{"id":2157325,"date":"2024-01-23T18:05:03","date_gmt":"2024-01-23T23:05:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-supreme-court-declares-that-texas-has-no-right-to-defend-its-own-borders\/"},"modified":"2024-01-23T18:10:00","modified_gmt":"2024-01-23T23:10:00","slug":"the-supreme-court-declares-that-texas-has-no-right-to-defend-its-own-borders","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-supreme-court-declares-that-texas-has-no-right-to-defend-its-own-borders\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court denies Texas&#8217; right to defend borders"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">16<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fthe-supreme-court-declares-that-texas-has-no-right-to-defend-its-own-borders%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2157325&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2> The Right of Self-Defense \u200bUnder Attack: Supreme Court Ruling Signals Troubling Trend <\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It&#8217;s no secret that the right of self-defense,\u2063 one \u200cof our most fundamental rights,\u200b is under threat in major cities across\u2063 the\u200b country. Recent high-profile cases, such as those of Kyle Rittenhouse and the McCloskeys, \u2063have\u2064 made it clear that defending yourself can lead to your life being destroyed \u200bby \u2064the government. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">What many people may not realize is that conservatives are now inadvertently aiding the left in neutralizing this right. The \u2063recent ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, with two supposedly conservative justices in the majority, has given the Biden administration the green light \u2063to terminate the right of self-defense along the \u2062southern border with Mexico. \u200bThis ruling is a significant blow to our ability\u200b to protect ourselves and our property, \u2063and it&#8217;s happening under \u2064the watch of the \u2063so-called &#8220;conservative majority&#8221; on the Supreme Court.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this ruling, the Supreme Court allowed the Biden administration to remove <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-says-biden-admin-can-cut-texass-border-wire-fencing\/\" title=\"SC: Biden Admin Can Reduce TX Border Wire Fencing\">razor-wire fencing<\/a> placed by Texas on private\u2064 property, with the consent\u200d of \u2062the property owners, in order to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/texas-governor-officials-using-shipping-containers-to-stop-illegal-migrants\/\" title=\"Texas Governor: Officials Using Shipping Containers to Stop Illegal Migrants\">prevent illegal migrants<\/a> from flooding across the border. This decision is a direct\u200c attack on\u200b the right of self-defense, as it undermines \u200bour \u200cability\u2064 to secure our borders and protect ourselves\u2062 from potential threats.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Supreme Court&#8217;s Troubling Silence<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">What&#8217;s particularly concerning about this ruling is the lack of explanation from the Supreme Court. There\u2064 was no majority opinion provided to justify the decision. However, looking at the lower court filings, it becomes\u2063 clear that the Biden administration argued that the razor-wire \u200cfencing endangered\u200d the lives of foreign criminals attempting to enter \u200bthe\u200b country. This argument is absurd and raises the question\u2064 of why we should be obligated to provide &#8220;emergency aid&#8221; to those who are breaking our laws.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Supreme\u2063 Court&#8217;s \u2062decision to side with the Biden administration \u200bin this case is a clear violation of the right of self-defense. It\u200d suggests that we \u2062have\u2062 an obligation to protect foreign criminals from themselves, rather than the right to \u200cprotect ourselves \u200bfrom potential threats. This is a dangerous precedent that undermines the very foundation of \u2062our self-defense rights.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Conservative Justices&#8217; Surprising Votes<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The \u200cfact that supposedly conservative justices, such as Amy Coney Barrett and\u2062 John Roberts, voted in favor \u200bof \u200cthis ruling is\u200d deeply\u200b concerning. It raises questions about their commitment to conservative principles and the protection of our constitutional rights. \u200bBarrett, in particular, has\u200d shown\u200d a pattern of siding with liberal justices on key issues, undermining the trust placed in her as a conservative justice.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">While this case is\u2062 still making its way through the court system, it&#8217;s clear that the Supreme Court&#8217;s ruling is a significant blow to our right to defend ourselves and our borders. It&#8217;s crucial for <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/bidens-border-policies-are-dangerous\/\" title=\"Biden\u2019s border policies are dangerous\">red state governors<\/a> to stand up against these\u200b attacks on\u200d our rights and protect their\u200d citizens and the border, even if it means defying the Supreme Court. When one side disregards\u2064 laws and borders, it releases others \u2063from their obligations to obey the federal court system. We \u200cmust be prepared\u2064 to defend our rights and our country, even if it means facing\u2062 potential conflicts.