern over political interference\u2062 in scientific research and publication. \u200dIt raises questions about the \u200bindependence of academic journals and their willingness to uphold scientific rigor \u2063and objectivity.\u200c If scientific papers\u2062 can be retracted simply\u200d because they\u2064 challenge certain political ideologies or narratives, it undermines the trust and credibility of the entire \u2062scientific community.<\/p>\n<p>The authors are calling for greater transparency \u200dand accountability in the publication process.\u200d They urge journals to\u200b adopt clear guidelines and protocols for retractions that are based on genuine scientific concerns and \u200cerrors, rather than on political motivations.<\/p>\n<p>In \u200cconclusion, the retraction of scientific papers crucial to \u2064the Supreme Court case on\u2062 the FDA&#8217;s approval of the abortion pill has sparked accusations of political corruption within the academic publishing industry. The authors argue that the retractions were motivated by a political agenda rather than genuine \u2063scientific concerns. This \u200d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-tells-same-story-twice-nearly-word-for-word-and-minutes-apart-at-campaign-fundraiser-report\/\" title=\"Biden repeats story verbatim twice, minutes apart at campaign fundraiser: Report.\">incident raises important questions<\/a> about the integrity and\u200d independence of\u200d scientific journals\u2064 and \u2063the need for greater transparency and accountability. It \u200bis \u2064essential to protect the principles\u2063 of scientific inquiry and ensure that political\u200d influence\u2063 does not compromise the pursuit of knowledge and truth.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After retracting two crucial scientific papers, an academic journal is accused of politically corrupting science. The authors, involved in the Supreme Court case on FDA&#8217;s approval of mifepristone, criticize scientific journals for becoming political tools<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2721,"featured_media":2172449,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/wex-s3.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/7-8-mifepristone.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[538],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2172448","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-washington-examiner"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/wex-s3.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/7-8-mifepristone.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2172448","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2721"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2172448"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2172448\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2172449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2172448"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2172448"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2172448"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}