The Western Journal

UK Cops Detain Jewish Man for 10 Hours, Saying Star of David Necklace was ‘Antagonistic’ to Nearby Palestinians

The article discusses concerns over the United Kingdom’s perceived decline in freedoms, particularly focusing on an incident where a Jewish lawyer was arrested adn detained for nearly ten hours at a pro-Palestinian protest in London simply for wearing a Star of David necklace. Footage reveals that police questioned the lawyer about his religious symbol, suggesting it could be seen as antagonistic in a tense environment, reflecting a troubling restriction on freedom of expression.The incident is framed as part of a broader pattern in the UK, where free speech is increasingly under attack amid mass immigration and political tensions. The article contrasts this with the United States, where constitutional protections for free speech remain stronger, attributing this partly to the U.S. having a written Constitution. It warns that the erosion of free speech in the UK and other Western countries is linked to leftist political influences and immigration policies, presenting these as interconnected threats to Western democratic values.


The United Kingdom’s descent into tyranny raises a chicken-and-egg-type question.

Namely, which came first: Western leftists’ assault on free speech, or their embrace of unfettered immigration, particularly the mass immigration of Muslims uninterested in assimilation?

Either way, the two phenomena have accelerated in unison, as evidenced by astonishing footage — obtained by London’s The Telegraph and published on Saturday — showing a police interviewer accusing a detained Jewish lawyer of antagonizing pro-Palestinian protesters simply by wearing a Star of David necklace.

London’s Metropolitan Police arrested the lawyer on Aug. 29 at a pro-Palestinian protest outside the Israeli embassy. They handcuffed him and detained him for nearly ten hours.

Police denied that the Star of David necklace prompted the Jewish lawyer’s arrest. Instead, they claimed that he ignored police orders designed to keep two groups of protesters separate.

Interview footage, however, told a different story.

“What necklace are you wearing?” a police interviewer asked in a clip posted to the social media platform X.

“Star of David,” the Jewish lawyer replied.

“The officer details this in their statement,” the interviewer noted.

The detained lawyer then spoke to his lawyer, who objected to the line of questioning. At that point, the interviewer insisted that he did not wish to give offense. Still, he continued asking about the necklace.

“We’re not talking about (the unnamed Jewish lawyer) walking around with a Star of David chain on his neck in a open forum in public generally,” the interviewer said, as if the location mattered. “We’re talking about a very niche environment where tensions are high, where two sides are coming together, have adverse opinions, adverse views.”

In other words, according to London’s Metropolitan Police, freedom of expression, whether religious or political, does not exist in places where the person doing the expressing might encounter high tensions and adverse views.

It got worse.

“Do you see how that could be an antagonistic emblem, or sign, however you want to phrase it, to people in that environment?” the interviewer asked, again returning to the necklace.

The Jewish lawyer wisely refused to answer any further questions.

Note that the interviewer never asked if the Jewish lawyer felt “antagonized” by any elements of the pro-Palestinian protest. That kind of consideration only goes one way.

In light of Europe’s history, one could scarcely imagine a more chilling line of questioning.

Nor should anyone labor under the delusion that this type of behavior from U.K. officials constitutes the exception.

In fact, here is an older clip of a U.K. police officer threatening to arrest a man simply for looking “quite openly Jewish” at a pro-Palestinian protest:

In the United States, of course, leftists have made relentless war on the Bill of Rights. Thus far they have failed. It turns out that the majority of Americans still venerate the freedoms enshrined on that ancient parchment.

As one X user perceptively noted, however, the British people have always suffered from their lack of a written constitution.

“It’s too bad that the UK forgot to write down their constitution. Turns out that’s important. Unwritten constitution is no constitution,” the user wrote.

Indeed, the majority of Americans still venerate free speech because the Founders wrote it into the First Amendment. Otherwise, one could easily imagine the U.K. police interviewer’s distorted line of reasoning resonating with millions of weak-minded individuals on both sides of the Atlantic.

As it stands, across the West only leftists attack freedom of speech. They also champion mass immigration. Whichever came first, they undoubtedly bear a direct relationship to one another. After all, only those determined to destroy the West would choose either course, let alone both.




Advertise with The Western Journal and reach millions of highly engaged readers, while supporting our work. Advertise Today.



" Conservative News Daily does not always share or support the views and opinions expressed here; they are just those of the writer."
*As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

Related Articles

Back to top button
Available for Amazon Prime
Close

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker