{"id":1387601,"date":"2022-03-18T06:30:00","date_gmt":"2022-03-18T10:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1387601"},"modified":"2022-03-18T08:00:14","modified_gmt":"2022-03-18T12:00:14","slug":"spygate-101-a-primer-on-the-russia-collusion-hoaxs-years-long-plot-to-take-down-trump","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/spygate-101-a-primer-on-the-russia-collusion-hoaxs-years-long-plot-to-take-down-trump\/","title":{"rendered":"SpyGate 101: A Primer On The Russia Collusion Hoax\u2019s Years-long Plot To Take Down Trump"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">30<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fspygate-101-a-primer-on-the-russia-collusion-hoaxs-years-long-plot-to-take-down-trump%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1387601&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><div><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/Screen-Shot-2022-03-17-at-4.47.41-PM-1024x704-1.png\" class=\"ff-og-image-inserted\" alt=\"image\" \/><\/div>\n<p>As Special Counsel John Durham continues to expose more details of the \u201cSpyGate\u201d or \u201cRussia collusion\u201d scandal, it can be difficult for any apolitical, non-news-junkie member of the public to grasp the ongoing developments.<\/p>\n<p>After all, for more than five years, the corrupt legacy media has refused to report on scandal or done so with a slanted portrayal of the facts. So most Americans remain unaware of the Democrats\u2019 years-long duplicity that sought to destroy first candidate and then President Donald Trump. Add to that reality the overlapping conspiracies and sprawling cast of characters involved, and it can be difficult to follow the story.<\/p>\n<p>That the scandal is dense, however, does not mean it should be ignored. To the contrary, the duplicity must not be disregarded because what Trump\u2019s political enemies tried to accomplish over the course of five years represents the biggest threat our constitutional republic has seen in the last century.<\/p>\n<p>So for those who care about our country and her future but don\u2019t want to be buried in the minutia of the scandal, here is your big-picture primer.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"dnc-emails-are-hacked\">DNC Emails Are Hacked<\/h2>\n<p>While every thread of SpyGate could be unraveled more, April 30, 2016, marks the cleanest point to pin the start of the intrigue. It was then, amid the contested presidential primaries, that the Democratic National Committee learned that its computer network had been breached. The DNC then <a href=\"https:\/\/redstate.com\/diary\/davenj1\/2020\/09\/21\/the-dnc-hack-part-1-background-and-discovery-n265855\">hired<\/a> a company called CrowdStrike to investigate the hack, and by mid-May, CrowdStrike concluded that Russian actors were responsible for the hack, which the DNC then reported to the FBI.<\/p>\n<p>The public first learned about the DNC server hack on June 14, 2016, when The Washington Post broke the story. Then, on July 22, 2016, after Trump and Hillary Clinton had been declared the presidential nominees, WikiLeaks released a trove of documents, purportedly obtained through the DNC hack.<\/p>\n<p>These documents included emails in which then-DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and other party officials disparaged Clinton\u2019s primary opponent, Bernie Sanders. The behind-the-scenes communiques also revealed that the DNC, which should maintain neutrality between primary candidates, favored Clinton, with top officials plotting ways to harm the Sanders campaign.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"clinton-campaign-plots-to-convert-dnc-scandal-into-trump-scandal\">Clinton Campaign Plots to Convert DNC Scandal into Trump Scandal<\/h2>\n<p>The timing of WikiLeaks\u2019 release of the DNC emails couldn\u2019t have been worse, with delegates poised in Pennsylvania to officially nominate Clinton the Democratic candidate for president. But by Sunday evening, the Clinton campaign had devised a strategy to respond to the scandal: blame it on Trump.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI\u2019m Jake Tapper at the Democratic Convention in beautiful Philadelphia, where the state of our union is exposed emails just published by WikiLeaks showing Democratic Party officials actively discussing possible ways to sabotage Bernie Sanders, even as they were insisting publicly that they were staying neutral during the primaries,\u201d the CNN host opened the video <a href=\"https:\/\/transcripts.cnn.com\/show\/sotu\/date\/2016-07-24\/segment\/01\">segment<\/a> that launched the Russia collusion hoax.<\/p>\n<p>Tapper introduced Clinton\u2019s then-campaign manager Robby Mook, asking him the campaign\u2019s reaction to the leaked emails. After responding that the DNC needed to \u201clook into this and take appropriate action,\u201d Mook pivoted to Trump, premiering the Russia conspiracy theory that would consume the country for the next five years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat\u2019s disturbing to us,\u201d Mook began, is that \u201cexperts are telling us that Russian state actors broke into the DNC, stole these emails, and other experts are now saying that the Russians are releasing these emails for the purpose of actually helping Donald Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Mook continued:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u201cI don\u2019t think it\u2019s coincidental that these emails were released on the eve of our convention here, and that\u2019s disturbing. And I think we need to be concerned about that. I think we need to be concerned that we also saw last week at the Republican Convention that Trump and his allies made changes to the Republican platform to make it more pro-Russian. And we saw him talking about how NATO shouldn\u2019t intervene to defend \u2014 necessarily should intervene to defend our Eastern European allies if they are attacked by Russia. So I think, when you put all this together, it\u2019s a disturbing picture. And I think voters need to reflect on that.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>When Tapper asked Mook for evidence to support his claims, Mook cited unnamed experts and press reports \u201cthat the hackers that got into the DNC are very likely by to be working in coordination with Russia.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf the Russians in fact had these emails, again, I don\u2019t think it\u2019s very coincidental that they are being released at this time to create maximum damage on Hillary Clinton and to help Donald Trump,\u201d Mook reiterated.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is a very, very strong charge that you\u2019re leveling here,\u201d Tapper interjected. \u201cYou\u2019re basically suggesting that Russians hacked into the DNC and now are releasing these files through WikiLeaks to help elect Donald Trump.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Again, Mook deflected to \u201ca number of experts,\u201d saying, \u201cExperts have said that it is the Russians that, in fact, went in and took these emails. And then, if they are the ones who took them, we have to infer that they are the ones then releasing them.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"clinton-campaign-co-opts-the-russia-collusion-hoax\">Clinton Campaign Co-Opts the Russia Collusion Hoax<\/h2>\n<p>While the Clinton campaign introduced the Russia collusion hoax on the eve of the DNC convention to convert the Sanders\u2019 scandal into one about Trump, the strategy also proved a perfect response to the second Clinton scandal \u2014 this one involving Clinton\u2019s illegal use of a private server during her time as secretary of state.<\/p>\n<p>The New York Times first <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2015\/03\/03\/us\/politics\/hillary-clintons-use-of-private-email-at-state-department-raises-flags.html\">broke the news<\/a> on March 2, 2015, that Clinton had used a private email server to communicate as secretary of state under President Barack Obama. Two days later, the Select Committee on Benghazi subpoenaed any Benghazi-related emails contained on the private server. Upon learning of the document request, a technician for Clinton\u2019s computer service provider deleted approximately 30,000 of Clinton\u2019s emails, which she claimed were personal emails.<\/p>\n<p>By May of 2016, the State Department\u2019s Office of the Inspector General had released an 83-page report <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20200710081517\/https:\/www.washingtonpost.com\/apps\/g\/page\/politics\/state-department-report-on-clintons-email-practices\/2039\/\">condemning<\/a> Clinton\u2019s use of the server. Coverage of this report <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2016\/05\/hillary-clinton-email-inspector-general-report-223553\">stressed<\/a> that the State Department had \u201cdeemed more than 2,000 of Clinton\u2019s messages as classified, including\u00a022 that were upgraded to the most sensitive national security classification, \u2018top secret.\u2019\u201d At the time, the media also noted that \u201cthe FBI is still probing whether any laws were broken laws by putting classified information at risk \u2014 or whether her staff improperly sent sensitive information knowing it wasn\u2019t on a classified system.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The Clinton campaign tried to downplay the FBI\u2019s involvement in the private-server scandal by framing it as \u201ca security inquiry,\u201d but in response to questions about that characterization, then-FBI Director James Comey <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2016\/05\/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-fbi-james-comey-223071\">said<\/a> he was \u201cnot familiar with the term \u2018security inquiry,\u2019\u201d stressing \u201cthe word\u00a0investigation\u201d is \u201cin our name.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re conducting an investigation. \u2026 That\u2019s what we do. That\u2019s probably all I can say about it,\u201d Comey concluded.