Implications of a three-person FERC for 2024’s crucial decisions
The Little-Known Agency That Holds the Power to Shape America’s Clean Energy Future
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the agency responsible for regulating U.S. energy transmission systems, is facing a critical challenge as it enters the new year with only three commissioners. This small board will play a crucial role in determining whether FERC can advance important transmission rules in 2024 and help the Biden administration achieve its clean energy goals.
A Delicate Balance of Power
With the recent departure of Republican FERC Commissioner James Danly, the commission is left with Acting Chairman Willie Phillips, Democratic Commissioner Allison Clements, and GOP Commissioner Mark Christie. Phillips often acts as a “swing vote,” allowing decisions to be made through a 2-1 majority, avoiding gridlock.
This dynamic is particularly significant as FERC tackles pressing issues related to the energy grid. Proposed rules include requirements for utilities to plan for long-term transmission needs and establish funding mechanisms for projects, aiming to reduce delays. Another rule aims to reform the process for obtaining permits for interstate transmission facilities.
As Congress struggles to pass permitting reform legislation, Democrats and clean energy advocates are looking to FERC to finalize these rules and expedite the integration of renewable energy into the grid. With Danly’s departure, there may be an opportunity for FERC to reach quicker resolutions on transmission-related matters.
A Clash of Perspectives
Danly strongly opposed the planning and cost allocation rule, criticizing it as unnecessary regulatory interference. He argued that there is insufficient evidence to justify changes to existing transmission rates and planning processes. Danly also raised concerns about the rule’s cost allocation provisions, suggesting that ratepayers would be burdened with funding other states’ policy plans.
While four commissioners initially supported the proposal, the landscape has changed since its introduction. The Supreme Court’s rejection of an EPA climate rule and Danly’s dissent have emboldened Republican state attorneys to challenge the rule, citing the major questions doctrine. This dissent has added fuel to the legal effort against the proposed rule.
Impasses and Compromises
The commission also faced challenges in approving gas projects, with disagreements arising over the consideration of greenhouse gas emissions. Phillips and Christie eventually reached a compromise, allowing them to move forward with gas projects. However, Clements and Danly had different reasons for dissenting, highlighting the complexity of the issues at hand.
Despite these obstacles, FERC has made progress in approving pipeline projects and streamlining the connection of renewable energy projects to the grid. However, there is growing pressure to fill the two vacant commissioner seats to ensure a fully staffed and functional FERC.
The Road Ahead
Obtaining bipartisan cooperation to confirm new commissioners may prove challenging, especially as the election approaches and senators face other pressing matters. However, delaying confirmations could complicate the passage of significant transmission rules. Senate Democrats have a limited window to confirm FERC nominees to maintain their majority on the agency.
The stakes are high, as the composition of FERC could change if Republicans regain control of the Senate and the White House. The future of America’s clean energy transition hangs in the balance, and the decisions made by this little-known agency will have far-reaching implications.
Read more from The Washington Examiner: Click here
How might the future replacement for Danly impact the direction and progress of clean energy initiatives within FERC?
On the other hand, Clements and many clean energy advocates argue that these regulations are essential for advancing the transition to a clean energy future. They believe that the current planning and cost allocation processes are outdated and hinder the integration of renewable energy sources. They argue that updating these processes will encourage greater investment in clean energy projects and promote a more resilient and sustainable energy grid.
With the departure of Danly, the balance of power within FERC may shift, potentially opening up opportunities for the advancement of clean energy goals. However, the replacement for Danly will be critical in determining the future direction of the commission. If a Republican nominee is selected, it may result in a divided commission with a continued stalemate on certain clean energy initiatives.
The Biden administration has made clear its commitment to combating climate change and accelerating the transition to clean energy. FERC plays a crucial role in achieving these goals by regulating the transmission of energy across state lines and ensuring a fair and efficient market for electricity. With only one Republican commissioner remaining, there may be an opportunity for FERC to align its priorities with those of the Biden administration and make significant progress in advancing clean energy policies.
In addition to the immediate challenges facing FERC, there are broader questions about the agency’s future role in shaping America’s clean energy future. The commission has traditionally focused on the reliability and stability of the energy grid, but as the importance of renewable energy continues to grow, there is a need for FERC to adapt its regulatory framework to accommodate these new technologies.
This includes addressing issues such as grid integration, energy storage, and the integration of electric vehicles into the grid. FERC must also consider the impact of these changes on consumers, ensuring that the costs and benefits of clean energy initiatives are distributed equitably.
The decisions made by FERC in the coming years will have a lasting impact on America’s clean energy future. By promoting policies that encourage the development of renewable energy sources and modernizing the energy grid, FERC can help pave the way for a sustainable and resilient energy system. It is crucial, therefore, that the commission is fully staffed and able to make informed and balanced decisions that prioritize the long-term interests of the nation.
In conclusion, FERC’s role in shaping America’s clean energy future cannot be underestimated. As the commission faces a critical challenge with the departure of one of its commissioners, the decisions made in the coming years will have far-reaching implications. It is essential that FERC remains committed to advancing clean energy goals and continues to work towards a more sustainable and resilient energy grid. By doing so, FERC can help lead the way towards a cleaner and more prosperous future for all Americans.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
