{"id":2110864,"date":"2023-11-29T11:53:02","date_gmt":"2023-11-29T16:53:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/states-press-hhs-over-illegal-rule-that-could-force-foster-care-providers-to-facilitate-trans-procedures\/"},"modified":"2023-11-29T12:01:10","modified_gmt":"2023-11-29T17:01:10","slug":"states-press-hhs-over-illegal-rule-that-could-force-foster-care-providers-to-facilitate-trans-procedures","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/states-press-hhs-over-illegal-rule-that-could-force-foster-care-providers-to-facilitate-trans-procedures\/","title":{"rendered":"States urge HHS to reconsider &#8216;illegal&#8217; rule forcing foster care providers to support trans procedures"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">30<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fstates-press-hhs-over-illegal-rule-that-could-force-foster-care-providers-to-facilitate-trans-procedures%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2110864&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>Tennessee Attorney General Leads Coalition\u200c to Challenge \u2064Proposed HHS Rule\u2062 on Transgender Procedures for Minors<\/h2>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In a\u2064 bold move, Tennessee \u200bAttorney General\u200c <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/news\/18-state-coalition-legal-group-appeal-ruling-that-deemed-tn-law-shielding-kids-from-sexually-explicit-performances-unconstitutional\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jonathan Skrmetti<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">  has rallied a\u200d coalition of 17 Republican attorneys general to challenge\u200c the Biden administration over a proposed Health\u200c and Human Services (HHS) \u200brule. This\u200b rule, they argue,\u2064 could potentially force\u200b foster care providers to facilitate transgender procedures \u2064on \u200dminors, a move they believe infringes on\u2063 religious liberty and expands federal\u200c government\u200d control over family law.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Urging Reconsideration of the Proposed\u200b Rule<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">In a strongly worded <a href=\"https:\/\/dw-wp-production.imgix.net\/2023\/11\/TN-Foster-Care-Rule-Comment-As-Filed-Version.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">letter<\/a> \u2062 addressed to HHS \u2063official Kathleen McHugh, the coalition\u2062 appeals to the agency to \u2064reconsider the <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.federalregister.gov\/documents\/2023\/09\/28\/2023-21274\/safe-and-appropriate-foster-care-placement-requirements-for-titles-iv-e-and-iv-b\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">proposed rule<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">.\u2062 They argue that this rule \u2064goes beyond\u2064 the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/6-7-million-covid-vaccines-given-in-u-s-with-70-of-available-doses-unused\/\" title=\"6.7 million COVID Vaccines Given in U.S. With 70% of Available Doses Unused\">federal government&#8217;<\/a>s \u200dauthority and \u200bwould require foster care providers to affirm \u200ba child&#8217;s gender\u200b identity, pronouns, \u2064and provide them\u2063 with necessary services. The coalition \u2063emphasizes that federal funding \u2064would be contingent on\u2063 compliance with this rule, which they believe exceeds the scope of \u2062federal \u2062authority.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Concerns \u2064Over Federal Overreach and\u200c Risky Medical Treatments<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The proposed rule, introduced in September, has raised \u2062significant concerns among the\u200d coalition. They assert that it represents a power grab by HHS and infringes on the \u2063responsibilities of\u2063 individual states. Additionally, the coalition expresses apprehension about <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/newsom-signs-bill-requiring-foster-parents-to-affirm-lgbt-identities\/\" title=\"Newsom signs bill mandating foster parents to support LGBT identities.\">foster \u2062care<\/a> \u2063providers being compelled\u200b to support &#8220;transitions&#8221; of minors identifying as transgender, including potentially risky medical treatments. \u200dTennessee, for instance, has already \u2063prohibited\u2062 such treatments for minors due to safety concerns.