{"id":1630386,"date":"2022-09-02T07:03:50","date_gmt":"2022-09-02T11:03:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1630386"},"modified":"2022-09-02T07:04:30","modified_gmt":"2022-09-02T11:04:30","slug":"5-times-the-anti-trump-fbis-trust-us-promise-fell-apart-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/5-times-the-anti-trump-fbis-trust-us-promise-fell-apart-2\/","title":{"rendered":"5 Times The Anti-Trump FBI\u2019s \u2018Trust Us\u2019 Promise Fell Apart"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">20<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2F5-times-the-anti-trump-fbis-trust-us-promise-fell-apart-2%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1630386&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>The Biden administration and the corporate media continue to assure Americans that the FBI\u2019s raid on former president Donald Trump\u2019s Mar-a-Lago home was both legally justified and of the utmost necessity. But the deep-state cabal and the leftist media cartel provided similar assurances about Crossfire Hurricane and Special Counsel Robert Mueller\u2019s targeting of Trump, with the assurances later proving worthless.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Here are five times SpyGate taught Americans to distrust and disprove accusations leveled at Donald Trump.<\/p>\n<h2>1. Devin Nunes\u2019 Memo Exposing FISA Abuse<\/h2>\n<p>On February 2, 2018, the House Intelligence Committee, then-chaired by Republican Rep. Devin Nunes, released a four-page memo detailing abuses of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by the FBI.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Before the memo\u2019s release, the FBI publicly opposed the move, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theatlantic.com\/politics\/archive\/2018\/01\/trump-fbi\/552062\/\">claiming<\/a> in a public statement that the bureau had \u201cgrave concerns about material omissions of fact that fundamentally impact the memo\u2019s accuracy.\u201d Justice Department officials likewise opposed releasing the memo, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2018\/01\/31\/highly-debated-nunes-memo-is-a-conspiracy-theory-rep-schiff-says.html\">warning<\/a> that \u201cdoing so would be \u2018extraordinarily reckless.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The then-ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, Adam Schiff, also sought to scuttle the release of the memo \u2014 or at least preempt the detailed revelations of FISA abuse \u2014 by calling the memo a \u201cconspiracy theory\u201d in an op-ed for The Washington Post. In it, Schiff <a href=\"https:\/\/www.cnbc.com\/2018\/01\/31\/highly-debated-nunes-memo-is-a-conspiracy-theory-rep-schiff-says.html\">condemned<\/a> the release, saying the memo was \u201cdesigned to suggest that \u2018a cabal of senior officials within the FBI and the Justice Department were so tainted by bias against President Trump that they irredeemably poisoned the investigation.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Nancy Pelosi, who is now speaker of the House, likewise attacked Nunes, demanding in a letter to then-House Speaker Paul Ryan that Nunes be removed as Intelligence Committee chairman. Nunes \u201cdisgraced\u201d the committee with his \u201cdishonest\u201d handling of the committee\u2019s review of the Russia collusion problem, Pelosi <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/02\/a-new-years-resolution-for-the-left-and-never-trump-apologize-to-devin-nunes\/\">wrote<\/a>. Nunes\u2019 committee, Pelosi <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/02\/a-new-years-resolution-for-the-left-and-never-trump-apologize-to-devin-nunes\/\">claimed<\/a>, had become a \u201ccharade\u201d and a \u201ccoverup campaign \u2026 to hide the truth about the Trump-Russia scandal.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>In response to the Nunes memo, former FBI Director James Comey <a href=\"https:\/\/www.huffpost.com\/entry\/james-comey-memo-response_n_5a74e663e4b0905433b42efc\">told<\/a> the country the memo was \u201cdishonest and misleading.\u201d Comey further claimed it \u201cwrecked the House intel committee, destroyed trust with Intelligence Community, damaged relationship with FISA court, and inexcusably exposed classified investigation of an American citizen.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Former CIA Director John Brennan also attacked Nunes, calling his exposure of the FISA abuse \u201cappalling\u201d and an abuse of his chairmanship of the House Intelligence Committee.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, years later, Nunes was proven correct, as the inspector general\u2019s report confirmed, establishing that the Republican House Intelligence chair had, if anything, understated the FISA abuse.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>For all the assurances the DOJ, FBI, their former leaders, and top politicians provided the American public, they were either lying or wrong \u2014 or both because <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/opinions\/rep-nuness-memo-crosses-a-dangerous-line\/2018\/01\/31\/cbdabedc-0696-11e8-b48c-b07fea957bd5_story.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">there was<\/a> \u201ca cabal of senior officials within the FBI and the Justice Department \u2026 so tainted by bias against President Trump that they irredeemably poisoned the investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>2. Surveillance Warrants Are Hard to Get<\/h2>\n<p>In addition to wrongly condemning Nunes\u2019 memo, government officials attempted to calm concerns over the FISA surveillance by <a href=\"https:\/\/www.c-span.org\/video\/?425087-1\/fbi-director-investigating-links-trump-campaign-russia\">assuring<\/a> the public that the process of obtaining a surveillance warrant was \u201crigorous\u201d and that to obtain surveillance of American citizens, a court must find \u201cprobable cause\u201d that warrants the wiretap.