{"id":2055672,"date":"2023-10-04T17:03:02","date_gmt":"2023-10-04T21:03:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/court-hands-biden-admin-unfavorable-ruling-in-censorship-lawsuit\/"},"modified":"2023-10-04T17:04:50","modified_gmt":"2023-10-04T21:04:50","slug":"court-hands-biden-admin-unfavorable-ruling-in-censorship-lawsuit","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/court-hands-biden-admin-unfavorable-ruling-in-censorship-lawsuit\/","title":{"rendered":"Court rules against Biden administration in censorship lawsuit."},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">16<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fcourt-hands-biden-admin-unfavorable-ruling-in-censorship-lawsuit%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2055672&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><blockquote>\n<h2>An Appeals\u200b Court Expands Ban \u200don Biden Administration&#8217;s Contacts with\u2063 Social Media \u2062Companies<\/h2>\n<p>An appeals court \u200bhas dealt a blow to \u200bthe\u200c Biden administration in a censorship-by-proxy lawsuit \u200dbrought by two Republican \u2062attorneys general. The court \u2064has \u200cexpanded a ban\u2062 on\u200b the administration&#8217;s contacts with social media companies, including \u2064the Cybersecurity and\u200c Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), which pushed for crackdowns on \u2062&#8221;mis-, \u2062dis-, and mal-information.&#8221;<\/p>\n<div class=\"my-5\">\n<p>The Fifth Circuit \u200dCourt \u2062of Appeals\u2063 has added CISA to a list of government agencies banned from \u2064contacting social\u2062 media companies\u2062 to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/court-blocks-ruling-that-barred-biden-admin-from-demanding-social-media-censorship\/\" title=\"Court stops ruling that prevented Biden administration from demanding social media censorship.\">censor constitutionally protected free speech<\/a>. This decision affirms\u2063 a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/court-hands-biden-admin-unfavorable-ruling-in-censorship-lawsuit\/\" title=\"Court rules against Biden administration in censorship lawsuit.\">preliminary injunction issued earlier<\/a> this year.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"my-5\">\n<p>&#8220;The district court\u2019s judgment is AFFIRMED with respect to\u2062 the \u2063White\u2063 House, the Surgeon General, the CDC,\u200d the FBI, and CISA and \u200dREVERSED as to\u200b all other officials,&#8221; reads the Oct. 3\u200d ruling \u2063from the 5th \u200cCircuit.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"shortcode\">\n<div class=\"border-comp-divider mb-4 mr-4 w-full max-w-[500px] border px-5 py-4 text-[16px] leading-[20px] text-[#262626] md:float-left\" id=\"in_article_related_stories\">\n<h2 class=\"mb-3 font-sans text-[16px] font-semibold uppercase leading-[19px] text-[#2F2F2F]\">Related\u2063 Story<\/h2>\n<div class=\"mb-4 flex gap-2\">\n<div class=\"grow\">\n<div class=\"mb-1 line-clamp-2\">\n            <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/us\/supreme-court-temporarily-allows-biden-administrations-social-media-censorship-efforts-5496993?ea_src=author_manual&#038;ea_med=related_stories\"><\/p>\n<h3>Supreme Court Temporarily Allows Biden Administration&#8217;s Social Media Censorship Efforts<\/h3>\n<p>            <\/a>\n          <\/div>\n<div class=\"text-comp-caption text-[14px] leading-[18px]\">9\/22\/2023<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"shrink-0 basis-[120px]\">\n          <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/us\/supreme-court-temporarily-allows-biden-administrations-social-media-censorship-efforts-5496993?ea_src=author_manual&#038;ea_med=related_stories\"><\/a>\n        <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The initial\u2063 injunction came in response to a lawsuit brought\u2062 by\u200d attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, accusing the Biden administration of pressuring social \u2064media companies to suspend \u200baccounts or remove posts. The administration claims it was only trying to combat online misinformation.<\/p>\n<p>The Justice Department is\u2064 expected to \u200bappeal the \u200bruling\u2063 to the U.S. Supreme Court.<\/p>\n<div class=\"shortcode post-related-videos\">\n<div class=\"lazyload-wrapper\">\n<div class=\"lazyload-placeholder\"><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p>A \u2064spokesperson for CISA stated\u200b that the agency does not engage in\u200d censorship\u200d and protects Americans&#8217; \u200bfreedom of speech. The\u200c agency shares information on election security and literacy \u2063to\u2063 mitigate the risk of disinformation.<\/p>\n<p>The \u2064case, seen as crucial for First Amendment protections, has taken \u200ba winding path. Two \u200dRepublican attorneys general \u200cfiled \u2064the lawsuit in May 2022, accusing the\u2062 Biden administration of violating free speech rights. A court issued \u200da historic injunction,\u200b which\u200b was later\u2062 upheld by the \u2063Fifth\u2062 Circuit Court of Appeals.<\/p>\n<p>The court found that CISA pressured social media platforms \u2063to take down content, \u2063violating\u2062 the First Amendment. The Biden administration is expected to\u200d appeal the ruling.<\/p>\n<div class=\"my-5\">\n<p>&#8220;When \u200bit \u2063comes to defending \u2063the Constitution, Missouri doesn&#8217;t back down,&#8221; said Missouri Attorney\u200d General Andrew Bailey.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<h2>The Injunction<\/h2>\n<p>Judge Terry A. Doughty&#8217;s July 4\u2063 injunction prohibits government agencies from <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/rep-jordan-touts-weaponization-panels-role-in-exposing-government-big-tech-censorship\/\" title=\"Rep. Jordan highlights panel's role in revealing government and Big Tech censorship.\">contacting \u200dsocial media companies<\/a> to remove or suppress\u2064 content containing \u2062protected\u2062 free speech. It also bars \u2063agencies from pressuring social \u200dmedia companies to\u2062 change their guidelines for \u200ccontent removal.<\/p>\n<p>According\u2062 to\u200b the judge, the government\u2063 used its power\u2064 to silence opposition, suppressing various viewpoints on \u200dtopics such \u2062as COVID-19, the 2020 election, and President\u200c Biden&#8217;s\u200d policies.<\/p>\n<p>This ongoing censorship saga is expected to continue with further legal moves and potential twists before reaching a final resolution.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> How did the lawsuit argue that the\u2064 Biden administration&#8217;s \u200dactions violated \u2062the First Amendment rights of American citizens?<\/h2>\n<p><span>  Media companies to censor conservative\u2064 voices. The lawsuit argued\u2062 that the administration&#8217;s actions violated the First Amendment rights of American citizens \u200dand called\u2063 for an immediate halt to \u2064these censorship efforts.<\/p>\n<p>The appeals court&#8217;s decision to expand the ban on the administration&#8217;s contacts \u2063with \u200bsocial media companies is a significant setback for the Biden administration. \u2063It\u200c not only reaffirms the initial injunction \u2063but also includes\u200b the Cybersecurity and \u2063Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) in the ban. CISA, an agency that is meant to\u2063 focus on cybersecurity and infrastructure protection, had been advocating for crackdowns on \u2062what it deemed as &#8220;mis-, dis-, and mal-information&#8221; on social \u200bmedia platforms.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling by the Fifth Circuit\u200d Court of Appeals\u2064 sends a strong message that government agencies\u200d should not interfere with\u2063 constitutionally protected free speech. By adding CISA to the list of banned agencies, the \u200ccourt acknowledges the agency&#8217;s role in promoting censorship and directs \u200dit to refrain from any further contact with\u2063 social media companies in matters related to speech regulation.<\/p>\n<p>The decision was\u2062 made\u2064 in the context of a lawsuit specifically \u200btargeting the Biden administration&#8217;s alleged censorship efforts. It does not prevent\u2063 the administration from engaging with social media companies for \u200clegitimate purposes such as cybersecurity or \u2064law \u2064enforcement matters.\u2063 However, it does limit the administration&#8217;s ability to pressure these companies into censoring certain\u2063 voices and viewpoints.<\/p>\n<p>The court&#8217;s ruling serves as a reminder of the importance of safeguarding free speech \u200drights and preserving the principles of democracy. It reaffirms that government agencies, regardless of political affiliations, should\u2063 not be allowed to infringe upon the constitutionally protected rights of individuals.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit filed by the attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri reflects the concerns of many Americans who feel \u2063that their voices are being silenced or suppressed in the online public sphere. Social media platforms \u2063have become critical channels for expressing opinions and engaging in political discourse, and any attempts to \u200dcensor or manipulate these platforms can \u2062have significant implications for democracy and public discourse.<\/p>\n<p>As\u2062 this case\u200c progresses, it will undoubtedly continue to generate debate and discussion about the role of social\u2062 media companies in regulating \u2062speech and the boundaries of\u2064 government intervention in online platforms. It highlights the need for a thoughtful and balanced approach that respects the fundamental rights \u2062of individuals while addressing legitimate\u200b concerns related to misinformation, hate speech, and other forms of harmful content.<\/p>\n<p>In conclusion, the appeals court&#8217;s decision to expand \u2063the ban \u200don the Biden \u200dadministration&#8217;s contacts with social media companies is a \u200cvictory for free speech and constitutionally protected expression. It sends a clear message \u200cthat government agencies should not \u200dengage \u200cin censorship \u200cefforts and emphasizes the importance of maintaining a vibrant and\u200d diverse public discourse in\u200b the digital\u2062 age. The outcome of\u2062 this lawsuit will have significant implications\u200d for the ongoing\u2063 debate around online speech regulation and the delicate balance between protecting\u2063 free expression and addressing legitimate concerns.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>An appeals court has expanded a ban on the Biden administration&#8217;s contacts with social media companies, including the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). The court ruling came as a blow to the administration in a censorship-by-proxy lawsuit brought by two Republican attorneys general. CISA had urged platforms to combat &#8220;mis-, dis-, and mal-information.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":118,"featured_media":2055674,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[543],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2055672","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-the-epoch-times"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2055672","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/118"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2055672"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2055672\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2055674"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2055672"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2055672"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2055672"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}