{"id":1580967,"date":"2022-07-31T07:49:23","date_gmt":"2022-07-31T11:49:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1580967"},"modified":"2022-07-31T07:49:45","modified_gmt":"2022-07-31T11:49:45","slug":"the-truth-about-mass-shootings-in-america","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/the-truth-about-mass-shootings-in-america\/","title":{"rendered":"The Truth About Mass Shootings in America"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">14<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fthe-truth-about-mass-shootings-in-america%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1580967&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p><em>News Analysis<\/em><\/p>\n<p>Mass shootings are extremely rare in America. But you wouldn\u2019t know that if you listened to politicians and much of the media. Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said in a recent Senate hearing on gun control that there had been 309 <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/t-mass-shootings\">mass shootings<\/a> in America so far this year. CNN reported that \u201cU.S. mass shootings are on pace to match last year\u2014the worst ever.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi said on the floor that there were 13 mass shootings across the country in just one weekend. Major media outlets like The New York Times, NBC News, and ABC News all reported on the\u2014allegedly\u2014\u201chundreds\u201d of mass shootings this year.<\/p>\n<p>All of this sounds like a national crisis and terrifying to the public, but fewer than 100 people a year are killed in mass shootings in America. While the horrific murder of young children in their school in Uvalde and the innocent people killed in a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park are terrible tragedies, those events do not mean people are at a high risk of being mass shooting victims.<\/p>\n<p>The way in which politicians who want more gun control bills deliberately scare people about mass shootings is by citing a made-up definition and using statistics from an unofficial database called the Gun Violence Archive.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cObviously, they are trying to broaden the definition to get as large a number as they can to scare the public,\u201d said Alan M. Gottlieb, founder of the Second Amendment Foundation, said in an interview. \u201cBut the public cares more about stopping these incidents before they happen. The way to prevent them is not to take away people\u2019s Second Amendment rights, but to make sure those people don\u2019t get the guns to start with\u2014and that is where we are failing.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Defining \u2018Mass Shooting\u2019<\/h2>\n<p>The standard government definition of \u201cmass shooting\u201d is four or more people killed in a public place who are chosen indiscriminately.<\/p>\n<p>This definition,\u00a0crafted by the nonpartisan Congressional Research Center (CRS) in 2013 (<a href=\"https:\/\/sgp.fas.org\/crs\/misc\/R43004.pdf\">pdf<\/a>), doesn\u2019t count domestic violence and gang or drug-related violence because CRS explained those crime activities already have \u201cfederal policies, law enforcement structures, and laws tailored in many instances to specifically address them.\u201d The definition matters for law enforcement and others who study and report on crime and look for solutions.<\/p>\n<p>But then unofficial groups started making up new definitions for \u201cmass shootings\u201d that changed the methodology for counting them, which made the numbers higher.\u00a0Mass shootings leads to more gun control legislation and increased media attention, according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.hbs.edu\/faculty\/Pages\/item.aspx?num=57005\">a Harvard University study<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The left-wing magazine \u201cMother Jones\u201d <a href=\"https:\/\/www.motherjones.com\/politics\/2012\/12\/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-data\/\">has a widely cited database<\/a>, and it made the definition as three or more killed, which of course increases the data. It also includes domestic violence killings, which CRS explained should not be included because \u201ca killer\u2019s relationship to his or her victims is important\u201d when \u201cdriven by a desire for revenge and\/or power.\u201d Those two changes in the definition have doubled its count for 2022.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis oversimplification of \u2018mass shootings\u2019 treats all incidents as the same problem when they are different issues that require different solutions,\u201d said Mark Oliva, managing director of public affairs for the National Shootings Sports Foundation, which lobbies for gun companies, told The Epoch Times. \u201cThis is what is seized upon by those calling for bans and complete disarmament of law-abiding citizens. The answer they turn to is getting rid of all guns, even for those who obey the law.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Gun Violence Archive<\/h2>\n<p>The biggest change came when the Gun Violence Archive (GVA)\u00a0changed the definition in its widely cited online database. It considers a \u201cmass shooting\u201d any incident in which there are \u201cfour victims shot\u201d\u2014not killed.<\/p>\n<p>Also, it includes the crime categories the CRS said are not relevant.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Gun Violence Archive\u2019s definition of \u2018mass shooting\u2019 can be misleading since it counts among their numbers gang-related crimes, officer-involved cases, and self-defense usages,\u201d said Oliva. \u201cThat leads to a much larger figure being used by Gun Violence Archive, but presents the information without context. This can be confusing for readers since many accept the information as an instance of a lone individual preying on multiple people. That isn\u2019t always the case, especially when looking at gang-related and drug-related incidents.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>GVA did not respond to a request for comment about its methodology. However, when the group\u2019s executive director, Mark Bryant, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.saf.org\/special-report-the-gun-violence-archive-and-its-scaring-of-america\/\">was asked<\/a> by the Second Amendment Foundation about the media\u2019s \u201coverhyping and misuse of his data,\u201d Bryant responded, \u201cIf the numbers are misleading, the journalist didn\u2019t do their homework.\u201d He added that \u201cWhen a journalist uses the mass-shooting numbers as their lead, they\u2019re not looking at the whole situation.