<\/p>\n<p>Adm. Michael Rogers, then a commander of United States Cyber Command, testified about the FISA process during a March 2017 congressional hearing. In response to a question posed to eliminate \u201cconfusion in the public\u201d about the collection of personal data, Rogers confirmed that the National Security Agency \u201cwould need a court order based on probable cause to conduct electronic surveillance on a U.S. person inside the United States.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>During the same hearing, the then-recently fired former FBI Director Comey <a href=\"https:\/\/www.c-span.org\/video\/?425087-1\/fbi-director-investigating-links-trump-campaign-russia\">expanded<\/a> on the surveillance process. \u201cThere is a statutory framework in the United States under which courts grant permission for electronic surveillance either in a criminal case or the national security case based on the showing of probable cause,\u201d Comey testified before Congress. \u201cIt is a rigorous, rigorous process, involving all three branches of government,\u201d the former FBI director stressed, noting it must go through an application process and then to a judge who must approve the order.<\/p>\n<p>The IG report on FISA abuse proved the promised rigor didn\u2019t exist. And the later conviction of Kevin Clinesmith for \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/news\/fbi-lawyer-found-guilty-of-forgery-in-trump-russia-probe-restored-to-good-standing-by-d-c-bar\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">falsifying<\/a> a document that was the basis for a surveillance warrant against former Trump campaign official Carter Page,\u201d punctuated that reality. The facts revealed in the IG report further established that Americans\u2019 faith in the FISA Court to serve as a check on the government was misplaced, with the judges <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/10\/the-fisa-court-is-complicit-in-the-fbi-abuses-its-raising-cain-over\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">serving<\/a> as but a rubberstamp of the DOJ\u2019s surveillance applications. So much for those assurances.<\/p>\n<h2>3. Don\u2019t Worry, \u2019Merica, No Spying on Trump Took Place<\/h2>\n<p>A third assurance Americans received from the powers-that-be was that no spying on the Trump campaign occurred. The inspector general\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/oig.justice.gov\/news\/doj-oig-releases-review-four-fisa-applications-and-other-aspects-fbis-crossfire-hurricane\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">report<\/a> on FISA abuse disproved those reassurances as well, revealing that the \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/28\/ig-report-proves-obama-administration-spied-on-trump-campaign-big-time\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Obama Administration Spied on the Trump Campaign Big Time<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>This reality pushed Russia-collusion hoaxers into esoteric discussions on the true meaning of \u201cspying.\u201d Even the United States Senate played the \u201cit depends what the meaning of spying is\u201d game, with New Hampshire Democrat Sen. Jeanne Shaheen quizzing FBI Director Christopher Wray on whether he would agree with then-Attorney General William Barr\u2019s use of the word \u201cspying.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI was very concerned by his use of the word spying, which I think is a loaded word,\u201d Shaheen bemoaned. \u201cWhen FBI agents conduct investigations against alleged mobsters, suspected terrorists, other criminals, do you believe they\u2019re engaging in spying when they\u2019re following FBI investigative policies and procedures?\u201d the senator asked Wray.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThat\u2019s not the term I would use,\u201d Wray replied, before noting that different people use different colloquialisms.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The discussion did not end there, however, with Shaheen pushing Wray on whether he had seen \u201cany evidence that any illegal surveillance into the campaigns or the individuals associated with the campaigns by the FBI occurred.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think I personally have any evidence of that sort,\u201d Wray replied.<\/p>\n<p>But even sidestepping the silly debate over what \u201cspying\u201d means, the guarantee Shaheen provided the American public \u2014 that no illegal surveillance into the Trump campaign or individuals associated with the Trump campaign had occurred \u2014 proved worthless.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The Department of Justice has since admitted that it illegally surveilled former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page and that such surveillance reached Trump campaign documents. So, yes, our federal government illegally surveilled the campaign of a presidential candidate.<\/p>\n<h2>4. Redactions Are Necessary to Protect Sources and Methods<\/h2>\n<p>A fourth key commitment conveyed to Americans throughout the multi-year unraveling of the Russia collusion hoax concerned the need to redact details in the publicly released documents. Such redactions were necessary to protect sources and methods, our overlords assured us.<\/p>\n<p>For instance, in a December 9, 2019 press release Wray issued in conjunction with the DOJ\u2019s inspector general\u2019s report on FISA abuse, Wray \u201cemphasized that the FBI\u2019s participation in this process was undertaken with my express direction to be as transparent as possible, while honoring our duty to protect sources and methods that, if disclosed, might make Americans less safe.\u201d Wray further promised that the FISA abuse report presented all material facts, \u201cwith redactions carefully limited and narrowly tailored to specific national security and operational concerns.