While Democrats like Sen. Sheldon \u2064Whitehouse<\/a> warn of “right-wing dark-money networks seeking to undermine the\u2064 future of democratic elections \u2062in the United States,” progressives have surpassed Republicans in utilizing supposedly nonpartisan nonprofit \u2063organizations\u2062 to win elections.<\/p>\n

According to data\u2064 compiled by Restoration of America, a conservative political action committee, over 150 progressive nonprofits spent $1.35\u2064 billion on political activities \u200din 2021 and 2022. \u2062While there are \u2063no readily available\u200c estimates of comparable conservative efforts, experts\u2062 believe\u2064 they are outmatched.<\/p>\n

“The liberal nonprofit sector is much larger than the conservative \u2062nonprofit in the\u2063 political arena,”\u200b said Bradley Smith, founder\u2064 of the conservative Institute for Free Speech and former commissioner with the Federal Election Commission.<\/p>\n

Progressive\u200c activist nonprofits include faith-based groups<\/a>, ethnic activist operatives<\/a>, and colleges<\/a> and universities, which play\u200b a significant role in the Democratic Party’s election strategy.<\/p>\n

These\u2063 groups navigate legal restrictions on nonprofits that accept tax-deductible\u200c donations \u2064by selectively\u200d engaging in nonpartisan efforts such as voter education and participation.<\/p>\n

However, much of the funding, like the $332 \u200cmillion donated by\u2062 Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his\u2064 wife Priscilla Chan to public\u200c elections offices for\u200b the 2020 elections, ends up in the hands of groups operating in liberal strongholds and\u200c working with \u200breliably\u2064 Democratic constituencies.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

This is how influential groups like the Voter Participation Center and the Center for Voter\u200c Information boost Democrat\u2062 turnout. Their mission is \u2064to encourage voting among specific demographics, such as\u2064 young people, \u2063people of color, and unmarried women, who are key constituents of the Democratic Party. Research from Nonprofit Vote shows that engaging these groups through nonprofits increases their likelihood of \u200dvoting by up\u2062 to \u2062two-and-a-half times.<\/p>\n

The importance of these groups was evident when the Biden administration \u200dmet with\u2062 leading progressive operators, including Democracy Fund, Fair Elections Center, FairVote, the Southern Poverty Law Center, Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, and the George Soros-backed Open Society Policy Center, to discuss \u2063expanding\u200d citizens’\u200d opportunities to register to vote.<\/p>\n

Nonprofit allies\u200b of the Democratic Party \u2062also echo their stance on issues like climate change and\u2064 voting procedures. For example, the\u200d Fair Elections Center refers to those who question the outcome of the 2020 presidential race as “election deniers” who oppose the right to vote. This aligns\u200d with President Biden’s statements on the matter.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Significant funding for these voting activist operations comes from the same sources that \u2062contribute millions of dollars to Democratic and progressive campaigns.<\/p>\n

Some of these sources include:<\/p>\n

The Tides \u200bFoundation<\/strong>,\u200c which had\u2062 $1 billion in \u200brevenue in 2020, funds the moveon.org PAC and supports the \u200dVoter Registration Project, League of Women Voters, and Project Vote. The foundation is affiliated with other Tides \u200dnonprofits that advocate for causes such \u200das abortion \u200drights, gun control, and “equity.” It is also a partner \u200dof\u2063 Black Lives Matter.<\/p>\n

New\u2063 Venture Fund<\/strong>, formerly known as Arabella Legacy \u2064Fund, advocates for \u2064progressive causes, including election laws, in 41 states. In 2020, it disbursed nearly $500 million for issues like racial \u2064justice. A civil rights\u200b lawsuit \u200dfiled by a former employee \u2063alleges \u200cthat New Venture engaged in prohibited partisan political activity<\/a>, although this is \u200bdisputed by the organization.<\/p>\n

