When California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom discovered that one \u2064of his state’s cherished\u200d gun bans had\u200d been deemed unconstitutional, he was\u200c livid. <\/p>\n

In a fiery rant \u200dshared on \u2064social \u2063media, Newsom launched a scathing attack on United States \u2063District Court\u200d Judge Roger Benitez, known\u2064 for striking down California’s attempts to infringe on Second Amendment rights. Newsom labeled Benitez a “right-wing, NRA puppet” and called his decision\u2062 “an absolute disgrace.”<\/p>\n

“This is precisely why America\u2062 needs a \u2062constitutional amendment to protect common-sense gun safety reforms<\/a>. Until then, extremist judges will\u2062 continue to undermine the will of the American people,” Newsom expressed on X<\/a>.<\/p>\n

The Democrat reiterated \u2064his\u200c anger in an official statement, accusing Benitez of making the state more dangerous for children, families, and worshippers.<\/p>\n

By the time Newsom voiced his disdain, California \u2063Attorney General Rob Bonta had already filed a notice of appeal<\/a> to overturn the\u2064 decision, describing \u200cit as “dangerous and misguided.”<\/p>\n

In 2021, Newsom had expressed a similar \u2063level of fury towards Benitez\u2064 when the judge first declared the\u2062 state’s sweeping gun ban unconstitutional. However, the ruling was later vacated and remanded back to Benitez after the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen<\/a><\/em>. Armed\u2063 with more precedent, Benitez once again declared the ban unlawful.<\/p>\n

<\/div>\n
“California’s response to the criminal misuse of a few is to disarm its law-abiding residents. This\u200b knee-jerk reaction is unconstitutional, just as it \u2063was 250\u2064 years ago,” Benitez stated<\/a> \u200cin \u200dhis decision.<\/p>\n
Both times Benitez intervened to protect the rights of law-abiding Americans, the corporate\u2062 media amplified Newsom’s furious response.<\/p>\n
The media’s favorable treatment of Newsom’s outrage stands in stark contrast to their relentless scrutiny of Republicans who oppose left-wing judicial rulings. Former President\u200c Donald Trump, in particular, faced severe criticism from the \u200dmedia. <\/p>\n
From the moment Trump took office\u200d until\u200b his departure, the corporate media deemed his disagreements with judicial decisions as “out of\u2063 line\u2063 with\u200b past\u2063 presidents” and a\u200b potential threat \u2062to the\u2064 rule\u2064 of law. They accused him of politicizing \u2064the courts and compromising judges’ safety.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
In 2017, just months after Trump took \u2062office, The \u200b Washington Post compiled a list<\/a> of \u2064”all the times Trump personally attacked judges” and criticized his\u2064 behavior.<\/p>\n
Even now, as a private citizen, Trump faces unprecedented consequences for criticizing judges and the\u200d corrupt Department of \u200cJustice.<\/p>\n
Democrats, from Sen. Chuck Schumer to the Biden White House, have engaged in verbal battles \u200cand encouraged\u200b retaliation against judges and courts that don’t align with their agenda. Newsom, a potential Democratic presidential candidate, has joined\u200d their \u2063ranks by blaming Benitez’s ruling for future\u200c gun violence.<\/p>\n
The corrupt corporate media clearly apply a double standard when it comes \u2064to Democrats undermining the\u2063 judiciary. Their \u200cwillingness to amplify and even fabricate smears\u2064 against Republican-nominated judges like Benitez is evident.<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n
\t\t\t\t\t \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n
\u2062 rnrn <\/p>\n
How \u200ddoes the media’s bias in favor of gun control advocates<\/a> affect the perception of those who oppose such measures?<\/h2>\n
Ment of Newsom’s rage reflects a larger trend\u2062 in\u200b which the mainstream media consistently sides with\u200d gun control advocates \u2064and demonizes those who oppose such measures. The framing of \u200dNewsom’s\u200c outrage as justified and righteous, while portraying Benitez as\u200d a puppet\u2063 of \u200dthe National Rifle Association (NRA), is \u2064not only biased but also misrepresents the facts of the case.<\/p>\n
Judge Benitez’s ruling was based on the recognition\u2062 that the Second Amendment protects the rights of \u200claw-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms. The decision highlighted the flaws in California’s sweeping gun ban, which unfairly targeted responsible gun owners and infringed upon their constitutional rights. By striking down the ban, Benitez affirmed \u200cthe importance of individual \u200cliberties and the need to uphold the Constitution.<\/p>\n
Newsom’s response, on\u2064 the other hand, \u2064demonstrates a \u200ddisregard for the rights and freedoms of law-abiding citizens.\u2062 Instead of accepting the court’s decision and engaging in a thoughtful debate on gun\u2064 control policies, he resorts to\u2064 personal attacks and inflammatory rhetoric. This approach undermines the spirit of civil discourse and hampers meaningful progress towards finding common-ground solutions on this important issue.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, Newsom’s call for a constitutional amendment to protect “common-sense gun safety reforms” is misleading. The Second Amendment \u2062already guarantees the\u200c right to \u2063bear arms,\u200b and any proposed amendment that infringes upon this right would \u2063not be in line with \u200dthe principles of the \u2062Constitution. It is important to remember that the Constitution was designed to protect individual liberties, including the\u200c right to \u2063self-defense, and should not be undermined by knee-jerk reactions or \u200cmisguided attempts to restrict this fundamental \u2064right.<\/p>\n
The media’s \u2064bias in favor of gun\u200d control advocates<\/a> not only\u200c hampers an open and honest debate on the issue but also perpetuates a divisive narrative that demonizes those who support the rights of law-abiding citizens. It is crucial for journalists and media outlets to\u200c provide\u2062 balanced and objective coverage \u2063of such matters, ensuring that all perspectives are given fair representation.<\/p>\n
In conclusion, Judge Benitez’s ruling to \u2063strike down California’s gun ban based on constitutional \u2063grounds should be celebrated as a victory for individual liberties and the rule of law. \u2063While Governor Newsom’s anger and dissatisfaction are understandable, his response to the court’s\u200b decision reinforces the \u200dneed for a more respectful and constructive dialogue on gun control policies. \u2064The media’s biased portrayal of \u2063this\u200c issue further highlights the importance of fair and balanced reporting, as it plays a crucial role in promoting informed public discourse and fostering a deeper\u200b understanding of complex issues like\u200c gun \u200dcontrol.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom was enraged when a cherished gun ban in his state was deemed unconstitutional. In a social media rant, he criticized Judge Roger Benitez, known for rejecting the blue state’s efforts to restrict gun rights.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":490,"featured_media":2076700,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[546],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2076699","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-federalist"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2076699","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/490"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2076699"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2076699\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2076700"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2076699"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2076699"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2076699"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}