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Republican Sens. Ron Johnson and Chuck Grassley challenged that portrayal of the redactions, <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/28\/grassley-johnson-demand-declassification-of-four-key-footnotes-in-ig-report-on-fisa-abuses\/\">suggesting<\/a> in a letter to then-Attorney General William Barr that several footnotes \u201cwere classified in the IG report only because they contradict certain claims made in the public version of the inspector general\u2019s report on FISA warrants documenting misconduct in the FBI\u2019s spying operation of the Trump campaign.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are concerned that certain sections of the public version of the report are misleading because they are contradicted by relevant and probative classified information redacted in four footnotes,\u201d Grassley and Johnson <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/28\/grassley-johnson-demand-declassification-of-four-key-footnotes-in-ig-report-on-fisa-abuses\/\">wrote<\/a>. \u201cThis classified information is significant not only because it contradicts key statements in a section of the report, but also because it provides insight essential for an accurate evaluation of the entire investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Republican senators then asked for the four footnotes to be declassified, stressing that \u201cthe American people have a right to know what is contained within these four footnotes and, without that knowledge, they will not have a full picture as to what happened during the Crossfire Hurricane investigation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In April of 2020, Acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell declassified the footnotes. And, as Grassley and Johnson had represented, the redactions weren\u2019t necessary to protect \u201csources and methods.\u201d Rather, the blacked-out lines were essential to <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/04\/16\/9-key-points-from-newly-declassified-report-details-on-fisa-abuse\/\">distorting<\/a> portions of the FISA report and to keeping the public in the dark about the full scope of the Spygate scandal.<\/p>\n<p>Another document declassified by Grenell exposed that Mueller\u2019s team falsely represented to a federal judge (and the American public) the substance of Michael Flynn\u2019s December 2016 telephone conversation with then-Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>As I <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/06\/01\/new-flynn-transcripts-confirm-mueller-team-lied-to-the-court-and-the-country\/\">reported<\/a> following Grenell\u2019s declassification of the transcript of the call between Flynn, Trump\u2019s then-incoming national security adviser, and Kislyak, Mueller\u2019s office deceived the country and a federal court when prosecutors claimed Flynn had discussed U.S. sanctions with his Russian counterpart. The transcripts established that, contrary to court filings, Flynn never raised the issue of sanctions with the Russian ambassador.<\/p>\n<p>The release of the Flynn transcript did reveal, however, the FBI\u2019s secret \u201csources and methods\u201d \u2014 but the sources and methods were those of deep-state actors seeking to rid themselves of the president\u2019s chosen national security adviser by launching a perjury trap and then lying about what Flynn said.<\/p>\n<h2>5. Crossfire Hurricane Was Properly Predicated\u00a0<\/h2>\n<p>To this day, both DOJ\u2019s Inspector General Michael Horowitz and Wray maintain that the FBI\u2019s launch of the Crossfire Hurricane investigation was properly predicated. Publicly released FBI documents say otherwise.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Former FBI agent Peter Strzok <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/09\/04\/mifsud-notes-provide-more-proof-crossfire-hurricane-was-an-excuse-to-spy-on-trump\/\">explained<\/a> the supposed predicate for launching Crossfire Hurricane on July 31, 2016, in the opening \u201cElectronic Communication\u201d that he both prepared and approved. <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/09\/04\/mifsud-notes-provide-more-proof-crossfire-hurricane-was-an-excuse-to-spy-on-trump\/\">According<\/a> to Strzok, the FBI opened the umbrella investigation into the Trump campaign after the government had \u201creceived information\u201d \u201crelated to the hacking of the Democratic National Committee\u2019s website\/server.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But Strzok\u2019s summary of the information received made no mention of any intel obtained by the FBI related to the DNC hacking. Rather, the supposed intel \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/09\/04\/mifsud-notes-provide-more-proof-crossfire-hurricane-was-an-excuse-to-spy-on-trump\/\">consisted<\/a> of information received from an unnamed representative, now publicly known to be Alexander Downer, a then-Australian diplomat\u201d stationed in London. The opening memorandum explained that Downer had relayed \u201cstatements Mr. [George] Papadopoulos made about suggestions from the Russians that they (the Russians) could assist the Trump campaign with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Hillary Clinton.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The opening document then asserted that Papadopoulos \u201calso suggested the Trump team had received some kind of suggestion from Russia that it could assist this process with the anonymous release of information during the campaign that would be damaging to Mrs. Clinton (and President Obama.).\u201d The electronic communication added a <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/09\/04\/mifsud-notes-provide-more-proof-crossfire-hurricane-was-an-excuse-to-spy-on-trump\/\">caveat<\/a>, though, noting that it was unclear whether Papadopoulos \u201cor the Russians were referring to material acquired publicly of [sic] through other means. It was also unclear how Mr. Trump\u2019s team reacted to the offer.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Thus, while Strzok framed the information <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/09\/04\/mifsud-notes-provide-more-proof-crossfire-hurricane-was-an-excuse-to-spy-on-trump\/\">received<\/a> by the FBI as evidence \u201crelated to the hacking of the Democratic National Committee\u2019s website\/server,\u201d the remainder of the Electronic Communication contradicted that claim and in fact acknowledged that the material might refer to \u201cpublicly acquired\u201d information.<\/p>\n<p>What the FBI did \u2014 or rather didn\u2019t do \u2014 after the launch of Crossfire Hurricane further confirms the sham predicate set forth by Strzok in the Electronic Communication.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>While Papadopoulos\u2019s statements to Downer supposedly prompted the FBI to open the Crossfire Hurricane investigation, agents failed to question Papadopoulos for six months. The FBI also put little (or no) effort into determining who purportedly told Papadopoulos that the Russians had dirt on Hillary. The supposed source of that statement, Joseph Mifsud, could have been easily located soon after the launch of Crossfire Hurricane if the FBI genuinely believed Russia had conspired with the Trump campaign to hack and release the DNC emails.<\/p>\n<p>Agents pursuing a legitimate investigation \u201cwould have <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/09\/04\/mifsud-notes-provide-more-proof-crossfire-hurricane-was-an-excuse-to-spy-on-trump\/\">immediately<\/a> scoured Papadopoulos\u2019s London-based connections and discovered he was associated with the London Centre of International Law Practice around the time he met with Downer. From there, the FBI could have easily fingered Mifsud as a possible source for the information, since he was listed as a board advisor and public source searches would show Mifsud had connections to Russia. (The intelligence community would have also hit on Mifsud\u2019s many connections to Western intelligence agencies.)\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But the FBI did none of this, waiting instead until late January 2017 to quiz Papadopoulos on the source of the supposed inside information coming from Russia. Yet, Wray and the DOJ\u2019s inspector general want Americans to trust them when they say that agents launched Crossfire Hurricane based on Papadopoulos\u2019s London chat with Downer over drinks.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Special Counsel John Durham, however, says otherwise, having released a statement following the DOJ\u2019s report on FISA abuse that informed the public that, \u201cbased on the evidence collected to date,\u201d his team had \u201cadvised the Inspector General that we do not agree with some of the report\u2019s conclusions as to predication and how the FBI case was opened.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The special counsel\u2019s public statements prove significant for two reasons. First, Durham\u2019s comments refute the inspector general\u2019s conclusions regarding the predication of Crossfire Hurricane. But beyond that, the fact that Durham needed to correct the record shows the lack of trust due the DOJ and even the inspector general\u2019s office \u2014 something further <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2022\/01\/31\/special-counsel-clarification-reveals-the-dojs-inspector-general-is-not-a-team-player\/\">confirmed<\/a> during the special counsel\u2019s prosecution of former Clinton campaign attorney Michael Sussmann.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Each of these five falsehoods peddled by the government to the public during the Russia collusion hoax has a clear corollary in the current scandal involving the FBI\u2019s raid on Trump\u2019s Mar-a-Lago home. And after the lies, pretext, and political warfare exposed during the unraveling of SpyGate, the DOJ and FBI\u2019s current entreat to an angry public to \u201ctrust them\u201d will be ignored \u2014 as it should.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n<p>\n  Margot Cleveland is The Federalist&#8217;s senior legal correspondent. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. <\/p>\n<p>Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize\u2014the law school\u2019s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. <\/p>\n<p>As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.<\/p>\n<div class=\"article-comments mt-30 mt-sm-60\">\n<div class=\"article-comments-container d-flex flex-column align-items-center py-30\">\n    <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"110\" height=\"106\" src=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/12\/fdrlst-mark.svg\" class=\"img-fluid mb-20\" alt=\"The Federalist logo eagle mark\" \/>    <\/p>\n<p>Unlock commenting by joining the Federalist Community.<\/p>\n<p>    <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/plans\/pricing\/\" class=\"btn btn-on-white\">Subscribe<\/a>  <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Biden administration and the corporate media continue to assure Americans that the FBI\u2019s raid on former president Donald Trump\u2019s Mar-a-Lago home was both legally justified and of the utmost<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":499,"featured_media":2315279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1630386","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630386","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/499"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1630386"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1630386\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2315279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1630386"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1630386"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1630386"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}