{"id":2057535,"date":"2023-10-06T05:31:01","date_gmt":"2023-10-06T09:31:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-for-profit-presidency\/"},"modified":"2023-10-06T05:38:34","modified_gmt":"2023-10-06T09:38:34","slug":"the-for-profit-presidency","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-for-profit-presidency\/","title":{"rendered":"Profit-driven presidency"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">4<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fthe-for-profit-presidency%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2057535&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>Why were businesses\u200c from China, Ukraine, Romania, Kazakhstan, and Russia so\u200b generous to Hunter Biden and the web of companies he and \u2064his Uncle\u200c Jim Biden were associated with during\u2064 a period\u2063 that coincided with Joe Biden\u2019s\u2064 term as vice president?<\/h2>\n<blockquote>\n<h3>The House Oversight Committee is asking this very question.<\/h3>\n<p>The answer will doubtless be part of any hearings that House Republicans might hold for the impeachment of the president.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The question itself gestures at an answer, but many Washington insiders\u2063 are puzzled. After all, in the \u2062words of Chuck Todd, NBC News political director and the recently departed \u2063Meet the Press host, \u201c<strong>It is not a crime to make money off of your last name.<\/strong>\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>IF RFK JR. GOES INDEPENDENT, DOES THAT HELP BIDEN OR TRUMP?<\/h2>\n<p>To those who live outside the Beltway,\u2062 the notion \u2063of trading on one\u2019s family connections has \u200cthe not-so-faint air of corruption. But to the\u200d initiated, \u2064it\u2019s just the way politics works. Influence peddling is the grease that enables the machinery of \u2062the federal bureaucracy and Congress\u2062 to operate. In the metropolitan Washington area, much of the population works in the capital\u2019s one major industry: government. That translates into widespread family connections between those who hold office and those who report \u2062about them \u200dor are lobbyists, political activists, and\/or campaign consultants. That, along with their own left-leaning political \u200cbias, accounts for why much of the corporate press regard \u200dany adversarial coverage of the Biden family business as Republican-planted bomb-throwing.<\/p>\n<p>But they\u2019re wrong about that, and not just because the capital\u2019s\u200b political culture \u2063is far too comfortable with the sway \u2064that lobbyists have over\u2062 the \u200cwriting of laws \u2062and\u200b the \u2062way unelected bureaucrats\u2064 enact regulations that have \u200bthe power of law. Routine lobbying may smell bad \u200bto average citizens, but there is a difference between run-of-the-mill Washington lobbying and the sort of activity\u200d that the Bidens were involved in.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h3>\u2018Honest graft\u2019 vs. crime<\/h3>\n<p>The two types of \u200d\u201ccashing in\u201d are what the political machines of the 19th and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/no-requiring-id-to-vote-is-not-like-jim-crow\/\" title=\"No, Requiring ID To Vote Is Not Like Jim Crow\">early 20th centuries<\/a> like New York\u2019s Tammany Hall would have called \u201chonest \u200dgraft\u201d and what amounts to actual crimes. When the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/exclusive-read-the-memo-provided-to-vp-pence-noting-that-he-has-the-opportunity-to-save-the-country\/\" title=\"EXCLUSIVE: Read the Memo Provided to VP Pence Noting that He Has the Opportunity to Save the Country\">quid pro quo<\/a> of transactions that are thinly disguised bribes \u200dis out in the open as well as\u200c related\u2064 to the normal business\u200c of government, that\u2063 might not be considered kosher by good government types and reformers \u2064and could \u2063often \u200cbe illegal. But to everyone else, it was just business as usual, with no victim.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Applied to the current context,\u2063 when the pharmaceutical industry, Big Oil and other energy lobbies, or any other\u2064 major business seeks to influence government\u200d policy, there is a similar understanding. In these efforts, for the most part, everyone knows what they want and what they are willing\u200c to give in\u2063 order to get it. And if \u200cthe lobbyists are fronted by \u200ba famous name or a \u200cformer politician \u200bwith sway on\u2062 Capitol Hill, \u200cthat too is\u200c understood\u200b as part of\u200c a process that is not conventionally transparent \u200bbut\u2062 still intuitively understood.