Thomas Massie accuses Garland of perjury over Ray Epps indictment confrontation.
Rep. Thomas Massie Accuses Merrick Garland of Perjury and Corruption
During a House Judiciary Committee hearing, Rep. Thomas Massie launched a scathing attack on U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland. Massie accused Garland of perjury for evading questions about the number of federal agents present in the crowd during the Jan. 6 Capitol incursion. Massie also criticized the Department of Justice for its questionable indictment of Ray Epps, who is rumored to have been a federal plant in the crowd.
Massie confronted Garland, asserting that his vague answers and refusal to provide information on an ongoing investigation amounted to contempt of Congress. He emphasized that Congress has a constitutional duty to conduct oversight and obtain answers, even during ongoing investigations. Despite Garland’s insistence on his authority to resist answering questions, Massie persisted in his line of inquiry.
Massie’s questioning focused on the number of federal agents embedded in the Jan. 6 crowd, but Garland claimed to have no personal knowledge and refused to provide a substantive answer. Massie expressed surprise at Garland’s lack of information and suggested that the Attorney General may have perjured himself. Garland maintained that he had no personal knowledge of the matter.
MASSIE: “How many agents or assets of the government were present on January 5th and January 6th.. Can you answer that now?”
GARLAND: “I don’t know the answer to that question.”
MASSIE: “I think you may have just perjured yourself that you don’t know if there were any” pic.twitter.com/a04nkeBGm9
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 20, 2023
There has long been suspicion that federal agencies infiltrated the crowd on Jan. 6, with the intention of entrapping individuals and inciting the breach of the Capitol building. Ray Epps, in particular, has been the focus of these claims, with many alleging that he was a federal plant. Epps can be seen in numerous videos urging the crowd to enter the Capitol and advocating for acts that some consider seditious and insurrectionary.
Recently, Epps was indicted on a misdemeanor charge related to his involvement in the Jan. 6 incursion. Massie criticized Garland for this seemingly inadequate indictment, questioning the coincidence of Epps’ indictment occurring just as he confronted Garland. Massie highlighted the stark contrast between the treatment of Epps and other individuals, such as grandmothers being sent to prison for non-violent protests or individuals receiving lengthy sentences for filming. He concluded that the American public is not convinced by the DOJ’s actions.
MASSIE ON RAY EPPS: “Yesterday you indicted him.. Isn’t that a wonderful coincidence. On a misdemeanor. Meanwhile you’re sending grandmas to prison you’re putting away people for 20 years for filming. Some people weren’t there yet you have the guy on video, he’s saying ‘Go into… pic.twitter.com/zF3vKTr3Jm
— Benny Johnson (@bennyjohnson) September 20, 2023
The House Judiciary Committee is currently investigating the alleged “weaponization” of the Justice Department, as part of broader GOP efforts to scrutinize corruption within the Biden administration. Massie’s criticisms highlight the glaring double standard in the DOJ’s treatment of individuals involved in the Jan. 6 incident. The lenient treatment of Epps, despite substantial evidence against him, raises suspicions of his potential role as a federal agent and suggests a cover-up.
The post Watch: Thomas Massie Accuses Garland of Perjury After Confronting Him About Ray Epps Indictment appeared first on The Western Journal.
How does Attorney General Merrick Garland’s evasion of questions and refusal to provide information undermine Congress’ oversight function?
Nary. Yet, despite this evidence, the Department of Justice has only charged Epps with misdemeanors, raising questions about their intent and integrity.
Massie’s accusation of perjury is not without merit. Garland’s unwillingness to provide information on the presence of federal agents and his claim of no personal knowledge is highly suspect. As the Attorney General, he should have access to such information and should be able to provide a straightforward answer. By evading the question, Garland not only raised doubts about his credibility but also hindered Congress’ oversight function.
Additionally, Massie’s criticism of the Department of Justice’s indictment of Ray Epps is valid. The discrepancy between Epps’ actions and the charges brought against him is glaring. If Epps was indeed a federal plant, it is crucial to determine who authorized his infiltration and what their intentions were. The Department of Justice’s decision to only charge him with misdemeanors seems to downplay the seriousness of his actions and undermines public trust in the justice system.
The accusation of corruption against Garland is a serious one. If it is true that federal agencies were involved in orchestrating the events of Jan. 6, it raises questions about the motives and actions of those in power. The American people deserve transparency and accountability from their government, especially regarding such significant and troubling events.
It is essential that Congress continues to press for answers and hold the Department of Justice accountable. The integrity of our democracy and the trust of the American people are at stake. If there has been perjury and corruption, those responsible must be held to account and ensure that justice is served.
In conclusion, Rep. Thomas Massie’s accusation of perjury and corruption against Attorney General Merrick Garland raises valid concerns about the events of Jan. 6 and the Department of Justice’s actions. The refusal to provide information, the questionable indictment of Ray Epps, and the suspicion of federal infiltration demand further investigation and accountability. Congress must fulfill its oversight duty and ensure that the truth prevails, restoring faith in our democracy and justice system.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Now loading...