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Impact on Faith-Based Providers and Compliance Costs<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The coalition argues that the proposed rule would disproportionately affect faith-based foster care providers, forcing them to comply with \u200b&#8221;gender \u2064ideology&#8221; that may \u200bcontradict their\u200c religious beliefs. They stress that this \u2062interference could violate their First\u2064 Amendment rights and discourage potential foster\u200b parents, exacerbating the shortage of available homes. Furthermore, the coalition contends that \u200dthe rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act and could drive out qualified\u2064 care providers due\u200c to\u200b <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/biden-admits-prices-are-too-high-for-too-many-things-but-points-the-blame-away-from-himself\/\" title=\"Biden acknowledges high prices, shifts blame elsewhere\">increased compliance costs<\/a> and legal exposure.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b><a href=\"https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" aria-describedby=\"sk-tooltip-9096\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https:\/\/www.google.com\/url?q=https:\/\/onelink.to\/dwapp&#038;source=gmail&#038;ust=1700760801843000&#038;usg=AOvVaw2PQrVSrJfhxNb4LcARqniG\">CLICK HERE \u200bTO GET THE \u200dDAILYWIRE+ APP<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The coalition includes attorneys\u2063 general from Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, South Carolina, Texas, Virginia, and West Virginia. Skrmetti asserts that Tennessee is\u200c prepared to \u2062take legal action if \u200dthe rule\u200c is implemented, as the\u200d state has a history \u200bof challenging <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/texas-gov-abbott-pushes-back-against-bidens-climate-agenda\/\" title=\"Texas Gov. Abbott pushes back against Biden\u2019s climate agenda\">federal overreach<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p> Cal Procedures for Minors<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The coalition\u2064 expresses deep concerns \u2062over the potential harm\u2062 this rule could cause to \u2062vulnerable children in\u2063 foster \u2062care. They argue that imposing transgender\u200b procedures\u2062 on\u2064 minors\u200c would bypass\u2061 parental consent and ignore the importance of \u200badequate medical \u2064evaluation and\u200b mental\u200d health counseling \u2064 <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/www.titaneast.com\/processs-uploads\/<?php echo date('m'); ?>\/TN%20Notice%20of%20Appeal.pdf&#8221; target=&#8221;_blank&#8221;\u200b rel=&#8221;noopener&#8221;><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">prior to making such \u2062life-altering decisions<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">. The coalition\u2062 asserts that \u200dthis \u200brule undermines \u200dthe principle of \u2062individual liberty and the\u2062 essential role of parents in their children&#8217;s lives. They stress that these decisions should be made by families and medical professionals, rather\u200b than imposed by federal regulations.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Protection of Religious\u2062 Liberty and Family Law<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">One \u200bof the primary concerns expressed\u2062 by the \u2064coalition is the potential infringement on religious liberty. They argue that this rule could force faith-based foster care providers\u2064 to \u2063violate their deeply\u200d held beliefs by\u200c compelling \u2063them to provide services that contradict their \u200breligious teachings. This, they assert, \u200dis a\u2062 direct \u2064violation of the First Amendment rights of religious \u2064organizations. Furthermore, the \u2062coalition\u200b asserts that federal government overreach \u200cinto family\u200d law is \u2063unacceptable. They emphasize the\u2062 importance of preserving the authority of states to determine their own \u2063family law policies and practices, without interference from\u200c the federal government.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Building a \u200cCoalition for Change<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The coalition led by Tennessee \u200bAttorney General Jonathan Skrmetti has effectively brought together attorneys general from 17 states \u2062who share the same concerns about \u2063the proposed HHS rule. Their unified front sends a \u200dstrong message to the Biden administration that this rule is problematic and\u2062 infringes\u2063 upon \u2062religious liberty \u200cand family law\u2062 rights. By standing together, they \u2062aim to protect the best\u200b interests of children in foster\u200b care \u2063and ensure \u2062that decisions regarding transgender \u200bprocedures for minors are made \u2062by those closest to them.<\/span><\/p>\n<h3>Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400\">The\u200b coalition\u2064 of 17 Republican attorneys general, led by Tennessee Attorney \u2062General \u2064Jonathan\u200b Skrmetti, is taking a bold step in challenging the proposed HHS rule on transgender procedures for minors. \u2063Their concerns \u2063about federal \u2062overreach, infringement \u2064on religious liberty,\u200b and undermining \u2063of family law rights are clearly stated in their\u200d appeal to the HHS. By \u2062rallying together, they hope to protect vulnerable children, uphold the principles of individual liberty and religious\u2064 freedom, and preserve the authority of states in determining family law policies. The \u200boutcome of this challenge will\u2062 have significant implications for the rights and well-being of children in \u200dfoster \u200ccare across the \u2063country.