{"id":2121874,"date":"2023-12-11T15:11:02","date_gmt":"2023-12-11T20:11:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-throws-out-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-rulings-for-federal-employees-military\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T15:14:38","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T20:14:38","slug":"supreme-court-throws-out-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-rulings-for-federal-employees-military","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-throws-out-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-rulings-for-federal-employees-military\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court rejects COVID-19 vaccine mandates for federal workers, military"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fsupreme-court-throws-out-covid-19-vaccine-mandate-rulings-for-federal-employees-military%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2121874&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p><!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC \"-\/\/W3C\/\/DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional\/\/EN\" \"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/TR\/REC-html40\/loose.dtd\"><br \/>\n<?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><?xml encoding=\"utf-8\" ?><html><body><\/p>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">(Photo by FABRICE \u2064COFFRINI\/AFP \u200dvia Getty Images)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h2>OAN\u2019s Brooke \u2063Mallory<\/h2>\n<p>11:56 \u200dAM \u2013 Monday, December 11, 2023    <\/p>\n<p>A number of rulings pertaining to the Biden administration\u2019s \u2063COVID-19 vaccination requirements for federal employees and \u2064military personnel were overturned by the Supreme Court, \u200bpreventing the decisions \u200bfrom becoming precedent-setting in the future.<\/p>\n<div id=\"div-gpt-ad-1663871513696-art-3\" style=\"min-width: 320px; min-height: 50px; text-align: center;\">  \t<script>  \t\tgoogletag.cmd.push(function() { googletag.display('div-gpt-ad-1663871513696-art-3'); });  \t<\/script>  <\/div>\n<div class=\"ad-slot__ad-label\">Advertisement<\/div>\n<\/p>\n<p>After declaring the disagreements moot, the justices agreed\u2062 to \u2062throw out the lower \u200ddecisions on Monday, clearing the way for any future vaccination\u200d requirements.<\/p>\n<p>The \u2062lawsuits\u2064 had resulted in differing \u200brulings from the courts, but the vaccination mandates were repealed\u200c before the\u200c Supreme\u2063 Court could comment\u2062 on any\u2062 of\u2064 the appeals. The judges\u200b had\u2064 to \u2063decide what legal remedy was \u2064suitable in light of\u200c the circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding the federal employee requirement, two appeals\u200d courts reached different\u200d decisions regarding whether federal workers may file a constitutional challenge in court or whether they have to go through the Merit Systems\u200b Protection \u200dBoard (MSPB)\u2062 first.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S.\u2063 Court\u200b of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined in March that the\u2062 MSPB was mandated by\u2064 federal law in a case that was brought by a civilian employee \u200cof\u2063 the Navy. A few days later, the U.S.\u200d Court of Appeals for \u200dthe 5<sup>th <\/sup>Circuit \u2062rendered an opposing\u2064 ruling\u200b in support of several plaintiffs, including a \u200dgroup called\u200b \u201cFeds for Medical \u200cFreedom.\u201d\u200d <\/p>\n<p>Earlier in May, Biden revoked the executive order that had instituted the federal employee vaccination mandate, prior to the Supreme Court\u2019s \u200ddecision in\u200b either\u200d case.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. Court of Appeals for\u2063 the 6<sup>th<\/sup> Circuit\u2062 then imposed an injunction \u2064in the military vaccination mandate \u200dcase,\u200b stopping the Air Force from enforcing the\u200d obligation against those who\u200d request \u200dreligious exemptions.<\/p>\n<p>A few weeks later, Congress enacted\u2064 a law mandating that Biden\u2019s defense secretary withdraw the\u2062 order prior\u2064 to the Supreme Court hearing\u2064 any appeals.<\/p>\n<p>The government pushed the\u2064 justices in \u2064all \u200cthree \u2062cases\u2064 to grant a \u200d\u201cMunsingwear vacatur,\u201d which overturns a lower court decision in certain cases\u2062 when it is deemed irrelevant.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs who prevailed in the\u200c cases and another government employee agreed, and the Navy employee\u2064 who had lost in the lower court petitioned \u2062the Supreme Court \u2063to uphold their decisions.<\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs said that since the Biden administration had willingly brought forth its own \u2064case, Munsingwear vacatur was inapplicable. One\u200b group also pointed out that the vaccination obligation persisted even though other pandemic-era policies had been removed months \u200cearlier.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u201cPetitioners ask this Court to endorse a \u2018heads we win, tails you \u200dget vacated\u2019 version\u200b of Munsingwear,\u2064 where they\u200c can litigate to the hilt in both \u2064district and circuit court and\u2014only if \u2062they lose\u2014then\u2063 decline to seek substantive \u2063review from this \u200bCourt and instead\u2063 moot the \u2063case and ask this Court to erase the circuit court loss from \u200cthe books,\u201d said the plaintiffs\u2019 attorney.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Ketanji Brown Jackson, the judge in\u200c two of the three cases,\u200c said that\u200b those who have consistently resisted the legal \u2062tactic\u2062 dissented from the court\u2019s ruling. In \u2062the third case, Jackson expressed that while \u2064she would personally disagree, she would grant the administration\u2019s motion in accordance with established Supreme Court precedent.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u201cIn my view,\u200d the party seeking vacatur has not established equitable entitlement to \u2063that remedy,\u201d Jackson wrote.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The Biden administration claimed that the president\u2019s decision to terminate the \u2063federal employee \u200dmandate\u200b was a result of evolving public\u200d health conditions.<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u201cThe President revoked EO 14,043 because of the waning of \u2062the pandemic, not any \u200beffort to evade\u200d judicial review or gain litigation\u200c advantage,\u201d the Justice Department said in the court filings.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Stay informed! Receive breaking \u2062news blasts directly to your inbox for free. \u2062Subscribe here. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.oann.com\/alerts\">https:\/\/www.oann.com\/alerts<\/a><\/p>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"rc-widget-10bad2\" data-rc-widget data-widget-host=\"habitat\" data-endpoint=\"\/\/trends.revcontent.com\" data-widget-id=\"278641\"><\/div>\n<p class=\"dpsp-share-text\" style=\"margin-bottom:10px\"> \t\t \t\tShare this post!\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>Senior litigation counsel at\u2062 the New Civil Liberties Alliance says the State Department\u2019s Global Engagement Center is using taxpayer fund to shut down <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/snopes-posts-bogus-pro-aoc-fact-check-ends-up-exposing-its-left-wing-bias\/\" title=\"Snopes Posts Bogus Pro-AOC \u2018Fact Check,\u2019 Ends Up Exposing Its Left-Wing Bias\">conservative news outlets<\/a>.  One America\u2019s John Hines has\u200d more from Washington.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>As tensions continue \u200cto rise in\u200b the Middle East over\u2062 the Israel Hamas War. <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>After severe storms\u2063 and tornadoes kill \u2064at least six people in Central Tennessee. <\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>with Thaddeus Cleveland<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>Microsoft and the \u2064AFL-CIO union federation\u2062 said they had struck\u200b a deal whereby the software giant will remain neutral in efforts \u2064by unions to encourage workers to\u2063 become\u2064 members.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>Amazon.com \u200basked a federal\u200d court to dismiss a U.S. \u200dgovernment antitrust lawsuit which accuses\u2062 the company of using illegal strategies\u2063 to \u2063boost profits at its online \u200dretail empire.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>More than 10 million people have signed up for X in December, X CEO \u200dLinda Yaccarino said \u200din a post \u2063on the social media platform.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-content\">\n<p>Alphabet shares ended 5.3% higher \u200bon Thursday as Wall Street cheered the launch of Gemini.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p> rnrn  <\/p>\n<h2> Does the Supreme\u200d Court&#8217;s ruling settle the question of the constitutionality of \u2063the Biden administration&#8217;s \u2063vaccination requirements for federal employees and military personnel?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  Diciary \u2062Department said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court\u2019s decision will have implications \u2064for \u200dfuture cases involving vaccine mandates and individual rights. It\u2062 clarifies that lower court decisions on such matters can be overturned if they become irrelevant due to changes in circumstances or if the issue at hand\u2063 is resolved through other means, such \u200cas executive orders or legislation.<\/p>\n<p>However, the ruling does not settle \u200cthe question of \u2064whether the Biden administration\u2019s vaccination requirements\u200d for federal employees and\u2062 military \u200dpersonnel are \u2062constitutional. It simply prevents the lower court decisions from setting a precedent for future cases.<\/p>\n<p>The debate over vaccine\u2064 mandates has been contentious, \u200bwith arguments on both sides. Supporters argue that such mandates are necessary to protect public health and control the spread of COVID-19. They believe that requiring individuals \u2062to be \u2062vaccinated is\u2064 a reasonable measure to prevent the further spread \u200cof the virus \u2064and ensure the safety of the community.<\/p>\n<p>Opponents, on the\u200b other hand, argue that\u200b vaccine mandates infringe \u200bupon individual rights and personal autonomy.\u200b They believe \u200bthat individuals\u2062 should have the right to make their own decisions \u200cregarding their health and whether to\u200c receive a \u200cvaccine. They also express concerns about potential side effects or \u200c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-fda-has-issued-a-new-warning-for-this-beverage\/\" title=\"The FDA Has Issued a New Warning for This Beverage\">long-term health risks<\/a> associated with the vaccines.<\/p>\n<p>This debate has played out in \u200dvarious legal challenges across\u2062 the country, with different courts reaching different conclusions. The Supreme Court\u2019s decision to overturn these lower court\u200c rulings \u200cadds to \u2063the complexity of the issue and leaves the \u200bquestion of vaccine\u2063 mandates unresolved.<\/p>\n<p>As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to evolve, governments and policymakers will face ongoing challenges in balancing public health concerns with individual\u200d rights and freedoms. The Supreme Court\u2019s decision highlights the need for clear and consistent guidance on vaccine mandates, \u2063as well as the importance of addressing\u200c these issues through established legal processes.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, finding a balance between protecting public health and respecting \u200cindividual rights will require thoughtful and nuanced discussions, informed by scientific evidence and legal expertise. It is \u2063crucial\u2062 for\u200c policymakers to \u2064consider the potential impact of their decisions on\u2063 public\u200c health, individual freedoms, and the overall well-being of society.<\/p>\n<p>The Supreme Court\u2019s recent decision serves as a reminder\u200d of the \u200ccomplexities surrounding\u2062 vaccine mandates and the need for careful consideration of these issues\u200c in order to navigate the challenges\u200d posed by the ongoing pandemic.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court overturned several rulings on Biden&#8217;s COVID-19 vaccination requirements for federal employees and military personnel, preventing them from setting future precedents. The disagreements were declared moot<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1866,"featured_media":2121875,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[542],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2121874","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-oann"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2121874","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1866"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2121874"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2121874\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2121875"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2121874"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2121874"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2121874"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}