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2>Mass Shooting Statistics<\/h2>\n<p>The Rand Corporation <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rand.org\/research\/gun-policy\/analysis\/essays\/mass-shootings.html\">did a study<\/a> on the various groups that count mass shootings and looked at how their definitions changed the results. In 2019, the seven main trackers reported mass shootings for the year ranged wildly from six to 503. Those same groups reported victims of mass shootings that year were as far apart as 60 and 628.<\/p>\n<p>The government does not track mass shootings every year. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/t-fbi\">FBI<\/a> releases an annual report on \u201cactive shooters\u201d which it defines as one or more individuals actively engaged in killing or attempting to kill people in a populated area. There were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fbi.gov\/file-repository\/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2021-052422.pdf\/view\">61 active shooter incidents in 2021<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/www.fbi.gov\/file-repository\/active-shooter-incidents-in-the-us-2020-070121.pdf\/view\">40 in 2020<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>But for mass shootings, the first statistics came from the CRS report in 2013. It looked at the previous three decades and identified a total of 78 public mass shootings that claimed 547 lives.<\/p>\n<p>This year, the Department of Justice <a href=\"https:\/\/nij.ojp.gov\/topics\/articles\/public-mass-shootings-database-amasses-details-half-century-us-mass-shootings\">released a database<\/a> of mass shootings in a report from the National Institute of Justice and a group called \u201cThe Violence Project.\u201d The database, which can be downloaded by request, shows a total of 176 mass shootings from 1966 to 2021 with a total of 1,259 people killed. That is an annual mean of 23 victims of mass shootings in 55 years.<\/p>\n<p>This graphic shows the data for the most recent 10 years from DoJ and the Violence Project. You can see there have been a total of 55 mass shootings and 516 victims in a decade.\u00a0(The total number of victims was 108 in 2017 because of the horrific mass shooting in Las Vegas in which 58 people were killed.)<\/p>\n<p>Then there are the GVA statistics. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gunviolencearchive.org\/past-tolls\">It says<\/a> there have been 369 mass shootings so far in 2022. It reports there were 692 mass shootings in 2021, 610 in 2020, and 417 in 2019. Even if you were to take all the fatal homicides that the GVA calls \u201cmass shootings\u201d for 2022, there were 379 victims.<\/p>\n<p>Now that so much of the media use the GVA numbers, there is more political and media attention on the rare events. Mass shootings get drastically more focus than the bigger issue of the enormous homicide and crime spike in America. Victims of mass shootings are a tiny percentage of all people killed by firearms each year, as seen in the following graphic.<\/p>\n<h2>Media Hype Over Mass Shootings<\/h2>\n<p>\u201cIt bleeds, it leads\u201d is a common saying in the news business to describe how crime is good for ratings. This is partly why the media has been doing such extensive coverage of the three mass shootings this year in Buffalo, Texas, and Illinois.<\/p>\n<p>While major TV networks use the GVA statistics now, the print media is not as sold into the new system.<\/p>\n<p>The Washington Post is seemingly split on whether it will spin the statistics to create a more dramatic narrative or be accurate. Its Fact Checker column <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/politics\/interactive\/2022\/uvalde-buffalo-mass-shootings-gun-control-laws\/\">recently wrote<\/a> that mass shootings occur six times a year on average (based on <a href=\"https:\/\/nij.ojp.gov\/library\/publications\/nature-trends-correlates-and-prevention-mass-public-shootings-america-1976\">a 2021 study<\/a>), but then the paper <a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/nation\/2022\/06\/02\/mass-shootings-in-2022\/\">published a news story<\/a> with the headline \u201c300 mass shootings so far this year\u201d\u2014based on the GVA.<\/p>\n<p>The \u201cmore than 300 mass shootings this year\u201d story has been run repeatedly by media around the country because it sounds terrifying. But the stories don\u2019t say how many victims are involved.<\/p>\n<p>Before the GVA existed, the 2013 congressional report concluded that \u201cWhile tragic and shocking, public mass shootings account for few of the murders related to firearms that occur annually in the United States.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mass shootings are horrible and terrifying for the communities where they occur. The Rand study said the impact of mass shootings is damaging to citizens\u2019 mental health, anxiety, and perception of safety. However, the fact is that the risk of dying in one is extremely unlikely.<\/p>\n<p><em>Editor\u2019s note: This story has been updated with a citation to the 2021 study.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"author_wrapper\">\n<div class=\"one_author_block round\">\n<div class=\"top_row\">\n\t\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.theepochtimes.com\/author-emily-miller\"><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Follow<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"bio\">Emily Miller is an award-winning investigative journalist and author in Washington, D.C. Her newsletter &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.emilypostnews.com\/\">Emily Posts News<\/a>&#8221; gives readers original, exclusive reporting and insider analysis.<\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>News AnalysisMass shootings are extremely rare in America. But you wouldn\u2019t know that if you listened to politicians and much of the media. Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) said<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1581186,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1580967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1580967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1580967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1580967\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1581186"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1580967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1580967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1580967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}