<\/p>\n<p>The same can be said\u2062 about the way political causes and their\u200c lobbyists operate in\u200c Washington or\u200d state capitals, such as when the pro-abortion \u200blobby NARAL, now known as Reproductive Freedom for All, and the National Rifle Association weigh in \u200don policy. They want\u2063 legislation and policy that is in sync with their ideologies and can offer political support and, in one form or another, the campaign contributions that are the lifeblood of any politician\u2019s future.<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<h3>Foreign bribery<\/h3>\n<p>But when foreign governments and\u2063 the companies they control throw \u200bmoney at those who they\u200c believe are in\u200b a position to \u200bhelp them, the process is neither transparent nor is it easily understood what is being offered \u2062in exchange for their generosity. \u2063And it cannot be waved away, even cynically, as \u201cconstituent services.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Foreign \u200dcompanies have lobbied in \u200cAmerica throughout our history.<\/p>\n<p>One of the most prominent examples concerned the European banks and\u2062 financial institutions that lent most of the money that paid for many of the railroads that companies chartered in the mid-19th century. These operations \u200binevitably involved greasing the \u200bhands of\u200c politicians who made the decisions about the rights \u2064and the routes that were\u2062 chosen.\u200b If a lot of that was spent in vain, since many of those companies and the states that backed them failed and\u2063 left the banks high \u2063and dry, that \u2064was part of the cost of doing business.<\/p>\n<p>In \u2062the 20th\u200c century, as American financial and military might make it a global superpower, nations seeking to influence Washington\u200c did their best\u2064 to influence those \u200cinvolved in the distribution of aid or \u200bsimilar transactions. The recent case in which Egyptian entities \u200dare accused of \u2063bribing Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman \u2064Bob Menendez (D-NJ), who has since vacated \u200dhis chairmanship, with gold bars and cash is appalling if\u2063 true. But\u2062 as with those 19 century \u200bstate legislators\u200d who were the recipients\u2064 of \u201cgifts\u201d from European railroad \u200cfinanciers, there isn\u2019t much of a mystery about what either \u2062party to the alleged transaction sought.<\/p>\n<p>The Clinton Foundation was founded in 2001 by \u2064the former president\u200c and\u200b first lady as a philanthropic endeavor. Over the course of the next 16 years, it raised a\u200c staggering total of $2\u200b billion from wealthy donors, including foreign entities. \u200cThough its good works were widely touted by friendly media as making a difference in the fight\u200d against global poverty, the true \u2062purpose of\u200d the foundation was easily discerned.<\/p>\n<p>By \u2063the normal standards by which charities are judged, the Clintons\u2019 effort could be considered something of\u2064 a scam. Its tax\u200d returns showed that less \u2064than 10% of the\u200b funds \u200cit raised\u2062 went toward actual philanthropy. Instead, most of the money went toward funding the Clinton \u200dPresidential Library and the Clinton Global Initiative.<\/p>\n<p>The library was, like all the \u200cother \u2064similar institutions created in the last generation\u2064 to house the papers and \u200bmemorabilia of\u200b recent presidents, a monument to the vanity of the Clintons, though not, it\u200c must be admitted, as \u200bgrand as those of his successors\u2062 George W. Bush \u200band Barack Obama.<\/p>\n<p>The Clinton \u200dGlobal \u200bInitiative was \u200calso not a charity. Instead, it was, as the New\u200c York Times once described it, a \u201cglitzy annual gathering of chief executives, heads \u200cof state and celebrities.\u201d Most of \u200dthe money raised\u2064 by the foundation went toward staging\u200c the event and for the \u2064travel and expenses incurred by Bill,\u2062 Hillary, and their daughter Chelsea.<\/p>\n<p>The \u200bClintons\u2062 posed \u2064as philanthropists. But they didn\u2019t feed the hungry\u2063 or clothe the \u2064poor. During the foundation\u2019s heyday, they were merely conveners \u200dof famous and smart people \u2064who supposedly brainstormed \u2064about how to do those things. They called this \u201clife-changing\u201d work, and it\u2019s possible that some of their efforts on which they spent a \u2064small percentage of the money \u2064they raised, such as <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-for-profit-presidency\/\" title=\"Profit-driven presidency\">supplying anti-malarial drugs<\/a> to African nations, \u200cdid some good.