Wyoming Republican Gov. Mark Gordon has agreed to engage in\u2064 a debate \u2064with\u2063 his critics regarding his ambitious plans to make the state “carbon negative,” shifting away from its \u200breliance on fossil fuels.<\/p>\n

Last\u200d Friday, Secretary of\u200d State Chuck Gray and 30 state lawmakers \u200ccalled on Governor Gordon to defend the merits of his “carbon negative” policy, which he \u200drecently presented \u200dat Harvard University.<\/p>\n

“It \u200dis evident that \u200dour \u2064climate is warming,” \u200cstated Governor \u2063Gordon \u2063during an event at the Harvard Kennedy School’s\u200d Institute of Politics. “Carbon dioxide is a significant\u200c contributor to this change. Urgent action is required to address this issue, and\u2063 simply abandoning\u200c fossil\u2062 fuels won’t solve it.”<\/p>\n

Governor Gordon, who oversees the leading \u200ccoal producer in the country, proudly declared that Wyoming is the first \u2063state committed\u200b to becoming carbon\u200b negative.<\/p>\n

“Achieving carbon negativity necessitates direct air capture or some form of carbon capture and sequestration,” Gordon emphasized.<\/p>\n

The governor’s remarks faced immediate criticism from members\u200d of the state’s Freedom Caucus \u2063and a vote \u200bof “no confidence” from the\u2062 Wyoming Republican Party.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n

“To our\u200d knowledge, the state of Wyoming has not unilaterally decided to abandon \u200bour legacy industries, \u200dand this is not a decision that the governor can make. Our \u200cstate’s\u2064 economy is not controlled \u2062by any elected official,” stated the \u200cWyoming Freedom Caucus.<\/p>\n

State Sen. Cheri Steinmetz, who led the effort to debate Governor Gordon, expressed concerns about adopting the narrative and terminology of the Biden\/AOC ‘green new\u2064 deal’ crowd, which portrays CO2\u200b as a pollutant and industries in Wyoming as polluters.<\/p>\n

Despite the backlash,\u2063 Governor \u200bGordon reaffirmed his commitment to\u2063 achieving carbon negativity during a meeting with the Western Governors’ Association.<\/p>\n

“There has been some \u2062confusion about what ‘decarbonizing the West’ means,” clarified Gordon during a press conference. “It’s about \u2063addressing \u200bthe issue\u200b of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere and aggressively \u200dmoving forward while \u2064recognizing the role of all energy sources.”<\/p>\n

As chairman of the Western Governors Association, Governor Gordon has \u200dprioritized “decarbonizing the West” through\u2062 a combination of increased renewable energy production and enhanced carbon \u200bcapture storage. In South Dakota, landowners have\u2064 faced legal battles due \u2064to a major carbon capture company constructing a pipeline across the \u2063upper Midwest.<\/p>\n

“Decarbonizing the West” comes\u200d with significant\u2064 costs, warned Steinmetz.<\/p>\n

“Wyoming citizens deserve \u2062to\u2064 hear why Governor Gordon believes climate change must be urgently addressed and why \u200bhe considers CO2 \u2064a pollutant causing climate change,” she added.<\/p>\n

In response to the governor’s commitment to demonize carbon, more than \u2062two dozen Republicans in the\u200c state legislature invited scientists from \u2062the \u2062CO2\u2064 Coalition, a climate advocacy group<\/a> that challenges the narrative blaming\u2064 carbon \u200bfor global warming, to participate \u200bin a public debate.<\/p>\n

“We challenge you and your representatives to\u200d a face-to-face, \u200cpublic, fair,\u200c and factual debate\u2063 on climate change\u2064 and the alleged\u200b contribution of CO2,” stated a letter signed \u200dby 30 lawmakers and the secretary of state. “While climate alarmists \u200cclaim to act ‘based on the science,’ \u2062they \u200bavoid engaging in debates with \u200dthose \u200dwho\u2063 hold different views. We believe \u2064that in Wyoming, we are better than that. The people of Wyoming deserve an \u2062open and robust conversation on this issue, hearing both\u200c sides \u200cof the CO2 debate and deciding \u2062for themselves.”<\/p>\n

Governor Gordon accepted the \u2064invitation \u2064on the same day it was sent, according to the Cowboy\u200b State Daily. \u2062However, it remains unclear whether he\u200d will personally participate in the\u2062 scientific forum or send representatives to argue on his\u2063 behalf.<\/p>\n

The CO2 Coalition expressed readiness to \u200dassist with the proposed debate in a letter \u200cto Rep. John Bear, the chairman\u200b of the Wyoming \u200bFreedom Caucus.<\/p>\n

Lawmakers have requested Governor Gordon to finalize the details for the \u200dpublic forum by\u2062 Friday.<\/p>\n

The debate will focus on four claims related to the governor’s\u200d Harvard speech: the Earth’s warming, the role of CO2, the urgency to \u2064address carbon warming, and Wyoming’s status as the first carbon-negative state.<\/p>\n