New Venture: Empowering Progressive Voting Groups<\/h2>\n
The Silicon Valley Community Foundation<\/strong> has \u200cbeen \u200ba major financial supporter of progressive voting groups such as American \u2063Votes, NAACP National Voter \u200cFund, and Fair Elections Center. \u2064Since 2020, they \u200dhave granted a staggering $106 \u200dmillion to nonprofits dedicated to voter education and turnout.<\/p>\n
These grants, facilitated by\u200c Zuckerberg’s millions, have been instrumental in supporting public \u200belections offices across the United States. Additionally, the foundation has donated funds to organizations like Planned Parenthood and Democracy Now, while\u2062 its employees have\u2063 exclusively\u2062 contributed to Democratic candidates.<\/p>\n
Over the past decade, there has been a \u200bsignificant increase in the number and funding of \u200delectorally active progressive nonprofits. These organizations\u2062 have taken on the role of engaging voters,\u200d replacing \u2062the traditional efforts\u200c of political campaigns.<\/p>\n
This shift can be attributed to a\u2063 changing political landscape, as Sasha Issenberg,\u2064 author of The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns<\/em>, explains. This transformation has been driven by the use of micro-analytics and social science in voter targeting, initially dominated by Republicans and later refined by Democrats. Younger individuals with a collectivist mindset have played a crucial \u2062role in this refinement.<\/p>\n
\n
“When you \u200dhad this era\u200b of innovation on the left,\u200d it set upon a culture that was already in place and wanted to perfect this idea.” – Sasha Issenberg<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Progressive voter groups have adeptly navigated tax rules, allowing 501(c)(3) \u2064nonprofits to engage in voter participation and get-out-the-vote drives, as long as they do not directly benefit\u2064 a\u200c political party.<\/p>\n
These \u2062groups possess valuable voter and demographic data, along with experienced community organizers.\u200d Erick Kaardal, a Minneapolis-based attorney, acknowledges their legal compliance and contrasts\u200b it with the challenges faced by conservative nonprofits. He emphasizes the\u200c significant\u200b resources \u200cthat progressives have invested in building a well-oiled\u2063 machine that operates\u2063 within the bounds \u2064of the law.<\/p>\n
Today, tax-exempt entities are at the\u200d forefront of voter registration and \u200bengagement efforts,\u2062 advocating for positions aligned with leading elected \u200bDemocratic officials.<\/p>\n
A Leftward Disparate Impact<\/h3>\n
As a result, seemingly neutral\u2062 efforts have a disparate impact that\u2062 favors Democrats over\u2063 Republicans. Ryan Williamson, co-author of Nationalized \u200bPolitics: Evaluating Electoral Politics \u2063Across Time<\/em>, highlights the importance\u200d of reaching every constituent \u2063equally to avoid disproportionate effects.<\/p>\n
The proliferation of nonprofits funding voter registration\u200d can be \u200ctraced back to the Obama campaign in 2008. This strategy has been\u200d successful for\u200c Democrats, who have consistently outperformed historical expectations in national \u200celections.<\/p>\n
Arabella Legacy Fund, founded in 2008, played a significant role in this proliferation. It\u2063 later transformed into the New Venture \u2062Fund, providing substantial funding to voting nonprofits. Arabella Advisors, a \u200dfor-profit entity, now handles strategy and management\u2063 for\u2062 New Venture and other partisan nonprofit enterprises.<\/p>\n
Progressives view\u200b the creation and \u200cfunding of\u2063 nonprofits as a core Democratic Party strategy. Their aim is to build a new\u2064 American majority, encompassing \u200dpeople of color, women, students, \u2064and the \u200bLGBTQ+ community. Ned Jones, deputy director \u200bof the conservative Election Integrity Network, acknowledges the effectiveness of this strategy and highlights the lack of funding, \u2063structure, and system on the opposing team.<\/p>\n
This article is \u200can exploration of how tax-exempt nonprofits navigate the U.S. \u200dtax code to support \u2064Democratic \u200bvoter turnout.<\/em><\/p>\n
\n
Engaging Paraphrase:<\/h2>\n
Get ready for an exciting \u200delection day! We have some fascinating insights to share with you, courtesy of RealClearInvestigations. So,\u200b grab \u2062a cup of coffee and let’s dive into the details.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
<\/p>\n
\u2064Do nonprofit \u2063organizations, \u200cparticularly \u2064progressive ones, have a partisan agenda that influences\u2062 elections in favor of a specific political party? <\/h2>\n
The law.<\/p>\n
However, critics argue that \u200dthese progressive nonprofit organizations, despite claiming to be nonpartisan, \u2063are simply\u200b extensions of the Democratic Party. They argue that the vast funding and \u200dsupport they receive from liberal donors and their alignment with Democratic Party objectives make it clear that their ultimate goal is to influence elections in \u200bfavor of the Democratic\u200c Party.<\/p>\n
Conservative nonprofit organizations, on the \u200dother hand, face \u2063more scrutiny and regulatory challenges. Bradley Smith points out that conservative nonprofits often face accusations of violating\u2064 the tax-exempt status rules and engaging in partisan political activities. The \u200cperception that conservative organizations are engaged in “dark money”\u200d operations further adds to the challenges they face.<\/p>\n
Despite these \u200bchallenges, conservative nonprofits still \u200cplay a significant\u200b role in elections. The National Rifle Association (NRA) is one prominent example of\u2063 a conservative nonprofit that has successfully\u2062 influenced elections through its political \u200badvocacy\u2064 and \u2063membership mobilization efforts.<\/p>\n
It is important to\u200d note that the influence of nonprofit organizations\u200c in\u2062 elections is not limited to funding and\u200b partisan activities. These organizations \u200calso contribute\u2062 to shaping the political discourse and promoting specific \u2063policy agendas. They can raise awareness about certain issues\u200d and advocate for legislative changes, \u200deffectively influencing public opinion and political\u2064 decision-making.<\/p>\n
The increasing role of nonprofit organizations in \u200d elections raises important \u200cquestions<\/a> about transparency and accountability. Critics argue that the vast amount of money flowing\u2063 through these\u2064 organizations, \u2064often from undisclosed sources,\u200c erodes the transparency \u200bof\u2063 the electoral process. They argue that \u2064voters have a right to know who is funding \u2062the campaigns and\u200c initiatives they\u2062 support.<\/p>\n
Efforts have been\u2063 made\u200c to increase \u200ctransparency \u200bin\u200c campaign financing, such\u2062 as the\u2064 requirement for\u200d political\u200d organizations to disclose their donors. However, \u200dthese regulations often have loopholes that allow \u200cnonprofit organizations to\u200c avoid disclosing their contributors.<\/p>\n
As the influence of nonprofit organizations in elections grows, it becomes crucial to have a comprehensive and \u200dtransparent framework to ensure that\u2064 the \u2062

Engaging Paraphrase:<\/h2>\nGet ready for an exciting \u200delection day! We have some fascinating insights to share with you, courtesy of RealClearInvestigations. So,\u200b grab \u2062a cup of coffee and let’s dive into the details.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n <\/p>\n

Engaging Paraphrase:<\/h2>\n
Get ready for an exciting \u200delection day! We have some fascinating insights to share with you, courtesy of RealClearInvestigations. So,\u200b grab \u2062a cup of coffee and let’s dive into the details.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
<\/p>\n