{"id":1068896,"date":"2021-11-30T14:29:58","date_gmt":"2021-11-30T19:29:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1068896"},"modified":"2021-11-30T14:30:06","modified_gmt":"2021-11-30T19:30:06","slug":"dem-senator-warns-of-revolution-if-roe-overturned-in-case-now-before-scotus","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/dem-senator-warns-of-revolution-if-roe-overturned-in-case-now-before-scotus\/","title":{"rendered":"Dem Senator Warns Of \u2018Revolution\u2019 If Roe Overturned In Case Now Before SCOTUS"},"content":{"rendered":"<aside class=\"mashsb-container mashsb-main mashsb-stretched\"><div class=\"mashsb-box\"><div class=\"mashsb-count mash-medium\" style=\"&quot;\"><div class=\"counts mashsbcount\">26<\/div><span class=\"mashsb-sharetext\">SHARES<\/span><\/div><div class=\"mashsb-buttons\"><a class=\"mashicon-facebook mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.conservativenewsdaily.net%2Fbreaking-news%2Fdem-senator-warns-of-revolution-if-roe-overturned-in-case-now-before-scotus%2F\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Facebook<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-twitter mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/intent\/tweet?text=&amp;url=https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/?p=1068896&amp;via=ConservNewsDly\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Twitter<\/span><\/a><a class=\"mashicon-subscribe mash-medium mash-nomargin mashsb-noshadow\" href=\"#\" target=\"_top\" rel=\"nofollow\"><span class=\"icon\"><\/span><span class=\"text\">Subscribe<\/span><\/a><div class=\"onoffswitch2 mash-medium mashsb-noshadow\" style=\"display:none\"><\/div><\/div>\n            <\/div>\n                <div style=\"clear:both\"><\/div><\/aside>\n            <!-- Share buttons by mashshare.net - Version: 4.0.47--><p>This week, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in a blockbuster case, <em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health<\/em>, that could lead to the overturning of the infamous <em>Roe V. Wade<\/em> decision of 1973 that permitted abortion.<\/p>\n<p>Democrat Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), speaking at &nbsp;a virtual event on Monday featuring New Hampshire\u2019s entire House and Senate delegation, condemned any attempt to overturn Roe, threatening that to do so would cause a \u201crevolution.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis infringement on women\u2019s rights, on our privacy, on the attempt to have state control of our personal health, really is what we would see in an authoritarian state,\u201d she said pompously. \u201cIt\u2019s not what we would expect in New Hampshire. I think if you want to see a revolution, go ahead, outlaw <em>Roe v. Wade<\/em> and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people. Because I think that will not be acceptable to young women or young men.\u201d<\/p>\n<p lang=\"en\" dir=\"ltr\">.<a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/SenatorShaheen?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">@SenatorShaheen<\/a> on new abortion restrictions going into effect in N.H. &amp; the upcoming Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization case: &#8220;I think if you want to see a revolution, go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is\u2026&#8221; <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/NHPolitics?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#NHPolitics<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/hashtag\/WMUR?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">#WMUR<\/a> <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/O7weoVuOSk\">pic.twitter.com\/O7weoVuOSk<\/a><\/p>\n<p>\u2014 Adam Sexton (@AdamSextonWMUR) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/AdamSextonWMUR\/status\/1465355304221257735?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">November 29, 2021<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Shaheen issued a statement in which she said, \u201cI\u2019ve lived the consequences of the pre-Roe era \u2014 I had friends in college who were forced to seek dangerous back alley abortions because women across the country were denied access to critical family planning services. We cannot allow Republican lawmakers to turn back the clock on women\u2019s reproductive health and rights, which is precisely what the Mississippi case seeks to do. It is time to sound the alarm. Roe v. Wade&nbsp;isn\u2019t just a decision that impacts women, their health and their financial security \u2013 it also impacts generations of families,\u201d according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/dem-senator-revolution-roe-wade-overturned\">Fox News<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIn&nbsp;Dobbs, the court considers the constitutionality of a Mississippi law&nbsp;that limits abortions after 15 weeks of gestation with exceptions for health emergencies and fetal abnormalities,\u201d Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network,&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/opinion\/supreme-court-mississippi-abortion-case-carrie-severino\">noted<\/a>. \u201cThe statute conflicts with the court\u2019s controlling abortion cases,&nbsp;<em>Roe<\/em><em>&nbsp;<\/em>and&nbsp;<em>Planned Parenthood v. Casey<\/em>, which held that laws may not pose an undue burden on abortion prior to viability.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201c<em>Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization<\/em>&nbsp;challenges the constitutionality of a Mississippi statute that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, well before viability. The Supreme Court signaled that it will focus squarely on&nbsp;<em>Roe<\/em>\u2019s \u2018essential holding\u2019&nbsp;by agreeing to decide whether all bans on elective abortion before viability are unconstitutional,\u201d The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.heritage.org\/the-constitution\/report\/dobbs-v-jackson-womens-health-organization-opportunity-correct-grave-error\">Heritage Foundation<\/a> explains, adding:<\/p>\n<p><em>Two features of the law are central to this litigation. First, it is a ban, rather than a regulation, on the performance of abortions. Second, this ban operates well before viability,&nbsp;which the Supreme Court established in&nbsp;Roe, and reaffirmed in&nbsp;Casey, is the \u201ccritical fact.