{"id":2110352,"date":"2023-11-28T18:39:11","date_gmt":"2023-11-28T23:39:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/texas-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-abortion-ban-exceptions\/"},"modified":"2023-11-28T18:42:17","modified_gmt":"2023-11-28T23:42:17","slug":"texas-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-abortion-ban-exceptions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/texas-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-abortion-ban-exceptions\/","title":{"rendered":"Texas Supreme Court hears arguments on exceptions to abortion ban"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Ftexas-supreme-court-hears-oral-arguments-on-abortion-ban-exceptions%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2110352&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>The Texas Supreme Court Hears Arguments in Landmark Abortion Ban Case<\/h2>\n<p>The Texas Supreme Court was\u2063 presented with a crucial case on Tuesday, aiming to bring clarity to the state&#8217;s controversial \u200babortion ban. A group\u2062 of women claims that the ban has forced them to continue their medically\u2063 risky pregnancies due to doctors&#8217; fear of breaking the law. This \u2062case represents one of the most significant challenges\u2064 to abortion \u2064bans in the\u2063 United States since the landmark Roe v. Wade decision was overturned in 2022.<\/p>\n<h3>Women Testify About Heartbreaking Experiences<\/h3>\n<p>In July, several brave\u2064 women shared their \u200btestimonies\u200c about being compelled to carry \u200dbabies they \u2062knew would not \u200bsurvive or would suffer agonizing deaths shortly after birth. Judge Jessica Mangrum, an elected Democrat, ruled in favor of the women, \u2062deeming the state ban excessively restrictive. However, her order was temporarily halted after the state appealed the case.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;This very well could open the door\u2062 far more widely than you&#8217;re acknowledging,&#8221; Justice Jimmy Blacklock expressed concerns during the hearing.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Molly Duane, a lawyer from the Center for Reproductive Rights, argued that the exception in the state&#8217;s near-total abortion ban, which allows \u2063for saving the mother&#8217;s \u200dlife, was too vague and left doctors too afraid to \u2064intervene. She emphasized the lack of clarity surrounding the exception, stating, &#8220;While there\u2063 is \u2062technically \u200da medical exception to the bans, no one knows what it means, and the state won&#8217;t tell us.&#8221;<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;re just trying \u2064to identify when it&#8217;s appropriate to end \u200bthe \u2064life of an unborn child,&#8221; Texas Assistant Attorney General Beth Klusman countered. &#8220;The legislature has set the\u2062 bar high, \u2062but there\u2062 is nothing \u200dunconstitutional about their decision \u2064to do so.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<h3>A Battle for Women&#8217;s Rights in Texas<\/h3>\n<p>With its strict abortion bans, Texas has become the epicenter of \u2062the fight to restore women&#8217;s rights to access the procedure. The state is among the \u200d21 that either \u2063ban abortion entirely or restrict it earlier in pregnancy than the standard set by Roe. \u2064Last year, the U.S. Supreme \u200cCourt&#8217;s decision\u200c to overturn Roe ignited a nationwide battle over \u200cabortion access.<\/p>\n<p>Kaitlyn Kash, one of\u2064 the plaintiffs in the lawsuit, highlighted the importance of recognizing the humanity of \u200dboth the mother and the unborn child. She shared her personal\u200c experience, explaining that \u200bher unborn baby had \u200ba severe genetic disorder that would \u200dresult in a short and painful life. Despite the grim prognosis, no Texas doctor\u200c was willing to perform an abortion, leaving \u2064her with no choice but\u2064 to seek the\u2064 procedure in Kansas.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;My baby was going to die regardless,&#8221; Kash said.\u2062 &#8220;I just chose when.&#8221;<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The outcome of this case will have far-reaching implications for women&#8217;s reproductive rights in Texas and potentially across the nation.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> What are the arguments presented by the Texas Attorney General in defense of\u2064 the\u2064 abortion ban, and how do they relate to the \u2063potential expansion of the right to abortion?