<\/p>\n<p>But the only ones whose lives we can be \u2062certain were \u201cchanged\u201d by the foundation\u2064 were the Clintons, their cronies, and their staff. Most \u200dof the $2 billion they\u200b raised was spent on salaries, travel, offices, and other perks. At its peak of popularity,\u200b the Clinton Foundation \u2064was the ultimate Lifestyles of the \u200dRich\u2063 and Famous reality show cloaked \u200bin a \u200cveneer\u2064 of good intentions and charitable \u200drhetoric. But not much \u200bof a charity.<\/p>\n<p>Why, then, did so many wealthy people give it so much money? Gaining access \u200bto famous people\u2064 is worth a lot to those interested in social climbing or being seen in\u2062 fashionable surroundings.\u2063 But for the numerous heads of state and foreign companies that donated to it, it was clearly an investment.<\/p>\n<p>Had the Clintons merely retired to private\u200d life after\u2063 leaving\u200d the White House, it\u2019s doubtful\u200c that their foundation would have raised a fraction \u2064of\u200b the money it accumulated. But given that Hillary Clinton had won a\u2064 New York Senate seat in 2000 and had \u200dher sights \u2063set on a presidential run from then on, it wasn\u2019t difficult to understand why so many people thought funding this vanity project was\u200d worth the money they spent on it.<\/p>\n<p>In this way,\u2063 the foundation was more than just a legal slush \u2063fund that\u2063 both eased their post-presidential lives and\u200b kept them in the public \u200deye. The money they were given was a not-so-subtle investment in\u2063 future political influence.<\/p>\n<p>That was made abundantly clear by the surge in donations that occurred in the lead-up to Hillary Clinton\u2019s unsuccessful campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2008 and then again in 2015 and 2016 as \u2062she won her party\u2019s nod and then headed into a\u200d general election showdown with Donald Trump that most\u2064 thought would be a coronation of the\u2063 nation\u2019s first female president.<\/p>\n<p>Any doubt\u2064 about the reason for giving to the foundation was made\u200c even more obvious by the steep decline \u200cin donations to it once Clinton was defeated\u200c by Trump.<\/p>\n<h2>The Biden \u2063family business<\/h2>\n<p>That is the context in which the dazzling success \u2064of Hunter Biden in the \u2062years following his father\u2019s election as\u200d vice president \u200cneeds\u200d to be \u200cunderstood.<\/p>\n<p>During much of Joe Biden\u2019s\u2063 36 years in \u2064the Senate, his brothers James and Francis Biden were \u201centrepreneurs\u201d who often sought to profit from their association with their brother. As a Wall Street Journal report noted, they traded \u2064on his name by taking calls from\u2062 the senator or vice president during business \u200dmeetings,\u200c a clear signal that\u200d they\u2064 could\u2063 give access to a person in power. This was a pattern that would be repeated by Hunter \u200bBiden.<\/p>\n<p>Hunter Biden\u2019s work life was\u200d similarly intertwined with his father\u2019s influence from \u2064the start, beginning\u2063 with \u2064being hired fresh out of law\u200c school by \u200dMBNA, a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/discover-card-cuts-ties-with-palestinian-terror-linked-organization\/\" title=\"Discover Card Cuts Ties With Palestinian Terror-Linked Organization\">credit card company<\/a> that benefited from\u200b legislation drafted by Joe Biden that made it more \u2063difficult for consumers\u200c to get bankruptcy protection. Within two years, \u2063Hunter Biden had risen\u2063 to the title of vice \u2063president there before leaving for a brief stint in the Commerce Department and\u2064 then forming his own lobbying firm.<\/p>\n<p>But it would not be until his father became vice president\u2062 that Hunter Biden began acquiring international connections.\u2064 As the summary and timeline published\u2064 by \u200cthe House Oversight Committee made clear, the Biden family business went \u2062global during this period. That was especially true in his second term when it was possible that he \u2064might challenge Hillary Clinton for the Democratic presidential \u200cnomination in 2016 and \u200baccelerated in the years after that as a Biden 2020 run became likely.