{"id":2153053,"date":"2024-01-18T17:38:01","date_gmt":"2024-01-18T22:38:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/a-practical-approach-to-living-longer-with-improved-health\/"},"modified":"2024-01-18T17:47:05","modified_gmt":"2024-01-18T22:47:05","slug":"a-practical-approach-to-living-longer-with-improved-health","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/a-practical-approach-to-living-longer-with-improved-health\/","title":{"rendered":"Live longer, be healthier with a practical approach"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">16<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fa-practical-approach-to-living-longer-with-improved-health%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2153053&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>The \u200bBenefits of Exercise: Insights from Dr. Jordan Peterson<\/h2>\n<p><i>The following is a transcript excerpt \u200dfrom\u2062 Dr. Jordan Peterson\u2019s conversation\u200c with physician and longevity \u200bexpert Peter Attia about the benefits of exercise, even from just three hours\u2062 a week. \u200bYou can <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/podcasts\/the-jordan-b-peterson-podcast\/wecewcwe\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">listen to<\/a> or <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/episode\/trttrt\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">watch<\/a> the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/comedian-matt-rife-remains-unapologetic-for-having-a-sense-of-humor\/\" title=\"Matt Rife stands firm, unapologetic for his humor\">full podcast \u2062episode<\/a> on DailyWire+.<\/i><\/p>\n<h3>Start time: 04:07<\/h3>\n<blockquote>\n<p><strong>Jordan Peterson:<\/strong> A long while \u2062back I was looking at interventions to improve people\u2019s lives, and I knew \u200cat\u2062 that point cognitive \u200cdecline was a major problem, especially\u2063 in terms \u2063of productivity and general competence. It is\u2064 a pretty pronounced linear downhill\u2064 trend on the fluid intelligence front\u2062 from\u200c about\u200c the age \u200cof 25 \u2063forward, and that can decline precipitously in the late \u206370s\u2064 and early \u206480s, especially\u200d with\u2063 the onset of degenerative neurological \u200cdiseases. I was looking at the literature \u200bon cognitive remediation. This was\u2063 about\u2062 10 or 15 years ago when\u2062 there were\u2062 a lot of online sites that purported to run you through cognitive exercises \u200cthat could increase\u2062 or maintain your IQ. There \u200dhas never been any evidence for that,\u200c by the way.\u2063 It is pretty damn dismal literature. But what I did find, and \u2063I\u2063 think\u200d this is extremely solid, is that if you want to maintain your cognitive function, both\u200d cardiovascular exercise\u2062 and weight lifting seem to do a \u200bpretty damn good\u200d job. Maybe \u2063that is because the brain is \u2062such an oxygen demanding organ. It is energy demanding \u2064and resource \u200cdemanding in other\u2062 ways, and if you can\u2064 keep yourself cardiovascularly fit, interestingly enough, that is the best pathway to cognitive health.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Then I looked on the \u200cpsychological side\u200d and found there were interventions that helped people\u200c get their story straight. Of course, psychotherapy\u2064 is one of those, \u2064but there are also written interventions. \u200dIf\u2063 people write \u2064about their past, about their past traumas, and \u200bif they write about their future plans, they reduce general uncertainty \u200cthat\u2064 reduces their stress, and that seems \u2063to produce a relatively pronounced physiological\u2064 benefit. So there is an interesting interplay there\u200b in terms of \u2062the emotional and the physical. It is pretty funny that if you want \u2064to improve your cognitive\u200c function or maintain it, \u200cyou should exercise \u200crather \u2063than think,\u2063 and \u2064if \u200cyou want to improve your physiology, you should straighten out your\u2062 story and face your traumas rather \u200dthan, say, exercise.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><strong>Peter Attia:<\/strong> I think that exercise is empirically the most\u200d valuable tool we have for both the cognitive and physical components. So let\u2019s\u200d start with \u200bthe cognitive because I think\u200b it was less\u2062 intuitive. So about 10 years ago when I really went\u200b down this \u200brabbit hole, I had one of \u200cmy research \u200danalysts spend a lot of time going through the literature, \u200bso \u2064we created a\u200b framework where we were going to look at every single intervention and \u200chow it impacted executive\u2062 function, processing speed, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/brett-favre-encourages-parents-to-keep-kids-away-from-tackle-football-until-age-fourteen\/\" title=\"Brett Favre Encourages Parents To Keep Kids Away From Tackle Football Until Age Fourteen\">short-term memory<\/a>,\u200d and long-term memory. Those were the four \u2064metrics \u2064we cared about \u200dbecause, as\u200b you point out, those \u2062are all bits of \u2064intelligence that decline with age.