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>  What are\u2064 the\u200b concerns \u200braised by the coalition regarding the potential harm this rule could cause to vulnerable children in \u200cfoster care?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  \u200c The concerns\u200c raised by the coalition regarding the potential harm this rule could cause to vulnerable children in foster care include:<\/p>\n<p>1. Disruption \u200dof\u2064 continuity in care: The rule could result\u200d in frequent placement changes for foster children, as faith-based agencies could refuse to\u200b work\u200d with foster parents who don&#8217;t share their \u2062religious beliefs. This could lead to\u2064 unstable and inconsistent\u200c care,\u200b impacting the well-being and\u200c development of children.<\/p>\n<p>2.\u2062 Limited access\u2063 to\u2063 diverse placements: If\u200c certain agencies are allowed to \u2062prioritize foster parents based on \u2062religious beliefs, \u2063it could result in a narrower pool \u2064of foster homes available for children. This may disproportionately\u200c affect \u200dLGBTQ+ \u200bchildren,\u200c as\u200b faith-based agencies may be more likely to discriminate against placements in non-traditional \u2062families.<\/p>\n<p>3. Religious\u200d discrimination: \u200bAllowing faith-based agencies to exclude certain foster parents based on their\u200b religious beliefs could discriminate against potential foster parents who are qualified and capable of \u2062providing a loving and safe home for children. It raises concerns about fairness and\u200b equality in\u200b the foster \u200ccare\u200d system.<\/p>\n<p>4. Delay in permanency: The \u200crule\u2062 could potentially lengthen the time\u200c it takes for children in foster care to find permanent homes. By limiting\u2064 the options for foster parents, \u2062it may be more challenging \u200bto\u2063 match children with suitable families, resulting in prolonged stays in foster \u200bcare.<\/p>\n<p>5. Emotional and psychological impact: Frequent placement changes and\u2064 limited access \u200cto diverse placements can have significant emotional and psychological implications\u200b for vulnerable \u200dchildren. Stable and supportive \u200cenvironments are crucial for\u2064 their well-being, and the rule&#8217;s \u200dpotential harm to these\u2062 aspects raises concerns \u2062about \u200bthe long-term impact on foster \u200cchildren.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the concerns revolve around the potential disruption of stable care, limited access to diverse placements, religious discrimination, delays \u200bin \u200bpermanency, and negative emotional \u200cand psychological \u2063effects on\u200b children in foster care.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>  What are the coalition&#8217;s primary concerns regarding\u2064 the potential infringement on religious liberty and\u200c federal government \u2064overreach into\u200d family law<\/h2>\n<p><span>  The coalition&#8217;s primary concerns regarding\u2064 the potential\u200c infringement on religious liberty and federal government overreach into family law include:<\/p>\n<p>1. Freedom of religion: The coalition is concerned that any encroachment on \u2063religious liberty may limit the ability of individuals and religious organizations \u200dto freely exercise their beliefs, particularly in\u200c relation to family law matters. They aim to protect the \u2064rights of individuals and\u2063 religious institutions to practice their faith without interference or discrimination.<\/p>\n<p>2. Parental rights: The \u2064coalition is wary of \u2064federal government overreach that might\u200c undermine parental rights and decision-making authority, particularly in matters \u200crelated\u200b to \u200dfamily law. They aim to defend\u200d the\u2064 rights of parents to raise and educate their children based on \u2063their own values and beliefs.<\/p>\n<p>3. Autonomy of \u2062religious organizations: The \u200ccoalition seeks to \u2063safeguard the autonomy of religious organizations in matters related to family law. They are concerned that government\u200d interference \u2063might \u200ccompromise the \u2064ability of religious institutions to define and uphold\u2064 their own standards and \u2063practices, especially\u2063 regarding marriage, adoption, and other family-related issues.<\/p>\n<p>4. Preservation of traditional values: The coalition may also \u2062prioritize \u200dupholding traditional values and\u200c norms in family law, and they may express concerns \u2064about \u2062potential societal\u2062 shifts that could result\u200d from government overreach. They \u2064might advocate\u2063 for policies that align \u2062with conservative viewpoints on\u200b marriage, gender, and other familial matters.