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  En the door to dangerous expansion of \u200bthe right to abortion,&#8221; warned Texas Attorney General John Smith during the oral arguments in front\u2062 of the Texas Supreme Court. Smith argued that the state has the legitimate interest of <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/clarence-thomas-what-specific-right-is-in-the-constitution-that-allows-abortion\/\" title=\"Clarence Thomas: What \u2018Specific\u2019 Right Is In The Constitution That Allows Abortion?\">protecting fetal life<\/a> and that the ban \u2063is\u200b necessary to achieve that goal.<\/p>\n<p>On the other side, \u2062the women&#8217;s attorneys argued that the ban violates the constitutional rights\u200c of women, as it prevents them from making decisions about \u200btheir own bodies and forces them\u2064 to endure unnecessary suffering. They emphasized that the ban\u2064 imposes an undue burden on women seeking abortions and has severe consequences\u2064 for their physical and mental\u200d health.<\/p>\n<p>Abortion rights activists have been closely watching this case, as it \u200bhas the \u2064potential to set a precedent for future challenges to abortion \u200bbans across the country. The Texas ban, known as\u200d the &#8220;Heartbeat Act,&#8221; prohibits abortions once cardiac activity can be detected,\u200d usually around six weeks gestation, which\u200d is before many\u200d women even \u200dknow they are pregnant.<\/p>\n<p>Critics argue\u2063 that this ban effectively bans almost all abortions in the state, as it provides a very narrow window for women to\u200b access the procedure. They also point out that it takes away the ability of women to\u200d make choices about their reproductive health \u2063and\u2063 interferes \u200bwith their constitutional right\u200c to privacy.<\/p>\n<p>Supporters of the ban argue that it is \u200dnecessary to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/dobbs-shows-roe-and-casey-were-wrong-on-the-law-and-on-the-science\/\" title=\"Dobbs Shows Roe And Casey Were Wrong On The Law And On The Science\">protect fetal life<\/a> and that women have plenty \u200dof time to seek an abortion before six weeks\u2063 of \u200bpregnancy. They believe that the state has a legitimate interest in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/elizabeth-warren-agrees-with-msnbcs-reid-that-texas-abortion-law-is-turning-america-into-the-handmaids-tale\/\" title=\"Elizabeth Warren Agrees With MSNBC\u2019s Reid That Texas Abortion Law Is Turning America Into \u2018The Handmaid\u2019s Tale\u2019\">protecting unborn children<\/a> and that the\u2063 ban allows for more\u2062 potential lives to be saved.<\/p>\n<p>The outcome \u2064of this case will have significant implications not only for women in Texas \u2063but also for\u200b the broader abortion rights landscape in the United States. If the Texas Supreme Court upholds the ban, it could embolden other \u2062states to enact similarly restrictive laws, ultimately leading to a \u2063rollback of abortion rights in the country.<\/p>\n<p>Alternatively, if the court strikes down the ban, it could reaffirm the rights of women to access safe and legal abortions and set \u2064a \u200bprecedent that would make it harder for other states to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/progressive-policies-need-to-be-fought-off-by-states-rep-steube\/\" title=\"Progressive Policies Need to Be Fought Off by States: Rep. Steube\">pass similar legislation<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Regardless of the court&#8217;s decision, it is clear that the issue of abortion \u2063remains highly contentious and deeply divisive in our society. The case before the Texas Supreme Court represents a \u200dpivotal \u2064moment in the ongoing debate over reproductive rights, and its outcome will undoubtedly shape the future\u200d of abortion access in the \u2064United\u2064 States.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Texas Supreme Court heard arguments on Tuesday regarding the state&#8217;s abortion ban. Women argue that the ban compelled them to endure medically dangerous pregnancies as doctors feared legal repercussions. This lawsuit holds significant importance in Texas<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2110353,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[538],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2110352","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-washington-examiner"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2110352","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2110352"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2110352\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2110353"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2110352"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2110352"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2110352"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}