In its relentless\u2062 campaign<\/a> to tarnish\u2062 the reputation of Justice Clarence Thomas, \u200bthe left-wing billionaire-funded website ProPublica is gearing up to release yet another deceitful article to justify its previous dishonest attacks on Thomas’ vacations with his friends. However, this latest \u200chit piece fails to change the fact that Thomas acted within the bounds of the\u200d law \u2063and in accordance with\u2062 the 2012 ruling of the governing legal body\u2062 that he acted appropriately.<\/p>\n

In its initial assault, ProPublica falsely accused Thomas of breaking the law by not reporting \u2062various vacations he took with his \u2064longtime friend Harlan Crow. To support \u200dthis claim, \u200cProPublica cited left-wing “judicial\u200d ethics<\/a>” experts\u200d who are funded by the same left-wing billionaires supporting the website.<\/p>\n

What \u2063ProPublica conveniently left out of its story is \u2062that the Judicial Conference of the United States,\u200d composed of \u200cfederal \u2062judges and responsible for implementing and enforcing ethics\u2064 laws for the federal judiciary, had already examined these allegations and determined in 2012 that Thomas had not failed to disclose any required information regarding travel reimbursements.<\/p>\n

It’s not \u200csurprising that the Judicial \u200dConference reached this conclusion,\u200b as there is ample evidence that\u2063 this has been the guidance provided to judges all along. For instance, Judge Ray Randolph produced\u2064 contemporaneous\u2064 notes from 2006,\u2064 in which \u2064he received advice from the conference staff stating that he was not obligated to report a flight\u2063 on a \u200bprivate plane or a\u200b stay at a lodge in Alaska based on the “personal hospitality<\/a>” definition outlined in the\u200b Ethics in Government Act and interpreted by the \u200bJudicial Conference.<\/p>\n

That’s why Thomas\u2064 did not \u2063report \u2062his trips \u200bwith Crow and his other friends. The law \u2063recognizes that tallying\u200c the number of times\u2064 you stay overnight at a friend’s\u2062 house, have \u2063dinner with them,\u200d or\u2063 go on vacation together is not the purpose of the law.<\/p>\n

It’s a journalistic disgrace that ProPublica failed to \u200bmention the Judicial Conference’s 2012 ruling, as it completely undermines the \u200dwebsite’s smear campaign suggesting that \u200bThomas violated\u2064 the law. Instead \u200dof acknowledging \u2062this glaring omission, ProPublica has been determined to stick to its false narrative and has spent months searching<\/a>\u2063 for ways to attack the 2012 ruling.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

Last week, ProPublica sent an email to Justice Thomas \u2063challenging a statement made by\u200d Thomas’ attorney in a\u2064 letter\u200b last August, which accurately stated: “The Judicial Conference issued a letter confirming that Justice Thomas had not improperly failed\u200b to disclose information concerning his travel.” According to ProPublica’s email, “a \u200bjudge who was on the committee \u2063at the time told us\u2064 ‘that couldn’t be further from the truth’\u200c because the committee did nothing.”<\/p>\n

What is this judge, quoted by ProPublica, referring to? The \u2063Judicial Conference’s April\u200d 30, 2012, letter states: “This matter has been reviewed by the Committee on Financial Disclosure of the Judicial Conference \u2063of the United States. It has concluded that nothing\u200b has been \u200cpresented to support a determination … \u2064that Justice\u200b Thomas willfully or improperly failed\u2062 to disclose information concerning travel reimbursements.”<\/p>\n

ProPublica \u2064expects its readers to believe a judge who seems willing to rewrite history over Thomas’ attorney, who accurately reflected the Judicial Conference’s determination.<\/p>\n

In its\u2063 email to Thomas, \u2064ProPublica also claims that the Judicial Conference did not investigate these allegations against Thomas and that some judges were troubled by how\u200c the \u2063matter was\u2064 handled. But why would an investigation be necessary? \u200bIf this travel fell under the personal hospitality \u200bprovision, there\u2063 was no obligation to report it. \u200bThis is the\u200c exact advice given to \u200bJudge Randolph and \u200blikely many other judges. No investigation\u2064 was needed.<\/p>\n

What are the motives behind the relentless attacks on Justice Thomas by \u200cleft-wing media and progressive activists?<\/h2>\n
Ight of their accusations\u2064 and exposes \u200ctheir\u2063 bias. This deliberate omission \u2063raises questions about\u2063 the \u200cintegrity and\u200b credibility of \u200bProPublica as a supposedly unbiased\u200d news source.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, the attempts\u200b by ProPublica to attack Justice Thomas’s\u200d character and integrity are not new. Since \u2063his \u200bappointment to the Supreme Court in 1991,\u2064 Thomas has\u2064 been the target of relentless\u2062 attacks from \u2064the left-wing media and progressive activists. These attacks are motivated by ideological differences, and their goal is to undermine Thomas’s conservative beliefs and influence \u200bon the court.<\/p>\n
The truth is that Justice Thomas has \u2062always acted within the boundaries of the law and\u200d the ethical guidelines set for federal \u2063judges. The Judicial Conference’s ruling in 2012 is a clear indication \u200dthat Thomas followed the proper procedures in reporting\u2062 his vacations and travel \u200dreimbursements.<\/p>\n
These attacks \u200con Thomas are not only baseless but also\u2064 harmful \u200dto the integrity of the judiciary. The \u200dSupreme Court is a\u2064 vital institution in\u2064 our democracy, and its justices should\u200d be held in \u2063high regard regardless of \u2062their political beliefs. Engaging in character assassination \u200dand spreading misinformation about a sitting justice\u2064 erodes public confidence in the court \u2062and \u2064undermines the\u200c rule of \u2062law.<\/p>\n
\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
It’s important to recognize\u200b these attempts \u200bby biased media outlets like ProPublica for what they \u2062are: smear campaigns intended\u2062 to discredit \u200band intimidate conservative \u200djustices. Instead of focusing on substantive disagreements and engaging in respectful\u2063 debate,\u2063 the left-wing media chooses to \u200cresort to personal attacks and distortion of facts.<\/p>\n
As\u2064 responsible citizens, we must be discerning consumers of news and seek \u200bout reliable and unbiased sources of information. Relying on outlets like\u2062 ProPublica, which clearly have an agenda \u2062and \u2062are funded by partisan \u200dbillionaires, does a\u2064 disservice to our democracy and\u2063 to the pursuit of truth.<\/p>\n
Justice \u2063Clarence Thomas, like\u200c any other justice\u200c on the Supreme Court, deserves fair treatment and respect. \u200bIt is our\u200c responsibility as citizens to ensure\u2063 that our judicial system remains\u200b impartial and free from undue political influence. \u200bThis starts with\u2063 rejecting baseless attacks\u200d and holding\u2062 media organizations accountable for their dishonesty and \u2063bias.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
<\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
In its relentless pursuit to tarnish Justice Clarence Thomas, ProPublica, a left-wing website funded by billionaires, is set to release yet another deceitful article. This attempt to justify their previous dishonest attacks on Thomas’ vacations with friends falls short. Regardless, it fails to alter the fact that Thomas acted within the boundaries of the law and his principles<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":739,"featured_media":2121425,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2121424","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2121424","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/739"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2121424"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2121424\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2121425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2121424"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2121424"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2121424"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}