When \u2064he saw U.S. institutions\u200d ignoring\u200c Swedish data out in June 2020 showing children \u200bhardly transmitted or contracted Covid-19\u200c at school, Harvard University\u2064 Professor of Medicine Martin Kulldorff \u200bdecided to \u200dstart speaking more on Twitter \u2062(now called X). <\/p>\n

\u201cI \u200dhave\u2064 three children\u2062 and \u2062I need to be able to\u200c see them in the\u2064 eyes,\u201d Kulldorff told The Federalist when asked\u2063 why he risked \u2062his\u200d position at Harvard, government research grants, even \u200cfriendships, for publicly opposing lockdowns and\u200d vaccine mandates.\u2063 \u201cIf I\u2019m \u2062a scientist, \u2062I\u200d have\u2063 to humbly seek the truth and honestly communicate that. I don\u2019t think there\u2019s another choice as a scientist. \u2026\u200c It was obvious that we\u200b had \u200cto speak up.\u201d<\/p>\n

The epidemiologist and \u2064infectious disease expert with more than<\/a> 200 research articles published in peer-reviewed \u200cpublications and cited more\u200c than 25,000 times had tried to make scientific arguments against lockdowns in U.S. publications since February \u20642020, \u200bbut he could only\u200c get his\u200b views into Swedish publications, he told The\u2062 Federalist in a phone \u2064interview \u200bWednesday.<\/p>\n

So\u2064 Kulldorff tried\u2063 getting his support for \u201cfocused protection\u201d instead of mass \u2064lockdowns out on social media. In his view,\u2063 it was \u2063especially important that\u2064 American children be allowed to go back to school, while\u2062 neighbors continued to take precautions \u200bon behalf \u200dof the elderly and others at high risk \u2062of a Covid infection, unlike most children. <\/p>\n

In attempting to speak on X, \u200dhowever, Kulldorff was blocked by what a lawsuit later discovered<\/a> was a \u201cvast \u200ccensorship enterprise\u201d throttling Americans\u2019 ideas online at the behest of multitudes of government officials and government-funded proxies. The Biden administration has appealed<\/a> the case to the Supreme Court, which paused<\/a> lower courts\u2019 injunctions against the censorship while\u2063 considering whether to take\u200b the case. In the meantime, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals is also considering whether to re-expand an\u200c injunction\u2062 against the\u2062 censorship to more federal agencies based on further\u2063 evidence. \u2062 <\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
The\u200b Biden\u200b Admin doesn’t want to\u200b stop censoring Americans in its \u2062quest for \u200bpower, so today we filed our opposition to gov’t’s stay motion in Missouri v. Biden (Murthy v. Mo.). We look forward to vindicating our clients’ \u2063rights once again, this \u200ctime in the nation’s highest court. pic.twitter.com\/y9OACvIU9d<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 Jenin\u2063 Younes (former \u200dhandle \u200d@leftylockdowns1) (@JeninYounesEsq) \u2064 September 20, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n