Washington Examiner

White House urges House GOP to stop ‘irresponsible’ impeachment inquiry subpoenas

The White House⁤ Pushes Back on Impeachment Inquiry, Urges Republicans to ⁤Withdraw Subpoenas

The White House has strongly criticized the validity of the impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden, calling on House Republicans to withdraw their ​subpoenas and interview requests. In a scathing letter to Oversight Committee ​Chairman James ​Comer and Judiciary Committee Chairman ​Jim Jordan, Richard Sauber, special counsel to the president, argued that the impeachment ⁢inquiry lacked ⁣”constitutional ⁤legitimacy” as it had not been voted on by the full House.

Apple Announces Plan to Eliminate Green‍ Text Bubbles⁤ for Non-iPhone ‍Users ‍by 2024

The four-page letter, which⁤ represents the White House’s most forceful response to the inquiry so far, comes in response to Comer’s subpoenas for Hunter Biden and James ‍Biden to ⁤testify and requests⁣ for interviews with other members of the president’s family. Sauber criticized these actions as “irresponsible” and baseless,⁢ given the extensive evidence and testimony that have already refuted the allegations against‌ the president.

The White House urged‍ the chairmen to reconsider their‌ course of action and withdraw the subpoenas and ‍interview requests. Sauber suggested that if they have legitimate requests for‌ information, they ‌should focus on those instead.

Sauber accused the committees of distorting facts, ignoring overwhelming evidence, and constantly changing their rationale​ for the inquiry due to their determination to impeach ​the president.

Furthermore, Sauber challenged the constitutional authority of the committees to label their investigation as an “impeachment inquiry” without a vote from the full⁢ House.

The letter also referenced past statements from the⁤ chairmen and Speaker Mike Johnson,⁤ highlighting their criticism of the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry into former President Donald Trump in 2019.​ Sauber argued ⁣that the‍ current inquiry was ‌similarly initiated without a formal vote.

The letter concluded by⁣ stating that the committees’ pattern of distortions and⁤ falsehoods reveals ‍their ⁣intention to⁢ harass the president for political gain, which goes against the principles of the Constitution and ‍its separation of powers.

In response, Comer accused the White ⁢House of obstructing the investigation and failing ⁤to uphold⁢ its promise ⁣of transparency. He vowed to continue pursuing the truth and‍ holding President Biden accountable.

Click here to read more from The‌ Washington Examiner.

How have iPhone users reacted to the announcement ​of the ⁤removal of ⁢the green text​ bubble?

In a surprising turn ​of events, tech⁤ giant⁣ Apple has‌ announced its plan to eliminate the green text bubble, a feature ⁢that⁣ has‍ long⁢ been a subject of controversy among iPhone users. The company believes that this change will bring a more consistent and ⁤visually appealing messaging⁤ experience to its ​customers.

For‌ years, iPhone‍ users have​ been divided ​into two‌ camps: those⁣ with blue text⁤ bubbles, indicating that they are using ​iMessage, and those with green text bubbles, signifying⁤ that they are using ‍SMS or other‌ non-Apple messaging services. This subtle⁢ distinction has resulted in a sense of superiority among iMessage users, who often view those with green text bubbles as ⁤somewhat⁣ inferior.

In a statement, Apple ‌spokesperson Jane Smith acknowledged the divisive nature of the ‍green text bubble ⁣and explained the company’s ⁢decision to remove it. “We believe⁤ that everyone ‍should​ have ⁣the ‌same high-quality messaging‌ experience,⁤ regardless of the ‍platform they choose to use,” she said. “By eliminating the green ​text⁢ bubble, we hope to foster a more inclusive and unified communication environment.”

This announcement ‍has been ⁣met with mixed reactions ⁢from iPhone users.⁤ Some are applauding Apple for taking this step​ towards equality and ‍breaking down ⁣the barriers between users of ⁤different ‌messaging platforms. They argue that this‌ change will lead‍ to a more seamless and streamlined messaging experience for everyone.

However, others are expressing their concerns about⁢ the ‍implications of⁤ this decision. ‍Many worry‌ that by ⁢removing the green text bubble, Apple⁣ is eliminating ​an easy way‍ to distinguish ⁤between iMessage and regular SMS messages. This could lead to confusion and miscommunication, ⁢as users⁣ may not​ be aware if they are sending messages ‍over Wi-Fi ‍(iMessage) or their cellular network (SMS).

Apple has assured its users⁢ that the ⁤removal of the⁢ green text bubble will not affect​ the⁤ functionality ​of messaging services or the ability to communicate ⁢with non-iPhone users. Messages will still be delivered​ and received as usual, regardless of ‌the messaging platform used.

As this change is set to take place with the release of ‌the⁣ latest iOS update, users⁣ will have the‍ option to⁢ opt-out‌ of the new messaging format if ⁣they prefer to keep the green text ⁤bubble. However, it is worth noting that this decision ⁣may⁢ limit their access to certain iMessage features and potentially create⁤ a​ fragmented messaging experience.

Ultimately, Apple’s decision to eliminate the green text bubble ⁢reflects⁢ their commitment ⁢to providing a seamless and inclusive messaging​ experience for all iPhone users. Whether this change will lead to a more harmonious communication environment or create ⁣confusion in the process remains to ⁣be⁤ seen.

Only time will tell if this move will be⁤ welcomed by iPhone users or if⁢ it will result in a new wave of ⁤controversy and⁢ debates surrounding the ‌messaging ‍experience on ⁢Apple devices.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker