Gender doctors are like modern lobotomists
How will history judge the ideologically motivated doctors who are surgically mutilating their gender-confused, often mentally disturbed juvenile patients, as well as feeding them hormones and other drugs with dangerous, long-term, deleterious effects?
Frankly, they deserve to go down in history with the doctors who implemented the infamous Tuskegee Experiment. Or the ones who “treated” mental illness and other medical problems with lobotomies, purveyors of what ultimately became “one of the most criticized medical procedures in history.”
History repeating itself
History seems to be repeating itself within the medical profession, which — when it comes to gender politics — is being driven by political correctness and critical gender theory, instead of biology and science. Doctors are using harmful, experimental, and permanently disfiguring “medical” procedures instead of trying to treat the underlying mental health conditions of their patients, something that leads to an increased risk of suicide and medical complications.
Why? Perhaps because they’re earning a fortune doing it: $2.1 billion in 2022.
These physicians need a remedial American history lesson in some of the most shameful and damaging episodes of misdiagnosis and mistreatment by their profession’s ethically challenged predecessors.
The Tuskegee Experiment and lobotomies
The Tuskegee Experiment, officially known as the “Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male,” was a heinous medical project started in 1932 at the Tuskegee Institute by the U.S. Public Health Service that didn’t end until 1972. It involved 600 black men, 399 of whom had syphilis, a progressive, deadly disease. In order to “study” the long-term effects of the disease, these men were enticed to participate with free medical exams, meals, and burial insurance.
But the patients were deliberately and intentionally not treated for syphilis. Instead, they were unknowingly given placebos instead of the effective treatment developed for the disease by the early 1940s – penicillin. As a result, the subjects “experienced severe health problems including blindness, mental impairment – or death,” as did many of their infected wives and children.
And then there were lobotomies, which involve severing the connection between the frontal lobe and other parts of the brain, resulting in significant changes in personality and occasionally in severe and permanent brain damage. They became popular “starting in the mid-1930s and throughout the ’40s to treat everything from schizophrenia, depression, and anxiety to ulcerative colitis and intractable pain.” Not only were there no long-term medical studies to justify such radical surgery before physicians started using this surgical mutilation to treat patients, but it often caused “epilepsy, personality defects, chronic headaches, seizures, permanent disability, or even death.”
The gruesomeness of this surgical intervention was graphically illustrated by Jack Nicholson and Louise Fletcher as Nurse Ratched in the Academy Award-winning 1975 film, “One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest,” and by Jessica Lange in “Frances” (based on the real-life story of actress Frances Farmer).
The new victims
In our gender-obsessed age, the new Tuskegee and lobotomy victims are the indoctrinated, social media-obsessed, gender-confused children who increasingly find themselves subjected to what amounts to a grand medical experiment. So little is known about “gender affirming” medical interventions — from removing sex organs, to fashioning faux organs, to chemical castration and more — that Dr. Blair Peters, a self-described “queer surgeon” in Oregon, acknowledged on video the significant complications associated with these procedures. He admitted that doctors like him were “figuring out what works” as they went along.
The revealing video was later taken down.
“Gender affirming” surgery involves the creation of false “neo-vaginas” from penis and scrotum tissue, the creation of faux “penises” from the forearm and inner thigh skin of young women, and even the complete removal of a “non-binary” minor’s genitals, an increasingly popular procedure known as “nullification.” Complications include incontinence, bleeding, infection, tissue necrosis, loss of sexual function, and more. Critically, these procedures provide no actual mental health or medical benefit — thereby debunking the prevailing narrative that “gender confirmation” procedures are “lifesaving care.”
Frankensteinian gender “medicine”
Gender “medicine,” like the Tuskegee experiments and surgical lobotomies, is Frankensteinian. They are experimental. They solve nothing. And they displace better and safer medical practices to suit current cultural fashions.
What’s more, minors are particularly vulnerable to the social manipulation and contagion of the gender medicine industrial complex. Children don’t reach full cognitive maturity until around age 25. So, a manufactured gender identity “crisis” targeting minors under the age of 18 for gender “affirming” procedures is particularly suspect considering their inability to meaningfully consent and understand the long-term consequences of their decisions.
Several European countries that once uncritically embraced “gender-affirming care” for minors have backed off their previous positions as the lack of evidence supporting the safety of these procedures is revealed, and the evidence of negative long-term health consequences accumulates. In the United States, the FDA is being sued for allegedly concealing records regarding the off-label use of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones on minors. Nearly two dozen states have enacted laws prohibiting “gender-affirming” interventions for minors and medical malpractice claims by victims are multiplying.
The writing is on the wall. If we refuse to face it, this will be our Tuskegee, our Cuckoo’s Nest, and the blame will be ours.
* * *
Hans von Spakovsky and Sarah Parshall Perry are senior legal fellows in The Heritage Foundation’s Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies.
The views expressed in this piece are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of The Daily Wire.
What evidence-based practices should be prioritized when addressing gender dysphoria in adolescents in order to ensure their mental health and overall well-being?
Cho.unm.edu/psychiatrists_underestimating_impulsivity_in_adolescence.html” target=”_blank” rel=”noopener”>age 25, and their brains are still developing. Making permanent decisions about their gender identity and undergoing invasive procedures at such a young age is not only medically irresponsible but also ethically questionable.
Moreover, studies have shown that the majority of children with gender dysphoria eventually outgrow it and identify with their biological sex as they grow older. The rush to prescribe hormone treatments and perform surgeries on these children denies them the opportunity to explore their identities and may lead to regretful decisions later in life.
Moving towards a more ethical approach
It is crucial that we reevaluate the current approach to gender dysphoria. Instead of rushing into irreversible medical interventions, doctors should focus on providing comprehensive mental health care to these vulnerable patients. Therapy, counseling, and support systems should be prioritized in order to address the underlying psychological issues that may contribute to their feelings of dysphoria.
Additionally, more research and long-term studies are needed to understand the effects of hormonal treatments and surgical interventions on young bodies and minds. The medical community should not be driven solely by political correctness or trendy theories, but rather by evidence-based practices that prioritize the well-being and long-term health of their patients.
The judgment of history
In the future, when looking back at this era of ideologically motivated doctors who surgically mutilated their gender-confused juvenile patients and fed them hormones and drugs with dangerous long-term effects, history will likely judge them harshly. Just as we now condemn the Tuskegee Experiment and the era of lobotomies, these practices will be seen as grievous violations of medical ethics and human rights.
It is our responsibility to hold these doctors accountable and demand better for the vulnerable individuals who are being subjected to these harmful procedures. Only through a collective effort to prioritize evidence-based medicine and promote comprehensive mental health care can we ensure that history does not repeat itself in this manner.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
