Wisconsin sports wagering bill pulled from Assembly calendar Wednesday
The Wisconsin online sports wagering bill was removed from the Assembly’s calendar and will not be voted on during the current session, according to Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer. The bill’s delay reportedly followed objections from eight Republican Assembly members, reducing the bill’s support below the required threshold of 50 votes from the majority party. neubauer expressed her support for Assembly Bill 601, which aims to return control of online sports betting to Wisconsin’s tribal nations. The proposal would amend the state’s definition of “bet” to allow mobile sports wagering by tribes, provided bettors are in Wisconsin and servers are on tribal land.This approach respects tribal sovereignty, protects consumers, and ensures revenue sharing between the 11 recognized tribes and the state. Supporters argue this is necessary to prevent unregulated national prediction markets, which are currently growing but not subject to state taxation or oversight.The bill still requires approval from the Wisconsin Senate and Governor Tony Evers, who has indicated support for gaming initiatives that involve the tribes.
Wisconsin sports wagering bill pulled from Assembly calendar Wednesday
(The Center Square) – Wisconsin’s online sports wagering bill won’t be voted on during the session on Wednesday, Assembly Minority Leader Greta Neubauer (D-Racine) said.
Neubauer said she wasn’t certain yet the reason it was pulled, but conservative radio host Dan O’Donnell reported the move came after eight Assembly Republicans objected to the bill, putting the total supporters under 50, which he said is a long-standing rule that 50 members of the majority party must support a bill in order for it to be put on the calendar.
Neubauer, meanwhile, said she would support Assembly Bill 601.
“We know that our tribes in Wisconsin have the right to control gaming in our state, and that’s not happening with online sports betting,” Neubauer said. “I do hope that we pass a bill that puts control of that industry back in their hands.”
The move comes after Rep. Tyler August (R-Walworth) sent a memo to fellow lawmakers earlier in the week urging the bill’s passage, as prediction markets – similar to sports wagering but allowed through federal oversight – are available across the country.
“If we leave a gray area in state law, national prediction platforms will fill it without our compact framework, Wisconsin oversight, or Wisconsin consumer safeguards,” August wrote. “AB 601 does the opposite: it channels activity into a regulated, Wisconsin-based, compacted environment with clear jurisdiction and accountability. This protects consumers, respects tribal sovereignty, and keeps revenue tied to Wisconsin operations rather than flowing to unaligned national apps.”
The proposal would also need to be approved by the Senate and signed by Gov. Tony Evers, who has indicated he would approve of a bill keeping gaming with the tribes.
The proposal would change the state’s definition of “bet” to allow the tribes to offer mobile sports wagering as long as the bettor is in Wisconsin and the sportsbook servers are on tribal land, an amendment to current compacts allowing for casino gambling and sports wagering on tribal lands despite the state’s ban on betting.
WHY DEMOCRATS’ HARD-FOUGHT REDISTRICTING WINS MAY ALL BE FOR NAUGHT
Prediction markets, however, have taken off this fall during football season with offerings very similar to sportsbooks, where operators such as Kalshi and Polymarket offer what they call event contracts, where users pick a side in a matchup or election and put their money behind that side against other users.
States tax regulated sportsbooks, but are not able to tax the prediction markets. In Wisconsin’s case, the bill would pave the way for tribal online sports wagering that is subject to revenue-sharing pacts between the 11 recognized tribes and the state.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