\u201d&nbsp;The Court might find it necessary, in the context of a constitutional challenge to such a pre-viability ban, to first determine whether viability, and therefore&nbsp;Roe\u2019s \u201ccentral principle\u201d&nbsp;itself, remains legitimate.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court announced they would grant certiorari to the case, although&nbsp;their review would only consider the question of whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional. <em>\u201c<\/em>Since the Court, in both Roe and Casey, effectively answered this question in the affirmative, agreeing to revisit this question suggests that the Court will reconsider the basic validity of these precedents,<em>\u201d &nbsp;<\/em>The Heritage Foundation noted.<\/p>\n<p><em>The Daily Wire is one of America\u2019s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a <\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.dailywire.com\/subscribe\"><em>member<\/em><\/a><em>.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>This week, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in a blockbuster case, Dobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health, that could lead to the overturning of the infamous Roe V. Wade decision of 1973 that permitted abortion.Democrat Senator Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH), speaking at \u00a0a virtual event on Monday featuring New Hampshire\u2019s entire House and Senate delegation, condemned any attempt to overturn Roe, threatening that to do so would cause a \u201crevolution.\u201d\u201cThis infringement on women\u2019s rights, on our privacy, on the attempt to have state control of our personal health, really is what we would see in an authoritarian state,\u201d she said pompously. \u201cIt\u2019s not what we would expect in New Hampshire. I think if you want to see a revolution, go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is of the public, particularly young people. Because I think that will not be acceptable to young women or young men.\u201d.@SenatorShaheen on new abortion restrictions going into effect in N.H. &#038; the upcoming Dobbs v. Jackson Women&#8217;s Health Organization case: &#8220;I think if you want to see a revolution, go ahead, outlaw Roe v. Wade and see what the response is\u2026&#8221; #NHPolitics #WMUR pic.twitter.com\/O7weoVuOSk\u2014 Adam Sexton (@AdamSextonWMUR) November 29, 2021Shaheen issued a statement in which she said, \u201cI\u2019ve lived the consequences of the pre-Roe era \u2014 I had friends in college who were forced to seek dangerous back alley abortions because women across the country were denied access to critical family planning services. We cannot allow Republican lawmakers to turn back the clock on women\u2019s reproductive health and rights, which is precisely what the Mississippi case seeks to do. It is time to sound the alarm. Roe v. Wade\u00a0isn\u2019t just a decision that impacts women, their health and their financial security \u2013 it also impacts generations of families,\u201d according to Fox News.\u201cIn\u00a0Dobbs, the court considers the constitutionality of a Mississippi law\u00a0that limits abortions after 15 weeks of gestation with exceptions for health emergencies and fetal abnormalities,\u201d Carrie Severino, president of the Judicial Crisis Network,\u00a0noted. \u201cThe statute conflicts with the court\u2019s controlling abortion cases,\u00a0Roe\u00a0and\u00a0Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which held that laws may not pose an undue burden on abortion prior to viability.\u201d\u201cDobbs v. Jackson Women\u2019s Health Organization\u00a0challenges the constitutionality of a Mississippi statute that bans most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy, well before viability. The Supreme Court signaled that it will focus squarely on\u00a0Roe\u2019s \u2018essential holding\u2019\u00a0by agreeing to decide whether all bans on elective abortion before viability are unconstitutional,\u201d The Heritage Foundation explains, adding:Two features of the law are central to this litigation. First, it is a ban, rather than a regulation, on the performance of abortions. Second, this ban operates well before viability,\u00a0which the Supreme Court established in\u00a0Roe, and reaffirmed in\u00a0Casey, is the \u201ccritical fact.\u201d\u00a0The Court might find it necessary, in the context of a constitutional challenge to such a pre-viability ban, to first determine whether viability, and therefore\u00a0Roe\u2019s \u201ccentral principle\u201d\u00a0itself, remains legitimate.On May 17, 2021, the Supreme Court announced they would grant certiorari to the case, although\u00a0their review would only consider the question of whether all pre-viability prohibitions on elective abortions are unconstitutional. \u201cSince the Court, in both Roe and Casey, effectively answered this question in the affirmative, agreeing to revisit this question suggests that the Court will reconsider the basic validity of these precedents,\u201d \u00a0The Heritage Foundation noted.The Daily Wire is one of America\u2019s fastest-growing conservative media companies and counter-cultural outlets for news, opinion, and entertainment. Get inside access to The Daily Wire by becoming a member.\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":60,"featured_media":2315279,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mo_disable_npp":"","fifu_image_url":"","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1068896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1068896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/60"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1068896"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1068896\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2315279"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1068896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1068896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.conservativenewsdaily.net\/breaking-news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1068896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}