The federalist

WI GOP Introduces Bills to Exit ERIC, Prohibit ‘Zuckbucks’ in Polls.

Wisconsin Takes⁣ Steps to Secure Elections

Wisconsin is making progress in safeguarding its elections with new measures introduced by Republican legislators. These measures aim to prohibit private funding of elections and remove‍ the state ‍from the​ leftist-controlled ⁣voter-roll​ “maintenance” group known⁣ as⁤ ERIC.

One of the ‍amendment’s co-sponsors, GOP Rep. ‍Ty ⁤Bodden, expressed his support,‌ stating, “We all know Zuckerbucks played a terrible role in the 2020 election and⁢ that must never be⁤ allowed to happen⁢ again.”

In the past, bills attempting‌ to restrict private money ⁢in ​Wisconsin ⁣elections were‌ vetoed by Democrat Gov.‌ Tony ‌Evers. However, by ⁣using the constitutional ‌amendment process, Republicans can bypass⁣ Evers’ opposition and let the voters have ‌the ⁢final‌ say.

The‍ proposed amendment​ seeks to ‌curb interference from private actors in the election ⁤process. ​During the‍ 2020 election, nonprofits like the Center for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL) and the Center for Election Innovation and Research‌ (CEIR) received hundreds ​of millions of dollars‌ from Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg. These “Zuckbucks” were used to change election protocols and heavily ⁢favored Democrat-majority counties.

Wisconsin received approximately $10.1 million in ⁢”Zuckbucks” from​ CTCL ‌during the ‌2020 contest, with the majority going to Democrat-won cities. The ‍constitutional amendment aims to put an end to this practice⁤ and prevent the perversion of the elections process.

Withdrawing Wisconsin‍ From ERIC

In addition‍ to the “Zuckbucks” ban,⁤ another Republican-backed ​measure seeks to withdraw Wisconsin from ERIC. ERIC, also known as the Electronic​ Registration Information Center,‍ is a voter-roll management organization that prioritizes registering new voters ​over cleaning ⁣up existing voter ⁢rolls.

The legislation introduced by GOP Rep. Ty Bodden​ and Sen. ‍Duey ​Stroebel aims to address concerns about ⁣voter data⁢ security and lack of ⁤transparency. ERIC’s relationship with CEIR, a ⁤left-wing nonprofit involved in the⁣ distribution of “Zuckbucks,” further raises concerns about partisan⁢ influence in voter registration​ outreach.

Several Republican election‍ officials have​ already withdrawn their ‌states ​from ERIC and formed separate data-sharing pacts to manage voter rolls more effectively. This growing list includes Alabama, Virginia, Ohio, and others.

How does disassociating from ERIC ⁤contribute to ensuring a fair and unbiased voter-roll ‍maintenance system in ⁣Wisconsin?

Distorting the integrity of our elections. It’s about time we put an end to the influence of private money and ensure that our elections are fair and transparent.”

The amendment aims to address concerns about the influence of private funding on elections. In the past, wealthy ⁢individuals and organizations ⁣have poured money into ⁢campaigns, leading⁤ to an unequal playing field where candidates with⁢ more financial resources have an advantage over others.‍ By prohibiting private funding, Wisconsin seeks ⁢to level​ the playing ‌field and​ ensure that the voice of every citizen is heard, regardless of their financial backing.

Additionally, the amendment seeks to remove the state from the leftist-controlled voter-roll maintenance group known as ERIC. This move comes in response to concerns about the objectivity and fairness of the group’s ‍actions. By disassociating from ERIC, Wisconsin hopes to establish its own independent system for voter-roll maintenance, free ⁣from any perceived biases⁤ or external influences.

These measures have​ garnered support from Republican legislators who believe that securing⁢ elections is crucial for the functioning of ‌democracy. They argue that without proper safeguards in place,⁤ there is a risk of voter fraud and ‍manipulation which can undermine the legitimacy of election results. By taking these steps, Wisconsin aims to restore faith and ⁣trust in ⁣the electoral process.

However, critics of these measures ‌argue that ⁣they​ are motivated by partisan interests rather than genuine concerns about election security. They⁢ claim ⁤that ⁣by targeting private funding, Republicans are ​attempting to limit ‍the‌ resources available to Democratic candidates and favor their own​ party. Similarly, ⁢they argue that removing Wisconsin ​from ERIC is a political‍ move designed to​ gain more​ control over the state’s voter rolls.

Despite the controversy surrounding⁤ these measures, it is⁢ clear that Wisconsin is taking steps to secure its elections. The debate over election security is a complex and contentious one, with valid arguments on both sides. Ultimately, the goal should be to ensure that ⁢every​ eligible citizen has the⁢ opportunity to vote and that their vote counts. Finding the right balance between election integrity and accessibility is crucial for the functioning of a democratic society.

It remains to be seen ⁤how these measures will be implemented‍ and their impact on future elections in Wisconsin. It is important for all ⁤stakeholders⁢ to engage in open and constructive dialogue to address concerns and find common ground. Ultimately, the strength of‍ Wisconsin’s democracy depends on the fairness and transparency of its electoral process.

As other states grapple with similar​ challenges, they can look to Wisconsin as an ‍example ⁢of taking proactive steps to ‍secure elections. The lessons learned from this experience can help shape ⁣future policies and practices, ensuring that the democratic process ‍remains strong and resilient.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker