Witness testifying about border has never been there
Witness Testifying Before Congress Raises Concerns About Border Crisis
A witness testifying before Congress on Wednesday about the border crisis acknowledged he’d never been to the border, resulting in U.S. Rep. Andy Biggs, R-Arizona, raising questions and concerns about the testimony.
Speaking before members of the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Accountability on Wednesday, David Bier, associate director of Immigration Studies at the Washington, D.C.-based libertarian Cato Institute, blamed failed immigration policies on the Trump administration.
“In January 2017, this flawed and already failing system underwent a years-long intentional sabotage campaign unlike anything witnessed in the history of modern immigration law,” Bier, a Democrat, said. From January 2017 to January 2021, nearly 500 policies – large and small – were implemented to disrupt the legal immigration system’s normal operations.”
He also said, “America’s immigration laws and regulations were already far too restrictive, offering little to no viable alternative to illegal immigration for most immigrants seeking entry to the United States.”
Advocating for More Foreign Nationals to Fill Open Jobs
Bier spoke ahead of the U.S. House Homeland Security Committee holding a hearing Thursday on the consequences of Department of Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas’ border policies.
Bier advocated for more foreign nationals to enter the U.S. to fill open jobs.
“From January 2021 to May 2023, the United States consistently averaged 10.5 million job openings per month,” he said. “Every month since January 2021 has seen more job openings than any previous month.”
Biggs asked Bier if he knew how many known, suspected terrorists (KSTs) entered the U.S. since President Joe Biden took office.
“A couple of hundred,” he replied.
Biggs replied, “No, that’s the number that we’ve actually interdicted. How many [terrorists] have come in? Do you know?”
“I know how many Border Patrol has arrested,” Bier replied. Biggs again repeated his question, saying he didn’t know how many had come in. Bier said he didn’t know either but “wanted Border Patrol [agents] to go after terrorists. If people came into the country legally, we’d have a more secure border.”
In fiscal 2023 alone, 736 KSTs were apprehended at U.S. borders, the highest number in U.S. history. The majority, 66%, were apprehended at the northern border, The Center Square first reported.
Former Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan, who also testified Wednesday, said the number of KSTs who weren’t caught who illegally entered the U.S. “should frighten everyone.” He also said current policies “have created the greatest national security crisis since 9/11.”
Biggs asked Bier if he’d “ever been to the border and watched the current process” of how Border Patrol agents issue parole papers to foreign nationals after they illegally enter the country.
“I’ve seen it on video,” he replied.
“You’ve not been down there?” Biggs asked.
“I’ve not personally witnessed it,” Bier replied.
Bier also repeated a previously debunked claim that 90% of fentanyl has been seized at ports of entry. Border Patrol chiefs and law enforcement officials have contradicted that claim, saying the majority of fentanyl is being trafficked between ports of entry and agents are needed in the field to seize it. Texas law enforcement officers, who don’t work at ports of entry, have seized more than 453 million lethal doses of fentanyl, enough to kill more than everyone in the U.S. and Mexico, according to data from Gov. Greg Abbott’s office.
Former U.S. Border Patrol Chief Raul Ortiz testified last year that Border Patrol agents had been instructed to release illegal foreign nationals en masse into the U.S. Rio Grande Valley Sector. Border Patrol Chief Gloria Chavez told officials the same thing. Mayorkas changed and implemented new parole policies, prompting multiple lawsuits, including one led by Florida. In one Florida case, a federal judge ruled Mayorkas’ policies were illegal and “the evidence establishes that Defendants [including Secretary Mayorkas] have effectively turned the Southwest Border into a meaningless line in the sand” and that Mayorkas’ “actions were akin to posting a flashing ‘Come In, We’re Open’ sign on the southern border.”
When asked about the parole process, Homan explained that illegal foreign nationals get work authorization papers. Biggs asked Bier, “How many people who were paroled into the country are working?” Bier said he didn’t know.
“Nobody knows,” Biggs said. “You want to know why? We don’t keep in contact with them. We have no idea where they went. We’ve taken them and distributed them throughout the country and we don’t know where they are or what they are doing.”
How does Rep. Biggs challenge Bier’s claim about the number of known terrorists who have entered the country since President Biden took office
Ey cross the border illegally. Bier admitted that he had never been to the border and therefore could not provide firsthand knowledge of the process.
This admission raised concerns among lawmakers, particularly Rep. Biggs, who questioned the credibility of Bier’s testimony. Without firsthand experience or knowledge of the situation at the border, Biggs argued that Bier’s statements lacked credibility and failed to address the real issues at hand.
Bier’s testimony focused on blaming the Trump administration for the failures of the immigration system. He argued that the Trump administration intentionally sabotaged the system, resulting in a flawed and failing system. Additionally, he claimed that immigration laws and regulations in the United States were already too restrictive, offering few alternatives to illegal immigration.
However, Rep. Biggs challenged these claims, questioning the impact of the policies implemented by the Trump administration and asking for evidence to support Bier’s arguments. Biggs also emphasized the importance of national security and questioned Bier on the number of known, suspected terrorists that had entered the country since President Biden took office.
Bier’s response that only a couple hundred terrorists had entered raised further concerns among lawmakers. Biggs argued that Bier didn’t have the correct information and pressed him on the number of terrorists who had actually entered the country. The lack of clarity and knowledge on this crucial issue further undermined Bier’s credibility.
Former Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director Tom Homan, who also testified before Congress, supported Biggs’ concerns about national security. Homan emphasized the number of known, suspected terrorists who had successfully entered the country without being apprehended, calling it a significant national security crisis.
In addition to the national security concerns, Bier advocated for more foreign nationals to enter the country to fill job openings. He highlighted the consistently high number of job openings and argued that allowing more foreign nationals to enter would benefit the economy. However, without addressing the potential impact on job opportunities for American citizens, this argument remains incomplete.
The hearing shed light on the ongoing border crisis and the concerns surrounding immigration policies. The lack of firsthand experience and knowledge from witnesses like Bier raised doubts about the accuracy and credibility of their testimony. Lawmakers emphasized the need for accurate information and effective policies to address the border crisis and ensure national security. The hearing highlighted the complexity of the issue and the importance of a comprehensive and balanced approach to immigration.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
