{"id":2057886,"date":"2023-10-06T12:36:01","date_gmt":"2023-10-06T16:36:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-lawyers-telegraph-supreme-court-request-to-dismiss-jan-6-criminal-case\/"},"modified":"2023-10-06T12:38:38","modified_gmt":"2023-10-06T16:38:38","slug":"trump-lawyers-telegraph-supreme-court-request-to-dismiss-jan-6-criminal-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-lawyers-telegraph-supreme-court-request-to-dismiss-jan-6-criminal-case\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump&#8217;s legal team signals request to Supreme Court to dismiss Jan. 6 case."},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">26<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Ftrump-lawyers-telegraph-supreme-court-request-to-dismiss-jan-6-criminal-case%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2057886&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>Trump&#8217;s\u2064 Lawyers \u2062Seek Dismissal of Election Interference Case, Eye Supreme\u2063 Court Review<\/h2>\n<p>Former President Donald Trump&#8217;s legal\u2062 team has made a bold move, asking a federal court \u2063to dismiss the 2020 election interference case against \u2062him. This strategic maneuver could potentially pave the way for a future review by the Supreme \u200bCourt.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s counsel recently submitted a filing to United States \u2062District Judge Tanya Chutkan,\u2064 who has been \u2062known for her strong stance \u2064against Trump\u200d and her tough sentencing of Jan. 6 Capitol riot defendants. \u2064The filing\u200c requests \u2064the \u200ddismissal of charges brought by special counsel Jack Smith.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The case accuses the former president\u2062 of obstructing the 2020 \u200dpresidential election and is set to go to\u200b trial on March 4 in Washington, D.C. Trump has pleaded \u2063not guilty \u2063to all charges.<\/p>\n<p>In their motion to \u2062dismiss, Trump&#8217;s lawyers extensively\u2062 reference Supreme Court precedent and highlight potential gaps in case\u200b law that have not been addressed by\u200b any\u2063 court. They argue that as a former Republican president seeking reelection, Trump is immune from prosecution for actions taken in his\u2062 official capacity.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;No court has addressed whether such Presidential immunity includes immunity from \u200bcriminal \u200bprosecution for \u2062the President\u2019s official act,&#8221; Trump&#8217;s lawyers wrote.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>While the\u2064 Supreme Court has previously ruled that presidents are immune from civil liability related to their official duties, legal\u2063 experts believe that Trump&#8217;s\u2062 legal team is\u200c targeting the highest court in the land with their arguments.<\/p>\n<p>Constitutional law experts, however, express skepticism \u200cabout the Supreme Court&#8217;s willingness to consider this motion, as most \u200ccriminal appeals typically occur after a conviction, not \u2064before a trial.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>&#8220;That said, if I were betting, I don&#8217;t \u200dthink it would work unless Trump could somehow demonstrate that he was acting \u2063in the scope of\u200c his office, as he alleges, but which fails the smell test,&#8221; said Andrew Lieb, a legal\u200b expert.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s\u200d lawyers contend that the charges against\u200b him are \u200cdirectly related to his official\u200d responsibilities as president and \u200cfall within the scope of his duties. Nevertheless, legal scholars doubt that the Supreme\u2064 Court would \u2062intervene in this case.<\/p>\n<p>The filing to dismiss\u200d the election obstruction charges coincided with similar attempts to \u2063dismiss hush money \u2062charges in New \u2062York and to delay\u200d a separate federal criminal trial in Florida. If \u2062these efforts fail, Trump&#8217;s legal \u200dteam has\u2062 also requested a time extension for pretrial motions in\u2062 Judge Chutkan&#8217;s \u200dcourt, further\u200b delaying the trial.<\/p>\n<p>Trump&#8217;s counsel \u2064emphasized the uniqueness\u200c of this case and the\u200c need for extensive research and development of legal arguments. They argue\u200c that additional time\u2063 is necessary to properly address the unprecedented legal issues at hand.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, a hearing\u2063 is scheduled \u200dfor \u2064October 16 in Judge Chutkan&#8217;s court\u2063 to consider special counsel Jack Smith&#8217;s \u2062request for a \u200blimited gag\u200d order on Trump, aimed \u2063at curbing his attacks on prosecutors and potential witnesses involved in the case.<\/p>\n<p>As this <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/trump-lawyers-telegraph-supreme-court-request-to-dismiss-jan-6-criminal-case\/\" title=\"Trump's legal team signals request to Supreme Court to dismiss Jan. 6 case.\">high-stakes legal battle unfolds<\/a>, all eyes are on the courts to see how they\u200d will handle this historic \u200bcase.