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The last Civil War taught us\u2064 that unimaginable conflicts can become a reality. If\u2064 the \u2062Biden administration remains in\u200c power after the next\u2064 election, we may find ourselves facing a similar situation. It&#8217;s up to us to protect our rights and ensure that our\u2064 government upholds its responsibility to defend our borders and \u200benforce our laws.<\/span><\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> How does \u2064this ruling potentially \u200bimpact our right to self-defense, and what are the dangers it\u200b poses for \u200bour ability to protect \u2062ourselves and our property within \u200bour own communities?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  Aking our laws\u200c and endangering our communities.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another troubling aspect of \u2063this ruling is the \u200cfact \u200dthat \u200cJustices Brett Kavanaugh and \u200cAmy Coney \u200dBarrett, both of whom \u200cwere appointed by former President Trump\u200c and\u200c are\u200c considered to be conservative \u200bjustices,\u200b sided with \u200bthe liberal justices in\u200b allowing the removal of the razor-wire fencing. This raises concerns about the \u2062reliability of so-called conservative justices and their commitment \u200cto\u2064 protecting our fundamental rights.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Implications for Self-Defense<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The implications of\u200d this ruling \u200bon \u200cthe \u2063right of self-defense are significant. If the\u200d government can justify the removal \u200dof protective measures intended to secure our borders \u200band \u200ckeep us safe, what&#8217;s \u2062to stop them from limiting our \u200bability to defend ourselves and our property within\u2063 our own communities? \u200bThis ruling sets a dangerous precedent\u2063 and could pave the \u200bway\u2064 for further erosion of our right \u200dto self-defense.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Furthermore, it sends a message that criminals and illegal migrants have greater rights and protections than law-abiding citizens. Instead of prioritizing the safety and \u2062security of American citizens, this ruling prioritizes the interests of those\u2064 who break our \u200blaws and seek to harm our communities.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Fighting for Our Rights<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is crucial\u2062 that \u2063we recognize the threat that this ruling and\u2062 others like \u200bit\u2062 pose \u2063to our fundamental rights. We cannot rely solely on the Supreme Court to protect our \u2063right of self-defense; it \u200bis \u200dup\u2064 to us\u200d as\u2062 citizens \u2062to hold our <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/republicans-democrats-h-r-1-is-a-power-grab-would-undermine-states-election-rules\/\" title=\"Republicans: Democrats\u2019 H.R. 1 Is a Power Grab, Would Undermine States\u2019 Election Rules\">elected officials accountable<\/a> and demand that our \u200brights are safeguarded. We must support organizations and \u2064individuals who fight for the preservation of\u200d our rights\u2062 and oppose\u200b any attempts to erode them.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Additionally, \u200dwe \u2064must continue to educate ourselves and others about the\u200d importance of the right of self-defense. By understanding the \u200bhistorical and philosophical foundations of this \u2063right, we\u200b can effectively \u200badvocate\u200b for its preservation and\u200b push back \u200bagainst attempts to weaken or eliminate it.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The recent ruling\u200c by the\u200d U.S. Supreme Court regarding the removal of razor-wire \u200cfencing on the southern border signals a troubling trend in the erosion of our right of self-defense. This decision undermines our ability to\u200b protect ourselves and our property, and raises \u2062questions about the\u2063 reliability of conservative justices in safeguarding our fundamental \u2064rights. It is\u2062 imperative that we remain vigilant, fight for our\u200d rights, and\u200d educate \u200dothers about the importance of self-defense in maintaining a free and secure\u200b society.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>At present, even non-court enthusiasts are aware that the crucial right of self-defense has been practically revoked in major cities. Notable cases like Kyle Rittenhouse, the McCloskeys, George Zimmerman, Daniel Penny, George Allan Kelly, Jose Alba, and Daniel have highlighted this concerning trend<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":305,"featured_media":2157326,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[541],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2157325","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-daily-wire"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2157325","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/305"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2157325"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2157325\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2157326"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2157325"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2157325"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2157325"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}