The federalist

VA cancels plan to hide V-J Day photo due to lack of inclusivity

VA Abandons Plan to Remove Iconic⁢ WWII Photo from Facilities

Backlash Ensues After Alleged Lack of “Inclusivity”

The Department of Veterans⁢ Affairs (VA) faced immediate backlash on Tuesday⁣ after⁣ leaked plans to remove a beloved World ​War II-era photo from its facilities. However, in a surprising‍ turn of‍ events, the VA ⁢has now decided to keep the iconic photo intact.

In a memo issued last Thursday, VA undersecretary RimaAnn Nelson called for the ⁤removal of the “V-J ‍Day in Times Square” photo from all Veterans Health Administration⁤ facilities. The decision was based on concerns that the photo depicted a “non-consensual act” and conflicted with the VA’s policy against sexual harassment and assault.

However, ⁤the leaked⁤ memo sparked widespread debate ⁢and condemnation, leading VA Secretary Denis⁣ McDonough to ‍clarify that the photo‌ will ⁤not be banned from VA facilities. McDonough’s statement ⁣on ‌social media reassured the public that the photo will continue ⁣to be displayed.

The authenticity of the memo was confirmed by ⁣The Military Times and verified ‍by unidentified ⁣officials ⁤who spoke with the Associated‍ Press.


Shawn Fleetwood⁣ is⁤ a‌ staff writer for The Federalist and a graduate of the ‍University of Mary Washington. He previously served ⁢as a state ‌content writer ‍for Convention of States Action and his work has been featured in numerous⁤ outlets, including⁤ RealClearPolitics, RealClearHealth, and Conservative Review. Follow him on‍ Twitter @ShawnFleetwood

Popular

How ⁤does the relationship ⁤between figure and ground ‌impact a viewer’s perception of an artwork?

Figure and Ground in Art: Examining the Relationship

Introduction

The interplay ⁣between figure and ​ground is a fundamental ​aspect of art that has intrigued scholars and artists for centuries. This concept explores⁤ the way in which an object, ‍known as the figure, interacts with its surrounding space, known as the⁤ ground. The relationship between these two elements‌ can greatly impact ​how ‌a viewer perceives and interprets a⁤ work ‌of art. This article aims to examine the significance and implications of figure and ‍ground ‍in art, highlighting its role in creating meaning and visual‍ impact.

Defining Figure and Ground

To understand figure and ground, it⁤ is important to first define these two components. The figure ‍refers to the primary object or subject ⁤depicted in a work of ⁣art. It is ‌the focal point ‍and ‍often the center of attention for the viewer. On ​the other hand, the ground refers to the background or the space surrounding the figure. It provides a context for the figure and can influence its perception and reception.

The Implications of Figure and⁣ Ground

The relationship between figure and ground has a profound impact on how a viewer perceives and⁢ interprets‌ an artwork. When a figure is clearly⁤ differentiated from the ground, it stands out and‍ captures the viewer’s attention. This can be achieved through contrast in color, ‍texture, size, or placement​ within the‍ composition. By emphasizing the figure, artists can direct the viewer’s gaze and create ‍a focal point that commands attention.

Conversely, when the ⁣figure blends into the ground, it can create a sense of⁣ unity and harmony. This can be​ achieved through the use of similar colors, textures, or⁤ patterns between ⁤the figure and the ground. In such instances, the figure becomes integrated into the overall composition and may evoke a sense of balance and tranquility.

In some cases, ⁢artists exploit the relationship between figure and ground to create ambiguity⁢ and play with the viewer’s perception. By blurring the boundary between ⁢the two, artists challenge traditional notions of form ‍and space. This can result in thought-provoking and visually stimulating artworks that encourage viewers to interpret and engage with ⁣the piece on multiple levels.

Examples in Art History

Figure and ground have long been explored in various art movements throughout history. The Renaissance period, for instance, placed great‍ emphasis on clearly delineated figures set against simple backgrounds.​ This allowed for the realistic representation of human figures in a naturalistic manner.⁢ In contrast, the Impressionist movement challenged these conventions by utilizing loose brushwork and blurred forms to merge figure and ground, capturing fleeting moments and impressions of the world.

One of the most famous examples of figure and ground‍ manipulation can be found in Pablo Picasso’s Cubist paintings. In works such as “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon,”⁢ Picasso fractured the figure into multiple perspectives, simultaneously presenting different views of the same subject. This shattered the traditional distinction between figure and ground ⁣and revolutionized the way artists approached representation and perception.

Conclusion

The‌ concept ​of figure and ground in art is a powerful tool used by artists to create ‌meaning, visual impact, and explore the⁢ boundaries of perception. Whether through emphasizing the figure, blending it into the ground for unity, or challenging traditional notions of form, figure and ground play a crucial role in shaping the viewer’s ⁤experience. By understanding this relationship, we can gain a deeper appreciation for the art we encounter, recognizing the intricacies and choices made by the artists in their portrayal ‌of figure and ground.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases
Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker