The daily wire

Mask-wearing at protests avoids responsibility, and that’s intentional

Protesters Hide ​Behind ‍Masks: A Cowardly Act of ⁣Avoiding Accountability

Following the October ⁤7‌ massacre of Israeli civilians by Hamas, college ‍campuses and streets ⁤of major US⁢ cities have been⁤ filled with rioters chanting anti-Israel slogans and often explicitly demonstrating their ‌fealty to Hamas. As is clear from​ numerous photographs, most of these ‌protestors conceal their faces.

This is true even of less violent⁣ protests. One ⁤example is the 100-plus ‌congressional staffers who staged a‌ walkout on ‍Capitol Hill, calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. Photos ⁣show⁤ that nearly all ⁤the staffers were wearing medical face ⁤masks. Presumably, when defying ​the will of your boss, and ‍the people who elected him or ⁤her, it’s best to remain anonymous. And the cowardice extends beyond Capitol Hill.

According ‌ to‍ coverage from the Daily Signal, many ⁤participants at a George Washington University Vigil for the Martyrs of Palestine” covered their faces. Daily Signal Reporter ⁢Mary Margaret ⁣Olohan was given a face ​mask and told to wear one by the pro-Palestine participants‍ so “they” wouldn’t ⁢identify her later in pictures.” It’s unclear who “they”⁢ is and even more unclear what the result‍ would be‍ of being identified, ⁢but the fact remains ​that ​pro-Palestine protesters hide behind masks.

But when looking at‍ the history of mask bans, crime, and even France’s so-called “burqa ban,” it begins to make sense.

In response to the COVID-19 virus, ‍many cities required that individuals cover their faces when in a building or ⁤in close proximity to other people. People disagreed over the effectiveness of this strategy, ‍but⁤ even ⁣if these measures were justified, most people are now delighted to go‍ back to semi-normal, maskless life. That ⁣is, ⁤except, for those ‍protesting in favor of Hamas, a US ‌State Department designated terror group.⁤ To understand, it helps to look at ‌the history of masking and its connection ​to crime.

In ‌2019 the American Civil Liberties ​Union (ACLU) published “America’s Mask Bans in the​ Age of Face Recognition Surveillance” denouncing mask bans.​ Mask bans in the United States date back to New York in 1845 when they were enacted to ⁢quell violence between renters and landlords.⁤ Later, mask bans were enacted in states Florida, Alabama,‌ West Virginia, and some other southern states in an attempt to⁣ stymie the‍ Ku Klux Klan and make⁤ it easier for police⁤ and civilians to identify Klan members and their​ supporters. Most of these mask mandates, according to Middle Tennessee State University’s ​Free Speech Center, “…use ​neutral ​language, typically‌ banning ⁢mask wearing that intimidates others.” The ⁤key is that these ⁢bans were enacted to deter criminal activity and stop giving criminals the legal right to hide their identity when terrorizing blacks and Catholics.

The ACLU report,‍ however, asserts that ‌the actual⁢ reason⁣ for mask bans was that political leaders⁢ “felt that violent⁣ racist terrorism was making‌ them look bad.”⁢ The report goes on​ to ​say that mask bans are an invasion of privacy, especially in our modern ‍era of facial-recognition​ software and smartphones. In other words, in 2019, before the​ COVID lockdowns and mask mandates, the ACLU had an⁢ ax to grind against mask bans because mask⁣ bans help police ⁣catch criminals.

But anti-mask-ban ‍rhetoric goes beyond the complaints that people might get caught committing crimes. Some⁣ alleged that mask ​bans, much like math and sandwich bread, are racist.

A⁤ June‌ 2023 article in⁣ The Trace states, ⁣“Philadelphia is‌ considering a ⁣ban on ski masks to reduce gun violence. ‌It’s reminiscent of other policies that criminalize ⁢Black fashion.”‌ Given that⁤ a mere 1.5% ⁤ of those hitting the slopes in 2021-2022 were ⁢Black, this is a ⁣strange way to characterize the ski⁤ mask. The article ignores the fact that the​ original purpose of mask bans was⁣ to​ ensure ​that⁢ Klan⁢ members could not hide from⁢ the⁣ law.

To be clear, not all criminals wear masks, and not all masked people are criminals. But the ​point stands that wearing‍ a mask while⁢ protesting in support⁤ of ⁤vile ideas⁤ or while committing a crime‌ serves no purpose other than hiding one’s ⁤identity⁣ to avoid accountability.

In ⁢2020, mask mandates were au courant, and rioters at “Fiery ‌But Mostly Peaceful” protests hid their ​faces ‌as they rioted, looted, and burned ‍ down buildings. And the cowardice⁣ continues today ‌with protestors​ in Western cities ‍ screaming “from the river to the ⁣sea” (a chant meaning that from the Mediterranean Sea ⁣to the Jordan‌ River, ⁤Israel should not exist) and physically assaulting Jews. Thanks​ to ⁢COVID-19 popularizing ⁤face masks, protesters today hide their faces, thereby making ‍it ⁣difficult to⁣ identify and prosecute them, as they‌ scream antisemitic slurs that would make ​a ​Grand​ Wizard blush ⁣(if you could see his⁢ face). And ⁤that is the point: pro-Hamas ‌protestors wear masks to avoid ​accountability.