<\/p>\n<h3>Key Points:<\/h3>\n<ul>\n<li>Trump&#8217;s lawyers seek dismissal of\u2063 election \u2062interference case<\/li>\n<li>Motion filed\u2062 to potentially\u2062 appeal to the Supreme Court<\/li>\n<li>Legal \u2063experts express doubt about\u200c Supreme Court&#8217;s involvement<\/li>\n<li>Similar attempts made\u2064 to dismiss \u2063charges\u200d and delay trials in other \u2064cases<\/li>\n<li>Request for \u200btime extension on pretrial motions to further delay trial<\/li>\n<li>Hearing scheduled for gag order request on Trump<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Read more:<\/strong> <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonexaminer.com\/news\/trumps-lawyers-ask-federal-court-dismiss-election-interference-case\">Trump&#8217;s Lawyers Ask Federal\u200d Court\u2062 to Dismiss Election Interference Case<\/a><\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> What are the potential implications for presidential immunity and accountability if the Supreme \u200dCourt were to review this case, and how could it influence future actions against former presidents for alleged misconduct while in office<\/h2>\n<p><span>  L analyst and constitutional law professor \u200cat the University of California, Berkeley.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Furthermore, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/medias-spin-on-who-leaked-scotus-opinion-doesnt-hold-water-legal-experts-say\/\" title=\"Media\u2019s Spin On Who Leaked SCOTUS Opinion Doesn\u2019t Hold Water, Legal Experts Say\">legal experts point<\/a>\u200c out \u200bthat\u200c previous\u2062 Supreme Court decisions have indicated that a sitting president can be subject to acts of obstruction of justice while in\u2063 office. The case of United States \u200cv. Nixon in 1974 established that no one is above the law, \u200dincluding the\u200c president.<\/p>\n<p>However,\u200d Trump&#8217;s\u2064 lawyers argue that the case against him lacks sufficient evidence to support the\u2064 charges of election interference. They claim that the evidence presented by special counsel Jack Smith is based on anonymous sources and \u200dhearsay, making\u200b it\u2062 unreliable and insufficient for a trial.<\/p>\n<p>In their filing, Trump&#8217;s legal team also raises concerns about the potential political bias\u2064 of the special counsel. They assert that \u200dSmith&#8217;s investigation was motivated by political animus and a desire to \u200bundermine Trump&#8217;s presidency, rather than a commitment to upholding the law.<\/p>\n<p>Legal analysts \u2062observe that \u2064this request for dismissal is a strategic move on Trump&#8217;s part. If the motion is denied by the district court, it could allow Trump to\u200b appeal directly to the Supreme Court, \u2063bypassing the usual appellate process.<\/p>\n<p>However, the Supreme Court has discretion in\u2062 choosing which cases to hear, and\u2064 without a conviction or lower court\u2063 ruling, it remains uncertain whether \u2063they\u200b will consider this case. The Court generally prefers to wait \u2062for a case to go through the lower courts in \u2063order to have\u2063 a fuller record and to allow lower courts to resolve any factual disputes first.<\/p>\n<p>Nevertheless, if the Supreme Court were to review the case, it would have significant implications for future presidential\u2064 immunity and the extent to which a \u200bformer president can be held accountable for alleged\u200d misconduct while in office.<\/p>\n<p>The decision by the United States District Court on Trump&#8217;s motion to dismiss will be closely watched by legal scholars, politicians, and the public alike. It will undoubtedly shape\u2062 the trajectory of this high-profile case and potentially impact the future\u2064 of presidential accountability for actions taken during their term in office.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>As the \u2064<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/doj-responds-to-trumps-accusation-of-first-amendment-infringement\/\" title=\"DOJ addresses Trump's First Amendment claim.\">legal\u2063 battle continues<\/a> to unfold, one thing remains clear \u2013 the stakes are high, and the outcome of this case could have far-reaching consequences for the American political landscape.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Former President Trump&#8217;s lawyers seek dismissal of the 2020 election interference case, possibly indicating plans for Supreme Court review. They filed a request with Judge Tanya Chutkan, who previously stated that &#8220;presidents are not above the law.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2057887,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[538],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2057886","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-washington-examiner"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2057886","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2057886"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2057886\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2057887"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2057886"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2057886"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2057886"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}