<\/p>\n<p>We looked at everything. We looked at every molecule. We looked at every possible \u200cthing that you \u2063could\u200d think of. And after about nine months of \u200cthis, the thing that stood out above all else \u2014 beyond any diet, beyond the importance \u200dof sleep, and other \u200bthings \u2062that certainly mattered, controlling\u2063 blood pressure, lipids, et cetera \u2014 was exercise. And even though I was a lifelong \u200dexerciser and love to exercise, I just couldn\u2019t believe it. \u200bIt \u200cseemed so trite that exercise could have such a\u2064 profound\u200d difference on the state of\u200c cognition, not just in terms of its\u2064 performance \u2062as effectively a \u200bno\u200d trophic, but also\u200c in its ability to delay \u2014\u200c if not outright prevent \u2014 \u2062dementia.<\/p>\n<p>Once we dug into the\u200b mechanisms, I think it became clear\u200c why\u2064 exercise\u2064 is \u200dso potent, \u2064and it\u2019s basically that\u2063 it is acting on so many\u2064 different levels. So \u2064as you pointed \u200cout, it\u2019s acting at a metabolic level. The \u2064brain is such an \u200cenergy\u2064 demanding organ, as you know and maybe your\u200c listeners do, it weighs about\u200d 2% of your body weight\u2064 and it\u2019s responsible for 20 to 25% of your \u2063energy consumption. Therefore, anything that disrupts \u200bthat is \u2062catastrophic. When you \u2062look at the improvements in glucose\u2062 disposal, insulin\u2063 sensitivity, and all metabolic parameters, exercise is the most \u2063important tool we have\u200b there. When you look at \u2062the reduction of inflammation, vascular health \u2063improvements, again, exercise stands \u200balone. When \u2062you look at the production of neurotrophic growth\u2064 factors such as BDNF, \u2064again, exercise is \u2062basically a drug for neurons.<\/p>\n<p>I\u200c think I eventually came around after\u2062 a year or so \u2063to realize\u200d that, again, \u2063as \u200dsimple as it sounds, exercise is such\u200b a \u200bpotent tool. And\u200d you look at\u2064 the brains of people who exercise \u200ba lot and you can see\u200b far\u200c less damage, not just microvascularly, but in terms of\u200c brain volume lost over time.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jordan Peterson:<\/strong> So let\u2019s talk about exercise from the\u2063 perspective of\u200d a behavioral psychologist. \u2064One of the things you learn as a\u200b behavioral psychologist is \u200dthat it is very\u200b difficult for \u200cpeople to change their attitudes\u200c or their actions, and it is very difficult\u200b for people to change\u2063 their \u2064lives. We all know this because we\u200c might tell\u200d ourselves, for example,\u2063 to exercise, and we might be well supplied with arguments\u200b for why \u2064that is a good \u200cidea, but that\u200c does not necessarily mean we learn how to \u200dincorporate an exercise routine\u200b into our \u2064lives.<\/p>\n<p>There are many reasons \u200cfor \u2062that, one \u2063being that exercise\u2063 is difficult, but it is also \u2063often the case that\u200b people do not \u2063form a strategy and break the problem down into steps that are simple enough to actually implement. They think things like, \u201cWell, I\u2019ll go to the gym two hours\u2063 a day, three times a week, and \u2062I\u2019ll start \u200cthat next week.\u201d The truth\u200d of \u200cthe matter is \u200dthey do not have six hours to spend, and they cannot tell\u2063 themselves what to do anyway.<\/p>\n<p>So as a behavioral psychologist, you look at \u2064the simplest possible change that produces the maximum \u200bpossible \u2062benefit. \u200bFor\u200c example,\u200d if people \u2063want to begin to implement an\u200d exercise routine, like maybe a daily\u2063 walk \u2062of 10 minutes\u2064 in the\u200b morning, where would \u200cyou start someone?