Not only ‍is ​hiding one’s face bad ‍for identifying criminals, it is also bad for civil ​society. Lawmakers in my home, France, ⁢agree.

Since 2010 France has​ banned wearing full face veils, including the niqab and burqa, ⁣in public—a ⁤measure misleadingly referred to as ⁣the “burqa ban.” The law applies equally to people of all religions, ethnicities, and​ nationalities who wish to cover their face in‍ a ⁢public or government building, and it remains perfectly legal to wear a hijab or​ shayla in public, as many ⁣Muslim women in​ France do. France ​banned face-coverings because lawmakers believed that⁢ they impeded “vivre ensemble,” or ⁢citizens’ ability to peacefully coexist and participate fully in French society. And the ‌notion that face covering ​impedes a healthy society is grounded in solid research.

Researchers at ⁢UC Berkeley and Google comparedfacial expressions across 144 ⁤countries and discovered that⁤ “people around the world tended to gaze in awe during fireworks displays, ⁣show contentment at weddings, furrow their brows in concentration when performing martial arts, show doubt‌ at protests, pain when lifting​ weights, and triumph ‍at rock concerts and competitive sporting events.” The data are ⁤clear—human beings from a tender age communicate with our ‍faces just as ‌much as our‍ words. According to a National Institute of Health (NIH)⁤ study, “Even newborns show clear evidence ⁣of organized facial expressions defining distinct ‌communicative states that respond to maternal⁢ care.” Facial ​coverings stymie communication ⁤and interpreting emotions—two ⁢things⁣ that drive⁤ human interaction.

Emmanuel Levinas, a French ​philosopher, once wrote, “The face speaks to me and‌ thereby invites me to a​ relation; ‍… ‌the face opens the primordial discourse whose first word is obligation.” To ⁤put this⁣ in context, ‌much of Levinas’s philosophy is rooted in what⁢ it means to encounter, ‍or‍ relate to other⁢ people. Seeing another person’s face calls upon​ us ‌to be responsible ​to one another as human beings. It stands to reason that hiding one’s face is an attempt to abdicate one’s responsibility to others and to society.

The Klan used masks to terrorize ‍innocent people in the 1920s, as pro-Palestinian and BLM⁢ activists do today. Of⁣ course, people should be allowed⁢ to demonstrate​ in favor of unpopular or even contemptible ideas⁣ without fear of reprisal. But they shouldn’t be allowed to engage in criminal behavior—or to mask themselves to get away with it.⁤ It ⁣shouldn’t be too much to ask that they ⁤have⁤ the courage​ to stand up, unmasked for what they believe in. And like everyone else, they must face ​responsibility for their ⁢actions.

* * ‍*

Ellie Krasne-Cohen is a visiting fellow at Independent Women’s ⁣Forum and founder of Krasne ​Strategies. She is ⁣a member of the National Association of Scholars.
The views expressed ‌in this piece are those of the author and‍ do not necessarily represent those of The Daily ⁢Wire.

What are the implications of wearing ​masks during protests and the impact on transparency, dialogue, and accountability in a democratic society

Titutes of Health study, facial expressions are an essential component of human communication, influencing social interactions and emotional understanding. When people hide their faces behind⁤ masks, they hinder this‌ fundamental aspect of communication, making it difficult for others to​ gauge their intentions and emotions.

Moreover, the act of hiding one’s face behind a mask while participating in protests ⁣or engaging in criminal activities reflects ​a lack of accountability. It allows individuals to escape the consequences of their ‍actions and avoid being identified and held responsible for their ⁤behavior. Accountability‍ is ‍a⁣ crucial element of a functioning society, as it maintains order, justice, and respect for‍ the rule of ​law.

Protesters who wear masks​ to conceal their identities may argue that it is an act of self-preservation and protection from potential retaliation. However, participating in a protest or expressing one’s opinions ⁣should not ⁣require anonymity. It is not a sign of courage ​or conviction to hide behind a ⁣mask but rather an embodiment ⁣of cowardice and evasion of ‍responsibility.

In recent years, the use of ‍masks has become a contentious ⁢issue due to its association with various movements and causes. While masks have become a common sight during the COVID-19 pandemic for health and safety reasons, their use in certain settings, such as protests,⁣ raises concerns about the intentions and ⁤actions of those wearing ‍them.

Historically, mask bans have been enacted ​to deter criminal‌ activity and ensure public safety.‌ In the fight against the Ku Klux Klan and other hate groups, mask ‌bans⁢ were implemented to prevent individuals from ‌hiding their identities while committing acts of ⁤terror and intimidation. They served as a means to protect communities and promote ‍accountability.

Wearing a mask while ⁤protesting in ‌support of controversial or extremist ideas only perpetuates a culture of fear, intimidation, and violence. When masks are used to obscure one’s identity and shield individuals from the consequences​ of their‌ actions, it ⁢undermines the principles of transparency, dialogue, and debate that are essential in a democratic society.

In conclusion,‍ the act of ‌protesters hiding behind masks reflects a cowardly act of avoiding accountability. It hinders communication, undermines transparency, and perpetuates a culture⁢ of fear and intimidation. Accountability is the foundation⁣ of a just and orderly ⁤society, and ⁤it should be‌ upheld by all individuals, regardless of their beliefs or causes. ⁤Only by taking responsibility for our actions can we ‍foster a society that values open dialogue, respect for the rule of law, and the pursuit of justice.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker