A<\/span> federal judge in Tennessee has temporarily blocked a new state law that would criminalize drag performances in public or in front of children. The law was supposed to go into effect at midnight, but Judge Thomas Parker issued a temporary restraining order on Friday, citing the law as a restriction on the constitutional protections of freedom of speech that was both vague and overly-broad.<\/p>\n

In his decision, Parker explained, \u201cIf Tennessee wishes to exercise its police power in restricting speech it considers obscene, it must do so within the constraints and framework of the United States Constitution.\u201d The state has so far failed to provide a \u201ccompelling government interest\u201d for why it should regulate drag performances to this extent.<\/p>\n

The law that Governor Bill Lee (R-TN) signed into legislation last month aimed to limit \u201cadult cabaret performances\u201d on public property to prevent children from viewing such shows. Violations of this law could result in a misdemeanor charge carrying up to a $2,500 fine and one year in prison, and repeat offenders could face felony charges with fines up to $3,000 and one to six years of prison time.<\/p>\n

Friends of George\u2019s, a Memphis-based theater company, sued to block the law, arguing that it \u201cexplicitly restrict[s] or chill[s] speech and expression protected by the First Amendment based on its content, its message, and its messenger.\u201d The theater company claimed that the law specifically \u201ctargets\u201d their drag performers and \u201cunlawfully restrains their expressive conduct not only within the confines of heavily-regulated adult-oriented establishments but virtually anywhere.\u201d<\/p>\n

The judge concluded by highlighting numerous potential limitations that this law could bring about, such as whether a citizen\u2019s private residence, a camping ground at a national park, or a minor browsing the internet from a public library would count as places where the drag shows would be prohibited. \u201cUltimately, the Statute\u2019s broad language clashes with the First Amendment\u2019s tight constraints,\u201d Parker added.<\/p>\n

The ban will remain on hold until the court reaches a final decision.<\/p>\n

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/body><\/html><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"