{"id":2052383,"date":"2023-10-02T13:21:02","date_gmt":"2023-10-02T17:21:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-quashes-2024-long-shot-candidates-14th-amendment-case-against-trump\/"},"modified":"2023-10-02T13:23:04","modified_gmt":"2023-10-02T17:23:04","slug":"supreme-court-quashes-2024-long-shot-candidates-14th-amendment-case-against-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-quashes-2024-long-shot-candidates-14th-amendment-case-against-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court dismisses 2024 candidate&#8217;s 14th Amendment case vs. Trump."},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"float:left\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fsupreme-court-quashes-2024-long-shot-candidates-14th-amendment-case-against-trump%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=2052383&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><h2>The Supreme Court Rejects Case Seeking to\u200c Disqualify\u2062 Trump from 2024 Presidential Ballot<\/h2>\n<p>The Supreme Court made a significant decision on Monday, turning away a case brought by a \u200d<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/supreme-court-quashes-2024-long-shot-candidates-14th-amendment-case-against-trump\/\" title=\"Supreme Court dismisses 2024 candidate's 14th Amendment case vs. Trump.\">long-shot 2024 presidential candidate<\/a> who\u200c aimed to \u200ddisqualify former President Donald Trump from running for office \u200cagain. The appeal, filed by John Anthony Castro, \u200da Texas-based tax consultant and fellow Republican nominee, cited Trump&#8217;s \u2064actions during the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot as grounds for nullifying his eligibility \u2064under the 14th Amendment. This amendment prohibits \u200dindividuals who have &#8220;engaged in insurrection or \u2062rebellion&#8221;\u2064 from holding public office.<\/p>\n<h3>Challenges\u2062 to\u200c Trump&#8217;s\u2062 Eligibility Under the 14th Amendment<\/h3>\n<p>Castro initially filed the\u2062 lawsuit in a Florida federal court, seeking to have Trump declared ineligible\u2064 for public office and\u200c prevented from appearing on the ballot in all states. However, this issue is likely to resurface in the Supreme\u2064 Court, as other legal \u2064battles involving Trump&#8217;s reelection campaign and the constitutional amendment are currently underway in lower courts.<\/p>\n<p>Several\u2062 challenges,\u2063 including Castro&#8217;s, have invoked Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, which prohibits individuals who have \u200ctaken an oath to support the\u2062 Constitution but then engaged in insurrection or \u2062rebellion\u200c from\u200b holding office. \u2062Castro has\u200d also \u2062filed lawsuits in 11 states with the aim of disqualifying\u200c Trump from running.<\/p>\n<p>The 14th Amendment has been invoked in \u2063previous cases involving\u200c Republican allies \u2064of\u200c the \u200bformer\u200b president, such as Rep. Marjorie \u200bTaylor Greene. However, a \u2064judge ruled in Greene&#8217;s favor, stating that the plaintiffs failed\u200c to provide \u2064sufficient evidence that her actions before, during, \u2064and after the\u2062 riot constituted an insurrection against the \u2064Constitution.<\/p>\n<h3>Legal Battles and the Supreme \u2064Court&#8217;s Decision<\/h3>\n<p>In June, a federal judge dismissed Castro&#8217;s lawsuit, citing \u2062a lack\u200b of legal injury. This prompted\u200c Castro to appeal\u2063 to the 11th Circuit\u2064 Court\u2064 of Appeals and eventually to the Supreme Court. Similar challenges are also\u2064 underway in\u2063 federal courts in Colorado, Minnesota, New Hampshire, and \u200bOklahoma.<\/p>\n<p>Despite these\u2062 legal challenges, Trump,\u200d who is considered \u2064the front-runner for the GOP \u200dnomination, has dismissed\u2062 the 14th Amendment claims \u2063as lacking\u200d legal basis or standing. In a recent post on\u200c his \u2063<a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-new-acting-attorney-general-jeff-rosen-recently-wrote-an-essay-on-foreign-influence-in-us-elections-this-tells-us-a-little-about-his-knowledge-of-whats-going-on-today\/\" title=\"The New Acting Attorney General Jeff Rosen Recently Wrote an Essay on Foreign Influence in US Elections \u2013 This Tells Us A Little About His Knowledge of What\u2019s Going On Today\">social media platform<\/a>, Truth Social, he highlighted\u2062 that the majority \u2064of legal scholars share \u2064this view.<\/p>\n<p>The \u2063Supreme Court&#8217;s\u2062 denial of the case was included in its first orders list for the new term, alongside numerous \u200dother cases.<\/p>\n<p> <\/p>\n<h2> What are the \u200bimplications of the Supreme\u2062 Court&#8217;s rejection of\u200b the case for the 2024 election<\/h2>\n<p><span>  The case<\/h3>\n<p>Castro&#8217;s appeal faced\u2063 multiple challenges right from\u2064 the beginning. Firstly, it was \u200bseen as highly unlikely to succeed given the Supreme Court&#8217;s reluctance\u200c to interfere in political matters. The Court has traditionally been hesitant to\u200b get involved in\u2063 disputes that are better left to the political process. In\u2063 addition,\u2063 the case itself was seen as weak due to the lack of clear evidence\u2062 linking Trump directly to \u2064the Capitol riot. While many have criticized Trump for his rhetoric\u2062 leading up to the event, proving his direct involvement would have been a difficult task.<\/p>\n<p>Furthermore, the 14th Amendment itself presents a significant hurdle \u200dfor those seeking to disqualify Trump. Courts have interpreted its language narrowly, requiring a direct and active participation in insurrection or rebellion to warrant disqualification. Simply being the former President at the time of the riot does not\u2062 automatically make one liable\u2062 under the amendment. This narrow interpretation is in line with the Court&#8217;s approach to constitutional interpretation, which focuses on the original\u200d intent\u200c and text of\u2064 the Constitution.<\/p>\n<h3>The Supreme\u200b Court&#8217;s decision<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s decision to reject the case came as no surprise to legal experts. The Court issued a one-sentence order stating that \u200dthe appeal was &#8220;denied \u2063without comment.&#8221; This lack of comment is standard practice for the Court when declining a case, and it does not indicate agreement or \u2064disagreement \u2064with the lower court&#8217;s decision.<\/p>\n<p>In this case, the Court was not called upon to rule on the merits of the appeal or make a determination on whether Trump should be disqualified from running for office again in 2024.\u200d Instead, the \u2062Court&#8217;s decision can \u2064be\u200d seen\u2063 as a procedural\u200d one, affirming the lower court&#8217;s ruling that\u200c the case is not within its jurisdiction to decide. This allows\u200d the political process to play out\u2063 and for voters to ultimately decide whether they \u2064want Trump to be\u200b their candidate in the upcoming\u200d presidential \u200celection.<\/p>\n<h3>Implications for the 2024 election<\/h3>\n<p>The Supreme \u200bCourt&#8217;s rejection of \u2062this\u2064 case has significant implications for the 2024 presidential election. By refusing to get involved, the Court is effectively leaving the decision of Trump&#8217;s eligibility up to the voters. \u2063This decision aligns with the Court&#8217;s traditional view that political matters should be resolved through the democratic process rather than judicial intervention.<\/p>\n<p>For Trump&#8217;s \u2064supporters, this decision is a victory, as \u200cit allows them the opportunity to support their preferred candidate without legal obstacles. On the other hand, those who believe that Trump should be held accountable for his actions during the Capitol \u2064riot may be disappointed by the Court&#8217;s decision. However, it is\u200b important to remember that the Court&#8217;s role is\u2062 to \u2062interpret the law, and its \u200bdecision in this case does \u200dnot\u200d absolve Trump of any <a href=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/knowles-how-the-looters-got-away-with-it\/\" title=\"KNOWLES: How The Looters Got Away With It\">potential legal consequences<\/a> in \u2063other forums.<\/p>\n<h3>Conclusion<\/h3>\n<p>The \u200cSupreme Court&#8217;s rejection of the case seeking to \u2062disqualify Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot is in line with\u200d its\u200c historical reluctance to\u200d interfere in political\u2062 matters. The \u200cCourt&#8217;s decision allows \u200dthe democratic process to\u200b proceed and leaves the ultimate decision of Trump&#8217;s eligibility to the voters. While this decision may be seen as\u2062 a victory for Trump&#8217;s supporters, it is important to remember that it does not absolve him of any potential legal consequences. The case serves as a reminder of\u200b the delicate balance between the judiciary and democracy, and the importance of allowing the political process\u200d to \u200bplay out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Supreme Court declined a case on Monday by a 2024 presidential candidate attempting to remove Donald Trump from the ballot. John Anthony Castro, a Texas tax consultant and Republican nominee hopeful, appealed, referencing Trump&#8217;s actions on a specific day. Justices rejected Castro&#8217;s appeal for disqualification.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2052384,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[538],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2052383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-washington-examiner"],"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/cndimages.nyc3.digitaloceanspaces.com\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/01\/IMG_2758-scaled-1.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2052383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2052383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2052383\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2052384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2052383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2052383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2052383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}