Vulnerable Dems urge Biden to take tougher stance on Houthis
Pressure Mounts on President Joe Biden to Take Stronger Action Against Iranian-Backed Houthi Terrorists
President Joe Biden is facing intense pressure from vulnerable members of his own party to take decisive action against the Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists. This comes after his administration recently designated the group as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) group, a move that was seen as weak compared to the previous harsher designation.
The decision to stop short of re-designating the Houthis as a Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) has sparked criticism from both Republicans and Democrats. Vulnerable Democrats up for re-election this year are urging Biden to show more strength in dealing with the matter, while Republicans have been pushing for tougher action for months.
Democrats Call for Stronger Measures
Senator Jacky Rosen (D-NV) expressed her support for the designation but emphasized the need to go further and formally label the Houthis as an FTO. She believes this is necessary to crack down on the flow of arms and funding to the group.
Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the importance of cutting off illicit funding for Iranian-backed terrorist groups like Hamas and the Houthis. He called for the administration to label the Houthis as an FTO to effectively hinder their ability to terrorize the region.
Senator Bob Casey (D-PA) also stressed the need for the Biden administration to designate the Houthis as an FTO and take additional steps to prevent them from causing further harm in the region.
An FTO designation would make it illegal for any U.S. individuals or entities to provide any form of support or resources to the group, including financial aid, training, assets, and communications. On the other hand, an SDGT designation targets specific individuals or entities rather than the entire organization.
The New York Times highlighted that designating the Houthis as an FTO would have made it much easier to prosecute anyone who knowingly supports the group with money, supplies, training, or other forms of material support.
CLICK HERE TO GET THE DAILYWIRE+ APP
What are the arguments for and against re-designating the Houthi rebels as an FTO, and what are the potential consequences of not taking this action?
Organization (FTO) has drawn criticism from lawmakers and national security experts who argue that stronger action is needed to counter the threat posed by the group. The Houthi rebels, backed by Iran, have been engaged in a brutal war in Yemen since 2015, causing immense human suffering and exacerbating the already dire humanitarian crisis in the country.
While the Biden administration’s decision to designate the Houthis as a SDGT group was intended to send a strong message, it fell short of the mark for many. The previous administration had designated the group as an FTO, which carries more significant consequences and allows for greater legal and financial measures to be taken against them. By failing to re-designate the Houthis as an FTO, the Biden administration has been accused of undermining efforts to combat their influence and disrupt their funding networks.
Furthermore, the Biden administration’s approach towards Iran has also come under scrutiny in relation to its dealings with the Houthi rebels. Critics argue that by not taking stronger action against the Houthis, the administration is implicitly giving Iran a free pass to continue supporting and enabling terrorist groups. Iran’s support for the Houthis extends beyond ideological affinity; it is a strategic move aimed at expanding its influence in the region and countering its rivals, including Saudi Arabia. By not taking decisive action against the Houthis, the Biden administration risks sending a message of weakness to Iran and other actors in the region.
The mounting pressure on President Biden to take stronger action against the Houthis is not only coming from within his own party but also from international allies and partners. Saudi Arabia, which has been one of the primary targets of Houthi attacks, has been urging the United States to adopt a tougher stance against the group. The United Arab Emirates, another key ally in the region, has also expressed similar concerns. These countries see the threat posed by the Houthis as a direct challenge to their security and stability and are looking to the United States for leadership and support.
In addition to the pressure from allies, there is also growing bipartisan support in Congress for a more robust response to the Houthis. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have expressed frustration with the administration’s decision and are calling for a re-evaluation of the policy towards the group. They argue that failing to counter the Houthi threat effectively could have long-term repercussions for regional stability and US national security.
President Biden is now faced with a difficult decision. On one hand, he must balance the need to take strong action against the Houthi terrorists with the risk of further exacerbating the humanitarian crisis in Yemen. On the other hand, he must consider the broader strategic implications of not confronting Iran’s support for the Houthis. This is a challenging task that requires careful consideration of all relevant factors.
As the pressure mounts on President Biden, it remains to be seen what course of action he will ultimately take. One thing is clear though – the status quo is not sustainable. The Houthi threat cannot be ignored, and a stronger response is needed to prevent further destabilization in the region. It is crucial for President Biden to listen to the concerns of lawmakers, allies, and national security experts and to take decisive action against the Iranian-backed Houthi terrorists. The future of Yemen and regional stability are at stake.
" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