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter \u2064Attia:<\/strong> \u2064 So \u200cit\u200b completely depends on their baseline. But \u2062based on your question, I\u2019m going to take it as we\u2019re talking about someone \u200dwho\u2019s doing no \u2062exercise. \u2064The good news is, first of all \u2014 and I accept\u200c the fact that not everybody\u2062 is swayed by data,\u200b but I \u2062at least\u200d want to put it\u2063 out there \u2014 if you\u2019re a \u2063person \u200dwho\u2019s in the \u200b\u201cdoing zero\u200c exercise per week\u201d\u2064 camp, the very\u200b good news is the benefit you get from\u2063 going from zero\u2063 to three hours a week is a \u2063greater benefit than anyone gets\u200d along the exercise curve. So \u200btaking someone \u2062who\u2019s at five hours and\u2064 taking them \u2062to 15 will produce less relative benefit than\u200d going \u2062from zero to three. \u200cSo in other words, I\u200c want that person\u2064 to see some real incentive for making\u200c this change.<\/p>\n<p>Secondly,\u200b I\u2019ll put\u200b some numbers to it.\u200d So going from no exercise to\u2062 three hours a week approximately reduces your all \u2062cause mortality \u2014\u2064 that is to say, death \u2014 \u2062by <i>every<\/i> cause\u200d by 50% at any moment in time. So \u2063if \u200cyou\u2019re standing there asking, what\u2019s\u2064 the probability I\u2019m going \u200cto die this\u2062 year? Well, we can \u2064sort of actuarially figure that out. You get to cut\u200c that number in\u2063 half by \u2063simply\u2062 going from zero to three hours of exercise a week if you\u2019re\u2064 a non-exerciser. So again, there\u2019s going to be a subset of people for whom that\u2019s\u2064 a\u2062 very powerful piece of information \u2064they didn\u2019t know.<\/p>\n<p>Then what I would say is, how do you do that? I agree with you\u200b that you\u2019re much better off trying to do 30 minutes six times a week than three hours once a day or \u2063two hours, you know, \u200din whatever fashion. What I would say is the most effective way to do that is probably \u200babout\u2063 90 minutes of low \u200bintensity \u2064cardio. And for \u200ba person who\u2019s not particularly fit, that\u2019s going to amount\u2064 to just brisk\u200d walking. Rather than tell them what to do, I tell them how to feel\u2062 when they\u2019re doing it. So what \u2062you want to\u200b <i>feel<\/i> is\u2064 out of\u200d breath enough that \u200dyou \u200dcan barely \u2062carry out a conversation, but you could if you had to, but not so out of breath that you can\u2019t carry on a conversation and not so easy\u2064 that you can speak easily. So there is that sweet spot in there. Physiologically,\u2062 we call that \u200dzone\u200d two, \u2063but I\u2019m not going \u2062to\u2063 bore them with\u200c that\u2063 nomenclature. It\u2019s just basically 90 minutes to, say, three times 30 \u200cor two times 45 a week \u2062where you\u2019re just \u2062out of breath enough that\u2064 you don\u2019t want to talk, \u2063but you could if you \u2063had\u200b to.\u200b That\u2019s part one.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jordan Peterson:<\/strong> So you push yourself \u200dpast, or slightly past, your simple level of comfort. Then let \u2064me push on you a bit with regards \u2064to three hours a week, \u2064again, \u2063from the perspective of taking someone \u2064from\u200b zero to \u2063somewhere.\u200d You talked about the benefits of walking, something approximating 20 to 25 minutes a day, that can be \u200ddispersed out \u2063various \u200bways. You also\u200c mentioned two 45-minute sessions or \u2062three 30-minute sessions. What would happen if someone goes from\u200c zero to\u2064 like\u2064 10 minutes a day or\u200d an hour a \u200bweek? Where do the \u2064benefits of that 3 hours kick in?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Attia:<\/strong> Yes,\u200c that\u2019s a great question. I don\u2019t think we have\u200b the fidelity of the\u2064 data at that level because you generally don\u2019t push \u2064enough of a conditioning benefit.\u200c But I think what you\u2019re getting at, \u200dand we do this as well, is you want \u200cto \u2064separate \u2063between\u200b the behavior change\u2062 and the physiologic change. James Clear has\u200b written a \u200blot about this, but I think a lot of \u2063people have come to the same conclusion with any behavior change. If it\u2019s a\u200c person who\u2019s never done anything, you\u2019re right; the answer\u2063 might be for every day\u2064 when\u2063 you wake up in the\u200b morning, rather than your normal routine of\u2063 jumping in front of the\u2062 computer, I want you to go and \u2062walk around the block once. It\u2019ll\u2062 take \u2064four minutes. I don\u2019t want to represent [that] you\u2019re going to get a\u200b physiologic benefit from\u200c that. You probably won\u2019t.<\/p>\n<p>But what you will get is, you\u2019re going to start to \u200breset a behavior which is, \u2063\u201cAha, the\u200c first thing I do in the morning now is this other thing,\u201d and we\u2019ll slowly increase that and at some point you will get a physiologic benefit. But what we\u2019re doing is planting\u200d the seed of how to change the behavior.