<\/p>\n<p>The decision of\u2063 the board of \u2062the Burisma energy company in Ukraine to put \u200cHunter Biden on its board of directors from 2014 to 2019, a post that earned\u2062 him millions \u2062of dollars, \u2064is probably \u2062the best known of his \u2064foreign connections.<\/p>\n<p>But of particular interest is\u2062 the fact that from 2013 to 2020, Hunter Biden served as a \u200dmember\u2064 of the board of the\u2063 Shanghai-based private equity fund BHR Partners, of which he acquired a 30% stake at a discount.\u200d The firm was controlled \u200dby people and entities that were \u200din thrall to the Chinese Communist Party.<\/p>\n<p>That the Chinese \u200dwould tap Hunter Biden as \u2064a financial wizard, and at \u2062a point in his life \u200dwhen he was already\u200d suffering\u200b from addiction problems, is curious. But it was rendered even more\u2064 interesting by\u2063 the\u200b fact that out of all the\u2064 many investment firms available to them,\u200b they chose \u2063BHR to assist them in a billion-dollar transaction in which they managed \u2062to seize control of the largest cobalt reserves in the world in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, \u2064which were owned by an American company. \u2063BHR\u2019s role in the transaction, involving a buyout of the U.S. company\u2019s\u2062 Canadian partner, was crucial. Yet it was buried deep in the middle of a lengthy feature in the New York Times in November \u200b2021 about the \u2063Chinese acquisition \u200cof a stranglehold on the\u200b world\u2019s supply \u2062of \u2062cobalt, a key resource needed \u200cfor the \u200cmanufacture of\u200b batteries for electric cars. Though\u200c the New York Times\u2019s sources\u2062 claimed that \u2063Hunter Biden made nothing\u200c from this deal, given the enormous sums involved, it\u2019s hard to believe that one of BHR\u2019s principals would be left out in that manner.<\/p>\n<p>In \u200bthis case, as in \u2062many other of the transactions\u200b that reportedly brought Hunter Biden\u2064 and his various firms up to \u200d$21\u200b million (that \u2063we know about), there was no apparent direct benefit that such foreign entities appeared to \u200bhave gotten by singling out the president\u2019s son in\u200b this manner.<\/p>\n<p>To date, none of the money has been traced directly to the president\u2019s accounts, though in\u2062 one \u2064instance, Chinese banks \u2063wired \u200d$250,000\u200d to Hunter\u200c Biden while listing his father\u2019s Delaware home as the address of the\u200c recipient.<\/p>\n<p>Much like the money donated to the Clintons, the flow of money to Hunter Biden and \u200chis uncles, which was then distributed\u200d to family \u2062members via a complicated set of corporations and bank \u200caccounts that resemble a classic money-laundering operation, seems intended to buy the\u200d influence of \u2062\u201cthe big guy\u201d\u200c whose political power enabled his relations to trade off their names.<\/p>\n<p>While Biden \u2064apologists keep insisting\u200b there\u2019s nothing illegal about any of this, their rationalizations fail to answer the \u2063obvious questions the \u2063money given to Hunter Biden\u200b raises about his father\u2019s \u200dactions or influence.<\/p>\n<p>Perhaps Joe \u2064Biden\u2019s well-known boast about \u2063leveraging U.S. aid to Ukraine in order to force the firing\u2063 of a prosecutor that was targeting \u2064Burisma\u2063 was \u2062above board. But for what purpose, other\u200c than to gain the support of the man tasked by Obama to run Ukraine\u2062 policy,\u2063 did Burisma intend by putting a drug addict with \u2062no energy \u200cindustry \u2062experience into a\u200c lucrative position on its board?<\/p>\n<p>The same questions can \u2062be asked about the millions that came to Hunter\u200d Biden from Chinese \u2062firms that are controlled by that country\u2019s ruling communist tyrants.<\/p>\n<p>And that is the problem with powerful\u2062 American \u2064political families\u200b playing the influence-peddling game abroad.\u2064 It\u2019s bad enough when domestic lobbyists are able to throw around the kind \u200dof money in Washington that makes and \u200dbreaks political careers. But there \u200dis no secret \u200dabout\u2063 what is going \u200don \u200bthere or what the implications \u2063of these transactions\u200d will \u200cbe.<\/p>\n<p>When foreign companies and governments \u2064play the same \u200bgame, the point of the operation is far murkier and calls into question\u2064 not just legislation or administrative regulations but American\u200c foreign policy\u2064 and the fate\u2062 of millions who are influenced by such decisions.<\/p>\n<p>As shady as these transactions seem, it is not just the lack of ethics on the part of those involved that ought\u200d to trouble people but also whether or not their\u2062 leaders and their dependents \u2063are compromised \u2062by their foreign clients and donors.<\/p>\n<p>The\u200c mere hint, based on what\u200b proved to be fallacious claims,\u2064 that Trump was colluding with Russia in the 2016 campaign was enough to create a faux scandal that transfixed American politics for three years. The evidence\u200d that the Bidens were peddling their influence abroad deserves at least as much attention. The \u200d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/republican-voters-deserve-answers-and-accountability-after-potential-red-wave-fizzles\/\" title=\"Republican Voters Deserve Answers and Accountability After Potential \"Red Wave\" Fizzles\">voters deserve answers<\/a>\u2063 to the question \u2062of what exactly those who funneled millions to the Bidens thought they were purchasing. Unless this affair is thoroughly investigated and accountability\u200b for any\u200d infractions of the law or compromising of government policy is demanded, the precedents set by\u2063 the Clintons and now the Bidens will create a new standard for behavior that will\u200c destroy what\u2019s left of the credibility \u200cof the Washington political class.<\/p>\n<p>Jonathan S. Tobin is editor-in-chief\u200b of JNS.org and a columnist for Newsweek. Follow him: @jonathans_tobin.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> \u200cWhat\u2062 are the implications of foreign businesses buying influence through financial support\u2062 for individuals like Hunter Biden, and how does this impact the PAA \u2063framework?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  Tion\u200c was \u200bused to fund these\u200c events \u200cand promote the Clintons&#8217; political ambitions. In essence, the Clinton Foundation was a vehicle for the Clintons to maintain their\u200d political influence and enrich themselves.<\/p>\n<p>Now, let&#8217;s turn to Hunter\u2062 Biden and\u2062 the web of \u2062companies \u2064he and his Uncle Jim Biden \u200bwere associated with. The reason why \u200dbusinesses from China, Ukraine, \u200dRomania, Kazakhstan, \u2064and Russia were so generous to Hunter \u200bBiden is\u200c simple: they saw \u2062an opportunity to buy \u200dinfluence.<\/p>\n<p>During Joe Biden&#8217;s term as vice president, Hunter \u200cBiden and\u2064 his Uncle Jim Biden were able to leverage their \u2064family connections \u2063to the highest\u200c levels \u200dof power in\u2062 the United States. Companies in\u2062 these countries\u2062 saw that by associating\u2062 themselves with the Biden family,\u2064 they could gain access to the \u200ccorridors\u200d of power \u2063and influence government policy to their advantage.<\/p>\n<p>But \u2062what did\u2063 these companies get\u200b in return for their \u200bgenerosity? That&#8217;s the question that\u2064 the House Oversight Committee is \u200basking. It is clear \u2062that there was a quid pro quo at play here. These companies were not simply donating to\u200d Hunter Biden&#8217;s \u200cventures out of the goodness of their hearts. They \u2062expected\u200c something \u200cin return.<\/p>\n<p>It is important\u2063 to note that foreign bribery is not a new\u200d phenomenon. Throughout history, countries seeking to further their interests have\u2062 tried to influence political leaders\u200c in other nations by offering\u2063 financial incentives. The difference here is \u200dthat the Bidens were \u200dnot acting on behalf\u2062 of the American government \u200cor\u200c in the best\u2063 interests of the \u200bAmerican people. They were<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The House Oversight Committee is questioning why businesses from China, Ukraine, Romania, Kazakhstan, and Russia showed generosity towards Hunter Biden and the companies linked to him and his Uncle Jim Biden during Joe Biden&#8217;s vice presidency. The answer will likely reveal a significant aspect of the situation.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2057536,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[538],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2057535","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-washington-examiner"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2057535","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2057535"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2057535\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2057536"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2057535"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2057535"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2057535"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}