During the Governor’s Business Forum, Governor Gordon distanced \u2064himself from\u2063 the urgency claim, stating that neither\u2062 the United States \u200dnor Wyoming is in a climate crisis.<\/p>\n

“We have never been more focused on responsibly\u2064 advancing into a future full of tremendous opportunities than we are right here\u200c in Wyoming,” Gordon \u200dasserted.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
rnrn <\/p>\n
What are the criticisms and concerns raised by Governor Gordon’s \u200dcritics regarding his\u2062 “carbon negative” plans for \u200dWyoming?<\/h2>\n
The Debate Over Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon\u2019s Carbon Negative Plans<\/p>\n
Wyoming Republican \u200cGovernor Mark Gordon has agreed to engage in a debate\u2064 with his critics regarding his ambitious plans to\u2062 make the state “carbon negative” \u2063and shift\u200c away from its reliance on fossil fuels. The call for this debate came from Secretary of State Chuck Gray and 30 state lawmakers who\u200c wanted Governor Gordon to defend the merits of \u2064his “carbon negative” policy, which\u200d he recently presented at Harvard\u200c University.<\/p>\n
Governor Gordon,\u200c during an \u2064event at the Harvard \u2064Kennedy School’s Institute \u200dof Politics, stated\u2062 that it \u200bis evident that the climate \u200cis warming and carbon dioxide\u2062 is a significant \u2063contributor to this change. He emphasized the\u2062 need for urgent\u200c action to address this issue\u200b and\u200b mentioned that simply abandoning fossil fuels\u200c won’t solve it.<\/p>\n
As the governor of Wyoming, which \u200bis \u200dthe leading coal producer in the country, Governor Gordon proudly declared that Wyoming \u2062is the first state committed \u200cto becoming carbon negative. He highlighted that achieving\u2062 carbon negativity \u200brequires direct air\u2063 capture<\/a>\u200b or\u200b some \u2062form of carbon\u2063 capture \u200dand sequestration.<\/p>\n
However, the governor’s remarks faced immediate criticism from\u200b members of the state’s Freedom Caucus and\u200b a vote of “no confidence” from the Wyoming Republican \u2063Party. The Wyoming\u2064 Freedom Caucus stated that the \u200bstate of Wyoming has\u2064 not \u2064unilaterally decided to abandon its legacy industries, and it is not a decision that the governor can make as the state’s economy is not \u2063controlled\u2064 by any elected \u200dofficial.<\/p>\n
State Sen. \u200bCheri Steinmetz, who led\u200c the effort to debate Governor Gordon, expressed concerns\u2063 about adopting the narrative \u200band\u2063 terminology of the Biden\/AOC ‘green new \u2063deal’ crowd, which portrays CO2 as a pollutant and industries\u200d in Wyoming as polluters.<\/p>\n
Despite \u200dthe backlash, Governor Gordon reaffirmed his commitment\u200d to achieving\u200d carbon negativity during \u200ba meeting with the Western Governors’ Association. He clarified that decarbonizing the\u2064 West\u200c is about addressing \u2064the issue of carbon\u2063 dioxide in \u200cthe atmosphere \u200cand\u2062 moving forward aggressively<\/a> while recognizing the role of all energy sources.<\/p>\n
As the chairman of the Western Governors Association, Governor Gordon has \u2064prioritized “decarbonizing the West” through a combination of\u200b increased renewable \u200benergy production and enhanced\u2064 carbon capture storage. However, the concept of decarbonizing the\u2064 West comes with significant costs,\u2063 as warned by Steinmetz. Wyoming citizens deserve\u200d to \u200dhear why Governor \u2063Gordon believes climate change must be urgently addressed \u200band why\u2062 he considers \u2064CO2 a pollutant causing\u200d climate change.<\/p>\n
In response to the governor’s\u200b commitment to demonize \u200bcarbon, more\u200b than two dozen Republicans \u200bin the state legislature invited scientists from the\u200d CO2 Coalition, a\u200b climate advocacy group \u200cthat challenges the\u2063 notion \u2062of CO2 \u200das a pollutant. This suggests that the debate over Wyoming’s carbon negative \u200dplans \u200cis likely to continue.<\/p>\n
In conclusion, Governor Gordon’s plans to make Wyoming carbon \u2063negative have sparked a debate \u200bamong his \u200dcritics. While he emphasizes\u200d the need to address climate\u2064 change urgently, \u200bcritics are concerned about the economic\u200b impact\u2062 and the portrayal of CO2 as a pollutant. The ongoing debate highlights the challenges and complexities associated with transitioning from fossil fuels to renewable energy sources<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Wyoming Gov. Mark Gordon, a Republican, has accepted the challenge to discuss his proposal of making the state “carbon negative” with his opponents. Secretary of State Chuck Gray and 30 lawmakers urged the two-term governor to engage in a debate regarding the benefits of this policy.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":494,"featured_media":2099681,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2099680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2099680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/494"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2099680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2099680\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2099681"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2099680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2099680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2099680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}