<\/p>\n<p>* * *<\/p>\n<p><i>To hear\u2062 the rest of the conversation, \u200ccontinue by listening\u2063 or \u2063watching this episode on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/watch\">DailyWire+<\/a>.<\/i><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jordanbpeterson.com\/\"><i>Dr. Jordan B. Peterson<\/i><\/a><i>  is a clinical\u2064 psychologist and professor emeritus at the University of Toronto. From 1993 to 1998 \u200che served as assistant and then associate \u2064professor of psychology at Harvard. He is the international\u2063 bestselling author\u2064 of Maps of\u200b Meaning, 12 Rules\u200b For Life, and Beyond \u2063Order. You can now\u200c <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/podcasts\/the-jordan-b-peterson-podcast\"><i>listen to<\/i><\/a>  or\u200b <a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/watch\/jordan-peterson\"><i>watch<\/i><\/a>  his popular lectures\u200c on\u2063 DailyWire+.<\/i><\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> Does exercise not only help prevent cognitive \u2062decline but also improve \u2063cognitive function<\/h2>\n<p><span>  Nefits start to kick in\u2063 and how do they compare\u2064 to \u2064the benefits of\u2062 three hours a \u200cweek?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Attia:<\/strong> \u200dI\u200c think there is \u2063a little bit of a dose-response curve.\u2062 So \u2064the fact of\u200b the matter \u200bis if \u2063you were to just go from zero \u200dto any positive number, even if that positive number\u200b is two \u200cminutes a day, \u200dthree times a\u2062 week, you\u2019re \u2062going to get some benefit. And exactly where that bends \u2063over into \u2062a \u2063plateau \u200bwhere you\u2019re not going to get a whole lot \u2064more additional benefit \u2062is unclear, but\u2064 I can tell\u2064 you that there\u2062 is no doubt that\u2064 going from zero\u2064 to three hours a week will \u200dgive you the biggest relative \u200breduction in both all-cause mortality and\u200b cognitive decline. I would\u2062 say that for \u2063most people, \u2062it is a relatively \u200bideal minimum to shoot for. And within that, we could \u2062certainly\u200c put priority on \u200dcertain types of exercise \u200bbecause, as you point out, there is definitely a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/simple-nasal-wash-reduces-risk-of-covid-hospitalization\/\" title=\"Simple Nasal Wash Reduces Risk of COVID Hospitalization\">dose-response relationship<\/a> to different \u2062types of\u200c exercise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jordan Peterson:<\/strong> And what about\u2063 lifting weights? \u2062You mentioned cardiovascular exercise, but\u2063 what about the benefits \u2064of weight lifting?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Attia:<\/strong> The \u200dbeauty \u200dof lifting \u200bweights \u200cis that it comes with a lot of the same corners \u2064being cut. If you want to have muscle strength, hypertrophy, and all the factors that go into not just looking better but \u2063also preventing sarcopenia, there is probably\u200c no\u2064 substitute for actually lifting weights.<\/p>\n<p>But I will qualify that and say that for most people in most phases of \u2063life, I think it \u2063is\u200c a superior prescription to just go for a walk or go for a jog. The metabolic benefits and\u200d the \u200cbenefits to the \u200cbrain of aerobic exercise, \u2063at the dose\u2064 we\u2019re talking about, is just so disproportionate to the benefit of lifting\u2064 weights that it is hard \u2062to\u2064 really\u200c envision a\u2064 person who would \u2064be better off doing that \u2063instead of exercise. That\u2019s not to say \u200cthat there aren\u2019t\u2063 situations where someone may want to \u200blift weights, such as if they already have a high level \u2062of cardiovascular function and they\u2019re looking to optimize aesthetics or they\u2019re trying to prevent\u2063 sarcopenia. But again,\u200d for most people, in\u2063 most phases of\u2064 life, I \u200bthink the answer\u200d is that\u200c it is virtually \u200dimpossible to get to the point where you\u2019re on \u2064a solid aerobic exercise\u2212only platform and not get benefits from \u200cexercise as we\u2019ve talked about\u2064 it so far. So I just\u200d don\u2019t see a tremendous amount of neurocognitive \u2063benefit or\u2063 metabolic\u200c benefit \u2063that you can spartanize from lifting weights. You\u2019re often left with a situation of having to supplement that with some level of\u2062 aerobic\u200d exercise, no matter what.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jordan \u200dPeterson:<\/strong> So what you are saying is\u2064 that, for the brain and \u200dcognition, cardiovascular exercise is the most important. \u2062If \u200dyou\u200d want the metabolic benefits\u2063 and muscle \u200dstrength, lifting weights is\u200d important, but cardiovascular exercise can\u200d provide those benefits as well.