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the coalition&#8217;s primary concerns revolve around defending religious liberty, protecting parental rights, preserving the\u200d autonomy of religious organizations,\u200c and \u200bupholding traditional values \u200cin the face of potential federal government overreach in family law.<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>  How \u2062does the coalition argue\u200d that\u2062 the imposition\u200d of transgender \u2064procedures on minors bypasses parental consent and undermines the role of parents in\u200d their children&#8217;s lives?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  The coalition argues that the imposition of transgender\u200b procedures on\u2064 minors without parental consent undermines the role\u200b of \u2063parents in their children&#8217;s lives by several \u200bmeans:<\/p>\n<p>1. Medical decision-making: The coalition believes\u200c that \u200dparents have the primary authority\u2063 and responsibility\u2064 to\u2062 make\u2062 medical \u200ddecisions for their children. They argue \u200dthat \u2062procedures related \u2064to transgender transition, \u200dsuch\u2062 as puberty blockers, hormone therapy, and surgeries,\u2063 are significant and irreversible interventions \u200cthat can have long-term \u2062physical and \u200bpsychological effects. Therefore, they believe parents should have the right to be fully informed and involved in such decisions.<\/p>\n<p>2. Ethical \u200dconcerns: The coalition raises ethical concerns about\u2064 the potential emotional and mental consequences of transgender procedures on minors. They argue that children and teenagers\u200d may not have the emotional maturity or \u2062fully \u200dunderstand the consequences of transitioning. They believe\u200b it is crucial \u2063for \u2062parents to guide their children through this\u200d process and ensure that any decisions\u2062 made are in\u200d their child&#8217;s \u200dbest \u2062interest.<\/p>\n<p>3. \u2062Informed consent: The coalition asserts that parents, \u2064as legal guardians, \u200dhave the\u2064 right to be informed about all medical procedures and treatments being\u200c administered to\u2063 their\u2064 children. They argue that attempts to bypass\u200d parental consent \u200cviolate the\u200c principles of informed consent, where \u200dparents are\u2064 entitled to adequate information to\u2064 make\u2062 decisions\u2062 based on\u200b their religious, moral, or cultural beliefs.<\/p>\n<p>4. Long-term consequences: \u2062The coalition advocates for parents to have a role in considering the long-term consequences of transitioning procedures\u200c for their children. \u2062They argue that \u200dmedical interventions related to transgender procedures may have irreversible physical effects, including\u200c infertility, decreased bone \u2063density, and potential surgical complications. Parents, they\u200c claim, should have the right to weigh these potential\u2064 risks and benefits based on \u200btheir knowledge and understanding of their \u2064child&#8217;s individual circumstances.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, the\u200c coalition believes that\u200b parental \u2064consent \u2063and\u2063 involvement \u2063in\u200c decisions regarding transgender \u2064procedures on minors are crucial to protect the well-being and best \u2063interests of the child. \u2063They\u2064 argue\u200b that\u200c the imposition \u2064of such\u2062 procedures without parental consent\u2064 undermines\u2063 the fundamental \u2063role of \u2064parents in\u200c raising and nurturing their children.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tennessee AG Jonathan Skrmetti and 16 GOP counterparts urged HHS to reconsider a rule that may force foster care providers to support transgender procedures for minors. In a letter to HHS official Kathleen McHugh, they expressed concerns about the potential impact of the proposed regulation<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":200,"featured_media":2110865,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[541],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2110864","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-daily-wire"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2110864","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/200"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2110864"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2110864\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2110865"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2110864"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2110864"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2110864"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}