<\/p>\n<p>At a press conference two months later, on July 5, 2016, Comey <a href=\"https:\/\/www.politico.com\/story\/2016\/05\/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-fbi-james-comey-223071\">announced<\/a> that the FBI had completed its investigation and that while Clinton\u2019s handling of classified information was \u201cextremely careless,\u201d he had referred the matter to the Department of Justice with a recommendation that no charges be filed. Comey took this same position when he testified before Congress, there calling Clinton\u2019s conduct related to the server \u201csloppy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Although Comey publicly declared the investigation into Clinton\u2019s private server closed, when Democrats gathered for their convention in Philadelphia, her campaign continued to face questions about the scandal, with Tapper drilling Mook about Comey\u2019s conclusion that Clinton\u2019s use of the private server had been \u201csloppy.\u201d Mook quickly changed the conversation to \u201cthis election\u201d and what \u201cvoters are looking for and asking about in this election.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Two days later, though, the media took Mook\u2019s lead and converted the Clinton server scandal into a scandal about Trump. A July 26, 2016, opinion <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usatoday.com\/story\/opinion\/2016\/07\/25\/wikileaks-emails-dnc-putin-bernie-hillary-trump-blackmail-guccifer-russian-column\/87524386\/\">article<\/a> for USA Today, titled \u201cPutin for President 2016,\u201d opened with an acknowledgment that Clinton\u2019s \u201csecret private-server emails are almost certainly already in the hands of Russian intelligence,\u201d and concluded, \u201cPutin can embarrass Hillary \u2014 or worse \u2014 whenever he wants.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re getting a small foretaste of that in the release of hacked\u00a0Democratic National Committee\u00a0emails,\u201d the piece continued, speaking of the DNC officials engaged in \u201cdirty tricks aimed at Bernie Sanders\u201d and \u201cgetting awfully chummy with some allegedly professional journalists.\u201d And with that, the media converted Clinton\u2019s use of a private server to a story about Trump and Russia\u2019s supposed backing of his candidacy.<\/p>\n<p>From then on, the Clinton campaign and a complicit media framed any concern over her use of a home-brew server and any questions about the details buried in the DNC emails not as a scandal about Clinton but as a conspiracy between Trump and Vladimir Putin.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"clinton-campaign-pays-for-and-peddles-fake-trump-russia-evidence\">Clinton Campaign Pays for and Peddles Fake Trump-Russia Evidence<\/h2>\n<p>By the last week of July 2016, the Russia collusion diversion controlled the narrative, and Democrats repurposed every question about the DNC hack or the sever scandal as an opportunity to peddle it.<\/p>\n<p>Similarly, Clinton\u2019s team converted every comment by Trump, even tangentially related to Russia, as further evidence of a conspiracy. Likewise, her campaign framed every Russia connection, past or present, between Trump, his business, his family, or members of his campaign as concrete proof of collusion.<\/p>\n<p>While the Clinton campaign had not gone public with the Russia-collusion angle until July 24, 2016, when Mook marketed that theme on CNN, it had been collecting supposed intel on Trump\u2019s connections to Russia for some time.<\/p>\n<p>In the first half of 2016, Perkins Coie, the law firm that represented the Clinton campaign, had hired private investigation firm Fusion GPS to collect opposition research on Trump. In turn, Fusion GPS hired Christopher Steele in May or June of 2016 to focus on Trump\u2019s connections to Russia, and by June 20, 2016, Steele had drafted the first of some 17 memoranda that would eventually compose what is now known colloquially as the Steele dossier.<\/p>\n<p>Steele shared his initial memorandum \u2014 which contained claims that the Kremlin had blackmail material on Trump, including the salacious and false \u201cgolden showers\u201d accusation \u2014 with an FBI contact on July 5, 2016. Over the next six months, Steele continued to craft the dossier, relying primarily on an unnamed \u201cPrimary Sub-Source,\u201d now known to be Russian national Igor Danchenko.<\/p>\n<p>Danchenko, who has since been indicted for lying to the FBI, is also alleged to have invented some of the supposed intel contained in the dossier. Danchenko also fed Steele false information about the Trump campaign, which a Clinton booster had invented and then passed on to Danchenko.<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line some five-plus years later is that the dossier consisted of a few publicly known accurate facts and a litany of false claims concocted by Danchenko and others and then sold by Steele and the Clinton campaign as the work of a former MI6 Russian expert.<\/p>\n<p>The Steele dossier represented but one aspect of the invented evidence of collusion. The Clinton campaign also paid Perkins Coie lawyer Michael Sussmann for his work in crafting, with the assistance of various tech experts, a report purporting to show that the Trump organization had established a secret-communication network with the powerful Russian Alfa Bank.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, computer scientists who had worked with the Clinton campaign\u2019s attorney \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2022\/02\/14\/special-counsel-democrats-framed-and-spied-on-trump-while-he-was-president\/\">surveilled<\/a> the internet traffic at Trump Tower, at his New York City apartment building, and later at the executive office of the president of the United States, then fed disinformation about that traffic to intelligence agencies hoping to frame Trump as a Russia-connected stooge.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As Steele, Fusion GPS, and other Clinton backers created fraudulent reports, they, along with the Clinton campaign and her lawyers, exploited their relationships with reporters and government officials.<\/p>\n<p>Steele and\/or Fusion GPS\u2019s founder Glenn Simpson shared Steele\u2019s memoranda with various news outlets. They also fed the supposed intel to members of the law enforcement and intelligence communities, including representatives in the Departments of Justice and State. After the FBI fired Steele as a source because he had spoken with the media, it arranged for him to continue providing his reports to the FBI by having him meet with a Justice Department attorney instead.<\/p>\n<p>This dual-prong approach resulted in a public saturated with circular confirmation of Trump-Russia collusion. Outlets parroted the false details fed to reporters by Steele and then referenced the FBI\u2019s investigations into the same matters to create the appearance that the investigations confirmed the validity of the leaks. Simultaneously, the FBI used media reports as a basis to confirm Steele\u2019s supposed intel.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"obama-admin-spies-on-trump-campaign-under-knowingly-false-pretenses\">Obama Admin Spies on Trump Campaign Under Knowingly False Pretenses<\/h2>\n<p>On July 31, 2016, the Obama administration and the FBI launched an investigation into the Trump campaign, branded \u201cCrossfire Hurricane.\u201d While to this day, the FBI maintains it opened Crossfire Hurricane after U.S. officials learned from an Australian diplomat that young Trump adviser George Papadopoulos had bragged \u201cthat the Russians had dirt on Hillary Clinton,\u201d former Attorney General William Barr and Special Counsel John Durham have both questioned that account.<\/p>\n<p>The Obama administration\u2019s targeting of the opposition party\u2019s presidential campaign came just as the Clinton campaign began publicly pushing the narrative that Trump was colluding with Russia to interfere in the 2016 presidential election. And the opening of Crossfire Hurricane came three days after then-CIA Director John Brennan <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/dni-brennan-notes-cia-memo-clinton\">briefed<\/a> President Barack Obama and other senior national security officials on intelligence alleging \u201cthat U.S. Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton had approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal against U.S. Presidential candidate Donald Trump by tying him to Putin and the Russians\u2019 hacking of the Democratic National Committee.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Brennan\u2019s briefing also noted that intelligence agencies had obtained intel indicating that on July 26, 2016, Clinton approved \u201ca proposal from one of her foreign policy advisors to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by Russian security services.\u201d In early September 2016, a U.S. intelligence official would forward an investigative referral to the FBI regarding \u201cClinton\u2019s approval of a plan\u201d about \u201cTrump and Russian hackers hampering U.S. elections as a means of distracting the public from her use of a private mail server.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Even with this foreknowledge of the Clinton campaign\u2019s plot to frame Trump, and even while watching the execution of the plan in real time, the FBI moved forward with Crossfire Hurricane. The FBI would also later use Steele\u2019s fraudulent reporting to obtain four court orders from the secret FISA court to surveil a former Trump campaign volunteer named Carter Page.<\/p>\n<p>While Page was no longer connected to the campaign when the FBI obtained the FISA surveillance orders, the warrant allowed the FBI to access prior correspondence between Page and the Trump campaign, as well as any communications Page continued to have with individual campaign members. Further, while FISA proceedings are secret, media leaks about the targeting of Page gave the press more material to further the Russia-collusion spin.<\/p>\n<p>Accessing private campaign emails, however, represented but one aspect of the spying that took place under the auspices of Crossfire Hurricane. The FBI also tasked a Confidential Human Source (CHS) with <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/28\/ig-report-proves-obama-administration-spied-on-trump-campaign-big-time\/\">questioning<\/a> Page, and that CHS \u201csought specific details from Page related to the Trump campaign, and fed Page unsolicited (and potentially illegal) advice concerning campaign strategy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The FBI used the same CHS to question Sam Clovis, a senior member of the Trump campaign. In a recorded conversation, the CHS posed several questions about sensitive campaign strategies and concerns.<\/p>\n<p>The spying on Trump\u2019s campaign also included the FBI using a private Trump security briefing as a possible opportunity to collect information for the investigation.<\/p>\n<h2 id=\"investigation-into-trump-continues-during-his-administration\">Investigation into Trump Continues During His Administration<\/h2>\n<p>Significantly, Crossfire Hurricane did not end with the 2016 election. Instead, after Trump defeated Clinton, the investigation continued and so did the leaks, with Comey giving Trump a briefing on the Steele dossier \u2014 a fact then leaked to give CNN a pretext to report on the Steele dossier.<\/p>\n<p>After Trump\u2019s inauguration, the FBI hatched a plot to oust the president\u2019s national security adviser, again with the help of the media. Comey also began writing secret memoranda of conversations he had with now-President Trump. And after Trump fired Comey, the latter leaked those memoranda to the media through a law professor friend, triggering the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller.<\/p>\n<p>Mueller continued Crossfire Hurricane, retaining many of the original FBI agents. The country would later learn that many of those investigating the Trump campaign held rabid anti-Trump sentiments, when text messages <a href=\"https:\/\/nypost.com\/2018\/06\/14\/texts-reveal-disgraced-fbi-agent-told-lover-well-stop-trump\/\">exchanged<\/a> by members of the Crossfire Hurricane team were made public. Other text messages went missing when several agents wiped their cell phones.<\/p>\n<p>The public learned of even more malfeasance by the Crossfire Hurricane team when the DOJ\u2019s Office of the Inspector General released a 400-plus-page report <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/01\/06\/inspector-general-report-shows-special-counsel-replicated-fbi-abuses\/\">concluding<\/a> that the DOJ included 17 significant inaccuracies and omissions in the FISA application and renewals related to Carter Page.<\/p>\n<p>These problems and others led then-AG William Barr to appoint U.S. Attorney John Durham to lead an investigation into Crossfire Hurricane, later naming him a special prosecutor.<\/p>\n<p>As part of his investigation, Durham revealed additional misconduct in Crossfire Hurricane when he obtained a guilty plea from a former FBI attorney for altering an email related to the FISA case against Page.<\/p>\n<p>Durham\u2019s team also obtained a <a href=\"https:\/\/thefederalist.com\/2020\/11\/30\/trumps-michael-flynn-pardon-is-only-the-beginning-of-the-justice-this-nation-deserves\/\">statement<\/a> from another FBI agent involved in the investigation named William Barnett. Barnett told DOJ investigators that there was never any basis for the bizarre \u201ccollusion\u201d theory and that Mueller\u2019s office pushed prosecutions with a \u201cget Trump\u201d mentality. But even then, Mueller found no evidence of Trump colluding with Russia.<\/p>\n<p>There are thousands more details already known and many more players involved \u2014 and that\u2019s before whatever else Durham may reveal. But just these basics provide all the information you need to understand SpyGate \u2014 and to see why it far surpasses the Watergate scandal.<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator\" \/>\n<p>\n  Margot Cleveland is a senior contributor to The Federalist. She is also a contributor to National Review Online, the Washington Examiner, Aleteia, and Townhall.com, and has been published in the Wall Street Journal and USA Today. <\/p>\n<p>Cleveland is a lawyer and a graduate of the Notre Dame Law School, where she earned the Hoynes Prize\u2014the law school\u2019s highest honor. She later served for nearly 25 years as a permanent law clerk for a federal appellate judge on the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. Cleveland is a former full-time university faculty member and now teaches as an adjunct from time to time. <\/p>\n<p>As a stay-at-home homeschooling mom of a young son with cystic fibrosis, Cleveland frequently writes on cultural issues related to parenting and special-needs children. Cleveland is on Twitter at @ProfMJCleveland. The views expressed here are those of Cleveland in her private capacity.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As Special Counsel John Durham continues to expose more details of the \u201cSpyGate\u201d or \u201cRussia collusion\u201d scandal, it can be difficult for any apolitical, non-news-junkie member of the public to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2315279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1387601","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1387601","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1387601"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1387601\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2315279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1387601"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1387601"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1387601"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}