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Attia:<\/strong> \u200dAbsolutely. And\u2062 let\u2019s \u200cnot forget about stretching. I think \u200cstretching has \u200bkind of gotten a bad \u2064rap because the way stretching \u200bhas \u200dtraditionally \u2062been \u200bdone \u2212 just going \u2062over to the corner and touching your toes \u2062and holding that \u2062position for 30 seconds \u2064\u2212 has been shown to\u200b be pretty ineffective at preventing injuries. But stretching done in the \u200ccontext of a good\u200d dynamic\u2063 warm-up or a cool-down \u2063where you\u2019re actually doing some movements in \u200dall\u2062 the different planes of \u200dmotion that are \u2062going \u200bto be called\u200b upon in whatever activity you\u2019re doing, \u200bI do think there is some benefit to it, \u200dboth as recovery \u2062and as injury \u2064prevention.<\/p>\n<p>So I would \u200bsay, if you had \u2064to go in order of three \u2062things, I would say the absolute most important thing is\u2062 getting the aerobic exercise.\u200d That should never be\u2064 skipped or replaced in the favor\u2064 of stretching or\u200d lifting\u200d weights. Secondly, I think as \u200dmany people as possible \u200bshould be getting some\u200d effort into \u2062their life to lift some\u200b weights,\u2063 but it could be very minimal \u2212\u200c a couple of \u200dmovements done perfect and heavy, almost like high-intensity interval strength training. That amount of\u2064 effort done \u200cwith correct \u200dform a few days a week is all \u2063you need to get\u2063 the maximum benefit.\u2063 And \u200dlastly, \u2064I do think\u200c there is some merit to a little bit of a\u2063 cool-down that\u2062 incorporates\u200b stretching \u2062and movement and that sort of thing. But certainly, the most important thing to be\u2063 doing\u200c routinely if\u2063 you can is aerobic exercise.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Jordan \u200dPeterson:<\/strong> And going \u200bback to the cognitive\u2063 benefits,\u200b it\u2019s important to highlight that exercise not only \u2062helps prevent cognitive decline but\u200d can\u2062 also improve cognitive function, right?<\/p>\n<p><strong>Peter Attia:<\/strong> Absolutely. Exercise is essentially the most powerful nootropic, which is\u200d a type of drug \u200cthat enhances cognitive\u2062 function. \u2064It <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/nitric-oxide-the-free-radical-you-need\/\" title=\"Nitric Oxide: The Free Radical You Need\">increases blood flow<\/a> to the brain, improves neurogenesis,\u2062 elevates levels of growth factors that enhance learning and memory, and reduces inflammation, among \u2062other things. So not\u2063 only does exercise maintain cognitive function as we age, but it can actually\u2064 make us \u2063smarter.<\/p>\n<p>So,\u2064 if\u2064 you\u2019re looking for an intervention that can improve both \u200dyour physical and cognitive health, exercise \u200dis \u200cthe key. Whether it\u2019s cardiovascular exercise\u2064 or \u2064weight lifting, incorporating a regular \u2063exercise routine into \u2064your life can have tremendous benefits. From \u200dreducing the risk of cognitive decline\u200b and\u200d improving cognitive function to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/republican-celeste-maloy-wins-special-election-for-utah-house-seat\/\" title=\"Republican Celeste Maloy wins special election for Utah House seat\">preventing chronic diseases<\/a> and improving overall well-being, exercise is truly a powerful tool. So, let\u2019s get moving and experience the transformative effects of\u200d exercise\u2063 on our lives!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Dr. Jordan Peterson&#8217;s discussion with physician Peter Attia on exercise benefits, even with just three hours weekly. Listen or watch the complete podcast on DailyWire+ (Start time: 04:07)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1006,"featured_media":2153054,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[541],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2153053","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-daily-wire"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2153053","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1006"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2153053"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2153053\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2153054"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2153053"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2153053"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2153053"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}